Files
msd-core/tests/edit-phase.test.cjs
Tom Boucher 87917131f2 refactor(#2790): consolidate 86 gsd-* skills to 59 — fold flags, delete dead skills (#2824)
* feat(#2790): consolidate 86 gsd-* skills to 59 — zero functional loss

Closes #2790

- `capture.md` — absorbs add-todo (default), note (--note), add-backlog
  (--backlog), plant-seed (--seed), check-todos (--list)
- `phase.md` — absorbs add-phase (default), insert-phase (--insert),
  remove-phase (--remove), edit-phase (--edit)
- `config.md` — absorbs settings-advanced (--advanced),
  settings-integrations (--integrations), set-profile (--profile);
  settings.md retained as-is
- `workspace.md` — absorbs new-workspace (--new), list-workspaces
  (--list), remove-workspace (--remove)

- `update.md` — adds --sync (absorbs sync-skills) and --reapply
  (absorbs reapply-patches)
- `sketch.md` — adds --wrap-up (absorbs sketch-wrap-up)
- `spike.md` — adds --wrap-up (absorbs spike-wrap-up)
- `map-codebase.md` — adds --fast (absorbs scan) and --query (absorbs
  intel)
- `code-review.md` — adds --fix (absorbs code-review-fix)
- `progress.md` — adds --next (absorbs next) and --do (absorbs do)

join-discord, research-phase, session-report, from-gsd2,
analyze-dependencies, list-phase-assumptions, plan-milestone-gaps

autonomous.md: updated Skill(skill="gsd:code-review-fix") →
Skill(skill="gsd:code-review", args="--fix --auto") to match
the consolidated skill name

- New: tests/enh-2790-skill-consolidation.test.cjs (48 tests)
- Updated: 14 existing test files redirected from deleted command paths
  to their consolidated equivalents
- docs/INVENTORY.md: Commands count 86→59, ghost rows removed, new
  consolidated rows added
- docs/INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json: regenerated to match filesystem

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(#2790): add CHANGELOG entry for skill consolidation

* docs(#2790): update COMMANDS.md for 86→59 skill consolidation

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2790): address CodeRabbit review findings

- CHANGELOG.md: add --next alongside --do in progress flag list
- config.md: remove trailing space from --profile code span (MD038)
- COMMANDS.md: add required descriptions to /gsd-phase examples;
  /gsd-phase without args errors, not interactive
- COMMANDS.md: add --next and --do to /gsd-progress flags table + examples
- test: convert content.includes('--reapply') to structural frontmatter
  parse; add allow-test-rule comment for workflow content assertions
- test: replace redundant existsSync duplicate with assertion that verifies
  the full consolidated flag surface (--sync | --reapply) in argument-hint

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2790): restore reapply-patches workflow and strengthen test assertions

- Create get-shit-done/workflows/reapply-patches.md: the #2790 consolidation
  deleted the 14K combined command+workflow file (reapply-patches.md) but
  update.md already referenced the workflow via execution_context_extended.
  Restoring it fixes a silent behavioral gap where --reapply had no workflow
  to load. Includes full three-way merge logic, hunk verification table
  (Step 4), and the Hunk Verification Gate (Step 5) that blocks cleanup
  until all user-added hunks are confirmed present in the merged output.

- Fix update.md: /gsd-reapply-patches → /gsd-update --reapply (stale ref)

- Fix reapply-verify-hunks.test.cjs: was checking existsSync(update.md) 8×;
  now points to the workflow file and asserts real behavioral content
  (Post-merge verification, Hunk presence check, Line-count check, backup
  reference, per-file tracking, structural ordering)

- Fix reapply-patches.test.cjs: replace content.includes() stubs with
  frontmatter-parsed argument-hint assertions; replace 4 existsSync(update.md)
  no-ops with real assertions against the workflow content

- Fix edit-phase.test.cjs: /gsd-edit-phase → /gsd-phase (COMMANDS.md now
  documents the consolidated command with --edit flag)

- Fix next-safety-gates.test.cjs: split OR predicates into independent
  assertions — --next in progress.md and --force in next.md workflow

- Fix workspace.test.cjs: add allow-test-rule comment for routing content
  checks (command routing text IS the deployed behavioral contract)

- Fix bug-2439 test: strengthen pre-flight assertion to verify gsd-sdk is
  referenced (not just --profile)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: address CodeRabbit review findings (CR round 2)

- INVENTORY.md: update sync-skills.md row to reference /gsd-update --sync
  instead of stale /gsd-sync-skills (absorbed in #2790)

- enh-2380-sync-skills.test.cjs: align INVENTORY.md assertion with the
  corrected reference; was asserting the old /gsd-sync-skills name while the
  manifest test correctly asserted /gsd-update, creating conflicting expectations
  in the same suite

- reapply-verify-hunks.test.cjs: add explicit notEqual(-1) assertions for all
  three anchors before the ordering check so a missing anchor produces a clear
  failure instead of a false positive (writeIdx=-1 < verifyIdx=5 is true)

- bug-2439-set-profile-gsd-sdk-preflight.test.cjs: defer fs.readFileSync until
  after the existence assertion; eager describe-level read caused the suite to
  crash before the existence test could run, making it effectively dead code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2790): address CR — INVENTORY routing + reapply test contract wording

Two unresolved CodeRabbit findings (Major):

- docs/INVENTORY.md: workflow-file table still pointed at obsolete
  /gsd-do, /gsd-next, /gsd-note, /gsd-add-todo, /gsd-add-backlog,
  /gsd-check-todos, /gsd-plant-seed slash commands. Re-route to the
  consolidated /gsd-progress (--next, --do) and /gsd-capture (--note,
  --backlog, --seed, --list) so the inventory is internally consistent.

- tests/reapply-verify-hunks.test.cjs: 'verification tracks per-file
  status' asserted on phrasing that doesn't appear in reapply-patches.md
  (the 'per-file' substring only matched accidentally via 'sequential
  integer per file'). Switch to the actual contract text — Hunk
  Verification Table, one row per hunk per file, verified column.

* test(#2790): update CR-INTEGRATION tests for consolidated --fix invocation

After the merge of main (which carries #2843's hyphen-form fix), the
consolidation in this branch absorbs gsd-code-review-fix into gsd-code-review
as the --fix flag. Update the two CR-INTEGRATION tests that previously
asserted on the standalone gsd-code-review-fix skill name to instead assert
on a gsd-code-review invocation carrying --fix in its arg tokens.

Tests still parse Skill() invocations structurally; only the asserted
skill-name + arg-token shape changed.

* test(#2790): scope success_criteria check to the <success_criteria> block

CodeRabbit nitpick: 'success criteria includes verification' did a
whole-file substring check, which can false-pass if the phrase appears
elsewhere in the document. Extract the <success_criteria>...</success_criteria>
block first via extractTagBlock() and assert against that scope only.

* fix(#2790): post-rebase reconciliation with main

- INVENTORY.md/JSON: add reapply-patches workflow row + bump count to 85
- autonomous.md: switch consolidated --fix invocation to hyphen Skill name
- analyze-dependencies test: assert COMMANDS.md does NOT document the
  consolidated-away /gsd-analyze-dependencies entry (was: bare .includes())

* fix(#2790): address remaining CR findings — strengthen contract tests

Doc-fixes:
- INVENTORY.md: route transition.md & edit-phase.md rows to consolidated
  /gsd-progress --next and /gsd-phase --edit (was: deleted /gsd-next, /gsd-edit-phase)
- config.md --profile branch: document #2439 pre-flight `command -v gsd-sdk`
  guard + install hint BEFORE the gsd-sdk invocation (closes opaque
  "command not found: gsd-sdk" regression path)

Test discipline (no-source-grep contract):
- bug-2439: replace bare `content.includes('gsd-sdk')` with structured
  parse of <context> block + --profile branch; assert pre-flight token,
  install hint, #2439 citation, and ordering vs gsd-sdk invocation
- edit-phase: parse INVENTORY.md edit-phase.md row's "Invoked by" column
  and assert `/gsd-phase --edit` (not the deleted /gsd-edit-phase)
- next-safety-gates: tighten `--next` documentation contract — require
  --next AND --force AND completeness routing (was OR-based, passed when
  only --next present)
- reapply-patches: parse argument-hint flag list structurally; scan ALL
  <execution_context*> blocks for the @-include of reapply-patches.md;
  parse Hunk Verification Table header columns directly; locate Step 5
  via heading parsing then assert (i) table reference, (ii) verified=no
  gate, (iii) STOP/halt directive, (iv) explicit absent-table halt path
- workspace: parse frontmatter, tokenize argument-hint across multiple
  bracketed segments, parse @-include targets from <execution_context>
  rather than substring-matching the file body

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-30 00:43:47 -04:00

391 lines
16 KiB
JavaScript

'use strict';
/**
* Tests for /gsd-edit-phase (#2617)
*
* Covers:
* - Command file and workflow file existence
* - Single-field edit instructions
* - Full-phase regeneration from clarified intent
* - Invalid depends_on blocks with clear error
* - Guarded edit of in_progress phase without --force
* - --force override of status guard
* - Invalid phase number produces clear error
* - Diff + confirmation before writing
* - Phase number and position are preserved
*/
const { describe, test } = require('node:test');
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
const fs = require('node:fs');
const path = require('node:path');
const ROOT = path.resolve(__dirname, '..');
// #2790: edit-phase.md was consolidated into phase.md as the --edit flag.
// The COMMAND_PATH here now points to the consolidated command.
const COMMAND_PATH = path.join(ROOT, 'commands', 'gsd', 'phase.md');
const WORKFLOW_PATH = path.join(ROOT, 'get-shit-done', 'workflows', 'edit-phase.md');
// ─── File existence ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
describe('edit-phase: file existence', () => {
test('commands/gsd/phase.md exists (absorbed edit-phase in #2790)', () => {
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(COMMAND_PATH), 'commands/gsd/phase.md should exist (consolidates edit-phase)');
});
test('get-shit-done/workflows/edit-phase.md exists', () => {
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(WORKFLOW_PATH), 'get-shit-done/workflows/edit-phase.md should exist');
});
});
// ─── Command file structure ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
describe('edit-phase: command file structure', () => {
test('consolidated phase.md has correct name frontmatter (#2790)', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(COMMAND_PATH, 'utf-8');
assert.ok(/^name:\s*gsd:phase/m.test(content), 'name should be gsd:phase (consolidated)');
});
test('command file has description frontmatter', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(COMMAND_PATH, 'utf-8');
assert.ok(/^description:/m.test(content), 'should have description frontmatter');
});
test('command file references edit-phase workflow', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(COMMAND_PATH, 'utf-8');
assert.ok(
content.includes('edit-phase.md'),
'command file should reference edit-phase workflow'
);
});
test('command file documents --force flag (passed through --edit)', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(COMMAND_PATH, 'utf-8');
assert.ok(content.includes('--edit') || content.includes('--force'), 'command file should document --edit flag (which supports --force)');
});
});
// ─── Workflow: single-field edit ─────────────────────────────────────────────
describe('edit-phase workflow: single-field edit', () => {
test('workflow instructs presenting current field values before editing', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const showsCurrentValues = (
/current\s+value/i.test(content) ||
/present.*current/i.test(content) ||
/display.*current/i.test(content) ||
/current_value/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(showsCurrentValues, 'workflow must present current field values before editing');
});
test('workflow supports editing specific fields individually', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const supportsIndividualFields = (
/specific\s+field/i.test(content) ||
/individual\s+field/i.test(content) ||
/edit.*field/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(supportsIndividualFields, 'workflow must support editing individual fields');
});
test('workflow covers title, goal, depends_on, requirements, success_criteria fields', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
assert.ok(/\btitle\b/i.test(content), 'workflow should mention title field');
assert.ok(/\bgoal\b/i.test(content), 'workflow should mention goal field');
assert.ok(/depends_on/i.test(content), 'workflow should mention depends_on field');
assert.ok(/requirements/i.test(content), 'workflow should mention requirements field');
assert.ok(/success_criteria/i.test(content), 'workflow should mention success_criteria field');
});
});
// ─── Workflow: full-phase regeneration ───────────────────────────────────────
describe('edit-phase workflow: full-phase regeneration', () => {
test('workflow supports regenerating all fields from clarified intent', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const supportsRegen = (
/regenerate/i.test(content) ||
/rewrite.*all/i.test(content) ||
/all.*from.*clarified/i.test(content) ||
/clarified.*intent/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(supportsRegen, 'workflow must support full regeneration from clarified intent');
});
test('workflow prompts user for clarified intent during full regeneration', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const promptsClarifiedIntent = (
/clarified?\s+intent/i.test(content) ||
/revised\s+intent/i.test(content) ||
/describe.*revised/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(
promptsClarifiedIntent,
'workflow must prompt user for clarified intent during full regeneration'
);
});
});
// ─── Workflow: invalid depends_on ────────────────────────────────────────────
describe('edit-phase workflow: depends_on validation', () => {
test('workflow validates depends_on references against existing phases', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const validatesDepends = (
/validate.*depends/i.test(content) ||
/depends.*valid/i.test(content) ||
/invalid.*depends/i.test(content) ||
/depends_on.*valid/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(validatesDepends, 'workflow must validate depends_on references');
});
test('workflow blocks write when depends_on references invalid phase', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const blocksInvalidRef = (
/invalid.*phase/i.test(content) &&
/exit|block|error/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(blocksInvalidRef, 'workflow must block write for invalid depends_on references');
});
test('workflow validates that depends_on does not reference the phase itself', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const preventsCircular = (
/not reference itself/i.test(content) ||
/circular/i.test(content) ||
/self-reference/i.test(content) ||
/itself/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(preventsCircular, 'workflow must prevent self-referencing depends_on');
});
});
// ─── Workflow: status guard ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
describe('edit-phase workflow: in-progress/completed status guard', () => {
test('workflow checks phase status before allowing edit', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const checksStatus = (
/disk_status/i.test(content) ||
/phase.*status/i.test(content) ||
/status.*check/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(checksStatus, 'workflow must check phase status before allowing edit');
});
test('workflow refuses to edit in_progress phases without --force', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const refusesInProgress = (
/in.progress/i.test(content) &&
/--force/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(refusesInProgress, 'workflow must refuse in_progress edits without --force');
});
test('workflow refuses to edit completed phases without --force', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const refusesCompleted = (
/completed/i.test(content) &&
/--force/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(refusesCompleted, 'workflow must refuse completed phase edits without --force');
});
test('workflow allows edit with --force flag override', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const forcePath = content.match(/--force[\s\S]{0,300}/i);
assert.ok(forcePath, 'workflow must handle --force flag');
const forceSection = forcePath[0];
const allowsForce = (
/proceed|continue|allow|override/i.test(forceSection) ||
/force.*was.*passed/i.test(content) ||
/force.*passed/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(allowsForce, 'workflow must allow editing when --force is passed');
});
});
// ─── Workflow: invalid phase number ──────────────────────────────────────────
describe('edit-phase workflow: invalid phase number', () => {
test('workflow produces clear error when phase number does not exist', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const handlesNotFound = (
/not.*found/i.test(content) ||
/phase.*not.*found/i.test(content) ||
/does not exist/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(handlesNotFound, 'workflow must error clearly when phase number does not exist');
});
test('workflow errors on missing phase number argument', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const handlesNoArg = (
/no.*argument/i.test(content) ||
/required/i.test(content) ||
/phase number required/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(handlesNoArg, 'workflow must error when phase number argument is missing');
});
});
// ─── Workflow: diff + confirmation ───────────────────────────────────────────
describe('edit-phase workflow: diff and confirmation', () => {
test('workflow shows diff of changes before writing', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const showsDiff = (
/diff/i.test(content) ||
/proposed.*change/i.test(content) ||
/show.*change/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(showsDiff, 'workflow must show a diff of changes before writing');
});
test('workflow asks for confirmation before writing', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const asksConfirmation = (
/confirm/i.test(content) ||
/apply.*change/i.test(content) ||
/y\/n/i.test(content) ||
/yes.*no/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(asksConfirmation, 'workflow must ask for confirmation before writing');
});
test('workflow exits without writing if user declines', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const handlesDecline = (
/says.*n/i.test(content) ||
/user says.*n/i.test(content) ||
/if.*user.*n/i.test(content) ||
/exit.*without.*writing/i.test(content) ||
/without writing/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(handlesDecline, 'workflow must exit without writing if user declines confirmation');
});
});
// ─── Workflow: phase number and position preservation ────────────────────────
describe('edit-phase workflow: phase number and position preservation', () => {
test('workflow preserves phase number when writing back', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const preservesNumber = (
/number.*preserved/i.test(content) ||
/preserve.*number/i.test(content) ||
/position.*preserved/i.test(content) ||
/number and position/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(preservesNumber, 'workflow must preserve phase number and position');
});
test('anti_patterns block renumbering', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const antiPatterns = content.match(/<anti_patterns>([\s\S]*?)<\/anti_patterns>/i);
assert.ok(antiPatterns, 'workflow should have anti_patterns section');
assert.ok(
/renumber|number.*preserved|preserve.*number/i.test(antiPatterns[1]),
'anti_patterns must prohibit renumbering'
);
});
test('workflow writes phase back in place (replaces section, not full file)', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const inPlace = (
/in.*place/i.test(content) ||
/replace.*section/i.test(content) ||
/section.*replace/i.test(content) ||
/replace.*old.*section/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(inPlace, 'workflow must write phase back in place (section replacement)');
});
});
// ─── Workflow: STATE.md update ────────────────────────────────────────────────
describe('edit-phase workflow: STATE.md roadmap evolution', () => {
test('workflow updates STATE.md Roadmap Evolution after edit', () => {
const content = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf-8');
const updatesState = (
/state\.add-roadmap-evolution/i.test(content) ||
/Roadmap Evolution/i.test(content)
);
assert.ok(updatesState, 'workflow must update STATE.md Roadmap Evolution after edit');
});
});
// ─── Docs registration ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
describe('edit-phase: documentation registration', () => {
test('INVENTORY.md routes edit-phase workflow through consolidated /gsd-phase --edit (#2790)', () => {
// #2790 absorbed /gsd-edit-phase into /gsd-phase as the --edit flag. The
// workflow file (edit-phase.md) survives, but its "Invoked by" column must
// point at the consolidated command surface, not the deleted standalone.
const inventory = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(ROOT, 'docs', 'INVENTORY.md'),
'utf-8'
);
// Locate the edit-phase.md row in the Workflows table and assert the
// "Invoked by" column documents /gsd-phase --edit (not the deleted form).
const rowMatch = inventory.match(/^\|\s*`edit-phase\.md`\s*\|[^|]*\|\s*([^|]+?)\s*\|$/m);
assert.ok(rowMatch, 'docs/INVENTORY.md must contain an edit-phase.md workflow row');
const invokedBy = rowMatch[1];
assert.ok(
/\/gsd-phase\s+--edit/.test(invokedBy),
`edit-phase.md row must list "/gsd-phase --edit" as caller; got: "${invokedBy}"`
);
assert.ok(
!/\/gsd-edit-phase\b/.test(invokedBy),
`edit-phase.md row must not still cite the deleted /gsd-edit-phase command; got: "${invokedBy}"`
);
});
test('INVENTORY.md contains edit-phase.md workflow', () => {
const inventory = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(ROOT, 'docs', 'INVENTORY.md'),
'utf-8'
);
assert.ok(
inventory.includes('edit-phase.md'),
'docs/INVENTORY.md must contain edit-phase.md workflow row'
);
});
test('INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json contains /gsd-phase in commands (#2790: edit-phase absorbed into phase.md)', () => {
// #2790: /gsd-edit-phase was absorbed into /gsd-phase as the --edit flag.
// The manifest now records /gsd-phase instead of /gsd-edit-phase.
const manifest = JSON.parse(
fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'docs', 'INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json'), 'utf-8')
);
assert.ok(
manifest.families.commands.includes('/gsd-phase'),
'INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json must list /gsd-phase in commands (absorbed /gsd-edit-phase via #2790)'
);
});
test('INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json contains edit-phase.md in workflows', () => {
const manifest = JSON.parse(
fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'docs', 'INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json'), 'utf-8')
);
assert.ok(
manifest.families.workflows.includes('edit-phase.md'),
'INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json must list edit-phase.md in workflows'
);
});
test('docs/COMMANDS.md documents /gsd-phase (absorbed /gsd-edit-phase via --edit flag, #2790)', () => {
const commands = fs.readFileSync(
path.join(ROOT, 'docs', 'COMMANDS.md'),
'utf-8'
);
assert.ok(
commands.includes('/gsd-phase'),
'docs/COMMANDS.md must document /gsd-phase (which absorbed /gsd-edit-phase via --edit flag in #2790)'
);
});
});