A PR whose diff is entirely under docs/ runs zero tests, so a guard whose INPUT
is shipped prose cannot protect the PR lane of the diffs it exists to check. Its
only firing opportunity is after merge, on the shared branch -- which is how next
went red on dacae9273 while the PR that caused it (#3746) was green on every
check.
The docs-lint job in .github/workflows/docs-required.yml -- an ALREADY-REQUIRED
context -- now selects and runs the docs guards that read the specific docs files
the PR changed.
scripts/docs-guard-registry.cjs test file -> the docs paths it reads (63)
scripts/select-docs-guards.cjs pure (changedPaths, registry) -> test files
scripts/lint-docs-guard-registration.cjs drift guard, wired into lint:ci
scripts/ci-test-scope.cjs is NOT touched -- `git diff origin/next --` on it is
empty -- so #764's saving stands and its 21 pinning tests are untouched.
Selection: exact path; trailing-slash directory prefix (boundary-checked --
docs/adrenaline.md does NOT match docs/adr/, which a naive startsWith gets
wrong); and '*' for the 6 entries that walk docs/ generally or read a computed
path. Unknown maps to '*' -- guessing narrow is how a guard silently stops
running. Measured: a typo fix selects 6 of 63; docs/AGENTS.md selects 12;
docs/COMMANDS.md selects 18.
Four things this got wrong first, each found by an independent reviewer or by
probe, and each having been asserted safe in a comment:
1. The registry started as a RULE in ci-test-scope.cjs's RULES, on the theory
that classify()'s !codeChanged normalization made it inert. True for
docs-ONLY diffs; false for MIXED docs+code diffs, where codeChanged is true
and the normalization never runs:
node scripts/ci-test-scope.cjs --files "docs/a.md src/semver.cts"
with the RULE: 25 targeted_tests
origin/next: 3 targeted_tests
Category error: RULES is the scoped lane's input; a docs-guard registry is a
lane manifest for a consumer that never calls classify(). Extracted; pinned
by value.
2. The second attempt was a dedicated workflow with paths: [docs/**]. Such a
workflow never reports on a non-docs PR, so it can never be a required
context without hanging every non-docs PR -- and a non-required check does not
block a merge, so the guard would have been advisory and #3753 unfixed.
docs-required.yml already has no paths: filter, already supplies the required
docs-lint context, already computes docs_changed, and already ran one docs
guard gated on it. Generalizing that step needs no ruleset edit at all.
3. The registry and the drift lint were built from ONE path-segment heuristic, so
both were blind identically -- and blind at the guard that motivated the issue.
The reader-call regex required a character BEFORE its keyword, so a callee
named exactly read( / load( / parse( / doc( / file( / content( could never
match; and only an INLINE path.join(ROOT,'docs','X.md') argument was caught,
missing the two-step-via-variable form -- the MAJORITY spelling -- plus
template literals and concatenation. Detector 1 fired on 14 of ~450 files, so
35 genuine guards sat unregistered while the lint reported 0 violations,
including cursor-reviewer (reads docs/COMMANDS.md, asserts
.includes('--cursor')) and inventory-headings-countfree. The "accepted blind
spot" this shipped with was the common case, not a fringe.
4. With detection fixed the true population is 115 files: 63 genuine guards, 52
incidental. Running all 63 in a REQUIRED check on a one-line typo fix is the
cost #764 exists to avoid -- install.test.cjs is 7840 lines and reads exactly
one docs file, docs/AGENTS.md, for its frontmatter. Dropping it reproduces the
bug; running it for a typo elsewhere is waste. Hence the map.
Then a second review round found six more, all fixed here:
- fragment-single-edit-propagation.install.test.cjs was EXEMPTED as
"overlay fixture only". False: it reads the real docs/registries/eos.json and
asserts on a registry entry name, and reads the real ADR-0001 and asserts its
H1. A docs-only PR touching either would have gone green and red next -- #3753
shipping again, from inside the fix for it. Now registered against both paths,
and all 52 remaining exemptions were re-audited one by one.
- The SUITES-collision guard compared RAW registry keys, but run-tests.cjs strips
a leading `tests/` BEFORE its suite check. So it caught 'all' and missed
'tests/all' -- the only spelling that can actually occur, since every key
carries the prefix. One typo would have run all 824 test files inside the
required job. Now normalized the same way run-tests.cjs normalizes.
- The lint failed OPEN on an unreadable tests dir or candidate file: 0 violations,
ok:true. A guard that cannot read its input must never report success.
- The exemption ratchet gated identity only, so a baselined file that later
STARTED asserting on shipped docs stayed exempt silently -- 52 permanently blind
files. The baseline now fingerprints the docs paths each exempted file
references and fails when that set changes, naming what changed.
- The exemption marker was still honored inside a multi-line template literal in
the header window. The scanner now tracks template-literal and block-comment
state.
- `git diff --name-only | grep '^docs/'` silently dropped C-quoted non-ASCII docs
paths, making docs_changed=false a green zero-guard check. Both call sites now
pass -c core.quotepath=false.
- The run step was gated on hashFiles(), which a force-committed
.docs-guard-tests.txt would satisfy. The step now rm -f's both scratch files
first and gates on an output it sets itself.
Three empty states, deliberately distinct, because conflating them rebuilds
#3753: an empty or malformed registry HARD-FAILS; docs changed with no guard
covering them logs and skips; no docs change is already gated. The middle state
must never be expressed as an empty --files-from, which prints `no tests in suite
"all"` and exits 0 -- a green check that guarded nothing. With the current
registry that state is unreachable, because the six '*' entries always match;
the branch is kept as defensive handling for a future registry and says so.
timeout-minutes: 15 bounds the required job against a hanging fork-supplied test;
it had none. npm ci was added because the job never installed dependencies -- the
previous single-file step got away without it, the registry does not.
docs/contributing/docs-guard-registration.md documents the rule, following its
sibling cross-platform-portability-rules.md, and CONTRIBUTING.md's CI Test
Quality Checks table links to it. It is also load-bearing: without a docs/ file
in the diff this PR would not have triggered its own lane, shipping an
unexercised change to a required check.
One unrelated fix, included because this PR surfaced it and CLAUDE.md forbids
deferring a defect found while working. On this branch's first CI run,
`full test (windows-latest, 24, shard 3/3)` was CANCELLED at exactly 30 minutes;
tests were still passing 0.8s before the cancel, so it is a wall-clock timeout,
not a hang, and a cancelled job reddens `Required tests`.
The cause is not this PR's test file, which costs ~60ms. Shard composition is
unstable: adding ONE file to the unit suite reshuffled 115 of 268 files between
shards, and shard 3 drew a heavier mix. Underneath that is a real pre-existing
defect. tests/ci-test-job-timeout-budget.test.cjs requires every lane's budget to
be >= 1.5x its MEASURED cost -- "a lane that got slower must be re-budgeted, not
excused" -- and its test-full entry recorded 19m from a windows-22 shard. That is
stale. Measured on `next` with none of this PR's changes present: 26m18s (run
32614439702, windows-latest/24 shard 3/3), 23m36s and 23m17s on shard 2/3. So the
lane costs ~26m and the 30-minute cap carried 1.14x headroom, not 1.5x. The gate
had been out of compliance with its own rule; this PR was merely the file
addition that reshuffled shard 3 past the cliff.
Fixed as that file prescribes: measuredMinutes 19 -> 27 with fresh evidence, and
test-full timeout-minutes 30 -> 45. The rule's minimum for 27m is 41; 45 is
deliberately above it because the reshuffle means per-shard worst case moves run
to run, and a budget pinned to the exact minimum would be re-breached by the next
test file anyone adds. Only that one job's timeout changed; test.yml's scope,
matrix and steps are untouched, so #764's saving is unaffected.
Raising that cap let the Windows shard finish (28m45s, inside 45) and uncovered
a real failure the 30-minute cancel had been masking:
`new quick-task branch branches off origin/main (#2916)` died with
`outcome=timed_out exitCode=null`, SIGTERM, at the 15000ms bound.
tests/quick-branching.test.cjs:149 `runStep` runs a `#!/usr/bin/env bash` script
executing MULTIPLE git commands, but was bound to GIT_TIMEOUT_MS (15000) -- the
norm for a SINGLE git plumbing call. tests/helpers/timeouts.cjs already documents
this exact failure and exists to fix it: HOOK_FANOUT_TIMEOUT_MS was created after
PR #3285 recorded "outcome=timed_out exitCode=null at exactly the 15000ms probe
bound while every other lane passed the same commit", and calls that "a bound
sized for the wrong class, not a slow machine". Our failure is that case
verbatim, so both sites move to the class norm rather than to a bigger number.
The same class also failed on `next` itself 21 hours earlier -- run 32608945654,
windows-latest/24 shard 1/3, `plan touching only src/ in a submodule project
keeps worktree isolation ENABLED` -- where tests/worktree-safety.test.cjs:5845
`runGate` fans out to `git config --file .gitmodules` under a hardcoded 30000.
Fixed too, since it is a defect in the tree regardless of which branch surfaced
it.
A survey of the whole tests/ tree found the same class-mismatch at further
bash fan-out sites bound under 60000ms, and the maintainer approved sweeping
them rather than leaving them latent to surface the same way one at a time. 16
fan-out sites across 16 files now use the class norm.
The sweep is class-correctness, not raising numbers until things pass. Sites
were moved ONLY where the bash body demonstrably spawns something (git, node,
npm, a CLI); self-contained shell snippets were left where they are, and are
listed as deliberately unchanged: pure if/printf bodies (copilot-install), pure
array/case builtins (code-review-pipeline-regression:638), a documented
pure-shell gsd_run stub (host-integration), single-process hook calls
(workflow-guard:222/271/302), and a deliberately tight 5000ms fast-check hook
(gsd-write-guard.property). Nothing was lowered. process-seam.test.cjs:513
(literal 300) is untouched on purpose -- it tests timeout BEHAVIOR, so raising
it would destroy what it asserts.
Shared file-level constants were the trap here, and were handled per file rather
than by redefinition: GIT_TIMEOUT_MS has ~15 users in git-base-branch and only 1
is a fan-out; WORKTREE_TIMEOUT_MS has 16 users in worktree.test.cjs and 3 are;
PROBE_TIMEOUT_MS has several in three more files. In each the CALL SITE was
changed and the constant left alone, so no single-plumbing-call site silently
inherited a 60s bound. The one exception is hooks-opt-in.test.cjs, where
HOOK_TIMEOUT_MS has exactly one consumer -- spawnHook, the fan-out itself -- so
redefining it is identical in effect and reads better.
Only two of these sites have actually been observed failing. The rest cite that
shared class and those two run ids rather than inventing evidence of their own.
Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
922 lines
33 KiB
JavaScript
922 lines
33 KiB
JavaScript
// docs-guard-exempt: 'docs/src/auth/x.ts' is a synthetic files-list fixture entry, not a real repo doc.
|
|
/**
|
|
* Failing-first (RED) tests for #2554 — path-scoped code-review depth overrides.
|
|
*
|
|
* Binds to the not-yet-built module `gsd-core/bin/lib/code-review-depth.cjs`
|
|
* (see .gsd/phase/feat-2554-support-path-scoped-code-review-depth-ov/40-design.md
|
|
* for the behavior table and .gsd/phase/.../50-test-matrix.md for the case
|
|
* matrix these tests are numbered against). The module does not exist yet —
|
|
* this file is expected to fail until it is built.
|
|
*
|
|
* Rows 1-41 and 44-45 (matrix numbering) are pure-function unit tests against
|
|
* the resolver directly — no fs, no clock, no subprocess. Rows 42-43 are CLI
|
|
* integration tests through the real `gsd-tools` binary (via runGsdTools),
|
|
* because CONTRIBUTING names the CLI round-trip as the only non-source-grep
|
|
* way to prove a config key is registered and survives a load. Row 44 has no
|
|
* quoted "Test name" in the matrix (asserted structurally by construction: every
|
|
* test below builds its own rules/files fixtures, no module-level mutable
|
|
* state) so it is not given its own test().
|
|
*/
|
|
const { describe, test } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('node:fs');
|
|
const path = require('node:path');
|
|
const fc = require('fast-check');
|
|
const {
|
|
REASON,
|
|
DEPTH_TIERS,
|
|
LARGE_SCOPE_THRESHOLD,
|
|
ruleMatchesFile,
|
|
resolveCodeReviewDepth,
|
|
normalizeRelPath,
|
|
} = require('../gsd-core/bin/lib/code-review-depth.cjs');
|
|
const { runGsdTools, createTempProject, cleanup } = require('./helpers.cjs');
|
|
|
|
// ─── enum lock ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('REASON enum', () => {
|
|
test('REASON is frozen and carries exactly the nine documented keys', () => {
|
|
assert.strictEqual(Object.isFrozen(REASON), true);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
Object.keys(REASON).sort(),
|
|
[
|
|
'GLOB_UNSUPPORTED',
|
|
'INVALID_DEPTH',
|
|
'NOT_AN_ARRAY',
|
|
'PATHS_MALFORMED',
|
|
'PATH_ABSOLUTE',
|
|
'PATH_CONTROL_CHAR',
|
|
'PATH_EMPTY',
|
|
'PATH_TRAVERSAL',
|
|
'RULE_NOT_OBJECT',
|
|
].sort(),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── resolution order (rows 1-10) ──────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('resolveCodeReviewDepth — resolution order', () => {
|
|
test('resolves to standard when nothing is configured', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [],
|
|
files: ['src/lib/a.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'standard');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.source, 'default');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('falls through to the global config depth', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: 'deep',
|
|
overrides: [],
|
|
files: ['src/lib/a.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'deep');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.source, 'config');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('escalates when a changed file sits under a rule path', () => {
|
|
// Production shape: plain cwd-relative POSIX strings, as git diff --name-only emits.
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'deep');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.source, 'rule');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result.matchedRule, { index: 0, path: 'src/auth', depth: 'deep' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('ignores rules that match no changed file', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['src/billing/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'standard');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.source, 'default');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.matchedRule, null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('a single matched file escalates the whole review', () => {
|
|
// Production shape: plain cwd-relative POSIX strings.
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['src/lib/a.ts', 'src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'deep');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.source, 'rule');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('takes the strongest tier among matching rules', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [
|
|
{ paths: ['src/lib'], depth: 'quick' },
|
|
{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' },
|
|
],
|
|
files: ['src/lib/a.ts', 'src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'deep');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.source, 'rule');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.matchedRule.path, 'src/auth');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('reports the first rule declared at the winning tier', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [
|
|
{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' },
|
|
{ paths: ['src/billing'], depth: 'deep' },
|
|
],
|
|
files: ['src/auth/x.ts', 'src/billing/y.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'deep');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result.matchedRule, { index: 0, path: 'src/auth', depth: 'deep' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('a matching rule replaces the global depth even when weaker', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: 'deep',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'quick' }],
|
|
files: ['src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'quick');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.source, 'rule');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('the invocation flag outranks every configured rule', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: 'deep',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'quick' }],
|
|
files: ['src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'deep');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.source, 'flag');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('validates rules even when the flag would win', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: 'deep',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'not-a-tier' }],
|
|
files: ['src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, false);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[0].reason, REASON.INVALID_DEPTH);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── segment-aware matching / negative space (rows 11-14, 26 counterpart) ──
|
|
|
|
describe('resolveCodeReviewDepth — segment-aware matching', () => {
|
|
test('does not match a sibling directory sharing a name prefix', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['src/authfoo/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'standard');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.matchedRule, null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('anchors the prefix at the path root, not anywhere in the path', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['docs/src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'standard');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.matchedRule, null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('treats a trailing slash as insignificant', () => {
|
|
const withSlash = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth/'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
const withoutSlash = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(withSlash, withoutSlash);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('a file-shaped rule matches only that exact file', () => {
|
|
const hit = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth.ts'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['src/auth.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(hit.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(hit.depth, 'deep');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(hit.source, 'rule');
|
|
|
|
const miss = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth.ts'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(miss.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(miss.depth, 'standard');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(miss.matchedRule, null);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── path normalization (rows 15-19) ───────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('resolveCodeReviewDepth — path normalization', () => {
|
|
test('normalizes a leading dot-slash on a changed file', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['./src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'deep');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('normalizes backslash separators on a changed file', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['src\\auth\\x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'deep');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('normalizes backslash separators in a rule path', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src\\auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'deep');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('relativizes an absolute changed-file path under the repo root', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['/repo/src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'deep');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.source, 'rule');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('an out-of-repo absolute path matches no repo-relative rule', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['/home/user/.claude/notes.md'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'standard');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.matchedRule, null);
|
|
|
|
// Discriminating case: a filesystem-root absolute path that merely
|
|
// *looks* like it could be repo-relative once a leading `/` is
|
|
// stripped. If normalizeRelPath ever unconditionally strips the
|
|
// leading `/`, this would false-escalate by matching rule `src/auth`.
|
|
const outsideRepo = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['/src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(outsideRepo.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(outsideRepo.depth, 'standard');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(outsideRepo.matchedRule, null);
|
|
|
|
// Sibling case: the same file, but genuinely under repoRoot, must
|
|
// still relativize and match — proving the fix does not over-correct.
|
|
const insideRepo = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['/repo/src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(insideRepo.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(insideRepo.source, 'rule');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(insideRepo.matchedRule && insideRepo.matchedRule.path, 'src/auth');
|
|
|
|
// Unit-level pin on normalizeRelPath itself.
|
|
assert.strictEqual(normalizeRelPath('/src/auth/x.ts', '/repo'), '/src/auth/x.ts');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── totality on empty inputs (rows 20-21) ─────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('resolveCodeReviewDepth — totality on empty inputs', () => {
|
|
test('is total on an empty changed-file set', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'standard');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.source, 'default');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.fileCount, 0);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.matchedRule, null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('an empty rule array is valid and changes nothing', () => {
|
|
const withEmptyArray = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: 'quick',
|
|
overrides: [],
|
|
files: ['src/lib/a.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
const withNoOverridesField = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: 'quick',
|
|
files: ['src/lib/a.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(withEmptyArray.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(withEmptyArray.depth, 'quick');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(withEmptyArray.source, 'config');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(withEmptyArray, withNoOverridesField);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── malformed rule paths (rows 22-27) ─────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('resolveCodeReviewDepth — malformed rule paths', () => {
|
|
test('rejects glob syntax with a configuration error', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth/**'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, false);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[0].reason, REASON.GLOB_UNSUPPORTED);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[0].ruleIndex, 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('rejects single-star and question-mark globs', () => {
|
|
const star = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/*.ts'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(star.ok, false);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(star.errors[0].reason, REASON.GLOB_UNSUPPORTED);
|
|
|
|
const question = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['a?b'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(question.ok, false);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(question.errors[0].reason, REASON.GLOB_UNSUPPORTED);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('rejects a rule path containing a parent-directory segment', () => {
|
|
for (const badPath of ['../etc', 'src/../../etc']) {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: [badPath], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, false, `expected ${badPath} to fail`);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[0].reason, REASON.PATH_TRAVERSAL);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('rejects an absolute rule path', () => {
|
|
for (const badPath of ['/etc/passwd', 'C:\\Windows']) {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: [badPath], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, false, `expected ${badPath} to fail`);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[0].reason, REASON.PATH_ABSOLUTE);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('rejects a rule path that normalizes to nothing', () => {
|
|
for (const badPath of ['', ' ', '/', '.', './']) {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: [badPath], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, false, `expected ${JSON.stringify(badPath)} to fail`);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[0].reason, REASON.PATH_EMPTY);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('trims whitespace and CR before validating a rule path', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: [' src/auth\r\n'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: ['src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'deep');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.matchedRule.path, 'src/auth');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('rejects a rule path containing an interior control character', () => {
|
|
// 'src/au th' below is 'src/au\tth' (tab); 'src/auth' below is
|
|
// 'src/au\x7fth' (DEL) — both non-printing, so they render as
|
|
// near-invisible in this test's source.
|
|
const cases = [
|
|
['src/au\nth', 'embedded newline'],
|
|
['src/au\rth', 'embedded carriage return'],
|
|
['src/au\tth', 'embedded tab'],
|
|
['src/au\x7fth', 'embedded DEL'],
|
|
];
|
|
for (const [badPath, label] of cases) {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: [badPath], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, false, `expected ${label} to fail`);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[0].reason, REASON.PATH_CONTROL_CHAR, `expected ${label} to fail`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('a glob-and-control-char path still reports GLOB_UNSUPPORTED (precedence)', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/*\nauth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, false);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[0].reason, REASON.GLOB_UNSUPPORTED);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── malformed rule shapes (rows 28-34) ────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('resolveCodeReviewDepth — malformed rule shapes', () => {
|
|
test('rejects a rule depth outside quick, standard and deep', () => {
|
|
for (const badDepth of ['light', 'DEEP', '']) {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: badDepth }],
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, false, `expected depth ${JSON.stringify(badDepth)} to fail`);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[0].reason, REASON.INVALID_DEPTH);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('rejects a rule with no depth', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'] }],
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, false);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[0].reason, REASON.INVALID_DEPTH);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('rejects a rule whose paths is absent, empty, or not a string array', () => {
|
|
const variants = [{ depth: 'deep' }, { paths: [], depth: 'deep' }, { paths: 'src', depth: 'deep' }];
|
|
for (const rule of variants) {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [rule],
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, false, `expected ${JSON.stringify(rule)} to fail`);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[0].reason, REASON.PATHS_MALFORMED);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('rejects a paths array containing a non-string', () => {
|
|
const withNumber = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['ok', 42], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(withNumber.ok, false);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(withNumber.errors[0].reason, REASON.PATHS_MALFORMED);
|
|
|
|
const withNull = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['ok', null], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(withNull.ok, false);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(withNull.errors[0].reason, REASON.PATHS_MALFORMED);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('rejects an overrides value that is valid JSON but not an array', () => {
|
|
for (const badOverrides of [{}, 'deep', 0, true, null]) {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: badOverrides,
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, false, `expected ${JSON.stringify(badOverrides)} to fail`);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[0].reason, REASON.NOT_AN_ARRAY);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('rejects a rule entry that is not an object', () => {
|
|
for (const badRule of ['src/auth', [], null, 0]) {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [badRule],
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, false, `expected ${JSON.stringify(badRule)} to fail`);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[0].reason, REASON.RULE_NOT_OBJECT);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('reports every malformed rule, not only the first', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [
|
|
{ paths: ['src/auth/**'], depth: 'deep' },
|
|
{ paths: ['src/billing'], depth: 'nonsense' },
|
|
],
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, false);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors.length, 2);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[0].reason, REASON.GLOB_UNSUPPORTED);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[0].ruleIndex, 0);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[1].reason, REASON.INVALID_DEPTH);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[1].ruleIndex, 1);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── hostile input (row 35-36) ─────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('resolveCodeReviewDepth — hostile input', () => {
|
|
test('a rule carrying a __proto__ key does not pollute Object.prototype', () => {
|
|
const hostileRule = JSON.parse('{"__proto__": {"polluted": true}, "paths": ["src/auth"], "depth": "deep"}');
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [hostileRule],
|
|
files: ['src/auth/x.ts'],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(({}).polluted, undefined);
|
|
// The call must still behave sanely — not necessarily error, but must not
|
|
// let the pollution attempt masquerade as a valid escalation.
|
|
assert.ok(result.ok === true || result.ok === false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('accepts unusual but well-formed rule paths', () => {
|
|
const longSegment = 'a'.repeat(4096);
|
|
const rulePath = `café/日本語 dir/${longSegment}`;
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: [rulePath], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: [`${rulePath}/x.ts`],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'deep');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.source, 'rule');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── large-scope downgrade boundary (rows 37-39) ───────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('resolveCodeReviewDepth — large-scope downgrade boundary', () => {
|
|
function filesUnder(rulePath, count) {
|
|
return Array.from({ length: count }, (_, i) => `${rulePath}/f${i}.ts`);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test('applies the large-scope downgrade at the file-count boundary', () => {
|
|
const below = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: filesUnder('src/auth', LARGE_SCOPE_THRESHOLD - 1),
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(below.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(below.depth, 'deep');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(below.resolvedDepth, 'deep');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(below.downgraded, false);
|
|
|
|
const at = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: filesUnder('src/auth', LARGE_SCOPE_THRESHOLD),
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(at.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(at.depth, 'deep');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(at.resolvedDepth, 'deep');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(at.downgraded, false);
|
|
|
|
const above = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }],
|
|
files: filesUnder('src/auth', LARGE_SCOPE_THRESHOLD + 1),
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(above.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(above.depth, 'standard');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(above.resolvedDepth, 'deep');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(above.downgraded, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(above.source, 'rule');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(above.matchedRule, { index: 0, path: 'src/auth', depth: 'deep' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('downgrades a flag-sourced deep without naming a rule', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: 'deep',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides: [],
|
|
files: filesUnder('src/misc', LARGE_SCOPE_THRESHOLD + 1),
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'standard');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.resolvedDepth, 'deep');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.downgraded, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.source, 'flag');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.matchedRule, null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('leaves a non-deep depth alone above the file-count threshold', () => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: 'standard',
|
|
overrides: [],
|
|
files: filesUnder('src/misc', LARGE_SCOPE_THRESHOLD + 1),
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.depth, 'standard');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.resolvedDepth, 'standard');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.downgraded, false);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── independence (row 45) ─────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('resolveCodeReviewDepth — independence', () => {
|
|
test('does not mutate its inputs', () => {
|
|
const overrides = [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }];
|
|
const files = ['src/auth/x.ts', 'src/lib/a.ts'];
|
|
const overridesSnapshot = JSON.stringify(overrides);
|
|
const filesSnapshot = JSON.stringify(files);
|
|
|
|
const first = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides,
|
|
files,
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
const second = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides,
|
|
files,
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
assert.strictEqual(JSON.stringify(overrides), overridesSnapshot);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(JSON.stringify(files), filesSnapshot);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(first, second);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── property-based tests (rows 40-41, plus one additional) ───────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('resolveCodeReviewDepth — properties', () => {
|
|
const segment = fc.string({
|
|
unit: fc.constantFrom(..."abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789".split('')),
|
|
minLength: 1,
|
|
maxLength: 8,
|
|
});
|
|
const rulePathArb = fc.array(segment, { minLength: 1, maxLength: 3 }).map((parts) => parts.join('/'));
|
|
const depthArb = fc.constantFrom(...DEPTH_TIERS);
|
|
const ruleArb = fc.record({ paths: fc.array(rulePathArb, { minLength: 1, maxLength: 2 }), depth: depthArb });
|
|
const fileArb = fc.array(rulePathArb, { minLength: 0, maxLength: 5 }).map((parts) => parts.join('/'));
|
|
|
|
test('property: a successful resolution is internally consistent', () => {
|
|
fc.assert(
|
|
fc.property(
|
|
fc.array(ruleArb, { minLength: 0, maxLength: 4 }),
|
|
// Bounded well below LARGE_SCOPE_THRESHOLD so the large-scope downgrade
|
|
// (rows 37-39, tested separately above) never fires here — this
|
|
// property is about matchedRule/depth consistency, not the downgrade.
|
|
fc.array(fileArb, { minLength: 0, maxLength: 10 }),
|
|
depthArb,
|
|
(overrides, files, configDepth) => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth,
|
|
overrides,
|
|
files,
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
// ruleArb/rulePathArb only ever generate well-formed rules (alnum
|
|
// segments, no glob/traversal/absolute chars), so this must hold.
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, true);
|
|
assert.ok(DEPTH_TIERS.includes(result.depth));
|
|
if (result.source === 'rule') {
|
|
assert.ok(result.matchedRule !== null);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.matchedRule.depth, result.depth);
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
},
|
|
),
|
|
{ numRuns: 200, seed: 25540 },
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('property: prefix matching is segment-aware', () => {
|
|
fc.assert(
|
|
fc.property(rulePathArb, segment, (rule, suffix) => {
|
|
assert.strictEqual(ruleMatchesFile(rule, `${rule}/${suffix}`), true);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(ruleMatchesFile(rule, `${rule}${suffix}`), false);
|
|
return true;
|
|
}),
|
|
{ numRuns: 200, seed: 25540 },
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('property: an overrides value that is not a JSON array is always rejected with NOT_AN_ARRAY', () => {
|
|
const nonArrayArb = fc.oneof(
|
|
fc.integer(),
|
|
fc.string(),
|
|
fc.boolean(),
|
|
fc.constant(null),
|
|
fc.object(),
|
|
);
|
|
fc.assert(
|
|
fc.property(nonArrayArb, (overrides) => {
|
|
const result = resolveCodeReviewDepth({
|
|
flagDepth: '',
|
|
configDepth: '',
|
|
overrides,
|
|
files: [],
|
|
repoRoot: '/repo',
|
|
});
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.ok, false);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(result.errors[0].reason, REASON.NOT_AN_ARRAY);
|
|
return true;
|
|
}),
|
|
{ numRuns: 200, seed: 25540 },
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── config-key registration (rows 42-43) ──────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('workflow.code_review_depth_overrides — config registration', () => {
|
|
test('the new key survives a config-set / config-get round trip', (t) => {
|
|
const cwd = createTempProject();
|
|
t.after(() => cleanup(cwd));
|
|
|
|
const value = JSON.stringify([{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }]);
|
|
const setResult = runGsdTools(
|
|
['config-set', 'workflow.code_review_depth_overrides', value, '--raw'],
|
|
cwd,
|
|
{ HOME: cwd },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(setResult.success, true, `config-set failed: ${setResult.error}`);
|
|
|
|
const getResult = runGsdTools(
|
|
['config-get', 'workflow.code_review_depth_overrides'],
|
|
cwd,
|
|
{ HOME: cwd },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(getResult.success, true, `config-get failed: ${getResult.error}`);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(JSON.parse(getResult.output), [{ paths: ['src/auth'], depth: 'deep' }]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('a configured override array survives a configuration load', (t) => {
|
|
const cwd = createTempProject();
|
|
t.after(() => cleanup(cwd));
|
|
|
|
const ensureResult = runGsdTools('config-ensure-section', cwd, { HOME: cwd });
|
|
assert.strictEqual(ensureResult.success, true, `config-ensure-section failed: ${ensureResult.error}`);
|
|
|
|
const configPath = path.join(cwd, '.planning', 'config.json');
|
|
const config = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(configPath, 'utf-8'));
|
|
config.workflow = config.workflow || {};
|
|
config.workflow.code_review_depth_overrides = [{ paths: ['src/billing'], depth: 'quick' }];
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(configPath, JSON.stringify(config, null, 2), 'utf-8');
|
|
|
|
const getResult = runGsdTools(
|
|
['config-get', 'workflow.code_review_depth_overrides'],
|
|
cwd,
|
|
{ HOME: cwd },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(getResult.success, true, `config-get failed: ${getResult.error}`);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(JSON.parse(getResult.output), [{ paths: ['src/billing'], depth: 'quick' }]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|