* test(#2554): failing-first suite for path-scoped code review depth overrides Binds the not-yet-built code-review-depth module: segment-aware path-prefix matching of a changed-file set against ordered {paths,depth} rules, resolution order flag > strongest matching rule > global > standard, typed validation errors, and the large-scope downgrade boundary. Also proves behaviorally that workflow.code_review_depth_overrides is not yet a registered config key. Refs #2554 * feat(#2554): resolve code review depth from path-scoped override rules Adds workflow.code_review_depth_overrides — an ordered array of {paths, depth} rules matched against a review's changed-file set by segment-aware path-prefix comparison. Resolution order is --depth= flag, then the strongest matching rule, then workflow.code_review_depth, then standard; a matching rule replaces the global rather than being max'd with it, so quick and standard rules stay meaningful. Glob metacharacters are a hard configuration error rather than sugar for a prefix, and malformed rules halt the review instead of degrading to standard. The resolver is pure and reports its own provenance, so the workflow can print the resolved depth and the rule that matched. The pre-existing >50-file deep-to-standard downgrade moves into the module and now names the rule it overrode. The key is registered centrally rather than as a capability config slice: the federated slice channel admits only boolean/string/number/enum, so an array slice would be dropped as malformed. Closes #2554 * test(#2554): correct depth-provenance assertions and pin out-of-repo paths Two corrections to the failing-first suite. The source assertion for a non-matching rule with no global configured expected 'config'; with no global set the depth comes from the default, and a companion assertion tolerated either value, so both passed against an implementation that derived provenance from whether any rules existed rather than from where the depth came from. The out-of-repo absolute-path case used a home-directory path that matched neither implementation, so it never exercised the defect it named. It now pins the discriminating cases: an absolute path outside the repo root must not match a repo-relative rule, and one under the root must. * docs(#2554): document path-scoped code review depth overrides Reference rows for workflow.code_review_depth_overrides in the configuration, features and commands references plus the locale copies that carry those tables, and in the planning-config reference. Explanation of why escalation is whole-review rather than per-file and why v1 is prefix-only. New how-to for scoping review depth by path, carrying the configuration-error reason table and the distinction between nothing to report and could not look. CONTEXT.md glossary entry and the INVENTORY row for the new CLI module. ja-JP and ko-KR CONFIGURATION.md carry no code_review keys at all, and ko-KR and pt-BR FEATURES.md carry no code-review config table, so those files are deliberately untouched. * fix(#2554): make the depth-misconfiguration halt executable and reject control chars Three review findings, all in this change. The misconfiguration halt was prose rather than shell: the error-printing fence was followed by an unconditional extraction fence, so an ok:false result threw and left the depth empty instead of stopping the review. Prose is not a guard — the two fences are now one block with a real conditional, and anything that is not the literal string true fails closed. An interior control character in a rule path survived validation and reached the provenance string and the summary box; rule paths now reject control characters via a new PATH_CONTROL_CHAR reason, after the glob check so precedence is unchanged. That in turn makes the field record safe to delimit, so the seven node invocations that each re-parsed the same result to read one field collapse to one. Also corrects the glossary entry's illustrative paths, which the glossary-ref check read as real repository references. * fix(#2554): use the fast-check v4 string API and acknowledge workflow growth Two failures from the remote matrix on d3111f45, both this branch's. The property block built its segment arbitrary with fc.stringOf, removed in fast-check v4. Because the arbitrary is constructed in the describe body, the throw took out all four property tests rather than one — they had never executed. Rewritten to fc.string({unit, ...}), the form this repo already uses in emitted-attribution.test.cjs. Every other fast-check helper in the file was audited against the installed module. The emitted-attribution growth arm needed an acknowledgment for code-review.md, which grew 5376 bytes. The pre-existing 3503 fragment keying the same file is spent — its ripple was absorbed when #3503 merged, and the base file is exactly the 34435-byte baseline this growth is measured against — so it cannot clear anything, while the ack lint hard-fails on a duplicate key across two sources. Removed it in favor of the new fragment, which is exactly how #3503 itself replaced the spent 3191 fragment. * docs(#2554): backfill changeset PR number --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
GSD Core 文档
文档按四个象限组织:教程通过实践帮助你学习,操作指南解决具体任务,参考文档提供权威信息,概念说明探讨设计理念与决策。
语言版本:English · Português (pt-BR) · 日本語 · 简体中文
Tutorials
How-to guides
- 在你的运行时上安装 — 适用于全部 16 个受支持运行时的安装步骤
- 讨论一个阶段 — 在规划开始前记录实现决策
- 规划一个阶段 — 执行调研、分解工作并验证计划质量
- 执行一个阶段 — 使用全新上下文的子代理以并行波次运行计划
- 验证并交付 — 审查已完成的工作、诊断失败并创建 PR
- 自主运行阶段 — 使用自主模式进行无人值守的阶段执行
- 处理快速临时任务 — 使用
/gsd-quick和/gsd-fast处理阶段循环之外的临时工作 - 配置模型配置文件 — 在高质量、均衡和经济模型层级之间切换
- 设置跨 AI 审查 — 配置第二个 AI 对主代理生成的代码进行审查
- 使用工作流并行工作 — 使用工作流同时运行独立的工作线
- 使用工作空间隔离工作 — 使用工作空间对实验性或高风险变更进行沙箱隔离
- 调试失败的执行 — 诊断并从中断或不完整的阶段执行中恢复
- 探索与草图 — 在提交计划之前,使用
/gsd-spike和/gsd-sketch进行探索性工作 - 设计 UI 阶段 — 使用 UI 阶段循环处理前端和视觉工作
- 从追踪器 Issue 驱动 GSD — 从 GitHub、Linear 或 Jira issue 启动一个阶段
- 从 GSD 2 迁移 — 将现有的 GSD 2 项目升级到 GSD Core
- 更新 GSD — 重新运行安装程序以获取最新版本
- 恢复与故障排查 — 修复常见问题、重建上下文并卸载
Reference
- 命令 — 每个命令的标志和示例
- 配置 — 完整配置模式、模型配置文件、Git 分支策略
- CLI 工具 —
gsd-tools.cjs用于工作流和代理的编程式 API - 功能特性 — 完整功能索引
- 清单 — 已安装的技能与界面映射
- STATE.md 模式 —
.planning/STATE.md的逐字段参考 - CONTEXT.md 模式 —
.planning/phases/<N>/CONTEXT.md的逐字段参考 - PLAN.md 模式 —
.planning/phases/<N>/PLAN.md的逐字段参考 - 规划产物 — 所有
.planning/文件及其作用
Explanation
- 上下文工程 — 上下文腐化如何形成,以及 GSD Core 如何防止它
- 阶段循环 — 讨论 → 规划 → 执行 → 验证 → 交付循环的设计原理
- 多代理编排 — 子代理的生成、范围界定和协调方式
- 安全模型 — 信任边界、权限和安全自动化
- 架构 — 系统架构、代理模型和数据流
- 讨论模式 —
/gsd-discuss-phase的假设模式与访谈模式 - 上下文监控 — 上下文窗口监控钩子架构
- Issue 驱动编排 — 使用现有原语从追踪器 issue 驱动 GSD 的方案
Related
- 根目录 README — 首页、快速开始和文档概览
- 变更日志 — 发布历史