Security-motivated migration of all stale repository and npm-scope references. Three categories of changes (58 files, 174 substitutions): 1. gsd-build → open-gsd (security-critical): - .github/workflows/release-sdk.yml — npm token comment, tarball filename pattern - .github/workflows/hotfix.yml — same - .changeset/fix-3406-detect-stale-sdk-shadow.md — @gsd-build/sdk → @open-gsd/sdk - .changeset/sharp-quails-leap.md — same - get-shit-done/workflows/update.md — CHANGELOG raw GitHub URL 2. GSD-redux org slug → open-gsd (canonical rename): - package.json + sdk/package.json — repository/homepage/bugs metadata - All README.*.md — live badge and link sections - CONTRIBUTING.md, CONTEXT.md, QUICK-WINS-CONFIRMED-BUGS.md - .coderabbit.yaml, .release-monitor.sh, scripts/sync-rulesets.sh - docs/** — all live agent/ADR/user-facing documentation - tests/** — repo slug assertions and test fixtures - scripts/changeset/cli.cjs + github-release-notes.cjs - .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/*, .github/pull_request_template.md - bin/install.js, get-shit-done/bin/lib/model-catalog.cjs - sdk/HANDOVER-*.md, sdk/src/*.test.ts 3. CLAUDE.md (gitignored local file — not in this commit): Updated separately outside git: --repo gsd-build/get-shit-done → --repo open-gsd/get-shit-done-redux with security warning. Intentionally unchanged: CHANGELOG.md, docs/RELEASE-*.md, .changeset/README.md, .changeset/build-hooks-atomic-write.md, README.md migration table (historical fork record), tests/changeset-serialize.test.cjs line 78 (serialization fixture). The gsd-build/get-shit-done repo is compromised (rug-pull documented in README.md). Do not push to or interact with that repo. Closes #120
5.1 KiB
Render agent definitions from templates at install/config-change time
Source: #2758 Decision: wontfix — closed on the technical merits Date: 2026-05-02
Proposal summary
Move config-gated prose out of agents/*.md into agents/templates/*.md.tmpl,
rendered at install time and after .planning/config.json writes via a new
gsd-sdk agents render subcommand. Conditional branches resolve at render time
(deterministic code) instead of at inference time (LLM interpretation).
Three named benefits:
- Token reduction proportional to disabled features.
- Deterministic feature gating (impossible-by-construction vs. test-for).
- Single source of truth for contributor-facing gating.
Cites PR #2279 (Codex/OpenCode model embedding at install time) as direct precedent for compile-time embedding.
Why GSD does not own this
1. The determinism claim is theoretical, not observed
The proposal's strongest argument is that config-gated branches in agent prose are a determinism failure surface. The actual patterns in the codebase today are already heavily mitigated:
- The
use_worktreesbranch ingsd-executoris resolved deterministically viagsd-sdk query config-getin bash — it is not LLM-interpreted. - "Skip if
workflow.Xisfalse" prose patterns are short, stable, and follow a uniform "missing key = enabled" convention. There is no documented history of LLMs running disabled checks or skipping enabled ones because of this prose.
A theoretical failure surface should not be traded for a real, high-risk
patch-migration surface (gsd-local-patches/ rebase logic, by the reporter's own
admission "the highest-risk piece of the change"). The reporter was asked for
documented evidence; none was provided.
2. Token waste is small and bounded
The codebase has roughly 5 workflow.* toggle references in agent files and
~20 "Skip if" conditional-prose patterns total — most 1–2 sentences. The
"real spend across multi-phase milestones" claim was not measured against
gsd-context-monitor output despite being asked. Without a measured baseline,
the token-savings argument is asserted rather than demonstrated, and the savings
ceiling on ~20 short conditionals is small enough that it does not justify a new
template-and-rendering subsystem with a CI-enforced template/generated split.
3. The deterministic-gating need is already served
PR #2279 established orchestrator-time config embedding for the cases that genuinely need deterministic resolution (model selection, reasoning effort, worktree mode). That mechanism is the right layer for orchestration-time decisions and can be extended toggle-by-toggle along the existing path without introducing a parallel templating subsystem. The proposal's own "Alternative #1" (continue the orchestrator-embedding pattern) was rejected on the grounds that agent-internal conditionals belong in the agent layer, but the asks behind the proposal — determinism, lower token cost — are equally satisfied by extending PR #2279 incrementally without a second mechanism.
Adding a templating layer alongside orchestrator-embedding means two mechanisms own the same problem. The proposal does not specify a partition rule, and the reporter did not respond when asked for one.
4. Patch-migration risk is disproportionate to benefit
The /gsd-reapply-patches three-way-merge migration for gsd-local-patches/
is, in the proposal's own words, the highest-risk piece of the change. It exists
solely to absorb a contributor-workflow shift — the user-facing surface is
unchanged. Risk that flows entirely from internal restructuring, where the
benefit is unmeasured token savings and a theoretical determinism gain, is the
wrong trade.
The reduced-scope variant (Alternative #5: fresh installs only, defer the migration) avoids that specific risk but still ships a parallel mechanism for benefits that remain unmeasured and that PR #2279's path can absorb.
Re-open criteria
This may be revisited if a contributor:
- Provides measured token deltas via
gsd-context-monitoragainst a representative all-toggles-off config, and the delta is materially larger than what extending PR #2279's orchestrator-embedding path one toggle at a time would produce. - Documents a real LLM misinterpretation of an existing toggle conditional
(executor ignored
workflow.use_worktrees: false, verifier ran whenworkflow.verifier: false, etc.) — not a projected failure mode. - Proposes a clear partition rule between orchestrator-time embedding (PR #2279) and any new install-time templating layer, so the two mechanisms do not overlap.
Related
- PR #2279 — Codex/OpenCode model embedding at install time (the established precedent for deterministic compile-time embedding into agent files)
- v1.37.0 release notes — shared-boilerplate extraction (reference files for mandatory-initial-read, project-skills-discovery)
get-shit-done/workflows/— workflow-level config embedding before subagent spawn (the path of least friction for incremental deterministic gating)