* fix(#2623): resolve parent .planning root for sub_repos workspaces in SDK query dispatch
When `gsd-sdk query` is invoked from inside a `sub_repos`-listed child repo,
`projectDir` defaulted to `process.cwd()` which pointed at the child repo,
not the parent workspace that owns `.planning/`. Handlers then directly
checked `${projectDir}/.planning` and reported `project_exists: false`.
The legacy `gsd-tools.cjs` CLI does not have this gap — it calls
`findProjectRoot(cwd)` from `bin/lib/core.cjs`, which walks up from the
starting directory checking each ancestor's `.planning/config.json` for a
`sub_repos` entry that lists the starting directory's top-level segment.
This change ports that walk-up as a new `findProjectRoot` helper in
`sdk/src/query/helpers.ts` and applies it once in `cli.ts:main()` before
dispatching `query`, `run`, `init`, or `auto`. Resolution is idempotent:
if `projectDir` already owns `.planning/` (including an explicit
`--project-dir` pointing at the workspace root), the helper returns it
unchanged. The walk is capped at 10 parent levels and never crosses
`$HOME`. All filesystem errors are swallowed.
Regression coverage:
- `helpers.test.ts` — 8 unit tests covering own-`.planning` guard (#1362),
sub_repos match, nested-path match, `planning.sub_repos` shape,
heuristic fallback, unparseable config, legacy `multiRepo: true`.
- `sub-repos-root.integration.test.ts` — end-to-end baseline (reproduces
the bug without the walk-up) and fixed behavior (walk-up + dispatch of
`init.new-milestone` reports `project_exists: true` with the parent
workspace as `project_root`).
sdk vitest: 1511 pass / 24 fail (all 24 failures pre-existing on main,
baseline is 26 failing — `comm -23` against baseline produces zero new
failures). CJS: 5410 pass / 0 fail.
Closes#2623
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(#2623): remove stray .planing typo from integration test setup
Address CodeRabbit nitpick: the mkdir('.planing') call on line 23 was
dead code from a typo, with errors silently swallowed via .catch(() => {}).
The test already creates '.planning' correctly on the next line.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
eba0c99698