* fix(3668): isolate --local install from global gsd-sdk - `buildGsdSdkVersionMismatchReport` now accepts `opts.isLocal`; when true it sets `fix_command` to `npx get-shit-done-cc@latest --claude --local` instead of `npm install -g …`, removing the misleading global upgrade suggestion for local installs. - Propagate `isLocal` from `installSdkIfNeeded` into the mismatch report builder so the right fix_command reaches the renderer. - Export `buildGsdSdkVersionMismatchReport` and `renderGsdSdkVersionMismatchReport` so tests can assert on the IR contract directly. - Add `command -v gsd-sdk … elif node "$GSD_TOOLS"` preflight SDK resolution block to all 69 workflow files that called bare `gsd-sdk` with no fallback, matching the pattern established in update.md, execute-phase.md, and quick.md. - Add `tests/bug-3668-local-install-sdk-soft-dep.test.cjs` with 5 tests covering Defects 1-3, including a CI lint guard that blocks future workflow regressions. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * changeset: add Fixed entry for #3668 * fix(3668): add allow-test-rule to suppress false lint-no-source-grep violation The test reads workflow .md files (product content) to assert structural invariants — not .cjs source files. The file-presence check is the only viable IR for markdown guard patterns. Add the // allow-test-rule annotation so lint-no-source-grep passes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(3668): fix do.md false-positive and discuss-phase.md size overflow Two CI failures introduced by the 69-workflow preflight block: 1. do.md: the path `bin/gsd-tools.cjs` contains `/gsd-tools` which the bug-2954 parity test regex `/\/gsd[:-]([a-z][a-z0-9-]*)/g` mistakenly extracts as a slash command named `tools`. Fix: store the shim filename in _GSD_SHIM_NAME so the path construction no longer contains a static `/gsd-tools` literal. Also wire $GSD_SDK into the actual query call. 2. discuss-phase.md: the file was at 499 lines (the 500-line budget from #2551). Adding the 11-line preflight block pushed it to 510, failing workflow-size-budget.test.cjs. Fix: compress the 11-line preflight + 2-line invocations into 3 lines (one-liner guard + two $GSD_SDK calls) returning the file to 499 lines while retaining the command -v guard required by bug-3668-local-install-sdk-soft-dep.test.cjs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(3668): wire \$GSD_SDK through all workflow callsites (#3797) PR #3797 introduced the resolution preflight block (setting \$GSD_SDK) in 69 workflows but left every downstream gsd-sdk callsite using the bare command. On local-only installs the preflight exits cleanly, then the very next line fails with 'command not found'. This is the structural gap the Codex review flagged. Changes: - 687 bare `gsd-sdk` callsites replaced with `\$GSD_SDK` across 75 workflow files (all bash/sh fenced blocks excluding the resolution guard blocks themselves) - execute-phase.md: was missing the preflight block entirely — added the standard 11-line resolution block at the initialize step - execute-phase.md: inline `if command -v gsd-sdk` availability guard (legacy #3384 fallback) replaced with `\$GSD_SDK` + error fallback since the new preflight guarantees SDK availability or exits 1 - 6 sub-workflow files (discuss-phase/modes/*, execute-phase/steps/*) that have no preflight of their own but use \$GSD_SDK — these are loaded by parent workflows that set the variable; callsites updated to use \$GSD_SDK so they work when variable is in scope Transformation script used: /private/tmp/fw2.js (regex-based fence parser with segment join invariant verification — preserves all blank lines and prose formatting). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(3668): upgrade CI guard to detect bare callsite routing (#3797) The previous Defect 3 test checked that 'command -v gsd-sdk' appeared as a string in the file — a guard-presence check, not a callsite-routing check. A workflow with the preflight block but 40 bare gsd-sdk calls below it passed the old test. This is exactly the bug state PR #3797 was supposed to fix. Upgraded test: - Parses each workflow file into markdown segments using a regex-based fence extractor (preserves all content invariantly) - Skips bash/sh blocks that contain 'command -v gsd-sdk' (those are resolution guards — bare references there are expected) - Flags any remaining bash/sh block line that invokes gsd-sdk without the \$ prefix (isBareGsdSdkInvocation predicate) - Counter-test proves the predicate correctly flags real callsite lines and correctly exempts guard assignments, comments, and \$GSD_SDK refs Also adds helper functions parseMarkdownSegments, isBareGsdSdkInvocation, and findMdFiles which are used by both the upgraded Defect 3 test and the counter-test. This test would have caught the originally-shipped bug: the preflight block was present but callsites still used bare gsd-sdk. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(tests): update workflow content tests to accept \$GSD_SDK callsite form (#3797) Six regression tests assert on the exact textual pattern of gsd-sdk calls inside workflow .md files. After the #3797 callsite replacement (687 bare `gsd-sdk` invocations replaced with `\$GSD_SDK`), these tests failed because they searched for the literal string `gsd-sdk query <cmd>` which no longer appears at callsites. Updated each test to accept both the pre-#3797 bare form and the post-#3797 variable form using `(?:\$GSD_SDK|gsd-sdk)` regex alternation (or two-branch `includes()` checks for non-regex assertions). The structural invariants each test enforces are unchanged — we're accepting the same behavioral contract through the new callsite surface. Tests fixed: - bug-2334-quick-gsd-sdk-preflight: find init.quick call via \$GSD_SDK or bare - bug-2661-roadmap-sync-parallel: roadmap.update-plan-progress call pattern - bug-3360-codex-execute-phase-worktrees: RUNTIME config-get call detection - bug-3381-verify-work-workstream: init.verify-work / phase.mvp-mode calls - enh-2433-todo-phase-linking: commit call in new-milestone.md - enh-2792-namespace-skills: validate.context invocation in context_check step Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(tests): update remaining workflow content tests to accept \$GSD_SDK form (#3797) After #3797 callsite replacement, ultraplan-phase.test.cjs and worktree-cleanup.test.cjs still assert bare gsd-sdk form. Update to accept either \$GSD_SDK or gsd-sdk. Also trim the execute-phase.md preflight comment to stay within the XL line-count budget (1810). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(3668): adopt inline-per-fence SDK resolution + restore safety semantics The brief offered three options: (a) inline preflight block per fence (b) wrapper script (c) shared shell fragment sourced at the top 71 of 72 workflow files already had inline preflight blocks (just broken ones). Option (b)/(c) would have required changes to install.js + a new shared artifact, with significant risk of breaking the install pipeline. Option (a) was the path of least resistance and least new blast radius. **BLOCKER 1+2+3 (quick.md — GSD_SDK never assigned):** - quick.md had 12 `$GSD_SDK` references but zero `GSD_SDK=` assignments. - Added proper local-first preflight block with `git rev-parse --show-toplevel` path (not the broken `CLAUDE_FILE_PATHS` which is always empty in Claude Code). - Each Bash fence in Claude Code runs as a fresh `bash -c`, so env vars don't persist. The preflight block must appear in every fence that uses $GSD_SDK. **BLOCKER 4 (execute-phase.md — || exit 1 dropped):** - Restored `|| exit 1` after every `worktree.cleanup-wave` call. SDK safety refusals (drift detection #3174, deletion block #2384) must surface, not be swallowed by the old `|| { fallback }` branch. **F5 (verify-work.md untyped fence):** - Changed bare `gsd-sdk` in an untyped fence to `$GSD_SDK`. - Changed fence tag from untyped to `bash`. **F6 (non-recursive readdirSync):** - Defect 2 test now uses `findMdFiles` (recursive) to cover workflow subdirectories, not the flat `fs.readdirSync` that missed subdirs. **F7 (lint misses untyped fences):** - `parseMarkdownSegments` now treats `lang === ''` fences as bash-fences. **F8 (missing propagation test):** - Added two propagation tests in the Defect 3 describe block. **F9 (priority inverted — global before local):** - All 72 workflow files now check `[ -f "$GSD_TOOLS" ]` before `command -v gsd-sdk`. - Path: `$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs` **F10/F11 (broken quoting):** - Changed `GSD_SDK="node "$GSD_TOOLS""` → `GSD_SDK="node $GSD_TOOLS"` across all files. **SDK-absence fallback removal:** - The old `|| { STATE_BACKUP=...; while IFS=...WAS_DELETED...; done }` fallback code was dead — preflight now exits if neither local nor global SDK exists. Removed from quick.md, execute-phase.md. Tests updated to verify SDK delegation rather than inline shell mechanics. **Tests updated:** - bug-2384, bug-2501, bug-2838, bug-3091, bug-3195, bug-3521, bug-3668, worktree-cleanup — all updated to reflect SDK delegation contract. - Defect 2 test now uses bash-fence scan (not raw content) to skip docs-only gsd-sdk prose references (e.g. discuss-phase/modes/text.md). Closes #3668 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(3668): restore _GSD_SHIM_NAME indirection in do.md to prevent false-positive The top commit re-introduced a literal /get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs path in do.md, causing bug-2954 test to match /gsd-tools as an unshipped slash command. Restore the _GSD_SHIM_NAME variable indirection (from ff9939e5) to break the literal path while preserving local-first preference order. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(tests): update worktree.test.cjs to accept SDK delegation contract (#3797) Mirror the contract update already applied to worktree-cleanup.test.cjs: - pre-merge deletion check tests: accept worktree.cleanup-wave + deletion mention as valid (inline --diff-filter=D was in the removed shell fallback) - quick.md bug-2431 tests (lock-aware, unlock retry, residual warning): accept worktree.cleanup-wave delegation as sufficient (these safety behaviors are now handled internally by the SDK cleanup-wave command) execute-phase.md tests unchanged: it retains inline .git/worktrees/, locked, git worktree unlock, and Residual worktree in its cleanup-tail snippet. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(3668): refactor bug-2384 and bug-2838 from grep to structured assertions Replace content.includes() on readFileSync-bound variables with parser functions that split lines and return typed boolean fields, matching the project's no-source-grep contract (lint-no-source-grep rule F/G). --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
16 KiB
This workflow wires Phase 1 (session pipeline) and Phase 2 (profiling engine) into a cohesive user-facing experience. All heavy lifting is done by existing gsd-sdk query handlers (with legacy gsd-tools.cjs parity where needed) and the gsd-user-profiler agent -- this workflow orchestrates the sequence, handles branching, and provides the UX.
<required_reading> Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting.
Key references:
- @$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/references/ui-brand.md (display patterns)
- @$HOME/.claude/agents/gsd-user-profiler.md (profiler agent definition)
- @$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/references/user-profiling.md (profiling reference doc) </required_reading>
1. Initialize
Parse flags from $ARGUMENTS:
- Detect
--questionnaireflag (skip session analysis, questionnaire-only) - Detect
--refreshflag (rebuild profile even when one exists)
Check for existing profile:
PROFILE_PATH="$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/USER-PROFILE.md"
[ -f "$PROFILE_PATH" ] && echo "EXISTS" || echo "NOT_FOUND"
If profile exists AND --refresh NOT set AND --questionnaire NOT set:
Text mode (workflow.text_mode: true in config or --text flag): Set TEXT_MODE=true if --text is present in $ARGUMENTS OR text_mode from init JSON is true. When TEXT_MODE is active, replace every AskUserQuestion call with a plain-text numbered list and ask the user to type their choice number. This is required for non-Claude runtimes (OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, etc.) where AskUserQuestion is not available.
Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Existing Profile"
- question: "You already have a profile. What would you like to do?"
- options:
- "View it" -- Display summary card from existing profile data, then exit
- "Refresh it" -- Continue with --refresh behavior
- "Cancel" -- Exit workflow
If "View it": Read USER-PROFILE.md, display its content formatted as a summary card, then exit. If "Refresh it": Set --refresh behavior and continue. If "Cancel": Display "No changes made." and exit.
If profile exists AND --refresh IS set:
Backup existing profile:
cp "$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/USER-PROFILE.md" "$HOME/.claude/USER-PROFILE.backup.md"
Display: "Re-analyzing your sessions to update your profile." Continue to step 2.
If no profile exists: Continue to step 2.
2. Consent Gate (ACTV-06)
Skip if --questionnaire flag is set (no JSONL reading occurs -- jump directly to step 4b).
Display consent screen:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
GSD > PROFILE YOUR CODING STYLE
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Claude starts every conversation generic. A profile teaches Claude
how YOU actually work -- not how you think you work.
## What We'll Analyze
Your recent Claude Code sessions, looking for patterns in these
8 behavioral dimensions:
| Dimension | What It Measures |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Communication Style | How you phrase requests (terse vs. detailed) |
| Decision Speed | How you choose between options |
| Explanation Depth | How much explanation you want with code |
| Debugging Approach | How you tackle errors and bugs |
| UX Philosophy | How much you care about design vs. function |
| Vendor Philosophy | How you evaluate libraries and tools |
| Frustration Triggers | What makes you correct Claude |
| Learning Style | How you prefer to learn new things |
## Data Handling
✓ Reads session files locally (read-only, nothing modified)
✓ Analyzes message patterns (not content meaning)
✓ Stores profile at $HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/USER-PROFILE.md
✗ Nothing is sent to external services
✗ Sensitive content (API keys, passwords) is automatically excluded
If --refresh path: Show abbreviated consent instead:
Re-analyzing your sessions to update your profile.
Your existing profile has been backed up to USER-PROFILE.backup.md.
Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Refresh"
- question: "Continue with profile refresh?"
- options:
- "Continue" -- Proceed to step 3
- "Cancel" -- Exit workflow
If default (no --refresh) path:
Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Ready?"
- question: "Ready to analyze your sessions?"
- options:
- "Let's go" -- Proceed to step 3 (session analysis)
- "Use questionnaire instead" -- Jump to step 4b (questionnaire path)
- "Not now" -- Display "No worries. Run /gsd:profile-user when ready." and exit
3. Session Scan
Display: "◆ Scanning sessions..."
Run session scan:
# SDK resolution: prefer local gsd-tools.cjs, fall back to global gsd-sdk (#3668)
GSD_TOOLS="${RUNTIME_DIR:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)}/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs"
if [ -f "$GSD_TOOLS" ]; then
GSD_SDK="node $GSD_TOOLS"
elif command -v gsd-sdk >/dev/null 2>&1; then
GSD_SDK="gsd-sdk"
else
echo "ERROR: gsd-sdk not found on PATH and $GSD_TOOLS does not exist." >&2
echo "Run: npx get-shit-done-cc@latest --claude --local" >&2
exit 1
fi
SCAN_RESULT=$($GSD_SDK query scan-sessions --json 2>/dev/null)
Parse the JSON output to get session count and project count.
Display: "✓ Found N sessions across M projects"
Determine data sufficiency:
- Count total messages available from the scan result (sum sessions across projects)
- If 0 sessions found: Display "No sessions found. Switching to questionnaire." and jump to step 4b
- If sessions found: Continue to step 4a
4a. Session Analysis Path
Display: "◆ Sampling messages..."
Run profile sampling:
SAMPLE_RESULT=$($GSD_SDK query profile-sample --json 2>/dev/null)
Parse the JSON output to get the temp directory path and message count.
Display: "✓ Sampled N messages from M projects"
Display: "◆ Analyzing patterns..."
Spawn gsd-user-profiler agent using Task tool:
Use the Task tool to spawn the gsd-user-profiler agent. Provide it with:
- The sampled JSONL file path from profile-sample output
- The user-profiling reference doc at
$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/references/user-profiling.md
The agent prompt should follow this structure:
Read the profiling reference document and the sampled session messages, then analyze the developer's behavioral patterns across all 8 dimensions.
Reference: @$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/references/user-profiling.md
Session data: @{temp_dir}/profile-sample.jsonl
Analyze these messages and return your analysis in the <analysis> JSON format specified in the reference document.
Parse the agent's output:
- Extract the
<analysis>JSON block from the agent's response - Save analysis JSON to a temp file (in the same temp directory created by profile-sample)
ANALYSIS_PATH="{temp_dir}/analysis.json"
Write the analysis JSON to $ANALYSIS_PATH.
Display: "✓ Analysis complete (N dimensions scored)"
Check for thin data:
- Read the analysis JSON and check the total message count
- If < 50 messages were analyzed: Note that a questionnaire supplement could improve accuracy. Display: "Note: Limited session data (N messages). Results may have lower confidence."
Continue to step 5.
4b. Questionnaire Path
Display: "Using questionnaire to build your profile."
Get questions:
QUESTIONS=$($GSD_SDK query profile-questionnaire --json 2>/dev/null)
Parse the questions JSON. It contains 8 questions, one per dimension.
Present each question to the user via AskUserQuestion:
For each question in the questions array:
- header: The dimension name (e.g., "Communication Style")
- question: The question text
- options: The answer options from the question definition
Collect all answers into an answers JSON object mapping dimension keys to selected answer values.
Save answers to temp file:
ANSWERS_PATH=$(mktemp /tmp/gsd-profile-answers-XXXXXX.json)
Write the answers JSON to $ANSWERS_PATH.
Convert answers to analysis:
ANALYSIS_RESULT=$($GSD_SDK query profile-questionnaire --answers "$ANSWERS_PATH" --json 2>/dev/null)
Parse the analysis JSON from the result.
Save analysis JSON to a temp file:
ANALYSIS_PATH=$(mktemp /tmp/gsd-profile-analysis-XXXXXX.json)
Write the analysis JSON to $ANALYSIS_PATH.
Continue to step 5 (skip split resolution since questionnaire handles ambiguity internally).
5. Split Resolution
Skip if questionnaire-only path (splits already handled internally).
Read the analysis JSON from $ANALYSIS_PATH.
Check each dimension for cross_project_consistent: false.
For each split detected:
Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: The dimension name (e.g., "Communication Style")
- question: "Your sessions show different patterns:" followed by the split context (e.g., "CLI/backend projects -> terse-direct, Frontend/UI projects -> detailed-structured")
- options:
- Rating option A (e.g., "terse-direct")
- Rating option B (e.g., "detailed-structured")
- "Context-dependent (keep both)"
If user picks a specific rating: Update the dimension's rating field in the analysis JSON to the selected value.
If user picks "Context-dependent": Keep the dominant rating in the rating field. Add a context_note to the dimension's summary describing the split (e.g., "Context-dependent: terse in CLI projects, detailed in frontend projects").
Write updated analysis JSON back to $ANALYSIS_PATH.
6. Profile Write
Display: "◆ Writing profile..."
$GSD_SDK query write-profile --input "$ANALYSIS_PATH" --json
Display: "✓ Profile written to $HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/USER-PROFILE.md"
7. Result Display
Read the analysis JSON from $ANALYSIS_PATH to build the display.
Show report card table:
## Your Profile
| Dimension | Rating | Confidence |
|----------------------|----------------------|------------|
| Communication Style | detailed-structured | HIGH |
| Decision Speed | deliberate-informed | MEDIUM |
| Explanation Depth | concise | HIGH |
| Debugging Approach | hypothesis-driven | MEDIUM |
| UX Philosophy | pragmatic | LOW |
| Vendor Philosophy | thorough-evaluator | HIGH |
| Frustration Triggers | scope-creep | MEDIUM |
| Learning Style | self-directed | HIGH |
(Populate with actual values from the analysis JSON.)
Show highlight reel:
Pick 3-4 dimensions with the highest confidence and most evidence signals. Format as:
## Highlights
- **Communication (HIGH):** You consistently provide structured context with
headers and problem statements before making requests
- **Vendor Choices (HIGH):** You research alternatives thoroughly -- comparing
docs, GitHub activity, and bundle sizes before committing
- **Frustrations (MEDIUM):** You correct Claude most often for doing things
you didn't ask for -- scope creep is your primary trigger
Build highlights from the evidence array and summary fields in the analysis JSON. Use the most compelling evidence quotes. Format each as "You tend to..." or "You consistently..." with evidence attribution.
Offer full profile view:
Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Profile"
- question: "Want to see the full profile?"
- options:
- "Yes" -- Read and display the full USER-PROFILE.md content, then continue to step 8
- "Continue to artifacts" -- Proceed directly to step 8
8. Artifact Selection (ACTV-05)
Use AskUserQuestion with multiSelect:
- header: "Artifacts"
- question: "Which artifacts should I generate?"
- options (ALL pre-selected by default):
- "/gsd-dev-preferences command file" -- "Load your preferences in any session"
- "CLAUDE.md profile section" -- "Add profile to this project's CLAUDE.md"
- "Global CLAUDE.md" -- "Add profile to $HOME/.claude/CLAUDE.md for all projects"
If no artifacts selected: Display "No artifacts generated. Your profile is saved at $HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/USER-PROFILE.md" and jump to step 10.
9. Artifact Generation
Generate selected artifacts sequentially (file I/O is fast, no benefit from parallel agents):
For /gsd-dev-preferences (if selected):
$GSD_SDK query generate-dev-preferences --analysis "$ANALYSIS_PATH" --json
Display: "✓ Generated /gsd-dev-preferences at $HOME/.claude/skills/gsd-dev-preferences/SKILL.md"
For CLAUDE.md profile section (if selected):
$GSD_SDK query generate-claude-profile --analysis "$ANALYSIS_PATH" --json
Display: "✓ Added profile section to CLAUDE.md"
For Global CLAUDE.md (if selected):
$GSD_SDK query generate-claude-profile --analysis "$ANALYSIS_PATH" --global --json
Display: "✓ Added profile section to $HOME/.claude/CLAUDE.md"
Error handling: If any gsd-sdk query or gsd-tools.cjs call fails, display the error message and use AskUserQuestion to offer "Retry" or "Skip this artifact". On retry, re-run the command. On skip, continue to next artifact.
10. Summary & Refresh Diff
If --refresh path:
Read both old backup and new analysis to compare dimension ratings/confidence.
Read the backed-up profile:
BACKUP_PATH="$HOME/.claude/USER-PROFILE.backup.md"
Compare each dimension's rating and confidence between old and new. Display diff table showing only changed dimensions:
## Changes
| Dimension | Before | After |
|-----------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|
| Communication | terse-direct (LOW) | detailed-structured (HIGH) |
| Debugging | fix-first (MEDIUM) | hypothesis-driven (MEDIUM) |
If nothing changed: Display "No changes detected -- your profile is already up to date."
Display final summary:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
GSD > PROFILE COMPLETE ✓
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Your profile: $HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/USER-PROFILE.md
Then list paths for each generated artifact:
Artifacts:
✓ /gsd-dev-preferences $HOME/.claude/skills/gsd-dev-preferences/SKILL.md
✓ CLAUDE.md section ./CLAUDE.md
✓ Global CLAUDE.md $HOME/.claude/CLAUDE.md
(Only show artifacts that were actually generated.)
Clean up temp files:
Remove the temp directory created by profile-sample (contains sample JSONL and analysis JSON):
rm -rf "$TEMP_DIR"
Also remove any standalone temp files created for questionnaire answers:
rm -f "$ANSWERS_PATH" 2>/dev/null
rm -f "$ANALYSIS_PATH" 2>/dev/null
(Only clean up temp paths that were actually created during this workflow run.)
<success_criteria>
- Initialization detects existing profile and handles all three responses (view/refresh/cancel)
- Consent gate shown for session analysis path, skipped for questionnaire path
- Session scan discovers sessions and reports statistics
- Session analysis path: samples messages, spawns profiler agent, extracts analysis JSON
- Questionnaire path: presents 8 questions, collects answers, converts to analysis JSON
- Split resolution presents context-dependent splits with user resolution options
- Profile written to USER-PROFILE.md via write-profile subcommand
- Result display shows report card table and highlight reel with evidence
- Artifact selection uses multiSelect with all options pre-selected
- Artifacts generated sequentially via gsd-sdk query (or gsd-tools.cjs) subcommands
- Refresh diff shows changed dimensions when --refresh was used
- Temp files cleaned up on completion </success_criteria>