* feat(#3840): generate docs/FEATURES.md from per-feature fragments docs/FEATURES.md was hand-maintained, and every feature PR wrote into two shared mutable cells: the '### N.' heading whose integer was hand-allocated at authoring time, and the hand-maintained table of contents. Concurrent PRs all picked the same next integer, and two PRs adding differently numbered features still collided on the TOC. #3831 was renumbered 165 -> 166 -> 167 -> 168 across successive rebases, each collision also costing a full matrix verification run because the sha-keyed pass marker dies with the rebase. Mechanism: one fragment per feature at docs/features/<slug>.md carrying id/title/group (and an optional order) in frontmatter, consolidated by scripts/gen-features.cjs --write|--check into a marker-delimited region of docs/FEATURES.md that holds BOTH the TOC and every section body. Group headings and their order are derived too - a group sorts by its lowest-ordered member - so there is no shared registry to edit either; optional per-group prose lives in docs/features/_groups/<slug>.md. A contributor adds exactly one new file. Wired into regen:derived and lint:generated-sync alongside the eight existing generators, matching gen-adr-index.cjs's CLI shape and typed-REASON reporting. Migration froze all 168 existing numbers verbatim: identical section set, identical order, identical bodies. Two defects found in the tree are fixed inline rather than carried forward - the '## Related' block had been spliced into the middle of the document, orphaning §142's Reference line, and four inbound anchors were already broken on next (FEATURES.md#runtime-identity in two files, and #143-spec-phase-edge-completeness-probe off by one). Since the repo has no link checker, --check now validates every inbound FEATURES.md#anchor by resolved target, so that class cannot ship silently again; locale FEATURES.md files resolve elsewhere and stay out of scope. Refs #3840 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#3840): carry upstream §69 delta into its fragment and harden the generator Review found section 69 missing '[--strict]' and REQ-STATE-05/06 versus origin/next. Root cause was a stale base, not extraction loss: those lines landed in394bf384b(#3844) AFTER this branch forked at63abcface, and 'git diff63abcfaceorigin/next -- docs/FEATURES.md' is exactly that hunk. Merging origin/next auto-applied the hunk into the GENERATED region, which --check immediately reported as stale; the delta is now carried in docs/features/statemd-consistency-gates.md and regenerated from there. --write is now fail-closed. It previously rendered the region even with violations outstanding, warning only on stderr and exiting 0, so a '--write && git commit' chain could commit a FEATURES.md carrying two colliding sections. It now refuses and exits 1; --force is the explicit override and says so in the report. The test that pinned the old behavior now pins the refusal, plus the --force override and its scoping. Marker forgery is rejected at two layers. A fragment body containing '<!-- FEATURES:START' or '<!-- FEATURES:END' is a typed body_forges_region_marker violation (fragments and group notes alike), and spliceIntoFeatures anchors the end boundary with lastIndexOf instead of indexOf, so a marker that reaches the document by any other route can only make the generated region grow, never shrink. Matching is on marker PREFIXES, so a decorated variant comment cannot slip past. Symlinked corpus entries are refused with a typed dirent_not_regular_file rather than read. A fork PR could otherwise commit docs/features/evil.md as a symlink to any readable path and have the generator inline those bytes into the committed docs/FEATURES.md on the next regen. Equivalence re-verified with a method that cannot cancel out. The first check extracted both operands with the same body-normalising helper, so anything that helper dropped was dropped on both sides. The replacement runs two independent passes: a global content-line multiset diff with no per-section logic at all (0 gained, 19 lost, all 19 the stale hand-written mini-TOC links this change deliberately deletes), and a per-section byte-exact body diff carrying a coverage assertion that fails loudly per file when the extractor accounts for fewer lines than the file contains. That assertion caught two blind spots in the checker itself. 168/168 sections present, order identical, one intended body difference (§142 regains the Reference line orphaned by the misplaced '## Related' block). Refs #3840 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#3840): backfill changeset PR number Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
4.5 KiB
How to diagnose which gsd-tools is running
Two packages publish a binary called gsd-tools: this one, and the predecessor
get-shit-done-cc. They answer some of the same verb names with different behavior.
This guide tells you which one you have and how to fix a bad resolution.
Use it when:
- a workflow behaves unlike its documentation,
- a workflow stops with
gsd-tools.cjs not found … and gsd_run is not on PATH, - or you simply want to confirm which tool a project is running against.
Why this matters
#3129 is the worked example.
phases.clear archives your phase directories under this package and deletes them
under the predecessor. Both print success-shaped output, and .planning/ is gitignored by
default, so the difference is invisible until the directories are gone.
Shipped workflows no longer resolve gsd-tools from PATH at all — they resolve gsd_run,
which only this package publishes. That closes the path that caused #3129. The steps below
are for confirming your setup and for fixing the cases the resolver now refuses.
Ask the tool what it is
gsd-tools runtime-identity
A healthy GSD runtime prints:
{
"packageName": "@opengsd/gsd-core",
"version": "1.12.0"
}
Three other outcomes are possible, and they mean different things:
| What you see | What it means |
|---|---|
| The JSON above | This is our tool. Nothing to do. |
A usage screen mentioning gsd-sdk, exit 1 |
This is the predecessor's binary. See A different package owns it. |
Error: Unknown command: runtime-identity |
This is our tool, but older than the verb. See It is an old gsd-core. |
| Nothing runs at all | Nothing named gsd-tools is on your PATH. That is fine — workflows do not need it. |
Then find out which package owns the file:
readlink -f "$(command -v gsd-tools)"
A different package owns it
The resolved path contains get-shit-done-cc, or the identity probe printed a gsd-sdk
usage screen.
Workflows will not reach it — they resolve gsd_run, which that package does not publish —
so this is no longer dangerous. It is still worth resolving, because you invoking
gsd-tools by hand will reach the wrong tool.
If you no longer use the predecessor:
npm uninstall -g get-shit-done-cc
If you need both installed, put this package's bin directory first on PATH:
export PATH="$(npm prefix -g)/bin:$PATH"
Re-run gsd-tools runtime-identity and confirm it reports @opengsd/gsd-core.
It is an old gsd-core
The resolved path is inside @opengsd/gsd-core, but runtime-identity is not a known
command. That version predates the verb. Nothing is wrong beyond being out of date:
npm install -g @opengsd/gsd-core@latest
A workflow says gsd_run is not on PATH
The resolver looked for gsd_run and found nothing, and none of the path-based locations
matched either. It stops rather than guessing — falling back to an arbitrary gsd-tools is
exactly the behavior that caused #3129.
This is expected in one specific case: an installation old enough to predate the gsd_run
binary (#381). Upgrade:
npm install -g @opengsd/gsd-core@latest
Confirm the binary is now present:
command -v gsd_run
If you deliberately pin an old version, invoke workflows from a project or config directory
where the path-based resolution branches apply — a local install under
gsd-core/bin/gsd-tools.cjs, or your runtime's config directory — rather than relying on
PATH.
Tell "not installed" apart from "wrong one installed"
These two look similar and have opposite fixes:
command -v gsd_run || echo "gsd_run: NOT FOUND"
command -v gsd-tools || echo "gsd-tools: NOT FOUND"
gsd_runfound — workflows resolve correctly, whatevergsd-toolssays.gsd_runmissing,gsd-toolspresent — the likely collision case. Runreadlink -f "$(command -v gsd-tools)"and follow the matching section above.- Both missing — nothing is installed globally; workflows will use a local or config-directory install if one exists.
Related
- Runtime identity — why the launcher resolves
gsd_runrather than asserting identity at every call runtime-identity— the verb's exact output- #3129 — the incident this prevents