Phase 2 of epic #4636, absorbing #4327 and #4354. Implements ADR-4650 decision 3: containment is a boundary concern — the predicate runs where external input enters, not at whichever interior call site remembered. Four boundaries now validate against their managed root and reject with a USAGE-shaped error before touching the filesystem: todo complete <name> -> todosDir(cwd) check predicate --phase-dir <dir> -> projectDir check decision-coverage-plan <dir> -> projectDir (via resolvePath) check gap-analysis.plan-post <dir> -> projectDir #4327 understated its own severity. It reports that a traversal name "resolves outside the todos root", which reads as an information leak. Measured, it was destructive: the command exited 0, MOVED the outside file into completed/, and unlinked the original. cmdTodoComplete ends in fs.unlinkSync(sourcePath), so an unconfined name consumed across the boundary rather than merely reading across it. Validation now precedes every fs call — existsSync, readFileSync, ensureDir, writeSync, unlinkSync — and both halves of the move are confined, so neither source nor destination can land outside the root. --dry-run is rejected on the same terms; a preview must not leak a resolved outside path either. #4354 reproduces exactly: a BLOCKING gate returned block:false sourced entirely from a SECURITY.md in a caller-chosen directory outside the project. THE HARDER HALF, found by the isolated adversarial review of the first attempt: validating a path and then using a DIFFERENT one closes nothing. The first fix validated `--phase-dir` joined against `--cwd`, then passed the RAW unjoined value into the predicate context. gate-predicate-evaluator uses it as-is and findPhaseArtifact resolves a relative path against the REAL process cwd — so validation and the read used two different roots whenever process.cwd() differed from --cwd. Reproduced: running from a directory holding a plan with `secret_field: LEAKED_VALUE`, a predicate declared against an empty --cwd project exited 0 and returned "actual":"LEAKED_VALUE". The rule now applied at all three router sites: **use the validated resolved path, never the raw input.** Independently re-verified after the fix — the lookup resolves in the --cwd project and no value leaks. gate-predicate-evaluator.cts is untouched and still imports no fs. Confining in the router is what keeps that pure-leaf contract intact AND covers ${PHASE_DIR} interpolation into command-exit-zero, which an evaluator-local fix would have missed entirely. Also fixed, same review: `todo complete .` and `..` passed containment (they resolve to the pending dir, which IS inside the root) and then threw an uncaught EISDIR with an absolute-path stack trace. Now a clean USAGE rejection naming the real reason — "todo name is not a file" — rather than borrowing the escape message, which would have stated something false. Ripples discharged BEFORE the verification checkpoint rather than after, per the Phase 1 retrospective: docs/reference/gate-predicates.md and docs/CLI-TOOLS.md document the new constraints, CONTEXT.md records why containment lives at the router rather than the evaluator, the changeset is written, and the install-tree goldens were regenerated to confirm unchanged (no new shipped file) rather than assumed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
317 lines
13 KiB
JavaScript
317 lines
13 KiB
JavaScript
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Integration tests for the `check predicate` subcommand wiring (#2008).
|
|
*
|
|
* These exercise the PRODUCTION stack: the real `buildPredicateDeps()` binding
|
|
* (which wraps shell-command-projection.execTool → bounded `sh -c` spawnSync) and
|
|
* the `parsePredicateFlags` arg parser. The pure evaluator logic is covered by
|
|
* gate-predicate-evaluator.test.cjs; this file proves the wiring holds against
|
|
* real subprocess exit codes and a real timeout kill.
|
|
*
|
|
* Commands run are instant (`true` / `false` / `exit 3`) or tightly bounded
|
|
* (a 100ms timeout killing `sleep 1`), so there is no orphan/leak risk.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const { describe, test, beforeEach, afterEach } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
const os = require('os');
|
|
|
|
const { evaluatePredicate } = require('../gsd-core/bin/lib/gate-predicate-evaluator.cjs');
|
|
const { buildPredicateDeps, parsePredicateFlags } = require('../gsd-core/bin/lib/check-command-router.cjs');
|
|
const { runGsdTools, createTempProject, cleanup } = require('./helpers.cjs');
|
|
|
|
// ─── buildPredicateDeps: real subprocess exit mapping ─────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('buildPredicateDeps — real bounded sh -c subprocess', () => {
|
|
const deps = buildPredicateDeps();
|
|
const cwd = process.cwd();
|
|
|
|
test('`true` => exitCode 0, not timed out', () => {
|
|
const r = deps.runBoundedShell({ command: 'true', cwd, timeoutMs: 5000 });
|
|
assert.equal(r.exitCode, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(r.timedOut, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('`false` => exitCode 1, not timed out', () => {
|
|
const r = deps.runBoundedShell({ command: 'false', cwd, timeoutMs: 5000 });
|
|
assert.equal(r.exitCode, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(r.timedOut, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('`exit 3` => exitCode 3', () => {
|
|
const r = deps.runBoundedShell({ command: 'exit 3', cwd, timeoutMs: 5000 });
|
|
assert.equal(r.exitCode, 3);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('stderr is captured from the subprocess', () => {
|
|
const r = deps.runBoundedShell({ command: 'echo oops >&2; exit 4', cwd, timeoutMs: 5000 });
|
|
assert.equal(r.exitCode, 4);
|
|
assert.match(r.stderr, /oops/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('timeout kills the subprocess (SIGTERM => timedOut:true)', () => {
|
|
const r = deps.runBoundedShell({ command: 'sleep 1', cwd, timeoutMs: 100 });
|
|
assert.equal(r.timedOut, true);
|
|
assert.equal(r.signal, 'SIGTERM');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── evaluatePredicate + production deps: end-to-end exit mapping ─────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('evaluatePredicate + production deps — command-exit-zero e2e', () => {
|
|
const deps = buildPredicateDeps();
|
|
const ctx = { cwd: process.cwd() };
|
|
|
|
test('command `true` => block:false', () => {
|
|
const res = evaluatePredicate({ kind: 'command-exit-zero', command: 'true' }, ctx, deps);
|
|
assert.equal(res.block, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('command `false` => block:true', () => {
|
|
const res = evaluatePredicate({ kind: 'command-exit-zero', command: 'false' }, ctx, deps);
|
|
assert.equal(res.block, true);
|
|
assert.match(res.message, /1/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('interpolation reaches the real shell ($PHASE_NUMBER via flag context)', () => {
|
|
const res = evaluatePredicate(
|
|
{ kind: 'command-exit-zero', command: 'test "${PHASE_NUMBER}" = "07" && true || false' },
|
|
{ cwd: process.cwd(), phaseNumber: '07' },
|
|
deps,
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(res.block, false);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── parsePredicateFlags ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('parsePredicateFlags', () => {
|
|
test('extracts --flag value pairs, skips positional + bare --flags', () => {
|
|
const out = parsePredicateFlags(['check', 'predicate', '--predicate', '{"kind":"x"}', '--phase-number', '03', '--raw']);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(out, { predicate: '{"kind":"x"}', 'phase-number': '03' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('last write wins for repeated flags', () => {
|
|
const out = parsePredicateFlags(['--phase-number', '01', '--phase-number', '02']);
|
|
assert.equal(out['phase-number'], '02');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('value that starts with -- is not consumed (treated as a flag)', () => {
|
|
const out = parsePredicateFlags(['--predicate', '--phase-number']);
|
|
assert.equal('predicate' in out, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('empty args => empty map', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parsePredicateFlags([]), {});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── #4130 follow-up: partitionPredicateArgs (flags + positionals, one parser) ─
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* `partitionPredicateArgs` is the single pass behind `parsePredicateFlags`:
|
|
* it returns BOTH the --flag value map AND the non-consumed positional tokens
|
|
* under the exact same skip/consume/last-wins semantics. `check
|
|
* decision-coverage-plan --context <path>` uses it so the flag and the
|
|
* positional surface share one parser with `check predicate` — the two
|
|
* parsers cannot diverge because there is only one.
|
|
*/
|
|
describe('partitionPredicateArgs (#4130 follow-up)', () => {
|
|
const { partitionPredicateArgs } = require('../gsd-core/bin/lib/check-command-router.cjs');
|
|
|
|
test('splits --flag value pairs from positionals', () => {
|
|
const { flags, positionals } = partitionPredicateArgs(
|
|
['check', 'decision-coverage-plan', '--context', '/tmp/CONTEXT.md', 'phases/01-init'],
|
|
);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(flags, { context: '/tmp/CONTEXT.md' });
|
|
assert.deepEqual(positionals, ['check', 'decision-coverage-plan', 'phases/01-init']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('parsePredicateFlags is exactly the flags half (one source of truth)', () => {
|
|
const vectors = [
|
|
['check', 'predicate', '--predicate', '{"kind":"x"}', '--phase-number', '03', '--raw'],
|
|
['--phase-number', '01', '--phase-number', '02'],
|
|
['--predicate', '--phase-number'],
|
|
[],
|
|
['--context'],
|
|
['a', '--context', 'b', '--context', 'c', 'd'],
|
|
];
|
|
for (const v of vectors) {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(partitionPredicateArgs(v).flags, parsePredicateFlags(v),
|
|
`flags half must equal parsePredicateFlags for ${JSON.stringify(v)}`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('value that starts with -- is not consumed: both stay flags, neither becomes positional', () => {
|
|
const { flags, positionals } = partitionPredicateArgs(['--context', '--other']);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(flags, {});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(positionals, ['--context', '--other']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('last write wins; flag values never leak into positionals', () => {
|
|
const { flags, positionals } = partitionPredicateArgs(['p1', '--context', 'a', 'p2', '--context', 'b', 'p3']);
|
|
assert.equal(flags.context, 'b');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(positionals, ['p1', 'p2', 'p3']);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── #4354: `check predicate --phase-dir` containment boundary ───────────────
|
|
//
|
|
// cmdCheckPredicate passes the `--phase-dir` flag VERBATIM into PredicateContext
|
|
// (src/check-command-router.cts) with no containment validation. Both predicate
|
|
// kinds read/interpolate that value: `artifact-frontmatter-equals` resolves it
|
|
// as `targetDir` for `findPhaseArtifact`, and `command-exit-zero` interpolates
|
|
// it into `${PHASE_DIR}` in the shelled-out command. These tests reproduce the
|
|
// issue's exact repro and prove the boundary is currently unconfined.
|
|
|
|
describe('check predicate --phase-dir — containment boundary (#4354)', () => {
|
|
let projDir;
|
|
let outsideDir;
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
projDir = createTempProject();
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(path.join(projDir, '.planning', 'phases', '05-x'), { recursive: true });
|
|
outsideDir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'gsd-predicate-outside-'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
afterEach(() => {
|
|
cleanup(projDir);
|
|
cleanup(outsideDir);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('[RED #4354] the issue\'s exact repro: artifact-frontmatter-equals against a foreign SECURITY.md via an outside --phase-dir must be rejected, not evaluated', () => {
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(
|
|
path.join(outsideDir, 'SECURITY.md'),
|
|
'---\nstatus: passed\n---\n# Security\n',
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const predicate = JSON.stringify({
|
|
kind: 'artifact-frontmatter-equals',
|
|
artifact: 'SECURITY.md',
|
|
field: 'status',
|
|
equals: 'passed',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = runGsdTools(
|
|
['--json-errors', 'check', 'predicate', '--predicate', predicate, '--phase-dir', outsideDir, '--raw'],
|
|
projDir,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// CURRENT BUG (documented, not asserted as desired): this command today
|
|
// succeeds and prints {"block":false,...} — a BLOCKING gate passing on
|
|
// foreign evidence read from OUTSIDE the project. REQUIRED behavior:
|
|
// the outside --phase-dir must be rejected before evaluation.
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
result.success,
|
|
false,
|
|
`an outside --phase-dir must be rejected before evaluating the predicate ` +
|
|
`(currently: ${result.success ? `SUCCEEDED with output ${result.output}` : 'failed for an unrelated reason'})`,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('[RED #4354] a command-exit-zero predicate interpolating ${PHASE_DIR} with an outside --phase-dir must also be rejected', () => {
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(outsideDir, 'marker.txt'), 'outside-marker\n');
|
|
|
|
const predicate = JSON.stringify({
|
|
kind: 'command-exit-zero',
|
|
command: 'test -f "${PHASE_DIR}/marker.txt"',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = runGsdTools(
|
|
['--json-errors', 'check', 'predicate', '--predicate', predicate, '--phase-dir', outsideDir, '--raw'],
|
|
projDir,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
result.success,
|
|
false,
|
|
`a command-exit-zero predicate interpolating an outside --phase-dir must be rejected ` +
|
|
`(currently: ${result.success ? `SUCCEEDED with output ${result.output}` : 'failed for an unrelated reason'})`,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('[regression] a valid in-project --phase-dir still evaluates', () => {
|
|
const phaseDir = path.join(projDir, '.planning', 'phases', '05-x');
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(
|
|
path.join(phaseDir, 'SECURITY.md'),
|
|
'---\nstatus: passed\n---\n# Security\n',
|
|
);
|
|
const predicate = JSON.stringify({
|
|
kind: 'artifact-frontmatter-equals',
|
|
artifact: 'SECURITY.md',
|
|
field: 'status',
|
|
equals: 'passed',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = runGsdTools(
|
|
['check', 'predicate', '--predicate', predicate, '--phase-dir', phaseDir, '--raw'],
|
|
projDir,
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(result.success, `Command failed: ${result.error}`);
|
|
const parsed = JSON.parse(result.output);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(parsed.block, false, 'in-project phase-dir evaluation must still pass');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('[regression #4652] a relative --phase-dir must resolve against --cwd, not the real process cwd, and must not leak the outside file', () => {
|
|
// The real process cwd (outsideDir) contains a foreign SECURITY.md; the
|
|
// CLI is told --cwd projDir with a relative --phase-dir '.'. Before #4652,
|
|
// cmdCheckPredicate validated the joined (projDir + '.') path but passed
|
|
// the RAW, un-joined '.' into ctx.phaseDir, which findPhaseArtifact then
|
|
// resolved against the real process cwd (outsideDir) — leaking foreign
|
|
// frontmatter. The fix must reject this, and the leaked value must never
|
|
// appear in the output.
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(
|
|
path.join(outsideDir, 'SECURITY.md'),
|
|
'---\nstatus: LEAKED_VALUE\n---\n# Security\n',
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const predicate = JSON.stringify({
|
|
kind: 'artifact-frontmatter-equals',
|
|
artifact: 'SECURITY.md',
|
|
field: 'status',
|
|
equals: 'NOPE',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = runGsdTools(
|
|
['--json-errors', 'check', 'predicate', '--cwd', projDir, '--predicate', predicate, '--phase-dir', '.', '--raw'],
|
|
outsideDir,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const combinedOutput = `${result.output || ''}${result.error || ''}`;
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!combinedOutput.includes('LEAKED_VALUE'),
|
|
`the outside file's frontmatter value must never leak into the output (got: ${combinedOutput})`,
|
|
);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
result.success && JSON.parse(result.output).block === false,
|
|
false,
|
|
`a relative --phase-dir must not resolve against the real process cwd and must not pass ` +
|
|
`(currently: ${combinedOutput})`,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('[regression] no --phase-dir at all still falls back to cwd and evaluates', () => {
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(
|
|
path.join(projDir, 'SECURITY.md'),
|
|
'---\nstatus: passed\n---\n# Security\n',
|
|
);
|
|
const predicate = JSON.stringify({
|
|
kind: 'artifact-frontmatter-equals',
|
|
artifact: 'SECURITY.md',
|
|
field: 'status',
|
|
equals: 'passed',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const result = runGsdTools(
|
|
['check', 'predicate', '--predicate', predicate, '--raw'],
|
|
projDir,
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(result.success, `Command failed: ${result.error}`);
|
|
const parsed = JSON.parse(result.output);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(parsed.block, false, 'cwd-fallback evaluation must still pass');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|