Files
msd-core/get-shit-done/workflows/settings.md
Tom Boucher 7ad1a5edf5 fix(3668): isolate --local install from global gsd-sdk (#89)
* fix(3668): isolate --local install from global gsd-sdk

- `buildGsdSdkVersionMismatchReport` now accepts `opts.isLocal`; when
  true it sets `fix_command` to `npx get-shit-done-cc@latest --claude
  --local` instead of `npm install -g …`, removing the misleading global
  upgrade suggestion for local installs.
- Propagate `isLocal` from `installSdkIfNeeded` into the mismatch report
  builder so the right fix_command reaches the renderer.
- Export `buildGsdSdkVersionMismatchReport` and
  `renderGsdSdkVersionMismatchReport` so tests can assert on the IR
  contract directly.
- Add `command -v gsd-sdk … elif node "$GSD_TOOLS"` preflight SDK
  resolution block to all 69 workflow files that called bare `gsd-sdk`
  with no fallback, matching the pattern established in update.md,
  execute-phase.md, and quick.md.
- Add `tests/bug-3668-local-install-sdk-soft-dep.test.cjs` with 5 tests
  covering Defects 1-3, including a CI lint guard that blocks future
  workflow regressions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* changeset: add Fixed entry for #3668

* fix(3668): add allow-test-rule to suppress false lint-no-source-grep violation

The test reads workflow .md files (product content) to assert structural
invariants — not .cjs source files. The file-presence check is the only
viable IR for markdown guard patterns. Add the // allow-test-rule annotation
so lint-no-source-grep passes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(3668): fix do.md false-positive and discuss-phase.md size overflow

Two CI failures introduced by the 69-workflow preflight block:

1. do.md: the path `bin/gsd-tools.cjs` contains `/gsd-tools` which the
   bug-2954 parity test regex `/\/gsd[:-]([a-z][a-z0-9-]*)/g` mistakenly
   extracts as a slash command named `tools`. Fix: store the shim filename
   in _GSD_SHIM_NAME so the path construction no longer contains a static
   `/gsd-tools` literal. Also wire $GSD_SDK into the actual query call.

2. discuss-phase.md: the file was at 499 lines (the 500-line budget from
   #2551). Adding the 11-line preflight block pushed it to 510, failing
   workflow-size-budget.test.cjs. Fix: compress the 11-line preflight +
   2-line invocations into 3 lines (one-liner guard + two $GSD_SDK calls)
   returning the file to 499 lines while retaining the command -v guard
   required by bug-3668-local-install-sdk-soft-dep.test.cjs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(3668): wire \$GSD_SDK through all workflow callsites (#3797)

PR #3797 introduced the resolution preflight block (setting \$GSD_SDK) in
69 workflows but left every downstream gsd-sdk callsite using the bare
command. On local-only installs the preflight exits cleanly, then the
very next line fails with 'command not found'. This is the structural
gap the Codex review flagged.

Changes:
- 687 bare `gsd-sdk` callsites replaced with `\$GSD_SDK` across 75
  workflow files (all bash/sh fenced blocks excluding the resolution
  guard blocks themselves)
- execute-phase.md: was missing the preflight block entirely — added
  the standard 11-line resolution block at the initialize step
- execute-phase.md: inline `if command -v gsd-sdk` availability guard
  (legacy #3384 fallback) replaced with `\$GSD_SDK` + error fallback
  since the new preflight guarantees SDK availability or exits 1
- 6 sub-workflow files (discuss-phase/modes/*, execute-phase/steps/*)
  that have no preflight of their own but use \$GSD_SDK — these are
  loaded by parent workflows that set the variable; callsites updated
  to use \$GSD_SDK so they work when variable is in scope

Transformation script used: /private/tmp/fw2.js (regex-based fence
parser with segment join invariant verification — preserves all blank
lines and prose formatting).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(3668): upgrade CI guard to detect bare callsite routing (#3797)

The previous Defect 3 test checked that 'command -v gsd-sdk' appeared
as a string in the file — a guard-presence check, not a callsite-routing
check. A workflow with the preflight block but 40 bare gsd-sdk calls
below it passed the old test. This is exactly the bug state PR #3797
was supposed to fix.

Upgraded test:
- Parses each workflow file into markdown segments using a regex-based
  fence extractor (preserves all content invariantly)
- Skips bash/sh blocks that contain 'command -v gsd-sdk' (those are
  resolution guards — bare references there are expected)
- Flags any remaining bash/sh block line that invokes gsd-sdk without
  the \$ prefix (isBareGsdSdkInvocation predicate)
- Counter-test proves the predicate correctly flags real callsite lines
  and correctly exempts guard assignments, comments, and \$GSD_SDK refs

Also adds helper functions parseMarkdownSegments, isBareGsdSdkInvocation,
and findMdFiles which are used by both the upgraded Defect 3 test and
the counter-test.

This test would have caught the originally-shipped bug: the preflight
block was present but callsites still used bare gsd-sdk.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(tests): update workflow content tests to accept \$GSD_SDK callsite form (#3797)

Six regression tests assert on the exact textual pattern of gsd-sdk calls
inside workflow .md files. After the #3797 callsite replacement (687 bare
`gsd-sdk` invocations replaced with `\$GSD_SDK`), these tests failed because
they searched for the literal string `gsd-sdk query <cmd>` which no longer
appears at callsites.

Updated each test to accept both the pre-#3797 bare form and the post-#3797
variable form using `(?:\$GSD_SDK|gsd-sdk)` regex alternation (or two-branch
`includes()` checks for non-regex assertions). The structural invariants each
test enforces are unchanged — we're accepting the same behavioral contract
through the new callsite surface.

Tests fixed:
- bug-2334-quick-gsd-sdk-preflight: find init.quick call via \$GSD_SDK or bare
- bug-2661-roadmap-sync-parallel: roadmap.update-plan-progress call pattern
- bug-3360-codex-execute-phase-worktrees: RUNTIME config-get call detection
- bug-3381-verify-work-workstream: init.verify-work / phase.mvp-mode calls
- enh-2433-todo-phase-linking: commit call in new-milestone.md
- enh-2792-namespace-skills: validate.context invocation in context_check step

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(tests): update remaining workflow content tests to accept \$GSD_SDK form (#3797)

After #3797 callsite replacement, ultraplan-phase.test.cjs and worktree-cleanup.test.cjs
still assert bare gsd-sdk form. Update to accept either \$GSD_SDK or gsd-sdk. Also trim
the execute-phase.md preflight comment to stay within the XL line-count budget (1810).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(3668): adopt inline-per-fence SDK resolution + restore safety semantics

The brief offered three options:
  (a) inline preflight block per fence
  (b) wrapper script
  (c) shared shell fragment sourced at the top

71 of 72 workflow files already had inline preflight blocks (just broken ones).
Option (b)/(c) would have required changes to install.js + a new shared artifact,
with significant risk of breaking the install pipeline. Option (a) was the path
of least resistance and least new blast radius.

**BLOCKER 1+2+3 (quick.md — GSD_SDK never assigned):**
- quick.md had 12 `$GSD_SDK` references but zero `GSD_SDK=` assignments.
- Added proper local-first preflight block with `git rev-parse --show-toplevel`
  path (not the broken `CLAUDE_FILE_PATHS` which is always empty in Claude Code).
- Each Bash fence in Claude Code runs as a fresh `bash -c`, so env vars don't
  persist. The preflight block must appear in every fence that uses $GSD_SDK.

**BLOCKER 4 (execute-phase.md — || exit 1 dropped):**
- Restored `|| exit 1` after every `worktree.cleanup-wave` call. SDK safety
  refusals (drift detection #3174, deletion block #2384) must surface, not be
  swallowed by the old `|| { fallback }` branch.

**F5 (verify-work.md untyped fence):**
- Changed bare `gsd-sdk` in an untyped fence to `$GSD_SDK`.
- Changed fence tag from untyped to `bash`.

**F6 (non-recursive readdirSync):**
- Defect 2 test now uses `findMdFiles` (recursive) to cover workflow
  subdirectories, not the flat `fs.readdirSync` that missed subdirs.

**F7 (lint misses untyped fences):**
- `parseMarkdownSegments` now treats `lang === ''` fences as bash-fences.

**F8 (missing propagation test):**
- Added two propagation tests in the Defect 3 describe block.

**F9 (priority inverted — global before local):**
- All 72 workflow files now check `[ -f "$GSD_TOOLS" ]` before `command -v gsd-sdk`.
- Path: `$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs`

**F10/F11 (broken quoting):**
- Changed `GSD_SDK="node "$GSD_TOOLS""` → `GSD_SDK="node $GSD_TOOLS"` across all files.

**SDK-absence fallback removal:**
- The old `|| { STATE_BACKUP=...; while IFS=...WAS_DELETED...; done }` fallback
  code was dead — preflight now exits if neither local nor global SDK exists.
  Removed from quick.md, execute-phase.md. Tests updated to verify SDK delegation
  rather than inline shell mechanics.

**Tests updated:**
- bug-2384, bug-2501, bug-2838, bug-3091, bug-3195, bug-3521, bug-3668,
  worktree-cleanup — all updated to reflect SDK delegation contract.
- Defect 2 test now uses bash-fence scan (not raw content) to skip docs-only
  gsd-sdk prose references (e.g. discuss-phase/modes/text.md).

Closes #3668

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(3668): restore _GSD_SHIM_NAME indirection in do.md to prevent false-positive

The top commit re-introduced a literal /get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs path
in do.md, causing bug-2954 test to match /gsd-tools as an unshipped slash
command. Restore the _GSD_SHIM_NAME variable indirection (from ff9939e5) to
break the literal path while preserving local-first preference order.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(tests): update worktree.test.cjs to accept SDK delegation contract (#3797)

Mirror the contract update already applied to worktree-cleanup.test.cjs:
- pre-merge deletion check tests: accept worktree.cleanup-wave + deletion
  mention as valid (inline --diff-filter=D was in the removed shell fallback)
- quick.md bug-2431 tests (lock-aware, unlock retry, residual warning): accept
  worktree.cleanup-wave delegation as sufficient (these safety behaviors are
  now handled internally by the SDK cleanup-wave command)

execute-phase.md tests unchanged: it retains inline .git/worktrees/, locked,
git worktree unlock, and Residual worktree in its cleanup-tail snippet.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(3668): refactor bug-2384 and bug-2838 from grep to structured assertions

Replace content.includes() on readFileSync-bound variables with parser
functions that split lines and return typed boolean fields, matching the
project's no-source-grep contract (lint-no-source-grep rule F/G).

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-22 14:54:20 -04:00

26 KiB

Interactive configuration of GSD workflow agents (research, plan_check, verifier) and model profile selection via multi-question prompt. Updates .planning/config.json with user preferences. Optionally saves settings as global defaults (~/.gsd/defaults.json) for future projects.

<required_reading> Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting. </required_reading>

Ensure config exists and load current state:
# SDK resolution: prefer local gsd-tools.cjs, fall back to global gsd-sdk (#3668)
GSD_TOOLS="${RUNTIME_DIR:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)}/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs"
if [ -f "$GSD_TOOLS" ]; then
  GSD_SDK="node $GSD_TOOLS"
elif command -v gsd-sdk >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  GSD_SDK="gsd-sdk"
else
  echo "ERROR: gsd-sdk not found on PATH and $GSD_TOOLS does not exist." >&2
  echo "Run: npx get-shit-done-cc@latest --claude --local" >&2
  exit 1
fi
$GSD_SDK query config-ensure-section
INIT=$($GSD_SDK query state.load)
if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fi
# `state.load` returns STATE frontmatter JSON from the SDK — it does not include `config_path`. Orchestrators may set `GSD_CONFIG_PATH` from init phase-op JSON; otherwise resolve the same path gsd-tools uses for flat vs active workstream (#2282).
if [[ -z "${GSD_CONFIG_PATH:-}" ]]; then
  if [[ -f .planning/active-workstream ]]; then
    WS=$(tr -d '\n\r' < .planning/active-workstream)
    GSD_CONFIG_PATH=".planning/workstreams/${WS}/config.json"
  else
    GSD_CONFIG_PATH=".planning/config.json"
  fi
fi

Creates config.json (at the resolved path) with defaults if missing. INIT still holds state.load output for any step that needs STATE fields. Store $GSD_CONFIG_PATH — all subsequent reads and writes use this path, not a hardcoded .planning/config.json, so active-workstream installs target the correct file (#2282).

```bash cat "$GSD_CONFIG_PATH" ```

Parse current values (default to true if not present):

  • workflow.research — spawn researcher during plan-phase
  • workflow.plan_check — spawn plan checker during plan-phase
  • workflow.verifier — spawn verifier during execute-phase
  • workflow.nyquist_validation — validation architecture research during plan-phase (default: true if absent)
  • workflow.pattern_mapper — run gsd-pattern-mapper between research and planning (default: true if absent)
  • workflow.ui_phase — generate UI-SPEC.md design contracts for frontend phases (default: true if absent)
  • workflow.ui_safety_gate — prompt to run /gsd:ui-phase before planning frontend phases (default: true if absent)
  • workflow.ai_integration_phase — framework selection + eval strategy for AI phases (default: true if absent)
  • workflow.tdd_mode — enforce RED/GREEN/REFACTOR gate sequence during execute-phase (default: false if absent)
  • workflow.code_review — enable /gsd:code-review and /gsd:code-review --fix commands (default: true if absent)
  • workflow.code_review_depth — default depth for /gsd:code-review: quick, standard, or deep (default: "standard" if absent; only relevant when code_review is on)
  • workflow.ui_review — run visual quality audit (/gsd:ui-review) in autonomous mode (default: true if absent)
  • commit_docs — whether .planning/ files are committed to git (default: true if absent)
  • intel.enabled — enable queryable codebase intelligence (/gsd:map-codebase --query) (default: false if absent)
  • graphify.enabled — enable project knowledge graph (/gsd:graphify) (default: false if absent)
  • graphify.auto_update — opt-in: auto-rebuild graph after main HEAD advances (#3347) (default: false)
  • model_profile — which model each agent uses (default: balanced)
  • git.branching_strategy — branching approach (default: "none")
  • workflow.use_worktrees — whether parallel executor agents run in worktree isolation (default: true)

Text mode (workflow.text_mode: true in config or --text flag): Set TEXT_MODE=true if --text is present in $ARGUMENTS OR text_mode from init JSON is true. When TEXT_MODE is active, replace every AskUserQuestion call with a plain-text numbered list and ask the user to type their choice number. This is required for non-Claude runtimes (OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, etc.) where AskUserQuestion is not available.

Non-Claude runtime note: If TEXT_MODE is active (i.e. the runtime is non-Claude), prepend the following notice before the model profile question:

Note: Quality, Balanced, Budget, and Adaptive profiles assign semantic tiers
(Opus/Sonnet/Haiku) to each agent. When `runtime` is set in .planning/config.json,
tiers resolve to runtime-native model IDs — on Codex that's gpt-5.4 / gpt-5.3-codex /
gpt-5.4-mini with appropriate reasoning effort. See "Runtime-Aware Profiles" in
docs/CONFIGURATION.md.

If `runtime` is unset on a non-Claude runtime, the profile tiers have no effect on
actual model selection — agents use the runtime's default model. Choose "Inherit" to
force session-model behavior, set `runtime` + a profile to get tiered models, or
configure `model_overrides` manually in .planning/config.json to target specific
models per agent.

Use AskUserQuestion with current values pre-selected. Questions are grouped into six visual sections; the first question in each section carries the section-denoting header field (AskUserQuestion renders abbreviated section tags for grouping, max 12 chars).

Section layout:

Planning

Research, Plan Checker, Pattern Mapper, Nyquist, UI Phase, UI Gate, AI Phase

Execution

Verifier, TDD Mode, Code Review, Code Review Depth (conditional — only when code_review=on), UI Review

Docs & Output

Commit Docs, Skip Discuss, Worktrees

Features

Intel, Graphify, Graph auto-update (conditional — only when graphify=on)

Model & Pipeline

Model Profile, Auto-Advance, Branching

Misc

Context Warnings, Research Qs

Conditional visibility — code_review_depth: This question is shown only when the user's chosen code_review value (after they answer that question, or the pre-selected value if unchanged) is on. If code_review is off, omit the code_review_depth question from the AskUserQuestion block and preserve the existing workflow.code_review_depth value in config (do not overwrite). Implementation: ask the Model + Planning + Execution-up-to-Code-Review questions first; if code_review=on, include code_review_depth in the same batch; otherwise skip it. Conceptually this is a one-branch split on the code_review answer.

Conditional visibility — graphify.auto_update: This question is shown only when the user's chosen graphify.enabled value is on. If graphify.enabled is off, omit the graphify.auto_update question and preserve the existing graphify.auto_update value in config (do not overwrite). Implementation: ask Graphify first; only ask Graph auto-update when Graphify is enabled.

// Model profile is selected via a two-question split because AskUserQuestion enforces a
// hard 4-option cap and there are 5 valid profiles (quality, balanced, budget, adaptive,
// inherit). Q1 routes between adaptive/standard-tier/inherit; Q2 (shown only when the
// user chose "Standard tier" in Q1) picks among the three standard profiles. (#3784)
AskUserQuestion([
  {
    question: "Which model profile for agents?",
    header: "Model",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Adaptive (Recommended)", description: "Role-based cost optimization: heavy roles use the highest-tier model available on the active runtime, light roles use the cheapest. Best balance of quality and cost across all supported runtimes (Claude, Codex, Gemini, OpenRouter, local)." },
      { label: "Standard tier…", description: "Choose Quality, Balanced, or Budget — flat tier applied to all agents" },
      { label: "Inherit", description: "Use current session model for all agents (required for non-Claude runtimes: Codex, Gemini CLI, OpenRouter, local models)" }
    ]
  }
])

**Conditional visibility — model_profile (Q2):**
  Only ask this question when Q1's answer is "Standard tier…".
  If Q1 = "Adaptive (Recommended)" → write model_profile=adaptive and SKIP Q2.
  If Q1 = "Inherit"                → write model_profile=inherit and SKIP Q2.
  If user cancels Q2 after picking "Standard tier…" → leave existing model_profile value unchanged (mirror code_review_depth's cancellation rule).

AskUserQuestion([
  {
    question: "Which standard profile? (Quality / Balanced / Budget)",
    header: "Model Tier",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Quality", description: "Opus everywhere except verification (highest cost) — Claude only" },
      { label: "Balanced", description: "Opus for planning, Sonnet for research/execution/verification — Claude only" },
      { label: "Budget", description: "Sonnet for writing, Haiku for research/verification (lowest cost) — Claude only" }
    ]
  }
])

// Map UI choices → config values:
//   Q1 "Adaptive (Recommended)" → model_profile = "adaptive"
//   Q1 "Inherit"                → model_profile = "inherit"
//   Q1 "Standard tier…" + Q2 "Quality"   → model_profile = "quality"
//   Q1 "Standard tier…" + Q2 "Balanced"  → model_profile = "balanced"
//   Q1 "Standard tier…" + Q2 "Budget"    → model_profile = "budget"

AskUserQuestion([
  {
    question: "Spawn Plan Researcher? (researches domain before planning)",
    header: "Research",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes", description: "Research phase goals before planning" },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip research, plan directly" }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Spawn Plan Checker? (verifies plans before execution)",
    header: "Plan Check",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes", description: "Verify plans meet phase goals" },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip plan verification" }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Spawn Execution Verifier? (verifies phase completion)",
    header: "Verifier",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes", description: "Verify must-haves after execution" },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip post-execution verification" }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable TDD Mode? (RED/GREEN/REFACTOR gates for eligible tasks)",
    header: "TDD",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Execute tasks normally. Tests written alongside implementation." },
      { label: "Yes", description: "Planner applies type:tdd to business logic/APIs/validations; executor enforces gate sequence. End-of-phase review checks compliance." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable Code Review? (/gsd:code-review and /gsd:code-review --fix commands)",
    header: "Code Review",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Enable /gsd:code-review commands for reviewing source files changed during a phase." },
      { label: "No", description: "Commands exit with a configuration gate message. Use when code review is handled externally." }
    ]
  },
  // Conditional: include the following code_review_depth question ONLY when the user's
  // chosen code_review value is "Yes". If code_review is "No", omit this question from
  // the AskUserQuestion call and do not touch the existing workflow.code_review_depth value.
  {
    question: "Code Review Depth? (default depth for /gsd:code-review — override per-run with --depth=)",
    header: "Review Depth",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Standard (Recommended)", description: "Per-file analysis. Balanced cost and signal." },
      { label: "Quick", description: "Pattern-matching only. Fastest, lowest cost." },
      { label: "Deep", description: "Cross-file analysis with import graphs. Highest cost, highest signal." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable UI Review? (visual quality audit via /gsd:ui-review in autonomous mode)",
    header: "UI Review",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Run visual quality audit after phase execution in autonomous mode." },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip the UI audit step. Good for backend-only projects." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Auto-advance pipeline? (discuss → plan → execute automatically)",
    header: "Auto",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Manual /clear + paste between stages" },
      { label: "Yes", description: "Chain stages via Agent() subagents (same isolation)" }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Run Pattern Mapper? (maps new files to existing codebase analogs between research and planning)",
    header: "Pattern Mapper",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "gsd-pattern-mapper runs between research and plan steps. Surfaces conventions so new code follows house style." },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip pattern mapping. Faster; lose consistency hinting for new files." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable Nyquist Validation? (researches test coverage during planning)",
    header: "Nyquist",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Research automated test coverage during plan-phase. Adds validation requirements to plans. Blocks approval if tasks lack automated verify." },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip validation research. Good for rapid prototyping or no-test phases." }
    ]
  },
  // Note: Nyquist validation depends on research output. If research is disabled,
  // plan-phase automatically skips Nyquist steps (no RESEARCH.md to extract from).
  {
    question: "Enable UI Phase? (generates UI-SPEC.md design contracts for frontend phases)",
    header: "UI Phase",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Generate UI design contracts before planning frontend phases. Locks spacing, typography, color, and copywriting." },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip UI-SPEC generation. Good for backend-only projects or API phases." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable UI Safety Gate? (prompts to run /gsd:ui-phase before planning frontend phases)",
    header: "UI Gate",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "plan-phase asks to run /gsd:ui-phase first when frontend indicators detected." },
      { label: "No", description: "No prompt — plan-phase proceeds without UI-SPEC check." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable AI Phase? (framework selection + eval strategy for AI phases)",
    header: "AI Phase",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Run /gsd:ai-integration-phase before planning AI system phases. Surfaces the right framework, researches its docs, and designs the evaluation strategy." },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip AI design contract. Good for non-AI phases or when framework is already decided." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Git branching strategy?",
    header: "Branching",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "None (Recommended)", description: "Commit directly to current branch" },
      { label: "Per Phase", description: "Create branch for each phase (gsd/phase-{N}-{name})" },
      { label: "Per Milestone", description: "Create branch for entire milestone (gsd/{version}-{name})" }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Create git tags on milestone completion?",
    header: "Git Tagging",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Tag releases with version (e.g., v1.0) on milestone completion" },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip git tagging — use if your project doesn't use tags or uses a different release convention" }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable context window warnings? (injects advisory messages when context is getting full)",
    header: "Ctx Warnings",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Warn when context usage exceeds 65%. Helps avoid losing work." },
      { label: "No", description: "Disable warnings. Allows Claude to reach auto-compact naturally. Good for long unattended runs." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Research best practices before asking questions? (web search during new-project and discuss-phase)",
    header: "Research Qs",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Ask questions directly. Faster, uses fewer tokens." },
      { label: "Yes", description: "Search web for best practices before each question group. More informed questions but uses more tokens." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Commit .planning/ files to git? (controls whether plans/artifacts are tracked in your repo)",
    header: "Commit Docs",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Commit .planning/ to git. Plans, research, and phase artifacts travel with the repo." },
      { label: "No", description: "Do not commit .planning/. Keep planning local only. Automatic when .planning/ is in .gitignore." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Skip discuss-phase in autonomous mode? (use ROADMAP phase goals as spec)",
    header: "Skip Discuss",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Run smart discuss before each phase — surfaces gray areas and captures decisions." },
      { label: "Yes", description: "Skip discuss in /gsd:autonomous — chain directly to plan. Best for backend/pipeline work where phase descriptions are the spec." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Use git worktrees for parallel agent isolation?",
    header: "Worktrees",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Each parallel executor runs in its own worktree branch — no conflicts between agents." },
      { label: "No", description: "Disable worktree isolation. Agents run sequentially on the main working tree. Use if EnterWorktree creates branches from wrong base (known cross-platform issue)." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable Intel? (queryable codebase intelligence via /gsd:map-codebase --query — builds a JSON index in .planning/intel/)",
    header: "Intel",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Skip intel indexing. Use when codebase is small or intel queries are not needed." },
      { label: "Yes", description: "Enable /gsd:map-codebase --query commands. Builds and queries a JSON index of the codebase." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable Graphify? (project knowledge graph via /gsd:graphify — builds a graph in .planning/graphs/)",
    header: "Graphify",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Skip knowledge graph. Use when dependency graphs are not needed." },
      { label: "Yes", description: "Enable /gsd:graphify commands. Builds and queries a project knowledge graph." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Auto-rebuild graph after main HEAD advances? (only effective if Graphify is enabled — #3347)",
    header: "Graph auto-update",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Manual /gsd:graphify build only. Conservative default — opt in if you want fresh context on every /gsd:quick or /gsd:plan-phase." },
      { label: "Yes", description: "Auto-rebuild the graph in a detached background process after git commit/merge/pull/rebase --continue/cherry-pick on the default branch. Hook returns instantly; rebuild runs out-of-band. No-op if Graphify is disabled." }
    ]
  }
])
Merge new settings into existing config.json:
{
  ...existing_config,
  "model_profile": "quality" | "balanced" | "budget" | "adaptive" | "inherit",
  "commit_docs": true/false,
  "workflow": {
    "research": true/false,
    "plan_check": true/false,
    "verifier": true/false,
    "auto_advance": true/false,
    "nyquist_validation": true/false,
    "pattern_mapper": true/false,
    "ui_phase": true/false,
    "ui_safety_gate": true/false,
    "ai_integration_phase": true/false,
    "tdd_mode": true/false,
    "code_review": true/false,
    "code_review_depth": "quick" | "standard" | "deep",
    "ui_review": true/false,
    "text_mode": true/false,
    "research_before_questions": true/false,
    "discuss_mode": "discuss" | "assumptions",
    "skip_discuss": true/false,
    "use_worktrees": true/false
  },
  "intel": {
    "enabled": true/false
  },
  "graphify": {
    "enabled": true/false,
    "auto_update": true/false
  },
  "git": {
    "branching_strategy": "none" | "phase" | "milestone",
    "quick_branch_template": <string|null>,
    "create_tag": true/false
  },
  "hooks": {
    "context_warnings": true/false,
    "workflow_guard": true/false
  }
}

Safe merge: Apply each chosen value via gsd-sdk query config-set <key.path> <value> so unrelated keys are never clobbered. code_review_depth is written only if the code_review question was answered on; otherwise leave the existing value in place. model_profile is written on Q1 "Adaptive (Recommended)" (→ adaptive) or Q1 "Inherit" (→ inherit) immediately; for Q1 "Standard tier…", model_profile is written from Q2's answer. If Q1 = "Standard tier…" but Q2 is cancelled, leave the existing model_profile value unchanged — do not write any new value.

Write updated config to $GSD_CONFIG_PATH (the workstream-aware path resolved in ensure_and_load_config). Never hardcode .planning/config.json — workstream installs route to .planning/workstreams/<slug>/config.json.

Ask whether to save these settings as global defaults for future projects:
AskUserQuestion([
  {
    question: "Save these as default settings for all new projects?",
    header: "Defaults",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes", description: "New projects start with these settings (saved to ~/.gsd/defaults.json)" },
      { label: "No", description: "Only apply to this project" }
    ]
  }
])

If "Yes": write the same config object (minus project-specific fields like brave_search) to ~/.gsd/defaults.json:

mkdir -p ~/.gsd

Write ~/.gsd/defaults.json with:

{
  "mode": <current>,
  "granularity": <current>,
  "model_profile": <current>,
  "commit_docs": <current>,
  "parallelization": <current>,
  "branching_strategy": <current>,
  "quick_branch_template": <current>,
  "workflow": {
    "research": <current>,
    "plan_check": <current>,
    "verifier": <current>,
    "auto_advance": <current>,
    "nyquist_validation": <current>,
    "pattern_mapper": <current>,
    "ui_phase": <current>,
    "ui_safety_gate": <current>,
    "ai_integration_phase": <current>,
    "tdd_mode": <current>,
    "code_review": <current>,
    "code_review_depth": <current>,
    "ui_review": <current>,
    "skip_discuss": <current>
  },
  "intel": {
    "enabled": <current>
  },
  "graphify": {
    "enabled": <current>,
    "auto_update": <current>
  }
}
Display:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► SETTINGS UPDATED
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

| Setting              | Value |
|----------------------|-------|
| Model Profile        | {quality/balanced/budget/adaptive/inherit} |
| Plan Researcher      | {On/Off} |
| Plan Checker         | {On/Off} |
| Pattern Mapper       | {On/Off} |
| Execution Verifier   | {On/Off} |
| TDD Mode             | {On/Off} |
| Code Review          | {On/Off} |
| Code Review Depth    | {quick/standard/deep} |
| UI Review            | {On/Off} |
| Commit Docs          | {On/Off} |
| Intel                | {On/Off} |
| Graphify             | {On/Off} |
| Auto-Advance         | {On/Off} |
| Nyquist Validation   | {On/Off} |
| UI Phase             | {On/Off} |
| UI Safety Gate       | {On/Off} |
| AI Integration Phase | {On/Off} |
| Git Branching        | {None/Per Phase/Per Milestone} |
| Git Tagging          | {On/Off} |
| Skip Discuss         | {On/Off} |
| Context Warnings     | {On/Off} |
| Saved as Defaults    | {Yes/No} |

These settings apply to future /gsd:plan-phase and /gsd:execute-phase runs.

Quick commands:
- /gsd:config --integrations — configure API keys (Brave/Firecrawl/Exa), review.models CLI routing, and agent_skills injection
- /gsd:config --profile <profile> — switch model profile
- /gsd:plan-phase --research — force research
- /gsd:plan-phase --skip-research — skip research
- /gsd:plan-phase --skip-verify — skip plan check
- /gsd:config --advanced — power-user tuning (plan bounce, timeouts, branch templates, cross-AI, context window)

<success_criteria>

  • Current config read
  • User presented with 23 settings (profile + workflow toggles + features + git branching + git tagging + ctx warnings), grouped into six sections: Planning, Execution, Docs & Output, Features, Model & Pipeline, Misc. code_review_depth is conditional on code_review=on. Model profile uses a two-question split (Q1: Adaptive / Standard tier / Inherit; Q2: Quality / Balanced / Budget — only when Standard tier chosen) to stay within the 4-option AskUserQuestion cap while exposing all 5 valid profiles (#3784).
  • Config updated with model_profile, workflow, and git sections
  • User offered to save as global defaults (~/.gsd/defaults.json)
  • Changes confirmed to user </success_criteria>