ddde001af6
* test(#3873): failing-first locale parity, plus tripwires for what must not move Pins ADR-3473 §8.8 at the artifact a reader actually sees. The English STATE.md reference carries a Status lifecycle section that is missing from all four translations — the section documenting the status enum whose clobbering is #3853. The test derives the heading set rather than hard-coding the missing one, and names the locale and the heading when it fails. Two tripwires that must pass today and after. The field-drift guard still catches a re-derived fallback ladder: §8.8 instructs deleting that script, and that instruction rests on a wrong premise about what it guards, so the test stops a future reader from deleting it on the ADR's word. And last_activity's label resolution is pinned to what ships today, because it is declared in one of the two tables this phase consolidates and not the other — the consolidation must not silently pick a side. The locale test buckets under docs rather than state, which is what it tests; that bucket is allowlisted with justification rather than folded into an unrelated docs suite. It reads only markdown, so it carries no allow-test-rule marker — a marker there would suppress nothing and would grow the unverified pool against its ceiling. Refs #3873 * feat(#3873): one schema owns the STATE.md key set, three tables become projections ADR-3473 §8.8. The key set was declared in four places that had to agree by hand and already did not: FIELD_CLASSIFICATION, FRONTMATTER_BODY_SOURCE, FRONTMATTER_KEY_TO_BODY_LABEL and buildStateFrontmatter's emit behavior. One frozen null-prototype schema now declares each key's type, enum, cardinality, source, preservation, body source, body label, accepted parse shapes and whether it is emitted unconditionally; the three tables are derived from it at module load. The projections are byte-identical to the literals they replace, key order included, and the parity tests compare against verbatim copies of today's tables rather than re-deriving both sides from the schema — a parity test fed from one source proves nothing, which is how a consolidation ships a changed policy under a green test. last_activity was the live disagreement: present in one table, absent from the other. The schema declares what ships today rather than the tidier answer, and a test pins it. The schema is a leaf module and owns the four field-policy types, re-exported from state-transition so existing importers are untouched — the same split health-diagnostic-types made to break a CJS require cycle. Refs #3873 * feat(#3873): generate the schema-derived regions, parity-check the prose tables ADR-3473 §8.8's generator half. gen-state-md-docs.cjs owns marked regions in the shipped template and all five reference docs, follows gen-features.cjs's fail-closed contract, and is wired into regen:derived and lint:generated-sync. The Status lifecycle section was missing from all four translations — the section documenting the status enum behind #3853 — and is now generated into every locale. Field cardinality is a new generated table: pure schema data, no prose, so nothing to lose. The Field-reference and Status-values tables are parity-CHECKED rather than generated. Their Purpose, When-populated and Matched-text columns are genuinely hand-translated per locale, and §8.8 itself says prose stays hand-translated; generating them from an English registry would overwrite four locales' translations on every write. The row set is checked against the schema instead, so a key added to one and not the other fails, which is what field drift actually means. Building that check found last_activity_desc undocumented in all five tables. Three keys the docs describe are absent from the schema — active_phase, next_action, next_phases. They are grandfathered by name, not by wildcard, so a fourth fails: a declared gap with a forcing function rather than a silent one. Refs #3873 * fix(#3873): declare what the parsers do, and close the shape-parity gap Two declarations in the new schema described intended behavior rather than actual — the defect class this epic exists to end, committed inside the epic. Both were caught by executing the parsers instead of reading their docstrings. current_plan.acceptedShapes claimed ['N', 'N of M']. Standalone, the hybrid shape errors; the path that looks like support is parseInt truncating '2 of 5' to 2 and discarding the rest. Narrowed to ['N']. The parser is deliberately NOT fixed here: that is #3784 and PR #3791 is already doing it. When #3791 lands this row must widen, and the shape test will go red until it does — the schema and the parser cannot drift apart quietly, which is what §8.8's checked-not- generated rule is for. STATUS_LIFECYCLE_ENUM claimed to be the closed set status can hold. normalizeStateStatus passes unrecognized prose through unchanged, so it is not closed at runtime. The seven members are the canonical values it maps onto; the docstring now says that and the test asserts the real lenient contract. Closes the acceptance item that a test asserts the parsers accept exactly the declared shapes: the check is table-driven over every row carrying acceptedShapes, guarded against passing vacuously on an empty set, and fails loudly if a future row has no registered driver. Adds the unwired-label throw and the fast-check property that every projection agrees with its schema row. Refs #3873 * fix(#3873): keep the shipped template's frontmatter first, and make row 27 able to fail The remote matrix caught 12 failures with one cause. Making the template's frontmatter a generated region wrapped it in its own yaml fence ahead of the markdown fence, so extractFileTemplate and readShippedStateTemplateBody — which both match the single markdown block — found the heading first, not the frontmatter. That breaks the contract every new project's STATE.md is created from: bug #21 and epic #1969 B8 pin that the File Template block starts with frontmatter and carries gsd_state_version. The markers now sit inside the single markdown fence, so the fence opens before the frontmatter and the region still ends ahead of the heading. Same layout as before this phase, with markers embedded rather than a second fence. Row 27 existed to catch exactly this and did not, because it was writer-seeded: it asserted against the generator's own output shape, so it passed on the broken template. It now parses the fence the way production does and was verified to fail against the broken shape before being trusted against the fixed one. A test that would not have caught the bug it exists to prevent is worse than no test. The emitted-attribution failure was separate and the fragment was the wrong remedy: gsd-core/templates/state.md self-attributes under a verbatim-copy identity rule, so a diff touching it needs no acknowledgment. Fragment deleted rather than left explaining nothing. Refs #3873 * docs(#3873): how to change the STATE.md schema The phase gate was right and my docs artifact was wrong. I listed lint:generated-sync as the second enablement step, which is a verification command dressed as one, and then claimed a one-step sequence owed no how-to. The real sequence is build:lib then regen:derived, and the ordering is a trap: the generator reads the COMPILED schema, so regenerating before building regenerates against the previous schema and commits artifacts that look plausible while disagreeing with the code just written. A reference table cannot carry an ordering dependency; that is what the how-to test is for. The page covers adding, changing and removing a key, every reason code the check emits and what to do about each, what is generated versus hand-translated and why the two prose-bearing tables are parity-checked instead of generated, adding a language, and the three grandfathered keys. Indexed from docs/README.md. Refs #3873 * chore(#3873): backfill changeset PR number --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Documentação do GSD Core
A documentação está organizada em quatro quadrantes: tutoriais ajudam você a aprender na prática, guias de instruções resolvem tarefas específicas, referência apresenta fatos autorizados, e explicação explora conceitos e decisões de design.
Versões por idioma: English · Português (pt-BR) · 日本語 · 简体中文
Tutorials
- Seu primeiro projeto — da instalação à primeira fase entregue, um caminho garantido
- Integrando uma base de código existente — leve o GSD Core a um repositório já existente
How-to guides
- Instalar no seu ambiente de execução — passos de instalação específicos para cada um dos 15 ambientes de execução suportados
- Discutir uma fase — registrar decisões de implementação antes do início do planejamento
- Planejar uma fase — executar pesquisa, decompor o trabalho e verificar a qualidade do plano
- Executar uma fase — rodar planos em ondas paralelas com subagentes com contexto renovado
- Verificar e entregar — revisar o trabalho concluído, diagnosticar falhas e criar o PR
- Rodar fases de forma autônoma — usar o modo autônomo para execução de fases sem supervisão
- Lidar com tarefas rápidas e ágeis — usar
/gsd-quicke/gsd-fastpara trabalho avulso fora do ciclo de fases - Configurar perfis de modelo — alternar entre níveis de modelo: qualidade, equilibrado e econômico
- Configurar revisão entre IAs — configurar uma segunda IA para revisar o código produzido pelo agente principal
- Trabalhar em paralelo com workstreams — executar linhas de trabalho independentes simultaneamente usando workstreams
- Isolar trabalho com workspaces — usar workspaces para isolar mudanças experimentais ou arriscadas
- Depurar uma execução com falha — diagnosticar e recuperar de execuções de fase quebradas ou incompletas
- Explorar e esboçar — usar
/gsd-spikee/gsd-sketchpara trabalho exploratório antes de comprometer com um plano - Projetar uma fase de UI — usar o ciclo de fase de UI para trabalho de frontend e visual
- Conduzir o GSD a partir de uma issue do rastreador — iniciar uma fase a partir de uma issue do GitHub, Linear ou Jira
- Migrar do GSD 2 — atualizar um projeto GSD 2 existente para o GSD Core
- Atualizar o GSD — executar novamente o instalador para obter a versão mais recente
- Recuperar e solucionar problemas — corrigir problemas comuns, reconstruir contexto e desinstalar
Referência
- Comandos — todos os comandos com flags e exemplos
- Configuração — schema completo de configuração, perfis de modelo, estratégias de branching git
- Ferramentas CLI — API programática
gsd-tools.cjspara workflows e agentes - Funcionalidades — índice completo de funcionalidades
- Inventário — skills instaladas e mapa de superfície
- Schema do STATE.md — referência campo a campo para
.planning/STATE.md - Schema do CONTEXT.md — referência campo a campo para
.planning/phases/<N>/CONTEXT.md - Schema do PLAN.md — referência campo a campo para
.planning/phases/<N>/PLAN.md - Artefatos de planejamento — todos os arquivos
.planning/e seus papéis
Explicação
- Engenharia de contexto — como a degradação de contexto se forma e como o GSD Core a previne
- O ciclo de fase — racional de design para o ciclo Discuss → Plan → Execute → Verify → Ship
- Orquestração multi-agente — como os subagentes são criados, delimitados e coordenados
- Modelo de segurança — limites de confiança, permissões e automação segura
- Arquitetura — arquitetura do sistema, modelo de agentes e fluxo de dados
- Modos de discussão — modo de suposições vs. modo de entrevista para
/gsd-discuss-phase - Monitoramento de contexto — arquitetura do hook de monitoramento da janela de contexto
- Orquestração orientada por issues — receita para conduzir o GSD a partir de uma issue do rastreador usando primitivos existentes
Relacionados
- README raiz — página inicial, início rápido e visão geral da documentação
- Changelog — histórico de versões