3c08315a5e
* test(#3827): new-mode routing approval gate before roadmapper (failing first) * fix(#3827): new-mode routing gate — classify approval no longer authorizes scaffold writes The route_new_mode step delegated to gsd-roadmapper (PROJECT.md, REQUIREMENTS.md, ROADMAP.md, STATE.md creation + commit) with no gate: the discovery gate approved classification only, and the zero-conflict branch said 'proceed to routing silently'. Merge mode previews its diff and gates via approve-revise-abort; new mode now shows the exact destinations and requires Create planning setup | Keep synthesized intel only | Abort, per the skill contract's routing-gate requirement. The keep-intel-only choice is the analysis-only path the issue asks for: no roadmapper, no destination writes, intel preserved; finalize labels it 'new (intel only)' and points at /gsd:new-project instead of plan-phase. Ambiguous gate answers re-ask once, then treat as Abort — never infer Create. Zero-conflict wording is mode-aware: silence about conflicts is not authorization to write. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: ingest-docs.md — #3827: +routing gate display block, AskUserQuestion contract, three disposition branches (incl. the intel-only no-write path), ambiguous-answer rule, intel-only finalize line, mode-aware zero-conflict pointer; a real behavioral gate, not incidental bloat. * chore(#3827): changeset fragment (pr number backfilled after PR creation) * chore(#3827): backfill changeset PR number (4037) --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Changeset Fragments
This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.
Why
Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.
See #2975 for the full rationale.
Adding a fragment
node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
--type Fixed \
--pr 1234 \
--body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"
This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.
Format
---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.
Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.
Opting out
PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.
At release time
Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:
node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty
This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.
Archived fragments
.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.