#2551/#3182/#2361 are pre-migration get-shit-done-redux issue numbers with no equivalent in open-gsd/gsd-core; they mislead triage and manufacture phantom blockers. Repoint to real successors (#717 byte-budget rework, #720) or rewrite as prose referencing the discuss-phase/modes progressive-disclosure split. Correct co-located 'line budget'/'<500 lines' framing to the byte-based reality (#717). Add a CI guard (tests/no-phantom-issue-refs.test.cjs) that fails if a phantom ref is reintroduced. SSH-key patterns (id_ed25519) left untouched. No user-facing runtime behavior change. Closes #1073
106 lines
5.0 KiB
JavaScript
106 lines
5.0 KiB
JavaScript
// allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product
|
|
// Workflow .md / agent .md / command .md / reference .md files — their text
|
|
// IS what the runtime loads. Testing text content tests the deployed contract.
|
|
// Per CONTRIBUTING.md exception matrix.
|
|
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Bugs #2549, #2550, #2552: discuss-phase context bloat and cache invalidation.
|
|
*
|
|
* #2549: load_prior_context must cap prior CONTEXT.md reads (was O(phases))
|
|
* #2550: scout_codebase must select maps by phase type (was always all 7)
|
|
* #2552: scout_codebase must not instruct split reads of the same file
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const { test, describe } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('node:fs');
|
|
const path = require('node:path');
|
|
|
|
const DISCUSS_PHASE = path.join(
|
|
__dirname, '..', 'gsd-core', 'workflows', 'discuss-phase.md',
|
|
);
|
|
// After the discuss-phase progressive-disclosure split (#717), the scout_codebase phase-type
|
|
// table and split-reads warning live in references/scout-codebase.md.
|
|
const SCOUT_REF = path.join(
|
|
__dirname, '..', 'gsd-core', 'references', 'scout-codebase.md',
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
function readDiscussContext() {
|
|
// Both files are required after the discuss-phase/modes split — fail loudly if either is missing
|
|
// rather than silently weakening the regression coverage.
|
|
for (const p of [DISCUSS_PHASE, SCOUT_REF]) {
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(p), `Required discuss-phase context source missing: ${p}`);
|
|
}
|
|
return [DISCUSS_PHASE, SCOUT_REF].map(p => fs.readFileSync(p, 'utf-8')).join('\n');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe('discuss-phase context fixes (#2549, #2550, #2552)', () => {
|
|
let src;
|
|
test('discuss-phase.md source exists', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(DISCUSS_PHASE), 'discuss-phase.md must exist');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
fs.existsSync(SCOUT_REF),
|
|
'references/scout-codebase.md must exist after the discuss-phase/modes progressive-disclosure split',
|
|
);
|
|
src = readDiscussContext();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── #2549: load_prior_context cap ──────────────────────────────────────
|
|
test('#2549: load_prior_context must NOT instruct reading ALL prior CONTEXT.md files', () => {
|
|
if (!src) src = readDiscussContext();
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!src.includes('For each CONTEXT.md where phase number < current phase'),
|
|
'load_prior_context must not unboundedly read all prior CONTEXT.md files',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('#2549: load_prior_context must reference a bounded read (3 phases or DECISIONS-INDEX)', () => {
|
|
// Read ONLY the parent file — `src.includes('3')` against the
|
|
// concatenated source can be satisfied by unrelated occurrences of "3"
|
|
// in scout-codebase.md (e.g., "3-5 most relevant files"), masking a
|
|
// regression where the parent drops the bounded-read instruction.
|
|
const parent = fs.readFileSync(DISCUSS_PHASE, 'utf-8');
|
|
const hasBound = /\b(?:most recent|latest|last|up to)\s+3\b[\s\S]{0,160}\bprior CONTEXT\.md\b/i.test(parent);
|
|
const hasIndex = parent.includes('DECISIONS-INDEX.md');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
hasBound || hasIndex,
|
|
'load_prior_context must reference a bounded read (e.g., most recent 3 phases) or DECISIONS-INDEX.md',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── #2550: scout_codebase phase-type selection ──────────────────────────
|
|
test('#2550: scout_codebase must not instruct reading all 7 codebase maps', () => {
|
|
if (!src) src = readDiscussContext();
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!src.includes('Read the most relevant ones (CONVENTIONS.md, STRUCTURE.md, STACK.md based on phase type)'),
|
|
'scout_codebase must not use the old vague "most relevant" instruction without a selection table',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('#2550: scout_codebase must include a phase-type-to-maps selection table', () => {
|
|
if (!src) src = readDiscussContext();
|
|
// The table maps phase types to specific map selections
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
src.includes('Phase type') && src.includes('Read these maps'),
|
|
'scout_codebase must include a phase-type to map-selection table',
|
|
);
|
|
// Key phase types must be covered
|
|
assert.ok(src.includes('UI') || src.includes('frontend'), 'Table must cover UI/frontend phases');
|
|
assert.ok(src.includes('Backend') || src.includes('API'), 'Table must cover backend phases');
|
|
assert.ok(src.includes('Testing'), 'Table must cover testing phases');
|
|
assert.ok(src.includes('Mixed'), 'Table must have a fallback for mixed/unclear phases');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── #2552: no split reads ───────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
test('#2552: scout_codebase must explicitly prohibit split reads of the same file', () => {
|
|
if (!src) src = readDiscussContext();
|
|
const prohibitsSplit = src.includes('split reads') || src.includes('split read');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
prohibitsSplit,
|
|
'scout_codebase must explicitly warn against split reads (same file, two offsets) that break prompt cache',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|