Files
msd-core/tests/coverage-uat-routing.test.cjs
Tom Boucher 5b5d473e13 chore(#3465): remove 22 verified-vestigial allow-test-rule markers (#3494)
Phase 1 of #3464. Removes the `// allow-test-rule:` marker from 22 test files
where it is provably vestigial, and tightens the ratchet ceiling in
scripts/lint-allow-test-rule-refs.ceiling.json from 305 to 285.

Eligibility is decided by two independent AST discriminators, both
conservative (any doubt => keep):

(a) Read-target type. Every readFileSync/readFile call in the file resolves
    statically to a prose/config extension (.md/.json/.yml/.yaml/.toml/.txt),
    or the file performs no reads at all. Any read of a source extension
    (.cjs/.js/.mjs/.ts/.cts/.mts/.jsx/.tsx), any dynamic/unresolvable path,
    and any other extension all disqualify the file.

(b) Marker context. Every `allow-test-rule:` occurrence is a genuine comment
    node, never string- or template-literal payload. A marker that lives
    inside a RuleTester `code:` fixture is test DATA, not a suppression
    directive; stripping it corrupts the test. tests/eslint-rules.test.cjs is
    the one such fixture host and is deliberately untouched.

An earlier attempt at this phase classified markers by "strip it and see if
local/no-source-grep still passes" and was reverted in full before commit.
That oracle is unsound: the rule only fires on a literal .cjs/.js/.ts path
containing a quoted bin/lib/gsd-core/src segment, tracked one hop from the
binding, so files that genuinely source-grep real JavaScript pass it
silently -- tests/no-unbounded-spawn-allowlist.test.cjs (reads test sources
through a listTestFiles() walk) and tests/claude-imperative-reference.test.cjs
(matches bin/install.js through an intermediate variable) both cleared it
while being real source-greps. The rule's implementation is narrower than its
intent, so it cannot adjudicate whether an exemption is load-bearing.

Scope is limited to comment deletions: the diff over the test tree is 100%
line removals with zero insertions, and no executable line is altered.

On the ceiling value. The measured count at this HEAD is 283, so 285 leaves 2
slack -- deliberate, and well inside the documented grace band of 3. Pinning
the ceiling to the exact count makes this change effectively unmergeable: any
concurrent PR that lands one marker-bearing test file re-reds it. That race
fired twice while preparing this branch (once mid-rebase taking the count
304->305 on next, once between rebase and the verification run taking it
282->283), and it is the same race that broke next in #3461. A ceiling of
actual+2 preserves a merge window while still ratcheting 305 -> 285.

Known limit, disclosed rather than papered over: this clears 22 of 303
markers and does not reach #3464's trend-to-zero goal. Most of the remaining
markers sit on dynamic-path reads, commonly a hoisted `const p =
path.join(tmpDir, 'STATE.md')` whose target is prose but is unresolvable to
this classifier. A stricter one-hop const resolution would flip an estimated
95 more; that is deliberately left to a follow-up so it can be reviewed on
its own evidence.

Marker discovery reads bytes rather than shelling out to grep:
tests/security-prompt-injection.security.test.cjs carries a literal NUL byte
(an intentional injection fixture) that makes grep treat it as binary and skip
it, which is why the true marked-file count is 303 and not the 302 a shell
scan reports.

Closes #3465

Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 13:10:49 -04:00

211 lines
8.0 KiB
JavaScript

// verify-work.md / execute-plan.md / summary*.md are workflow & template text the
// runtime loads and executes. Asserting that they wire the deterministic coverage
// classifier (and preserve the legacy prose fall-through) tests the deployed
// contract. Per CONTRIBUTING.md exception matrix. The behavioral classification
// itself is exercised through the CLI (no source-grep) in the first half of this
// file and in coverage-metadata-parser.test.cjs.
'use strict';
/**
* Issue #1602 — `verify-work` consumes the SUMMARY `coverage:` block
* deterministically (auto-pass vs human-UAT), and the authoring/consuming
* workflows + templates are wired for it.
*/
const { describe, test } = require('node:test');
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
const fs = require('node:fs');
const path = require('node:path');
const { createTempProject, cleanup, runGsdTools } = require('./helpers.cjs');
const ROOT = path.resolve(__dirname, '..');
const PHASE_DIR_REL = path.join('.planning', 'phases', '01-foundation');
function summaryDoc(frontmatterBodyLines) {
return [
'---',
'phase: 01-foundation',
'plan: 01',
'status: complete',
...frontmatterBodyLines,
'---',
'',
'# Phase 1 Plan 1: Foundation Summary',
'',
'## Accomplishments',
'- Built the thing',
'',
].join('\n');
}
function writeSummary(tmpDir, frontmatterBodyLines) {
const dir = path.join(tmpDir, PHASE_DIR_REL);
fs.mkdirSync(dir, { recursive: true });
const rel = path.join(PHASE_DIR_REL, '01-01-SUMMARY.md');
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(tmpDir, rel), summaryDoc(frontmatterBodyLines), 'utf-8');
return rel;
}
function classify(tmpDir, rel) {
const result = runGsdTools(`uat classify-coverage --summary ${rel}`, tmpDir);
assert.ok(result.success, `command should succeed: ${result.error || result.output}`);
return JSON.parse(result.output);
}
describe('verify-work coverage consumption — issue scenarios (behavioral, via CLI)', () => {
test('(a) all entries auto-covered => all_auto_covered true, nothing presented', (t) => {
const tmpDir = createTempProject();
t.after(() => cleanup(tmpDir));
const rel = writeSummary(tmpDir, [
'coverage:',
' - id: D1',
' description: "covered one"',
' verification:',
' - kind: unit',
' ref: "tests/a.test.ts#a"',
' status: pass',
' human_judgment: false',
' - id: D2',
' description: "covered two"',
' verification:',
' - kind: integration',
' ref: "tests/b.test.ts#b"',
' status: pass',
' human_judgment: false',
]);
const out = classify(tmpDir, rel);
assert.equal(out.all_auto_covered, true);
assert.equal(out.present.length, 0);
assert.equal(out.auto_passed.length, 2);
});
test('(b) mixed => only the non-auto entries are presented', (t) => {
const tmpDir = createTempProject();
t.after(() => cleanup(tmpDir));
const rel = writeSummary(tmpDir, [
'coverage:',
' - id: D1',
' description: "auto covered"',
' verification:',
' - kind: unit',
' ref: "tests/a.test.ts#a"',
' status: pass',
' human_judgment: false',
' - id: D2',
' description: "needs judgment"',
' verification:',
' - kind: automated_ui',
' ref: "playwright:x.png"',
' status: pass',
' human_judgment: true',
' rationale: "visual sign-off"',
' - id: D3',
' description: "uncovered"',
' verification: []',
' human_judgment: false',
]);
const out = classify(tmpDir, rel);
assert.equal(out.total, 3);
assert.equal(out.all_auto_covered, false);
assert.equal(out.auto_passed.length, 1);
assert.equal(out.auto_passed[0].id, 'D1');
const presentedIds = out.present.map((e) => e.id).sort();
assert.deepEqual(presentedIds, ['D2', 'D3']);
});
test('(c) absent coverage block => legacy mode (caller uses prose extraction unchanged)', (t) => {
const tmpDir = createTempProject();
t.after(() => cleanup(tmpDir));
const rel = writeSummary(tmpDir, ['tags: [auth]']);
const out = classify(tmpDir, rel);
assert.equal(out.mode, 'legacy');
});
test('(d) fail-safe: an entry the executor left unclassified routes to present, never auto', (t) => {
const tmpDir = createTempProject();
t.after(() => cleanup(tmpDir));
const rel = writeSummary(tmpDir, [
'coverage:',
' - id: D1',
' description: "left unclassified"',
' verification: []',
' human_judgment: true',
' rationale: "Coverage not determined at authoring time — verifier must classify"',
]);
const out = classify(tmpDir, rel);
assert.equal(out.auto_passed.length, 0);
assert.equal(out.present.length, 1);
assert.equal(out.present[0].reason, 'human_judgment');
});
});
describe('verify-work.md is wired to the deterministic classifier (deployed contract)', () => {
const VERIFY_WORK = fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'gsd-core', 'workflows', 'verify-work.md'), 'utf-8');
test('extract_tests invokes the deterministic classify-coverage verb', () => {
assert.ok(
/uat[. ]classify-coverage/.test(VERIFY_WORK),
'verify-work.md extract_tests must invoke the `uat classify-coverage` verb',
);
});
test('preserves the legacy prose fall-through for un-migrated SUMMARYs', () => {
assert.ok(
/legacy/i.test(VERIFY_WORK) && /fall (through|back)/i.test(VERIFY_WORK),
'verify-work.md must describe the legacy fall-through when the coverage block is absent',
);
});
test('routes human_judgment / non-passing entries to human UAT', () => {
assert.ok(
VERIFY_WORK.includes('human_judgment') || VERIFY_WORK.includes('present'),
'verify-work.md must reference the present/human_judgment routing',
);
});
});
describe('execute-plan.md create_summary populates the coverage block (deployed contract)', () => {
const EXECUTE_PLAN = fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'gsd-core', 'workflows', 'execute-plan.md'), 'utf-8');
test('create_summary documents coverage population with the fail-safe default', () => {
assert.ok(EXECUTE_PLAN.includes('coverage'), 'create_summary must mention the coverage block');
assert.ok(
EXECUTE_PLAN.includes('human_judgment'),
'create_summary must reference human_judgment for the fail-safe default',
);
});
});
describe('SUMMARY templates carry the coverage field (deployed contract)', () => {
const templates = {
main: fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'gsd-core', 'templates', 'summary.md'), 'utf-8'),
standard: fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'gsd-core', 'templates', 'summary-standard.md'), 'utf-8'),
complex: fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'gsd-core', 'templates', 'summary-complex.md'), 'utf-8'),
minimal: fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, 'gsd-core', 'templates', 'summary-minimal.md'), 'utf-8'),
};
test('the main template documents the coverage schema and field semantics', () => {
assert.ok(templates.main.includes('coverage:'), 'summary.md must include the coverage block');
assert.ok(templates.main.includes('human_judgment'), 'summary.md must document human_judgment');
assert.ok(templates.main.includes('verification'), 'summary.md must document verification');
});
for (const [name, body] of Object.entries(templates)) {
test(`${name} template references coverage`, () => {
assert.ok(body.includes('coverage'), `${name} template must reference the coverage field`);
});
}
test('variant templates do not ship a live empty coverage list (fail-open footgun guard)', () => {
for (const name of ['standard', 'complex', 'minimal']) {
const body = templates[name];
const live = body.split('\n').some((l) => /^coverage:\s*\[\]\s*$/.test(l));
assert.ok(
!live,
`${name} template must not default to a live \`coverage: []\` — that would auto-skip UAT; keep it commented/illustrative`,
);
}
});
});