- Create /gsd:create-roadmap slash command entry point - Add check_research step to workflow after check_brief - Incorporate research findings into phase structure planning - Add Research Context section to roadmap output when research exists 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.4 KiB
3.4 KiB
description, allowed-tools
| description | allowed-tools | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Create roadmap with phases for the project |
|
Roadmaps define the phase breakdown - what work happens in what order. This command can be used:
- After /gsd:new-project (without research)
- After /gsd:research-project (with domain research incorporated)
<execution_context>
@/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/create-roadmap.md
@/.claude/get-shit-done/templates/roadmap.md
@~/.claude/get-shit-done/templates/state.md
</execution_context>
Check for research:
!ls .planning/research/*.md 2>/dev/null || echo "NO_RESEARCH"
Load config: @.planning/config.json
```bash # Verify project exists [ -f .planning/PROJECT.md ] || { echo "ERROR: No PROJECT.md found. Run /gsd:new-project first."; exit 1; } ``` Check if roadmap already exists:[ -f .planning/ROADMAP.md ] && echo "ROADMAP_EXISTS" || echo "NO_ROADMAP"
If ROADMAP_EXISTS: Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Roadmap exists"
- question: "A roadmap already exists. What would you like to do?"
- options:
- "View existing" - Show current roadmap
- "Replace" - Create new roadmap (will overwrite)
- "Cancel" - Keep existing roadmap
If "View existing": cat .planning/ROADMAP.md and exit
If "Cancel": Exit
If "Replace": Continue with workflow
ls .planning/research/*.md 2>/dev/null
If research found: Load and summarize each research file:
- ecosystem.md → Key libraries/frameworks recommended
- architecture.md → Architectural patterns to follow
- pitfalls.md → Top 2-3 critical pitfalls to avoid
- standards.md → Standards and conventions to follow
Present summary:
Found project research:
Ecosystem: [key libraries/frameworks]
Architecture: [key patterns]
Pitfalls: [top 2-3 to avoid]
Standards: [key conventions]
This will inform phase structure.
If no research found:
No project research found.
Creating roadmap based on PROJECT.md alone.
(Optional: Run /gsd:research-project first for niche/complex domains)
The workflow handles:
- Domain expertise detection
- Phase identification (informed by research if present)
- Research flags for each phase
- Confirmation gates (respecting config mode)
- ROADMAP.md creation
- STATE.md initialization
- Phase directory creation
- Git commit
What's next?
- Discuss Phase 1 context (/gsd:discuss-phase 1)
- Plan Phase 1 in detail (/gsd:plan-phase 1)
- Review/adjust phases
- Done for now
If user selects "Discuss Phase 1 context" → invoke `/gsd:discuss-phase 1`
If user selects "Plan Phase 1 in detail" → invoke `/gsd:plan-phase 1`
</step>
</process>
<output>
- `.planning/ROADMAP.md`
- `.planning/STATE.md`
- `.planning/phases/XX-name/` directories
</output>
<success_criteria>
- [ ] PROJECT.md validated
- [ ] Research incorporated if present
- [ ] ROADMAP.md created with phases
- [ ] STATE.md initialized
- [ ] Phase directories created
- [ ] Changes committed
</success_criteria>