517bae8d6d
* fix(#2372): widen decision-coverage scan to planner-canonical tags, fix message Bug: check.decision-coverage-plan's remediation message told the user to cite decisions "(or body)" but extractPlanDesignatedSections only scanned <objective>/<tasks>/<task>/<action>. A decision cited in <read_first>, <behavior>, <verify>, <acceptance_criteria>, or <done> was invisible to the gate — false BLOCKING coverage gap, plus the message's own fix-hint sent the user to "the body" where re-citing still failed. Two-part fix (must change together — that drift was the bug): 1. Widen XML_DECISION_TAGS_RE in src/check-command-router.cts to also match <read_first>, <behavior>, <verify>, <acceptance_criteria>, <done>. These are all planner-canonical tags the planner is told to use (plan-phase.md:830-862, plan-phase.md:772). The body negative- lookahead mirrors the opening-tag set so each tag's body is captured independently. 2. Correct buildPlanMessage to name ONLY the surfaces the extractor actually scans (front-matter must_haves/truths/objective, designated markdown headings, and the nine planner-canonical tag bodies). The misleading "(or body)" clause is gone. Also updates the planner's documented contract (agents/gsd-planner.md:69) and user-facing docs (docs/CONFIGURATION.md, docs/USER-GUIDE.md) to reflect the wider scan. Regression tests in tests/decisions.test.cjs cover each newly-scanned tag body, a control (no citation still uncovered), and a message/extractor parity assertion that names every scanned surface — so the two cannot drift apart again. Out of scope (per triage): cmdDecisionCoverageVerify/buildVerifyMessage is a separate command (decision-coverage-verify) checking shipped artifacts, not plan citations — untouched. * chore(#2372): regenerate agent-size-baseline + golden-install-parity fixtures gsd-planner.md grew 49172 → 49294 (+122 chars) from the widened decision- coverage contract (5 new scanned tag names + heading clarification). Growth is justified: the contract surface is itself the fix — the prior text under-described what the gate scans, which was the bug. Updates: - tests/agent-size-baseline.json (gsd-planner.md: 49172 → 49294) - 17 tests/fixtures/golden-install-parity/*.json (one hash per runtime) - tests/fixtures/install-tree/*.json (regenerated by gen:golden) * fix(#2372): per-tag matching — outer-tag citations survive inner-tag nesting Code review (subagent) flagged a Medium edge-case regression from the single-alternation regex: when a newly-scanned tag nests inside another scanned tag, the alternation's negative lookahead halts the outer tag's body at the inner tag — losing any D-NN citation in the outer tag's prefix prose. Concretely: <action>per D-05 <verify>npm test</verify></action> → 3-tag alternation (old): captured 'per D-05 <verify>npm test</verify>' as <action> body → D-05 caught → 9-tag alternation (bug): captured 'npm test' only (from <verify>); D-05 in <action> prefix LOST Switches extractXmlTagBodies to per-tag matching: each tag gets its own regex whose negative-lookahead tempers only against the SAME tag's reopening. So <verify> inside <action> is absorbed into <action>'s body (D-05 caught) AND <verify> is matched separately on its own pass. Per-tag preserves both: - the reporter's case (sibling tags inside <read_first>) - nested-tag citations in outer-tag prefix prose - ReDoS safety (each per-tag regex keeps the #2128 body tempering) Also adds the reviewer's other requested edge-case tests: - non-scanned tag (<name>) bearing D-NN must NOT count - self-closing form <read_first /> safely ignored - attribute form <verify type="...">D-NN</verify> (canonical planner shape) - CRLF newlines in tag body do not break capture * chore(changeset): backfill pr:2443 in .changeset/noble-elks-chatter.md
Changeset Fragments
This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.
Why
Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.
See #2975 for the full rationale.
Adding a fragment
node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
--type Fixed \
--pr 1234 \
--body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"
This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.
Format
---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.
Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.
Opting out
PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.
At release time
Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:
node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty
This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.
Archived fragments
.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.