Files
msd-core/.changeset
Tom Boucher 5214ad5802 fix(#4267): correct tdd.md pointer citations; fix(#4269): collapse plan-level gate-rule duplication (#4295)
* fix(#4267): correct tdd.md pointer citations; fix(#4269): collapse plan-level gate-rule duplication

execute-plan.md and gsd-executor.md each cited "Red-Green-Refactor Cycle"
for three facts (commit-scope contract, fail-fast rule, error handling),
but only the commit-scope contract lives there. Fail-fast is in tdd.md's
"Fail-Fast Rules" subsection (under "Gate Enforcement Rules") and error
handling is in tdd.md's "Error Handling" section — cite each correctly.

gsd-executor.md's "Plan-Level TDD Gate Enforcement" section also fully
restated the gate-sequence rules tdd.md's "Gate Enforcement Rules" already
owns (and covers more thoroughly, including the actual git-log validation
script). Collapse it to a short pointer, matching the treatment already
used by the cycle-steps pointer immediately above it.

Adds tests/tdd-reference-correctness.test.cjs asserting the pointer text
cites the correct section names, that those sections actually carry the
guidance, and that the old gate-sequence restatement is gone from
gsd-executor.md.

Closes #4267
Closes #4269

* docs(#4267): add changeset for tdd.md pointer correctness fix

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#4267): acknowledge execute-plan.md growth

execute-plan.md grew 95 bytes (39766 -> 39861) from the corrected
three-section citation in the #3990/#4267 cycle-steps pointer.

Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: execute-plan.md — net +95 bytes from citing the "Fail-Fast Rules" and "Error Handling" sections by name instead of a single mis-scoped section (#4267).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#4267): update PROSE_ALLOWLIST line numbers shifted by the pointer-citation edit

This branch's edits to agents/gsd-executor.md and gsd-core/workflows/execute-plan.md
shifted line numbers, leaving tests/no-bare-gsd-tools-command-position.test.cjs's
PROSE_ALLOWLIST pointing at stale lines. Update both entries to their new correct
lines (811 and 419 respectively) without changing the underlying prose.

* fix(#4267): restore INVALID_RED citation, fix allowlist line shift after #3770 rebase

The rebase onto next picked up #3770's already-merged fail-fast update to
gsd-executor.md's plan-level gate section, which this branch's own commit
collapses into a pointer. The conflict resolution kept the pointer but
dropped the literal "INVALID_RED" term that tests/tdd-red-evidence.test.cjs
requires gsd-executor.md to name — restored it. Also updates
no-bare-gsd-tools-command-position.test.cjs's PROSE_ALLOWLIST line number
for gsd-executor.md, shifted again by the rebase.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#4267): fix non-matching regression-guard regex in tdd-reference-correctness

The fail-fast regression guard asserted gsd-executor.md no longer contains
"If a test passes unexpectedly during the RED phase" — but the actual old
prose (removed by this branch's pointer-collapse) read "If a test passes
unexpectedly during RED, STOP". The regex never matched the real old text,
so the assertion would have passed even against the unmodified pre-change
file. Caught by an isolated orthogonal review pass. Fixed to match the
actual removed wording, and confirmed (via a direct grep) it is genuinely
absent from the current file.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(#4267): backfill changeset PR number

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 19:13:56 -04:00
..

Changeset Fragments

This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.

Why

Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.

See #2975 for the full rationale.

Adding a fragment

node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
  --type Fixed \
  --pr 1234 \
  --body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"

This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.

Format

---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.

Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.

Opting out

PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.

At release time

Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:

node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty

This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.

Archived fragments

.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.