5b5e5bcf2e
RED-first adversarial guards pinning machine-proven fail-first BEFORE any producer change. They inject a new proveFailFirst option the current producer does not read, so they FAIL against the attestation-greens code (src/prohibition-enforcement.cts:411). This RED is INTENTIONAL — Plans 02-03 wire the prover and turn them green. New tests: - FF-01: attestation + clean pass but no machine proof -> hard-gate (currently RED: producer greens on attestation; actual 'green' vs notStrictEqual 'green') - FF-01 positive: proven-fail-first + clean pass -> green (passes now, pins shape) - FF-04: passes-on-violation (prover could not prove red) -> hard-gate (RED) - FF-04: fails-on-clean even when proven -> hard-gate (passes via runCheck:false) No source edited. 2 new guards RED, 2 positive controls green.
466 lines
25 KiB
JavaScript
466 lines
25 KiB
JavaScript
// Behavioral tests for the deterministic prohibition-enforcement producer (#1259, ADR-550 D5d
|
|
// "heavy half"). Requires the BUILT gsd-core/bin/lib/prohibition-enforcement.cjs — authored as
|
|
// src/prohibition-enforcement.cts and compiled by `npm run build:lib` (mirrors how the verify-tier
|
|
// suite requires the built probe-core.cjs). Typed-field assertions only; the check-runner is
|
|
// injected so no real subprocess is spawned. No source-grep.
|
|
'use strict';
|
|
process.env.GSD_TEST_MODE = '1';
|
|
|
|
const { test, describe } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const path = require('node:path');
|
|
const { createTempDir, cleanup } = require('./helpers.cjs');
|
|
|
|
const ENFORCEMENT_LIB = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'gsd-core', 'bin', 'lib', 'prohibition-enforcement.cjs');
|
|
|
|
const TEST_TIER = Object.freeze({
|
|
requirement_id: 'R1',
|
|
category: 'safety',
|
|
status: 'resolved',
|
|
verification: 'test',
|
|
resolution: null,
|
|
reason: null,
|
|
statement: 'MUST NOT read source files and text-search them in tests',
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('prohibition-enforcement: deterministic test-tier producer (#1259 / ADR-550 D5d)', () => {
|
|
test('exports the producer + route functions', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
assert.equal(typeof enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement, 'function',
|
|
'must export runProhibitionEnforcement (the deterministic producer)');
|
|
assert.equal(typeof enforce.routeProhibitionEnforcement, 'function',
|
|
'must export routeProhibitionEnforcement (the CLI surface)');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('locate-miss (no check descriptor) -> fail-closed, located:false, no evidence', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(TEST_TIER, null, {
|
|
runCheck: () => ({ passed: true }),
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(result.located, false, 'no locatable check');
|
|
assert.notEqual(result.status, 'green', 'locate-miss must never be green');
|
|
assert.equal(result.flagged, true, 'locate-miss must be flagged');
|
|
assert.equal(result.kind, null, 'no kind when nothing located');
|
|
assert.ok(Array.isArray(result.evidence) && result.evidence.length === 0, 'no evidence on locate-miss');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('malformed check descriptor (missing target) -> treated as locate-miss', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(TEST_TIER, { kind: 'node-test' }, {
|
|
runCheck: () => ({ passed: true }),
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(result.located, false, 'a descriptor without a target is not locatable');
|
|
assert.notEqual(result.status, 'green');
|
|
assert.equal(result.flagged, true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('node-test check that passes -> green + non-empty typed evidence', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'node-test', target: 'tests/neg.test.cjs', failFirst: true },
|
|
{ runCheck: () => ({ passed: true }) },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(result.status, 'green');
|
|
assert.equal(result.flagged, false);
|
|
assert.equal(result.tier, 'test');
|
|
assert.equal(result.located, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.kind, 'node-test');
|
|
assert.equal(result.evidence.length, 1, 'one evidence record built');
|
|
const ev = result.evidence[0];
|
|
assert.equal(ev.kind, 'node-test');
|
|
assert.equal(ev.target, 'tests/neg.test.cjs');
|
|
assert.equal(ev.failFirst, true);
|
|
assert.equal(ev.passed, true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('lint-rule (no-source-grep) check that passes -> green, evidence carries rule id', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'lint-rule', rule: 'local/no-source-grep', target: 'tests/', failFirst: true },
|
|
{ runCheck: () => ({ passed: true }) },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(result.status, 'green');
|
|
assert.equal(result.flagged, false);
|
|
assert.equal(result.kind, 'lint-rule');
|
|
assert.equal(result.evidence[0].kind, 'lint-rule');
|
|
assert.equal(result.evidence[0].rule, 'local/no-source-grep', 'evidence records which rule asserted the must-NOT');
|
|
assert.equal(result.evidence[0].target, 'tests/', 'evidence records the linted target path, not the rule id');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('buildLintArgs runs the project eslint as JSON over the target (plugins load via flat config; #1259 SF-01)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
assert.equal(typeof enforce.buildLintArgs, 'function',
|
|
'must export buildLintArgs — the eslint argv builder for the lint-rule real runner');
|
|
const argv = enforce.buildLintArgs({ kind: 'lint-rule', rule: 'local/no-source-grep', target: 'tests/' });
|
|
assert.ok(Array.isArray(argv), 'argv is an array');
|
|
const fmtIdx = argv.indexOf('--format');
|
|
assert.ok(fmtIdx !== -1 && argv[fmtIdx + 1] === 'json',
|
|
'emits --format json so the report can be filtered by ruleId');
|
|
assert.ok(argv.includes('--no-warn-ignored'),
|
|
'must pass --no-warn-ignored so an eslint-ignored target returns [] (fails closed), not a length-1 warning result');
|
|
assert.ok(!argv.includes('--rule'),
|
|
'must NOT use --rule — it cannot load a plugin rule like local/no-source-grep (the SF-01 bug)');
|
|
assert.equal(argv[argv.length - 1], 'tests/', 'the LAST arg is the lint target path');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('lint-rule descriptor missing its rule id -> locate-miss, never green', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'lint-rule', target: 'tests/', failFirst: true }, // no `rule`
|
|
{ runCheck: () => ({ passed: true }) },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.notEqual(result.status, 'green', 'a lint-rule with no rule id is not a valid wired check');
|
|
assert.equal(result.flagged, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.located, false, 'an under-specified lint-rule descriptor is not locatable');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('check that FAILS -> hard-gate (non-green, flagged), located:true, no evidence', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'node-test', target: 'tests/neg.test.cjs', failFirst: true },
|
|
{ runCheck: () => ({ passed: false }) },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.notEqual(result.status, 'green');
|
|
assert.equal(result.flagged, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.located, true, 'the check was located even though it failed');
|
|
assert.equal(result.evidence.length, 0, 'a failing check builds no evidence');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('caller does NOT attest fail-first (descriptor failFirst:false) -> hard-gate, never green', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
// fail-first is caller-attested (#1259 BL-02): a check the caller does not attest as fail-first
|
|
// is not a valid regression proof and must never green, even if the run passes.
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'node-test', target: 'tests/neg.test.cjs', failFirst: false },
|
|
{ runCheck: () => ({ passed: true }) },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.notEqual(result.status, 'green', 'a non-attested check is not a valid regression proof');
|
|
assert.equal(result.flagged, true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('a runCheck that THROWS fails closed, never propagates (no-throw contract, NEW-WR-01)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'node-test', target: 'tests/neg.test.cjs', failFirst: true },
|
|
{ runCheck: () => { throw new Error('runner blew up'); } },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.notEqual(result.status, 'green', 'a throwing runner must never green');
|
|
assert.equal(result.flagged, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.located, true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('hard-gates in BOTH modes on a failing check (ADR-550 D4)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
for (const mode of ['interactive', 'autonomous']) {
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'node-test', target: 'tests/neg.test.cjs', failFirst: true },
|
|
{ runCheck: () => ({ passed: false }), mode },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.notEqual(result.status, 'green', `non-green in ${mode}`);
|
|
assert.equal(result.flagged, true, `flagged in ${mode}`);
|
|
assert.equal(result.mode, mode, 'mode echoed for transparency');
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('passing run echoes the requested mode without changing the green verdict', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'node-test', target: 'tests/neg.test.cjs', failFirst: true },
|
|
{ runCheck: () => ({ passed: true }), mode: 'autonomous' },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(result.status, 'green', 'a passing wired check is green in autonomous mode too');
|
|
assert.equal(result.mode, 'autonomous');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── #1279 RED-first adversarial guards (FF-01 / FF-04 / FF-05) ───────────────
|
|
// These pin MACHINE-PROVEN fail-first BEFORE the producer change. They inject a NEW
|
|
// `proveFailFirst` option that the current producer does not read, so they FAIL against the
|
|
// attestation-greens code (src/prohibition-enforcement.cts:411). Their failure IS the FF-01 RED
|
|
// signal; Plans 02-03 wire the prover and turn them green. No source is edited in this plan.
|
|
|
|
test('attestation alone no longer greens: a clean pass with no proving prover hard-gates (FF-01)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
// The single most important guard: caller attests failFirst:true AND the run passes cleanly,
|
|
// but the prover could NOT prove the check fails-on-violation (provenFailFirst:false). Without a
|
|
// machine proof, attestation alone must NEVER green — it must hard-gate, flagged, located.
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'node-test', target: 'tests/neg.test.cjs', failFirst: true },
|
|
{
|
|
runCheck: () => ({ passed: true }),
|
|
proveFailFirst: () => ({ provenFailFirst: false }),
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
assert.notEqual(result.status, 'green',
|
|
'attestation + a clean pass but no machine proof of fail-first must NEVER green (FF-01)');
|
|
assert.equal(result.flagged, true, 'an un-proven check is flagged');
|
|
assert.equal(result.located, true, 'the descriptor was located; it just was not proven fail-first');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('a machine-proven fail-first check with a clean pass greens (FF-01 positive)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'node-test', target: 'tests/neg.test.cjs', failFirst: true },
|
|
{
|
|
runCheck: () => ({ passed: true }),
|
|
proveFailFirst: () => ({ provenFailFirst: true, method: 'violation-fixture' }),
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(result.status, 'green',
|
|
'a check proven to fail-on-violation AND pass-on-clean must green');
|
|
assert.equal(result.located, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.evidence.length, 1, 'one evidence record built on a proven green');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('passes-on-violation (prover could not prove red) hard-gates, never green (FF-04 both-directions)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
// The wired check passes on a clean run, but the prover ran it against a known violation and the
|
|
// check did NOT go red (provenFailFirst:false). A check that passes-on-violation is not a
|
|
// regression guard -> hard-gate.
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'node-test', target: 'tests/neg.test.cjs', failFirst: true },
|
|
{
|
|
runCheck: () => ({ passed: true }),
|
|
proveFailFirst: () => ({ provenFailFirst: false }),
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
assert.notEqual(result.status, 'green',
|
|
'a check that does not go red on a known violation is not a regression guard (FF-04)');
|
|
assert.equal(result.flagged, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.located, true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('fails-on-clean (clean run did not pass) hard-gates even when fail-first is proven (FF-04 both-directions)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
// The prover proved the check goes red on a violation, but the clean run FAILED — both directions
|
|
// must hold (fail-on-violation AND non-vacuous pass-on-clean) for green. A failing clean run
|
|
// hard-gates regardless of the proof.
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'node-test', target: 'tests/neg.test.cjs', failFirst: true },
|
|
{
|
|
runCheck: () => ({ passed: false }),
|
|
proveFailFirst: () => ({ provenFailFirst: true, method: 'violation-fixture' }),
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
assert.notEqual(result.status, 'green',
|
|
'a proven-fail-first check whose clean run failed must still hard-gate (FF-04)');
|
|
assert.equal(result.flagged, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.located, true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('routeProhibitionEnforcement parses a JSON request file and emits a structured result', (t) => {
|
|
const fs = require('node:fs');
|
|
const { execFileSync } = require('node:child_process');
|
|
// Write a request file; the route reads it and runs the node-test descriptor's default runner
|
|
// (its target does not exist, so it fail-closes deterministically — we assert the JSON SHAPE,
|
|
// not a green verdict). We invoke the built CLI surface in a child process so output()
|
|
// (writeAllSync to fd 1) is captured on stdout — no source-grep (we parse our own emitted JSON).
|
|
const dir = createTempDir('prohib-enf-');
|
|
const reqPath = path.join(dir, 'req.json');
|
|
const runnerPath = path.join(dir, 'runner.cjs');
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(reqPath, JSON.stringify({
|
|
prohibition: TEST_TIER,
|
|
check: { kind: 'node-test', target: 'tests/neg.test.cjs', failFirst: true },
|
|
mode: 'autonomous',
|
|
}));
|
|
// A tiny runner that requires the BUILT module and invokes the route — output() writes to fd 1.
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(runnerPath,
|
|
"require(" + JSON.stringify(ENFORCEMENT_LIB) + ")" +
|
|
".routeProhibitionEnforcement(['check','prohibition-enforcement'," + JSON.stringify(reqPath) + "], false);\n");
|
|
t.after(() => cleanup(dir));
|
|
|
|
const captured = execFileSync('node', [runnerPath], { encoding: 'utf-8' });
|
|
const parsed = JSON.parse(captured);
|
|
assert.equal(typeof parsed, 'object', 'route emits a JSON object');
|
|
assert.equal(parsed.tier, 'test', 'tier is preserved through the CLI surface');
|
|
assert.equal(parsed.located, true, 'the check descriptor was located');
|
|
assert.equal(parsed.mode, 'autonomous', 'mode flows through the CLI surface');
|
|
assert.equal(typeof parsed.flagged, 'boolean', 'flagged is a typed boolean');
|
|
assert.ok(Array.isArray(parsed.evidence), 'evidence is an array');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Real-runner helpers (mutation-pinned; #1259 BL-01 / SF-01) ─────────────────
|
|
// These pin the deterministic parsing/threshold logic of the REAL runner so a Stryker mutant that
|
|
// weakens "non-vacuous pass" or the ruleId filter is caught — the contract the injected-runner tests
|
|
// above deliberately bypass.
|
|
describe('prohibition-enforcement real-runner helpers (#1259)', () => {
|
|
test('parseNodeTestSummary extracts the TAP tests/pass/fail/cancelled counts', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(enforce.parseNodeTestSummary('# tests 3\n# pass 2\n# fail 1\n# cancelled 1\n'),
|
|
{ tests: 3, pass: 2, fail: 1, cancelled: 1 });
|
|
assert.deepEqual(enforce.parseNodeTestSummary('no summary here'), { tests: 0, pass: 0, fail: 0, cancelled: 0 });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('tapTestNames EXCLUDES skipped/todo tests (they never ran, m1)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(enforce.tapTestNames('ok 1 - guards the must-NOT\nok 2 - other # SKIP\nok 3 - later # TODO\n'),
|
|
['guards the must-NOT'], 'a # SKIP / # TODO test is not a real run and must not count');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('isNonVacuousNodeTestPass: a SKIPPED negative test (file wrapper passes) is NOT a pass (m1)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
// file wrapper + a skipped negative test: pass>=1 but the only named test is skipped -> vacuous.
|
|
const skipped = 'ok 1 - empty.test.cjs\nok 2 - the negative test # SKIP\n# tests 2\n# pass 2\n# fail 0\n# cancelled 0\n';
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.isNonVacuousNodeTestPass(skipped, 'empty.test.cjs'), false,
|
|
'a skipped negative test never executed -> must not green');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('isNonVacuousNodeTestPass: a CANCELLED run is not a pass (m1)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
const cancelled = 'ok 1 - guards\n# tests 1\n# pass 1\n# fail 0\n# cancelled 1\n';
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.isNonVacuousNodeTestPass(cancelled, 'neg.test.cjs'), false,
|
|
'a cancelled run is not a clean pass');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('isNonVacuousNodeTestPass: an empty file (node names the test after the file) is NOT a pass (BL-01)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
// node --test of a zero-test file: `ok 1 - empty.test.cjs`, `# tests 1 # pass 1` — counts alone
|
|
// cannot distinguish it from a real test, so the file-named result must NOT count as a pass.
|
|
const empty = 'ok 1 - empty.test.cjs\n1..1\n# tests 1\n# pass 1\n# fail 0\n';
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.isNonVacuousNodeTestPass(empty, 'empty.test.cjs'), false,
|
|
'a file-named-only result is vacuous — the BL-01 false-green guard');
|
|
// BASENAME-NORMALIZED: node may report the file-test by an ABSOLUTE/normalized path while the
|
|
// descriptor target is relative (cross-OS / node-version). The basenames must still match → vacuous.
|
|
const emptyAbs = 'ok 1 - /tmp/x/empty.test.cjs\n1..1\n# tests 1\n# pass 1\n# fail 0\n';
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.isNonVacuousNodeTestPass(emptyAbs, 'empty.test.cjs'), false,
|
|
'an absolute-path file-test name must still be recognized as vacuous (basename compare, WR-02)');
|
|
// Mirror case (pins the TARGET-side basename): relative TAP name vs ABSOLUTE descriptor target.
|
|
const emptyRelName = 'ok 1 - neg.test.cjs\n1..1\n# tests 1\n# pass 1\n# fail 0\n';
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.isNonVacuousNodeTestPass(emptyRelName, '/abs/path/neg.test.cjs'), false,
|
|
'a relative file-test name vs an absolute target must still be vacuous — both sides basename-normalized (WR-R4-01)');
|
|
const real = 'ok 1 - guards the must-NOT\n1..1\n# tests 1\n# pass 1\n# fail 0\n';
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.isNonVacuousNodeTestPass(real, '/abs/path/neg.test.cjs'), true,
|
|
'a real named test distinct from the file is a genuine pass (even vs an absolute target)');
|
|
const failing = 'not ok 1 - guards\n# tests 1\n# pass 0\n# fail 1\n';
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.isNonVacuousNodeTestPass(failing, 'neg.test.cjs'), false,
|
|
'any failure means not a pass');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('eslintJsonHasRule detects a ruleId; unparseable report -> true (fail-closed)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.eslintJsonHasRule(JSON.stringify([{ messages: [{ ruleId: 'local/no-source-grep' }] }]), 'local/no-source-grep'), true);
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.eslintJsonHasRule(JSON.stringify([{ messages: [{ ruleId: 'other' }] }]), 'local/no-source-grep'), false);
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.eslintJsonHasRule('not json', 'local/no-source-grep'), true,
|
|
'an unreadable report must be treated as a violation, never a silent pass');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('eslintFileResultCount: 0 when nothing linted (vacuity guard)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.eslintFileResultCount(JSON.stringify([{}, {}])), 2);
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.eslintFileResultCount('[]'), 0);
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.eslintFileResultCount('garbage'), 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('eslintHasFatalError: a parse/fatal error must fail closed (B1)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
const fatal = JSON.stringify([{ messages: [{ ruleId: null, fatal: true, severity: 2, message: 'Parsing error' }], fatalErrorCount: 1 }]);
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.eslintHasFatalError(fatal), true, 'a fatal/parse error means the rule never ran -> fail closed');
|
|
const clean = JSON.stringify([{ messages: [], fatalErrorCount: 0 }]);
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.eslintHasFatalError(clean), false, 'a clean lint has no fatal error');
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.eslintHasFatalError('not json'), true, 'an unreadable report is treated as fatal (fail closed)');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('eslintJsonHasRule also reads suppressedMessages — an inline-disabled violation still counts (B1)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
const suppressed = JSON.stringify([{ messages: [], suppressedMessages: [{ ruleId: 'local/no-source-grep' }] }]);
|
|
assert.equal(enforce.eslintJsonHasRule(suppressed, 'local/no-source-grep'), true,
|
|
'a violation suppressed via // eslint-disable must NOT be treated as clean');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Real runner end-to-end (NO injected runCheck; #1259 SF-02 / BL-01 / SF-01) ──
|
|
// Spawns real subprocesses so the SHIPPING default runner is exercised — the gap that let BL-01 and
|
|
// SF-01 slip past the injected-double tests. Typed-field assertions only.
|
|
describe('prohibition-enforcement REAL runner end-to-end (#1259)', () => {
|
|
const fs = require('node:fs');
|
|
|
|
test('a genuine non-vacuous passing node-test greens via the real runner', (t) => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
const dir = createTempDir('prohib-real-pass-');
|
|
t.after(() => cleanup(dir));
|
|
const tf = path.join(dir, 'neg.test.cjs');
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(tf,
|
|
"const { test } = require('node:test');\nconst assert = require('node:assert');\ntest('guards the must-NOT', () => { assert.ok(true); });\n");
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'node-test', target: tf, failFirst: true },
|
|
{ cwd: dir },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(result.status, 'green', 'a real, passing, non-vacuous negative test must green');
|
|
assert.equal(result.located, true);
|
|
assert.equal(result.evidence.length, 1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('a HANGING node-test fails closed via the bounded timeout (B2: no unbounded subprocess)', (t) => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
const dir = createTempDir('prohib-hang-');
|
|
t.after(() => cleanup(dir));
|
|
const tf = path.join(dir, 'hang.test.cjs');
|
|
// A test that never returns; the bounded timeout must kill it and dispose non-green.
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(tf,
|
|
"const { test } = require('node:test');\ntest('hangs forever', () => { while (true) {} });\n");
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'node-test', target: tf, failFirst: true },
|
|
{ cwd: dir, timeoutMs: 1500 },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.notEqual(result.status, 'green', 'a hung check must be killed and fail closed — never hang verify or green');
|
|
assert.equal(result.located, true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('an EMPTY node-test file (exit 0, zero tests) does NOT green via the real runner (BL-01)', (t) => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
const dir = createTempDir('prohib-real-empty-');
|
|
t.after(() => cleanup(dir));
|
|
const tf = path.join(dir, 'empty.test.cjs');
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(tf, '// intentionally empty — no test cases\n');
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'node-test', target: tf, failFirst: true },
|
|
{ cwd: dir },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.notEqual(result.status, 'green', 'an empty (zero-test) file must NEVER green — fail-closed');
|
|
assert.equal(result.located, true, 'the check was located; it just did not genuinely pass');
|
|
assert.equal(result.evidence.length, 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('a clean in-tree target greens the lint-rule kind via the real eslint runner (SF-01: plugin loads)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
// Runs real `npx eslint --format json src/clock.cts` under the project flat config (so the
|
|
// `local` plugin loads). src/clock.cts is a clean source with no no-source-grep violation.
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'lint-rule', rule: 'local/no-source-grep', target: 'src/clock.cts', failFirst: true },
|
|
{ cwd: process.cwd() },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(result.status, 'green', 'a clean target with no no-source-grep violation must green via real eslint');
|
|
assert.equal(result.kind, 'lint-rule');
|
|
assert.equal(result.evidence[0].rule, 'local/no-source-grep');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('an eslint-IGNORED target does NOT green the lint-rule kind (vacuous-green guard, NEW-BL-01)', () => {
|
|
const enforce = require(ENFORCEMENT_LIB);
|
|
// The generated bin/lib artifact is eslint-ignored. Without --no-warn-ignored, eslint returns a
|
|
// length-1 "File ignored" result that would falsely pass the vacuity guard. It must fail closed.
|
|
const result = enforce.runProhibitionEnforcement(
|
|
TEST_TIER,
|
|
{ kind: 'lint-rule', rule: 'local/no-source-grep', target: 'gsd-core/bin/lib/prohibition-enforcement.cjs', failFirst: true },
|
|
{ cwd: process.cwd() },
|
|
);
|
|
assert.notEqual(result.status, 'green', 'an ignored path lints nothing — must NEVER green');
|
|
assert.equal(result.located, true, 'the descriptor was well-formed; it just did not genuinely pass');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|