The Pass-2 topological level assignment in cmdPhasePlanIndex dequeued its Kahn's-algorithm queue with Array.shift(), which is O(n) per call in V8, so the BFS was O(V^2) and slowed superlinearly on deep queues (wide fan-in plan graphs). Extract the traversal into a pure, exported computeDependencyLevels (rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId) and dequeue via a head index (queue[head++]) -> O(V+E). Behavior is identical: same FIFO order, same longest-path levels, same visited-count cycle detection. A complexity-contract comment above the loop documents why shift() must not be reintroduced. Adds tests/phase-dependency-levels.test.cjs with deterministic behavior and edge-case coverage (linear chain, diamond longest-path, independent set, cycle, canonical-prefix resolution, empty, self-loop, duplicate edge, external dep). A timing-based complexity guard was intentionally omitted: the O(V+E) Map-build constant dilutes the O(V^2) signal until impractical N (~1e6), so an empirical guard is inherently flaky on contended CI — the contract is enforced by the inline comment and correctness tests instead. Fixes #307 Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
155 lines
7.6 KiB
JavaScript
155 lines
7.6 KiB
JavaScript
// allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product
|
|
// Tests for the extracted computeDependencyLevels pure function in phase.cjs.
|
|
// Covers correctness (behavior) and edge cases. The O(V+E) complexity contract
|
|
// is documented inline in computeDependencyLevels (phase.cjs) above the head-index
|
|
// queue loop; timing-based guards were removed (#307) because the O(V+E)
|
|
// Map-build constant dilutes the O(V^2) signal until N is ~1e6, making
|
|
// empirical ratio tests inherently flaky on contended CI runners.
|
|
|
|
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
const { test, describe } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const { computeDependencyLevels } = require('../get-shit-done/bin/lib/phase.cjs');
|
|
|
|
// Helper: build rawPlans + planMap + canonicalToId from a simple spec.
|
|
// spec is an array of { id, dependsOn } objects.
|
|
function buildInputs(spec) {
|
|
const rawPlans = spec.map(s => ({ id: s.id, dependsOn: s.dependsOn ?? [] }));
|
|
const planMap = new Map(rawPlans.map(p => [p.id.toLowerCase(), p]));
|
|
const canonicalToId = new Map(rawPlans.map(p => [p.id.toLowerCase(), p.id]));
|
|
return { rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe('computeDependencyLevels — behavior tests', () => {
|
|
|
|
// (a) Linear chain: 0 ← 1 ← 2 (1 depends on 0, 2 depends on 1)
|
|
test('(a) linear chain assigns levels 0,1,2 and visits all nodes', () => {
|
|
const { rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId } = buildInputs([
|
|
{ id: 'p0', dependsOn: [] },
|
|
{ id: 'p1', dependsOn: ['p0'] },
|
|
{ id: 'p2', dependsOn: ['p1'] },
|
|
]);
|
|
const { level, visited } = computeDependencyLevels(rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId);
|
|
assert.equal(visited, 3);
|
|
assert.equal(level.get('p0'), 0);
|
|
assert.equal(level.get('p1'), 1);
|
|
assert.equal(level.get('p2'), 2);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// (b) Diamond: A; B,C depend on A; D depends on B and C → longest-path levels
|
|
// A=0, B=1, C=1, D=2
|
|
test('(b) diamond uses longest-path (D=2, not 1)', () => {
|
|
const { rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId } = buildInputs([
|
|
{ id: 'A', dependsOn: [] },
|
|
{ id: 'B', dependsOn: ['A'] },
|
|
{ id: 'C', dependsOn: ['A'] },
|
|
{ id: 'D', dependsOn: ['B', 'C'] },
|
|
]);
|
|
const { level, visited } = computeDependencyLevels(rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId);
|
|
assert.equal(visited, 4);
|
|
assert.equal(level.get('A'), 0);
|
|
assert.equal(level.get('B'), 1);
|
|
assert.equal(level.get('C'), 1);
|
|
assert.equal(level.get('D'), 2);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// (c) Independent set: no deps → all level 0
|
|
test('(c) independent set: all nodes at level 0, all visited', () => {
|
|
const N = 10;
|
|
const spec = Array.from({ length: N }, (_, i) => ({ id: `node-${i}`, dependsOn: [] }));
|
|
const { rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId } = buildInputs(spec);
|
|
const { level, visited } = computeDependencyLevels(rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId);
|
|
assert.equal(visited, N);
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < N; i++) {
|
|
assert.equal(level.get(`node-${i}`), 0, `node-${i} should be level 0`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// (d) Cycle: A depends on B and B depends on A → visited < N
|
|
test('(d) cycle: visited < N signals cycle (not all nodes reachable)', () => {
|
|
const { rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId } = buildInputs([
|
|
{ id: 'A', dependsOn: ['B'] },
|
|
{ id: 'B', dependsOn: ['A'] },
|
|
]);
|
|
const { visited } = computeDependencyLevels(rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId);
|
|
assert.ok(visited < rawPlans.length, `expected visited < 2, got ${visited}`);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// (e) Prefix resolution via canonicalToId: dep given as canonical prefix resolves
|
|
// to the full plan ID. Mirrors the #3785 behavior.
|
|
test('(e) canonical prefix resolution (depends_on short form resolves via canonicalToId)', () => {
|
|
// Plan with full stem ID; dep references canonical prefix only
|
|
const rawPlans = [
|
|
{ id: '03-01-auth-hardening', dependsOn: [] },
|
|
{ id: '03-02-token-rotation', dependsOn: ['03-01'] }, // short prefix dep
|
|
];
|
|
// planMap uses full-stem lowercase keys (planMap.get('03-01') would miss)
|
|
const planMap = new Map(rawPlans.map(p => [p.id.toLowerCase(), p]));
|
|
// canonicalToId maps prefix → full ID
|
|
const canonicalToId = new Map([
|
|
['03-01', '03-01-auth-hardening'],
|
|
['03-02', '03-02-token-rotation'],
|
|
]);
|
|
const { level, visited } = computeDependencyLevels(rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId);
|
|
assert.equal(visited, 2, 'both plans should be visited (no cycle)');
|
|
assert.equal(level.get('03-01-auth-hardening'), 0);
|
|
assert.equal(level.get('03-02-token-rotation'), 1, 'prefix dep resolved → level 1');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// (f) EMPTY: no plans → level.size === 0 and visited === 0, no throw.
|
|
test('(f) empty rawPlans: returns empty level map and visited === 0', () => {
|
|
const { level, visited } = computeDependencyLevels([], new Map(), new Map());
|
|
assert.equal(level.size, 0, 'level map should be empty');
|
|
assert.equal(visited, 0, 'visited should be 0 with no plans');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// (g) SELF-LOOP: a plan whose dependsOn includes its own id → in-degree is never
|
|
// decremented to 0 → the plan is never enqueued → visited === 0 (cycle signalled).
|
|
// Self-dep: inDeg starts at 0, then gets +1 for the self-edge → inDeg = 1 forever.
|
|
test('(g) self-loop: plan is never enqueued, visited === 0 (cycle signalled)', () => {
|
|
const { rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId } = buildInputs([
|
|
{ id: 'solo', dependsOn: ['solo'] },
|
|
]);
|
|
const { level, visited } = computeDependencyLevels(rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId);
|
|
assert.equal(visited, 0, 'self-loop plan should never be visited');
|
|
assert.ok(visited < rawPlans.length, 'visited < rawPlans.length signals cycle');
|
|
assert.ok(!level.has('solo'), 'self-loop plan should not appear in level map');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// (h) DUPLICATE EDGE: plan B lists the same dep A twice.
|
|
// Effect: inDeg(B) = 2 (double-counted), adj(A) = ['B', 'B'] (double-pushed).
|
|
// When A is processed (curLevel=0):
|
|
// First 'B': inDeg(B) → 1, level(B) set to 1 (not pushed yet).
|
|
// Second 'B': inDeg(B) → 0, level(B) stays 1 (already set), B pushed.
|
|
// Result: visited === 2, level(A) === 0, level(B) === 1.
|
|
// This documents the existing behavior: duplicate deps double-count in-degree and
|
|
// double-push the adjacency list, but the final level/visited result is still correct
|
|
// because each decrement pairs with a push.
|
|
test('(h) duplicate edge: B lists dep A twice → visited === 2, levels A=0 B=1', () => {
|
|
const { rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId } = buildInputs([
|
|
{ id: 'A', dependsOn: [] },
|
|
{ id: 'B', dependsOn: ['A', 'A'] }, // duplicate dep
|
|
]);
|
|
const { level, visited } = computeDependencyLevels(rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId);
|
|
assert.equal(visited, 2, 'both A and B should be visited');
|
|
assert.equal(level.get('A'), 0, 'A has no deps → level 0');
|
|
assert.equal(level.get('B'), 1, 'B depends on A → level 1');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// (i) EXTERNAL/UNRESOLVED DEP: plan B lists a dep that is neither in planMap nor in
|
|
// canonicalToId → the dep is ignored (continue), B retains in-degree 0 → B is level 0.
|
|
// Both A and B have in-degree 0 and are visited → visited === 2.
|
|
test('(i) unresolved/external dep is ignored: B still enqueued at level 0', () => {
|
|
const { rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId } = buildInputs([
|
|
{ id: 'A', dependsOn: [] },
|
|
{ id: 'B', dependsOn: ['nonexistent-external-plan'] },
|
|
]);
|
|
const { level, visited } = computeDependencyLevels(rawPlans, planMap, canonicalToId);
|
|
assert.equal(visited, 2, 'both plans should be visited (external dep ignored)');
|
|
assert.equal(level.get('A'), 0, 'A has no deps → level 0');
|
|
assert.equal(level.get('B'), 0, 'B external dep ignored → in-degree 0 → level 0');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
});
|