* feat(#2492): add gates ensuring discuss-phase decisions are translated and verified Two gates close the loop between CONTEXT.md `<decisions>` and downstream work, fixing #2492: - Plan-phase **translation gate** (BLOCKING). After requirements coverage, refuses to mark a phase planned when a trackable decision is not cited (by id `D-NN` or by 6+-word phrase) in any plan's `must_haves`, `truths`, or body. Failure message names each missed decision with id, category, text, and remediation paths. - Verify-phase **validation gate** (NON-BLOCKING). Searches plans, SUMMARY.md, files modified, and recent commit subjects for each trackable decision. Misses are written to VERIFICATION.md as a warning section but do not change verification status. Asymmetry is deliberate — fuzzy-match miss should not fail an otherwise green phase. Shared helper `parseDecisions()` lives in `sdk/src/query/decisions.ts` so #2493 can consume the same parser. Decisions opt out of both gates via `### Claude's Discretion` heading or `[informational]` / `[folded]` / `[deferred]` tags. Both gates skip silently when `workflow.context_coverage_gate=false` (default `true`). Closes #2492 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2492): make plan-phase decision gate actually block (review F1, F8, F9, F10, F15) - F1: replace `${context_path}` with `${CONTEXT_PATH}` in the plan-phase gate snippet so the BLOCKING gate receives a non-empty path. The variable was defined in Step 4 (`CONTEXT_PATH=$(_gsd_field "$INIT" ...)`) and the gate snippet referenced the lowercase form, leaving the gate to run with an empty path argument and silently skip. - F15: wrap the SDK call with `jq -e '.data.passed == true' || exit 1` so failure halts the workflow instead of being printed and ignored. The verify-phase counterpart deliberately keeps no exit-1 (non-blocking by design) and now carries an inline note documenting the asymmetry. - F10: tag the JSON example fence as `json` and the options-list fence as `text` (MD040). - F8/F9: anchor the heading-presence test regexes to `^## 13[a-z]?\\.` so prose substrings like "Requirements Coverage Gate" mentioned in body text cannot satisfy the assertion. Added two new regression tests (variable-name match, exit-1 guard) so a future revert is caught. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2492): tighten decision-coverage gates against false positives and config drift (review F3,F4,F5,F6,F7,F16,F18,F19) - F3: forward `workstream` arg through both gate handlers so workstream-scoped `workflow.context_coverage_gate=false` actually skips. Added negative test that creates a workstream config disabling the gate while the root config has it enabled and asserts the workstream call is skipped. - F4: restrict the plan-phase haystack to designated sections — front-matter `must_haves` / `truths` / `objective` plus body sections under headings matching `must_haves|truths|tasks|objective`. HTML comments and fenced code blocks are stripped before extraction so a commented-out citation or a literal example never counts as coverage. Verify-phase keeps the broader artifact-wide haystack by design (non-blocking). - F5: reject decisions with fewer than 6 normalized words from soft-matching (previously only rejected when the resulting phrase was under 12 chars AFTER slicing — too lenient). Short decisions now require an explicit `D-NN` citation, with regression tests for the boundary. - F6: walk every `*-SUMMARY.md` independently and use `matchAll` with the `/g` flag so multiple `files_modified:` blocks across multiple summaries are all aggregated. Previously only the first block in the concatenated string was parsed, silently dropping later plans' files. - F7: validate every `files_modified` path stays inside `projectDir` after resolution (rejects absolute paths, `../` traversal). Cap each file read at 256 KB. Skipped paths emit a stderr warning naming the entry. - F16: validate `workflow.context_coverage_gate` is boolean in `loadGateConfig`; warn loudly on numeric or other-shaped values and default to ON. Mirrors the schema-vs-loadConfig validation gap from #2609. - F18: bump verify-phase `git log -n` cap from 50 to 200 so longer-running phases are not undercounted. Documented as a precision-vs-recall tradeoff appropriate for a non-blocking gate. - F19: tighten `QueryResult` / `QueryHandler` to be parameterized (`<T = unknown>`). Drops the `as unknown as Record<string, unknown>` casts in the gate handlers and surfaces shape mismatches at compile time for callers that pass a typed `data` value. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2492): harden decisions parser and verify-phase glob (review F11,F12,F13,F14,F17,F20) - F11: strip fenced code blocks from CONTEXT.md before searching for `<decisions>` so an example block inside ``` ``` is not mis-parsed. - F12: accept tab-indented continuation lines (previously required a leading space) so decisions split with `\t` continue cleanly. - F13: parse EVERY `<decisions>` block in the file via `matchAll`, not just the first. CONTEXT.md may legitimately carry more than one block. - F14: `decisions.parse` handler now resolves a relative path against `projectDir` — symmetric with the gate handlers — and still accepts absolute paths. - F17: replace `ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-CONTEXT.md | head -1` in verify-phase.md with a glob loop (ShellCheck SC2012 fix). Also avoids spawning an extra subprocess and survives filenames with whitespace. - F20: extend the unicode quote-stripping in the discretion-heading match to cover U+2018/2019/201A/201B and the U+201C-F double-quote variants plus backtick, so any rendering of "Claude's Discretion" collapses to the same key. Each fix has a regression test in `decisions.test.ts`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
520 lines
17 KiB
TypeScript
520 lines
17 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* Decision-coverage gate tests for issue #2492.
|
|
*
|
|
* Two gates, two semantics:
|
|
*
|
|
* - `check.decision-coverage-plan` — translation gate, BLOCKING.
|
|
* Each trackable CONTEXT.md decision must appear (by id or text) in at
|
|
* least one PLAN.md `must_haves` / `truths` / body.
|
|
*
|
|
* - `check.decision-coverage-verify` — validation gate, NON-BLOCKING.
|
|
* Each trackable decision should appear in shipped artifacts (PLANs,
|
|
* SUMMARY.md, files_modified, recent commit messages). Missing items
|
|
* are reported as warnings only.
|
|
*/
|
|
import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, afterEach } from 'vitest';
|
|
import { mkdtemp, writeFile, mkdir, rm } from 'node:fs/promises';
|
|
import { join } from 'node:path';
|
|
import { tmpdir } from 'node:os';
|
|
import {
|
|
checkDecisionCoveragePlan,
|
|
checkDecisionCoverageVerify,
|
|
} from './check-decision-coverage.js';
|
|
|
|
let tmp: string;
|
|
let phaseDir: string;
|
|
let contextPath: string;
|
|
|
|
async function setupPhase(decisionsBlock: string, plans: Record<string, string>, summary?: string) {
|
|
await mkdir(phaseDir, { recursive: true });
|
|
await writeFile(contextPath, `# Phase 17 Context\n\n${decisionsBlock}\n`, 'utf-8');
|
|
for (const [name, content] of Object.entries(plans)) {
|
|
await writeFile(join(phaseDir, name), content, 'utf-8');
|
|
}
|
|
if (summary !== undefined) {
|
|
await writeFile(join(phaseDir, '17-SUMMARY.md'), summary, 'utf-8');
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function planFile(mustHavesYaml: string, body = ''): string {
|
|
return `---
|
|
phase: 17
|
|
plan: 1
|
|
type: implementation
|
|
wave: 1
|
|
depends_on: []
|
|
files_modified: []
|
|
autonomous: true
|
|
must_haves:
|
|
${mustHavesYaml}
|
|
---
|
|
${body}
|
|
`;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(async () => {
|
|
tmp = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), 'gsd-deccov-'));
|
|
phaseDir = join(tmp, '.planning', 'phases', '17-foo');
|
|
contextPath = join(phaseDir, '17-CONTEXT.md');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
afterEach(async () => {
|
|
await rm(tmp, { recursive: true, force: true });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('checkDecisionCoveragePlan — translation gate (#2492)', () => {
|
|
it('passes when every trackable decision is cited by id in a plan', async () => {
|
|
await setupPhase(
|
|
`<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-01:** Use bit offsets
|
|
- **D-02:** Display TArray element type
|
|
</decisions>`,
|
|
{
|
|
'17-01-PLAN.md': planFile(
|
|
` truths:
|
|
- "D-01: bit offsets are exposed via API"
|
|
artifacts: []
|
|
key_links: []`,
|
|
// D-02 cited under a designated `## tasks` heading (review F4).
|
|
'## tasks\n- Implements D-02: TArray display logic.\n',
|
|
),
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoveragePlan([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.passed).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(result.data.uncovered).toEqual([]);
|
|
expect(result.data.total).toBe(2);
|
|
expect(result.data.covered).toBe(2);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('fails when a decision is not covered by any plan and names it', async () => {
|
|
await setupPhase(
|
|
`<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-01:** Use bit offsets, not byte offsets
|
|
- **D-99:** A decision nobody bothered to plan
|
|
</decisions>`,
|
|
{
|
|
'17-01-PLAN.md': planFile(
|
|
` truths:
|
|
- "D-01: bit offsets are exposed"
|
|
artifacts: []
|
|
key_links: []`,
|
|
),
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoveragePlan([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.passed).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(result.data.uncovered.map((u: { id: string }) => u.id)).toEqual(['D-99']);
|
|
expect(result.data.message).toMatch(/D-99/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('honors `truths` AND `must_haves` body bullets', async () => {
|
|
await setupPhase(
|
|
`<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-01:** First decision
|
|
- **D-02:** Second decision
|
|
</decisions>`,
|
|
{
|
|
'17-01-PLAN.md': planFile(
|
|
` truths:
|
|
- "D-01 honored"
|
|
artifacts: []
|
|
key_links: []`,
|
|
'## must_haves\n- D-02: also honored in body\n',
|
|
),
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoveragePlan([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.passed).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('skips when context_coverage_gate is disabled in config', async () => {
|
|
await setupPhase(
|
|
`<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-01:** Anything
|
|
- **D-02:** Anything else
|
|
</decisions>`,
|
|
{ '17-01-PLAN.md': planFile(` truths: []\n artifacts: []\n key_links: []`) },
|
|
);
|
|
await mkdir(join(tmp, '.planning'), { recursive: true });
|
|
await writeFile(
|
|
join(tmp, '.planning', 'config.json'),
|
|
JSON.stringify({ workflow: { context_coverage_gate: false } }),
|
|
'utf-8',
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoveragePlan([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.skipped).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(result.data.passed).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('skips cleanly when CONTEXT.md is missing', async () => {
|
|
await mkdir(phaseDir, { recursive: true });
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoveragePlan([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.skipped).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(result.data.reason).toMatch(/CONTEXT/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('skips cleanly when <decisions> block is missing', async () => {
|
|
await mkdir(phaseDir, { recursive: true });
|
|
await writeFile(contextPath, '# Phase 17\n\nNo decisions block here.\n', 'utf-8');
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoveragePlan([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.skipped).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('does not flag non-trackable decisions (Discretion / informational / folded)', async () => {
|
|
await setupPhase(
|
|
`<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-01:** trackable
|
|
- **D-02 [informational]:** opt-out
|
|
- **D-03 [folded]:** opt-out
|
|
|
|
### Claude's Discretion
|
|
- **D-99:** never tracked
|
|
</decisions>`,
|
|
{
|
|
'17-01-PLAN.md': planFile(
|
|
` truths:
|
|
- "D-01"
|
|
artifacts: []
|
|
key_links: []`,
|
|
),
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoveragePlan([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.passed).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(result.data.total).toBe(1); // only D-01 is trackable
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('checkDecisionCoverageVerify — validation gate (#2492)', () => {
|
|
it('reports honored decisions when ID appears in shipped artifacts', async () => {
|
|
await setupPhase(
|
|
`<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-05:** Validate input
|
|
</decisions>`,
|
|
{ '17-01-PLAN.md': planFile(` truths: ["D-05"]\n artifacts: []\n key_links: []`) },
|
|
'## Summary\nImplemented D-05.\nfiles_modified: []\n',
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoverageVerify([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.honored).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(result.data.not_honored).toEqual([]);
|
|
expect(result.data.blocking).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('reports decisions not honored when ID appears nowhere', async () => {
|
|
await setupPhase(
|
|
`<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-50:** Add metrics endpoint
|
|
</decisions>`,
|
|
{ '17-01-PLAN.md': planFile(` truths: []\n artifacts: []\n key_links: []`) },
|
|
'## Summary\nDid other things.\n',
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoverageVerify([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.honored).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(result.data.not_honored.map((u: { id: string }) => u.id)).toEqual(['D-50']);
|
|
expect(result.data.blocking).toBe(false); // non-blocking by spec
|
|
expect(result.data.message).toMatch(/D-50/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('skips when context_coverage_gate is disabled', async () => {
|
|
await setupPhase(
|
|
`<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-50:** anything
|
|
</decisions>`,
|
|
{ '17-01-PLAN.md': planFile(` truths: []\n artifacts: []\n key_links: []`) },
|
|
);
|
|
await mkdir(join(tmp, '.planning'), { recursive: true });
|
|
await writeFile(
|
|
join(tmp, '.planning', 'config.json'),
|
|
JSON.stringify({ workflow: { context_coverage_gate: false } }),
|
|
'utf-8',
|
|
);
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoverageVerify([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.skipped).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(result.data.blocking).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('skips cleanly when CONTEXT.md is missing', async () => {
|
|
await mkdir(phaseDir, { recursive: true });
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoverageVerify([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.skipped).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Adversarial-review regression tests ──────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('translation gate haystack restriction (review F4)', () => {
|
|
it('does NOT count a D-NN citation buried in an HTML comment', async () => {
|
|
await setupPhase(
|
|
`<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-77:** A trackable decision worth six or more words long
|
|
</decisions>`,
|
|
{
|
|
'17-01-PLAN.md': planFile(
|
|
` truths: []\n artifacts: []\n key_links: []`,
|
|
'<!-- D-77 was here -->\nNothing else mentions the decision.',
|
|
),
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoveragePlan([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.passed).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(result.data.uncovered.map((u: { id: string }) => u.id)).toContain('D-77');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('does NOT count a D-NN citation buried in a fenced code example', async () => {
|
|
await setupPhase(
|
|
`<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-78:** A trackable decision worth six or more words long
|
|
</decisions>`,
|
|
{
|
|
'17-01-PLAN.md': planFile(
|
|
` truths: []\n artifacts: []\n key_links: []`,
|
|
'## Design notes\n\n```text\nExample: D-78 should appear here\n```\n',
|
|
),
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoveragePlan([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.passed).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(result.data.uncovered.map((u: { id: string }) => u.id)).toContain('D-78');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('counts a citation in front-matter `must_haves`', async () => {
|
|
await setupPhase(
|
|
`<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-79:** Trackable decision text long enough to soft-match.
|
|
</decisions>`,
|
|
{
|
|
'17-01-PLAN.md': `---
|
|
phase: 17
|
|
plan: 1
|
|
must_haves:
|
|
- "D-79 must be honored"
|
|
truths: []
|
|
artifacts: []
|
|
key_links: []
|
|
---
|
|
`,
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoveragePlan([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.passed).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('counts a citation in front-matter `truths`', async () => {
|
|
await setupPhase(
|
|
`<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-80:** Trackable decision text long enough to soft-match.
|
|
</decisions>`,
|
|
{
|
|
'17-01-PLAN.md': planFile(` truths: ["D-80 honored"]\n artifacts: []\n key_links: []`),
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoveragePlan([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.passed).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('soft-phrase length gating (review F5)', () => {
|
|
it('flags a sub-6-word decision when only the body paraphrases — id citation is required', async () => {
|
|
await setupPhase(
|
|
// 4 words → cannot soft-match; user must cite the id.
|
|
`<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-81:** Use bit offsets always
|
|
</decisions>`,
|
|
{
|
|
'17-01-PLAN.md': planFile(
|
|
` truths: ["something else"]\n artifacts: []\n key_links: []`,
|
|
// No D-81 citation, paraphrase only.
|
|
'## tasks\n- Use bit offsets in storage layer\n',
|
|
),
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoveragePlan([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.passed).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(result.data.uncovered.map((u: { id: string }) => u.id)).toEqual(['D-81']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('still passes a sub-6-word decision when the id is cited', async () => {
|
|
await setupPhase(
|
|
`<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-82:** Disable cache
|
|
</decisions>`,
|
|
{
|
|
'17-01-PLAN.md': planFile(` truths: ["D-82"]\n artifacts: []\n key_links: []`),
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoveragePlan([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(result.data.passed).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('verify-phase summary parsing (review F6, F7)', () => {
|
|
it('reads files_modified from EVERY summary, not just the first', async () => {
|
|
await mkdir(phaseDir, { recursive: true });
|
|
await writeFile(
|
|
contextPath,
|
|
`# Phase 17 Context
|
|
|
|
<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-83:** A long-enough trackable decision text for soft matching honored elsewhere.
|
|
</decisions>
|
|
`,
|
|
'utf-8',
|
|
);
|
|
await writeFile(
|
|
join(phaseDir, '17-01-PLAN.md'),
|
|
planFile(` truths: []\n artifacts: []\n key_links: []`),
|
|
'utf-8',
|
|
);
|
|
// Summary 01 — no files_modified mentioning D-83.
|
|
await writeFile(
|
|
join(phaseDir, '17-01-SUMMARY.md'),
|
|
'files_modified:\n - "src/unrelated.ts"\n',
|
|
'utf-8',
|
|
);
|
|
// Summary 02 — files_modified entry whose content mentions D-83.
|
|
await writeFile(
|
|
join(phaseDir, '17-02-SUMMARY.md'),
|
|
'files_modified:\n - "src/keeper.ts"\n',
|
|
'utf-8',
|
|
);
|
|
await mkdir(join(tmp, 'src'), { recursive: true });
|
|
await writeFile(join(tmp, 'src', 'unrelated.ts'), '// nothing relevant\n', 'utf-8');
|
|
await writeFile(join(tmp, 'src', 'keeper.ts'), '// honors D-83 in code\n', 'utf-8');
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoverageVerify([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
// If only the first SUMMARY were parsed, D-83 would be missing.
|
|
expect(result.data.honored).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(result.data.not_honored).toEqual([]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('rejects absolute files_modified paths outside projectDir (path traversal guard)', async () => {
|
|
await mkdir(phaseDir, { recursive: true });
|
|
await writeFile(
|
|
contextPath,
|
|
`# Phase 17
|
|
|
|
<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-84:** A trackable decision text spanning enough words to soft-match.
|
|
</decisions>
|
|
`,
|
|
'utf-8',
|
|
);
|
|
await writeFile(
|
|
join(phaseDir, '17-01-PLAN.md'),
|
|
planFile(` truths: []\n artifacts: []\n key_links: []`),
|
|
'utf-8',
|
|
);
|
|
// Summary points at /etc/passwd and a parent-traversal path. Both must be skipped.
|
|
await writeFile(
|
|
join(phaseDir, '17-01-SUMMARY.md'),
|
|
'files_modified:\n - "/etc/passwd"\n - "../../../etc/hostname"\n',
|
|
'utf-8',
|
|
);
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoverageVerify([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
// Should not honor D-84 from those files (and should not throw).
|
|
expect(result.data.honored).toBe(0);
|
|
expect(result.data.not_honored.map((u: { id: string }) => u.id)).toEqual(['D-84']);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('workstream-aware config (review F3)', () => {
|
|
it('honors workstream-scoped context_coverage_gate=false', async () => {
|
|
await setupPhase(
|
|
`<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-85:** A trackable decision long enough to potentially soft match.
|
|
</decisions>`,
|
|
{ '17-01-PLAN.md': planFile(` truths: []\n artifacts: []\n key_links: []`) },
|
|
);
|
|
// Root config does NOT disable the gate.
|
|
await mkdir(join(tmp, '.planning'), { recursive: true });
|
|
await writeFile(
|
|
join(tmp, '.planning', 'config.json'),
|
|
JSON.stringify({ workflow: { context_coverage_gate: true } }),
|
|
'utf-8',
|
|
);
|
|
// Workstream config DOES disable it.
|
|
await mkdir(join(tmp, '.planning', 'workstreams', 'feat-x'), { recursive: true });
|
|
await writeFile(
|
|
join(tmp, '.planning', 'workstreams', 'feat-x', 'config.json'),
|
|
JSON.stringify({ workflow: { context_coverage_gate: false } }),
|
|
'utf-8',
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Without workstream → enabled → would fail
|
|
const rootResult = await checkDecisionCoveragePlan([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
expect(rootResult.data.skipped).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(rootResult.data.passed).toBe(false);
|
|
|
|
// With workstream → workstream config disables → skipped
|
|
const wsResult = await checkDecisionCoveragePlan(
|
|
[phaseDir, contextPath],
|
|
tmp,
|
|
'feat-x',
|
|
);
|
|
expect(wsResult.data.skipped).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(wsResult.data.passed).toBe(true);
|
|
|
|
// Same for verify
|
|
const wsVerify = await checkDecisionCoverageVerify(
|
|
[phaseDir, contextPath],
|
|
tmp,
|
|
'feat-x',
|
|
);
|
|
expect(wsVerify.data.skipped).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('config-type validation (review F16)', () => {
|
|
it('warns and defaults to ON when context_coverage_gate is a number', async () => {
|
|
await setupPhase(
|
|
`<decisions>
|
|
### Cat
|
|
- **D-86:** A trackable decision text long enough to soft-match.
|
|
</decisions>`,
|
|
{ '17-01-PLAN.md': planFile(` truths: []\n artifacts: []\n key_links: []`) },
|
|
);
|
|
await mkdir(join(tmp, '.planning'), { recursive: true });
|
|
await writeFile(
|
|
join(tmp, '.planning', 'config.json'),
|
|
JSON.stringify({ workflow: { context_coverage_gate: 1 } }),
|
|
'utf-8',
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const warnings: string[] = [];
|
|
const origWarn = console.warn;
|
|
console.warn = (msg: string) => warnings.push(String(msg));
|
|
try {
|
|
const result = await checkDecisionCoveragePlan([phaseDir, contextPath], tmp);
|
|
// Defaulted to ON → not skipped, runs the gate (and fails with uncovered D-86).
|
|
expect(result.data.skipped).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(result.data.passed).toBe(false);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
console.warn = origWarn;
|
|
}
|
|
expect(warnings.some((w) => /context_coverage_gate.*invalid type/.test(w))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|