* test(#2913): add regression for hotfix empty-cherry-pick discrimination Two layers: (1) real-git test proving the discrimination logic (check for unmerged paths → skip if empty, abort if conflict) is correct; (2) source-text assertions proving the logic and summary heading are in release.yml. Before the fix: release.yml treats any non-zero cherry-pick exit as a conflict, so an already-applied commit (empty pick) aborts the entire hotfix create. * fix(#2913): distinguish empty cherry-pick from genuine conflict git cherry-pick exits non-zero for BOTH genuine conflicts AND empty picks (the change is already present by content). The hotfix create job treated every non-zero exit as a conflict, so an already-applied commit (notably the structural 'chore: sync next package version' that follows every release finalize) aborted the entire run. Now the error handler checks for unmerged paths (git diff --diff-filter=U): - No unmerged paths → already applied by content → skip, record, continue. - Unmerged paths present → genuine conflict → existing abort/push/exit-1 behavior and operator guidance, unchanged. The job summary now has a separate 'Skipped (already applied by content)' heading, distinct from 'Skipped (feat/refactor/etc)'. * fix(#2913): address review — post-skip continuation test + conflict observability Two findings from isolated adversarial review: 1. MINOR (test gap): no test proved the sequencer is clean after --skip, so a regression switching --skip to --quit would pass green. Added a second cherry-pick after the skip asserting it succeeds. 2. MINOR (observability): SKIPPED_EMPTY was dropped on the conflict-exit path — already-applied commits before a genuine conflict were silently lost from the summary. Now the conflict summary emits them under a dedicated heading. * chore(#2913): add changeset fragment * chore(#2913): backfill changeset PR number 2970 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Changeset Fragments
This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.
Why
Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.
See #2975 for the full rationale.
Adding a fragment
node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
--type Fixed \
--pr 1234 \
--body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"
This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.
Format
---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.
Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.
Opting out
PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.
At release time
Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:
node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty
This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.
Archived fragments
.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.