msd-core/docs/adr/1671-dynamic-context-management-platform.md

ADR-1671: Dynamic context management platform

• Status: Proposed
• Date: 2026-06-24
• Extends: ADR-0002 (Command Contract Validation Module), ADR-457 (build-at-publish generation model for bin/lib/*.cjs)
• Relates: ADR-857 §7 (Connected-Capability / MCP contract — kept deferred by this ADR)

Context

GSD ships command and workflow content as large, hand-edited Markdown files. Two structural problems compound:

1. Authoring is monolithic. A single workflow body carries every branch inline. gsd-core/workflows/plan-phase.md is 93,973 bytes / 1,770 lines; execute-phase.md is 93,426 bytes. Mutually-exclusive paths (--prd, --ingest, --mvp, --reviews) all live in the same file, so a runtime loads guidance for branches a given invocation will never take.

2. One payload ships to every runtime. Install copies the whole gsd-core/ tree (3.4 MB, 89 workflows, 1.7 MB) byte-identical to all 15 runtimes via copyWithPathReplacement (bin/install.js). The only per-runtime work is string rewrites and description truncation. There is no per-runtime trimming or splitting.

The result is constant pressure against size caps, enforced today only against source files (not emitted output) by a two-part guard (issue #1074): a per-file baseline ratchet plus per-tier hard caps (workflows XL 96 KiB / LARGE 60 KiB / DEFAULT 40 KiB; agents XL 56 KiB / LARGE 48 KiB / DEFAULT 24 KiB). Several files have almost no headroom — agents/gsd-verifier.md has 293 bytes. The one true emission-time cap, Windsurf's 12,000-byte limit (src/runtime-artifact-conversion.cts), is a hard throw with no graceful fallback. Adding one rule to a tight file forces an extract-to-references/ refactor (DEFECT.AGENT-FILE-SIZE-CAP-BREACH), turning a one-line edit into a multi-file change that ripples across stub frontmatter, the workflow body, reference fragments, and docs/ — each guarded by a different lint.

A separate but related pain: the repo-root CONTEXT.md predicate fact-store (~935 lines, ~200 KB of CLASS.subkey=value predicates that agent briefs are required to "cite verbatim") has no programmatic reader, validator, or selector. Briefs are hand-assembled, and META.RULE.brief-must-cite-doc is enforced only socially — paraphrasing from memory has caused real violations (5/8 agents in one documented batch).

The machinery already exists, in silos

Research into the codebase found that most JIT primitives are already present and proven; they are just single-purpose and not composed:

• Lazy reference loading — the init bundle. gsd_run query init.<cmd> (src/init.cts) returns JSON of paths + flags, not contents; the model reads only the files it needs ("paths only to minimize orchestrator context", plan-phase.md:66). This is Anthropic's recommended "lightweight identifiers over payloads" pattern, in production.
• Progressive disclosure — gsd-core/workflows/help.md reads only the one mode file matching the argument (brief 0.9 KB / default 1.9 KB / full 34 KB).
• Token-budgeted assembly — src/prompt-budget.cts applyBudget() already does priority-ordered, budget-trimmed composition with an omission note — but it is walled into the cross-AI review pipeline only.
• Pointer-passing channel — src/io.cts spills any payload > 50 KB to a tmpfile and returns @file:<path>.
• A codegen factory + drift-guard harness — 13 generators share one --check/--write idiom (derive fresh, diff committed, exit 1 on drift). scripts/gen-plugin-skills.cjs already generates 69 shipped SKILL.md files from commands/gsd/*.md.
• A reusable structured-markdown parser — src/markdown-sectionizer.cts, already powering the per-phase <decisions> fact-store reader (src/decisions.cts).

External practice

The closest external analogs are Anthropic Agent Skills' three-tier progressive disclosure (metadata → SKILL.md → bundled references), MCP resources/prompts/deferred-tools (list-then-fetch JIT), and priority/token-budget prompt renderers (Priompt, VS Code @vscode/prompt-tsx) that include the highest-priority fragments that fit a budget via a binary-search cutoff, with flexReserve floors for load-bearing content and <isolate> for a stable cacheable prefix. The portability catch is real and load-bearing: only the Skills format (directory + SKILL.md + frontmatter) is an open standard; native lazy loading is Claude-specific, and GSD's 15 runtimes do not all support skills or MCP (cf. surface-mismatch bugs #1614 antigravity, #1615 windsurf).

Decision

Adopt a dynamic context management platform built on a hybrid of build-time and run-time assembly, reusing the existing seams rather than inventing new infrastructure:

1. Fragment store (authoring model). Author workflow content as composable, priority-tagged fragments (workflow sections + shared references/ + predicate-derived blocks), each carrying an applicability condition (which flags / capabilities / runtimes require it). This is the net-new authoring discipline.

2. Build-time composer + per-runtime budget emission (the universal floor). Generalize prompt-budget.cts out of the review silo into a shared context-composer seam (src/*.cts → build:lib → bin/lib/*.cjs). At build/install time, for each command × runtime, the composer selects the needed fragments and trims by priority to fit that runtime's measured cap (scripts/workflow-size.cjs lfByteCount), emitting a right-sized artifact through the existing converter. Caps move from source to emitted output; the Windsurf 12 KB throw becomes a graceful auto-trim/auto-extract — noting that this throw is currently duplicated byte-identically in two surfaces, bin/install.js:2796-2797 and src/runtime-artifact-conversion.cts:1116-1117, so the change must land in both or they drift. This is what makes caps stop biting on non-lazy runtimes, and it requires no runtime feature — so it is the universal floor.

3. Progressive disclosure where the host supports it. On lazy-loading hosts (Claude Code and the Agent SDK), keep the stub + @-ref model and let the init bundle name exactly which files to read; the body and references load on demand.

4. Run-time selection via the init seam (per-request precision). Extend the init bundle / command-routing-hub dispatch (src/command-routing-hub.cts) to emit a typed manifest of which sections / references / predicates a specific invocation needs (given parsed args, flags, phase state, active capabilities), reusing the @file: spill channel for assembled fragments. This is layered on top of the fragment store.

5. Formalize the CONTEXT.md predicate fact-store → JIT selector. Give the predicate grammar a parser (on markdown-sectionizer), an ID-uniqueness validator, a --check/--write drift-guard, and a task → relevant predicate set selector. This converts hand-assembled briefs into JIT-generated context and attacks the maintainer-side "edit a 200 KB file by hand" pain directly. This is sequenced first (see Prototype) because it is the smallest, lowest-risk piece that proves the whole pattern.

6. Defer MCP (Connected-Capability). Per ADR-857 §7 / #956, a served MCP catalog (resources/prompts/deferred-tools) remains an additive future enhancement for MCP-capable runtimes — never a replacement for the file-copy floor. Not in scope here.

Options considered

Option	Summary	Fixes caps?	Runtime compat	Decision
A. Progressive-disclosure authoring	Metadata-first files + one-level references; lean on host lazy-load	Partial; needs host lazy-load	Authoring universal; native JIT Claude-first	Adopt as a layer
B. Build-time composer + per-runtime budget emission	Composer trims fragments to each runtime cap, emits right-sized files	Yes — measured before write	Universal floor	Adopt as core
C. Run-time selection via init seam	Init bundle names which slices this invocation needs	Reduces per-invocation context	Broad (the gsd_run shim is universal)	Adopt after B
D. MCP served catalog	Serve content as resources/prompts/deferred-tools	For MCP hosts only	Partial; needs 2nd channel	Defer (ADR-857 §7)
E. Predicate fact-store → JIT selector	Parse/validate/select CONTEXT.md predicates	Maintainer-side big-file pain	N/A (build + orchestrator)	Adopt first

Pure Agent Skills (A alone) and pure MCP (D alone) were rejected as the foundation because both are runtime-partial; only build-time emission (B) relieves caps on every runtime.

Architecture and contracts

• Fragment unit (open question, see below): either separate files (clean lazy-load + INVENTORY rows) or in-file section markers (<!-- gsd:section ... -->, mirroring the existing <!-- gsd:loop-host --> markers consumed by scripts/gen-loop-host-contract.cjs).

• Composer contract: an ordered list of fragments, each carrying a shrink strategy; the closed set is verbatim, head-shrink, proportional-truncate (with a per-fragment floor), and drop. flexReserve-style floors for load-bearing fragments (META.RULE citation rules, contribution gates, closing-keyword rules) generalize the existing per-plan 1024-byte floor. A byte-stable canonical prefix (<isolate>) is kept identical across runtimes to preserve KV-cache warmth and keep launcher-parity tests green.

  Amended by #2929 (Phase 2). This ADR originally specified the contract as "priority + binary-search cutoff to a per-runtime budget". Implementing Phase 2 established that a cutoff alone cannot express the function this platform generalizes: prompt-budget.applyBudget is not a cutoff but a fixed five-step ladder in which each section carries its own shrink strategy, and only three of its eight sections are ever droppable — PROJECT.md is head-shrunk to N lines and plans are proportionally tail-truncated with a per-plan floor, while instructions and roadmap are never trimmed at all. A cutoff composer sorts by priority and discards the tail; it has no way to say "shrink this one", "truncate that one but never below its floor", or "these three are the only droppables, in this order". Building to the literal wording and routing prompt-budget through it would have silently changed review-prompt output. Shrink strategies are therefore the core abstraction, and binary-search cutoff becomes one strategy among them — the right one for per-runtime emission in Phases 3-4, not for this ladder. Ordering is declaration order rather than a numeric priority field. This is an elaboration of the decision's intent, not a reversal of it.

• Applicability grammar (added by #2930, Phase 3). The fragment unit's when= attribute is deliberately a CLOSED grammar: exactly one atom from a frozen vocabulary — always, flag:--wave, state:gap-closure-phase, state:has-prior-phases — with no boolean operators, negation, or nesting, and an unknown when= value throws rather than being ignored. This is a Greenspun's-Tenth-Rule guard: left open-ended, when= acquires &&/!/precedence/runtime-capability predicates and becomes an ad-hoc, informally-specified predicate language grown one condition at a time. Widening the vocabulary requires a coordinated ADR amendment, not an organic edit. when= is parsed and validated in Phase 3 but not yet acted on; applicability selection is Phase 5.

• Budget unit: bytes for emission caps (matches lfByteCount, deterministic, offline-safe); a token estimate for run-time selection.

  Corrected by #2931 (Phase 4) — the Windsurf cap was never load-bearing. The Context section above states that the one true emission-time cap, Windsurf's 12,000-byte limit, "is a hard throw with no graceful fallback", and Phase 4 inherited that as "Windsurf installs that currently hard-fail will succeed". Measured on next at 640eaee16, that is false. convertClaudeCommandToWindsurfWorkflow emits a stub — a title, a one-line description, and an @-reference to the real command body — not an inlined workflow. Across all 71 commands/gsd/*.md the largest emission is 304 bytes against the 12,000-byte cap: 11,696 bytes of headroom, zero commands over. Reaching the throw requires a single frontmatter description field of ~11.7 KB. capabilities/windsurf/capability.json confirms this is the only commands converter for Windsurf (destSubpath: workflows).

  This was wrong at authoring rather than expired: fc2a7c055 (2026-06-23) introduced both the stub and the throw in a single commit, one day before this ADR was written (2026-06-24). The throw has never guarded a full body.

  Two consequences. First, epic user story 1 — "a solo developer on a capped runtime can install and run GSD without hitting size limits" — was already satisfied before this epic began, because Windsurf already uses the stub + @-ref progressive-disclosure model this ADR's Decision item 3 describes. Second, the real gap is narrower and was previously unstated: nothing anywhere measures an emitted artifact against its host's declared limit. Phase 4 closes that, and does not "fix Windsurf". The throw is removed in favor of truncating the description — the same bound its sibling convertClaudeCommandToWindsurfSkill already applied — which makes the cap unreachable by construction and leaves the 12,000 constant in exactly one place: the guard table. That eliminates the DEFECT.GENERATIVE-FIX dual-surface duplication this ADR flags, rather than adding a parity test for it.

• Determinism + drift-guard: every generated artifact follows the universal --check/--write idiom and is committed; any constant shared between two surfaces gets a DEFECT.GENERATIVE-FIX parity assertion. Caps are asserted on emitted per-runtime bytes via real spawn-install tests (engine-direct tests are false-green for install behavior).

• Boundary coverage: the composer's budget logic is tested at cap-1 / cap / cap+1 per RULESET.TESTS.boundary-coverage.

Migration path

Sequenced to de-risk — prove the pattern on the smallest surface first, scale last:

1. This ADR establishes the platform, the fragment/composer contract, emission-time caps, and the drift-guard requirement.

2. Prototype the predicate fact-store (Option E) — landed with this ADR as a non-shipping reference example under examples/dynamic-context-management/ (see Prototype below).

3. Lift prompt-budget.cts out of the review silo into a shared context-composer seam with fast-check property tests + boundary coverage.

4. Pilot fragmentization on one XL workflow (plan-phase.md or execute-phase.md): split into priority-tagged sections + applicability; composer emits per-runtime; prove byte-identical-or-smaller output and green gsd-test docker.

5. Move caps from source to emitted output; turn the Windsurf throw into graceful auto-trim; auto-regenerate size baselines on intentional edits.

   Superseded in part by ADR-2719 (#2724), which landed after this ADR. There are no size baselines left to auto-regenerate: tests/workflow-size-baseline.json, tests/agent-size-baseline.json, scripts/update-size-baseline.cjs and npm run size:baseline were all deleted, and the differential attribution check is now the sole gate (RULESET.EMITTED_ATTRIBUTION). ADR-2719 also already moved hash propagation to emitted per-runtime artifacts across 19 manifests. What it did not move is the size ratchet, which still keys on source dirs (currentSizes reads gsd-core/workflows/*.md and agents/*.md by bare filename). Phase 4 therefore adds an absolute per-runtime cap over emitted bytes — reusing ADR-2719's existing spawn-install walk — and deliberately leaves the growth ratchet source-keyed: re-keying it onto the 8,529 emitted paths would turn one acknowledgment per edited file into roughly nineteen, which is how a gate becomes something contributors route around.

6. Wire the init bundle (C) to emit a per-invocation sections manifest; workflows consume it.

7. Roll out across LARGE/XL tiers; update INVENTORY families + parity tests.

8. (Deferred) MCP served catalog (ADR-857 §7 / #956).

Ordering landmine: any generator consuming compiled output must run after build:lib (tsc), like gen-plugin-skills / gen-capability-registry; regenerating before build:lib silently drops unbuilt modules (gsd-inventory-manifest-regen-needs-build).

Consequences

Positive

• Caps stop biting: each runtime's emitted artifact is measured and trimmed before write.
• A discovered fact lands in one fragment / predicate, not 4 hand-edited surfaces.
• Reuses the existing converter, drift-guard, boundary-test, and markdown-sectionizer infrastructure — the net-new pieces are only the fragment model and the composer.
• Opens a path to collapse the 10+ hand-written per-runtime body converters toward a data-driven spec.

Negative / risks

• Trimming a load-bearing fragment is a correctness hazard (history: paraphrased META.RULE → agent violations). Mitigate with flexReserve floors, a Promptfoo-style eval gate, and boundary tests.

  Amended by #2931 (Phase 4) — the eval gate is deterministic, not model-graded. A blocking CI gate driven by exogenously-graded LLM judgment, as Phase 4 originally worded it, contradicts two recorded decisions: PROBE.ci.surface — "the contract (parse/validate, projection round-trip, fail-closed guards), NEVER the LLM judgment" (ADR-550 D5) — and PROHIB.judgment-tier — "never-silent / never-hard-halt soft gate" (ADR-550 D4). PROHIB.recall further records that there is no compiled prohibition-probe recall engine to source an assertion set from; the PROHIB.*/PROBE.* classes describe the architecture of that subsystem, not a corpus of prohibitions about workflow content.

  The gate therefore asserts the contract, which is both blocking and deterministic: composeWithinBudget already returns omitted, shrunk, floored and isolatePrefix, so the gate proves no fragment declared load-bearing was omitted or shrunk, that a floored fragment is a success rather than a finding, and that the isolate prefix survives byte-identical. It carries an explicit anti-vacuity rule — an empty load-bearing set fails, because a gate asserting over nothing proves nothing. No model participates. This satisfies the mitigation this section asks for while honoring D4/D5.

• Per-runtime emission multiplies artifacts across the 15 × N matrix (inventory/parity surface).

• Build-order fragility (must run after build:lib).

• Dual-surface drift if any future MCP channel is added — requires parity assertions.

Prototype (step 2, Option E) — non-shipping reference example

A working prototype proves the platform pattern end-to-end. It ships as a reference example only, under examples/dynamic-context-management/ — deliberately outside the build (src/ → bin/lib/), the npm package files[], the installer, and the CI test suite (tests/). Nothing in it is compiled into or installed with GSD; the production implementation lands in a later phase.

• examples/dynamic-context-management/context-predicates.cjs — pure parser/selector: parsePredicates(markdown) (handles bare and list-item backtick predicate forms, splits on first =, skips fenced code / blockquote prose, detects duplicate IDs), selectPredicates(predicates, {klass, prefix, contains}) (the JIT "task → predicate set" selector), and buildIndex(predicates) (deterministic, sorted).
• examples/dynamic-context-management/gen-context-index.cjs — self-contained CLI with --check/--write drift-guard plus a --select <query> mode demonstrating JIT brief assembly.
• examples/dynamic-context-management/CONTEXT-INDEX.json — sample generated index: 415 predicates, 20 classes (verified 2026-07-31; down from 416 after #2928/PR #2938 reconciled the last duplicate predicate ID, RULESET.WORKFLOW_MARKDOWN.FENCES). Originally committed as 393 predicates, 18 classes (2026-06-24); CONTEXT.md has since gained the PROBE (11) and PROHIB (10) classes, with DEFECT 161→167 and RULESET 59→56→55. The committed artifact had gone stale (--check exited 1) and was regenerated with --write.
• examples/dynamic-context-management/demo.cjs + README.md — runnable usage example and notes.

During research the slice was validated with 42 behavioral tests (predicate forms, fenced-code / prose skipping, duplicate-id detection, the selector, a deterministic index, and a fast-check property test); those landed as CI tests under tests/ with the production implementation (#2928/PR #2938).

The prototype immediately surfaced 3 latent duplicate predicate IDs in CONTEXT.md (RULESET.WORKFLOW_MARKDOWN.FENCES, RULESET.GEMINI.TOOLS.ask_user, RULESET.GEMINI.TEST_SENTINEL) — integrity drift no existing tool catches.

Re-checked 2026-07-31: the two RULESET.GEMINI.* duplicates were removed along with the Gemini runtime, not reconciled deliberately; the remaining RULESET.WORKFLOW_MARKDOWN.FENCES duplicate was reconciled deliberately in #2928/PR #2938, which also productionized --check into CI so it now fails closed on any new duplicate ID.

Phase 0 acceptance status (2026-07-31). The epic's Phase 0 criterion — "gen-context-index --check green in CI" — was unmet: --check exited 1 against next, and no CI job failed, because the example sits deliberately outside tests/ — the red was invisible to the pipeline. The index has now been regenerated and --check exits 0.

That is a point-in-time true-up, not a fix. Per Open question 4, the index is keyed on baked line numbers, so it will re-drift on the next CONTEXT.md line shift. The criterion stays fragile until the keying changes — and it stays silently fragile for as long as the drift-guard remains outside CI.

Prototype scope notes: the parser is intentionally self-contained for the example; production should consume the compiled markdown-sectionizer seam, live under src/ → bin/lib/, and be drift-guarded by a generator wired into the build after build:lib.

Done (#2928). Production landed under src/context-predicates.cts → gsd-core/bin/lib/context-predicates.cjs (ADR-457 build-at-publish). Fence-aware line skipping mirrors markdown-sectionizer.cts's exported scanFencedBlocks delimiter-matching rule exactly (byte-for-behavior parity proven by a dedicated test suite) via a LOCAL, interleaved single pass, rather than a call into that seam directly: a two-pass design (mask comments, then call scanFencedBlocks, or the reverse) cannot correctly resolve mutual precedence between HTML comments and fences in both directions — a fence delimiter inside a real comment (with no later real closer) was found to falsely skip the rest of the file to EOF, and the converse ordering falsely let a comment token inside a real fence leak past the fence's own close — so the two constructs are scanned together, each suppressing the other's open/close detection while active (post-#2928-review fix; see src/context-predicates.cts's module doc comment). scripts/gen-context-index.cjs --check/--write is wired into lint:generated-sync (so lint:ci, CI-gated) and into build (after build:lib) and regen:derived; the selector is exposed live via gsd-tools query context-predicates --class|--prefix|--contains.

Open questions

1. Fragment unit: separate files vs in-file section markers?
2. Build-time emission vs run-time assembly as the primary surface during migration (double-write vs per-workflow cutover)?
3. Whether/when to invest in per-runtime native channels (skills, MCP) above the universal file floor.

Resolved by #2928 — index keying: stable IDs, with no line field at all. Question 4 asked stable IDs vs baked line numbers: CONTEXT-INDEX.json stored each predicate's line, so --check re-drifted on any CONTEXT.md line shift — a typo fix three sections up failed the gate. Raised by @davesienkowski (#1671, 2026-06-25). The shipped resolution is stronger than the option originally proposed (keying the comparison on stable IDs with line retained as non-compared metadata): the committed ContextIndex.predicates entries carry no line field at all. Committed-but-uncompared metadata goes silently stale — the same defect class the drift-guard exists to catch, with the alarm removed — so it was dropped from the committed artifact rather than merely excluded from the comparison. line is still returned by the live parsePredicates/gsd-tools query context-predicates result for callers that want to cite a source location; only the committed docs/CONTEXT-INDEX.json shape omits it.

Resolved by other work — not carried as open. A fourth question was proposed in review (#1671, 2026-06-25): what populates the eval-gate assertion set, and is it graded exogenously? Since that review, the answer has landed as first-class predicate classes rather than remaining a design gap: PROBE.principle (verifier-reach-equals-spec-reach), PROBE.family (edge-probe + prohibition-probe + ui-consideration-probe), PROBE.protocol (recall → precision), and PROHIB.judgment-tier (exogenous grading) — see ADR-550 D4/D7 and ADR-1606. The PROHIB.* predicates live in the same CONTEXT.md store this ADR formalizes, which is the single-store property that review asked for.

Resolved by #2930 (Phase 3) — fragment unit: in-file <!-- gsd:section id= when= --> markers. Question 1 asked separate files vs in-file section markers. Confirmed with the maintainer: separate files are eliminated by this phase's own acceptance criterion — "emitted output byte-identical-or-smaller" — because splitting a workflow into files changes the emitted tree's shape, which is neither identical nor smaller, it is different; it also multiplies INVENTORY rows and @-ref contract surface for no Phase-3 benefit. A sidecar fragment manifest keyed on heading anchors was also rejected: zero source growth, but it creates a second surface that drifts from the workflow — the exact multi-surface edit pain the epic exists to remove (DEFECT.GENERATIVE-FIX), and directly against the epic's "one fragment, not 4 surfaces" thesis. The shipped answer is in-file markers, stripped at emit so the installed artifact carries no build metadata and shrinks; markers are self-anchoring (no line-number keying — Open question 4 already rejected that for the predicate index, and the same reasoning applies here), and the existing <!-- gsd:loop-host … --> block at plan-phase.md:1 is in-repo precedent for the form. Production landed under src/workflow-fragments.cts → gsd-core/bin/lib/workflow-fragments.cjs (ADR-457 build-at-publish), piloted on execute-phase.md. The pilot was retargeted from plan-phase.md mid-phase, and the reason is itself the most important finding here. The branches the epic names as motivating (--prd, --ingest, --mvp, --reviews) all live in plan-phase.md — but plan-phase.md sits only 36 B under an independent, pre-existing size gate (tests/phase6-capstone-conformance.test.cjs's PRE_PHASE6, an ADR-857 Phase-6 completion property that this ADR's own Blast-radius analysis did not enumerate against, catching only the XL cap). It cannot absorb even the smallest marker overhead, so it could not be fragmentized at all under this phase's grammar, independent of any shape limitation. The pilot instead proves the mechanism on state- and flag-gated <step> blocks in execute-phase.md (partial-wave/flag:--wave, gap-closure-artifacts/state:gap-closure-phase, regression-gate/state:has-prior-phases), which has 728 B of real headroom under its own PRE_PHASE6 gate. This is direct evidence for the epic's premise that fragmentization pays off, but it also means Phase 4 (moving size caps from source bytes to emitted bytes) may need to land before plan-phase.md itself can be fragmentized. Separately, and independent of the size-gate finding: the marker grammar addresses SECTION-shaped branches only — a whole-line, non-nesting comment pair around a contiguous block — and --mvp's content in plan-phase.md is INTERLEAVED rather than sectioned (MVP_MODE resolution shares a bash block with --tdd/--no-tracer/--no-reversibility-gates at plan-phase.md:125-158, and is inline ${MVP_MODE === 'true' ? ... } template interpolation at :794-803), so --mvp would remain unmarkable by this grammar even if the size gate allowed it. Phase 6 must either accept that gap or introduce a finer-grained (sub-line) mechanism for interleaved branches.

Resolved by #2930 (Phase 3) — build-time emission is the primary surface; per-workflow cutover, no double-write. Question 2 asked build-time emission vs run-time assembly as the primary surface during migration, and whether that requires a double-write period. Because markers are stripped at emit, an unmarked workflow parses to exactly one implicit fragment and composes back byte-identical by construction — that structural guarantee is what makes a per-workflow cutover safe file-by-file, with no double-write period and no flag day: a workflow can gain markers on its own schedule without touching any other workflow's emission path. Phase 5's run-time selection is planned to consume a build-derived manifest, not markers read at run time, keeping the run-time surface decoupled from the authoring surface.

Related

• ADR-0002 — Command Contract Validation Module (the stub <execution_context> @-ref contract this platform's emission must keep satisfying).
• ADR-457 — build-at-publish generation model (the codegen + drift-guard precedent the composer extends).
• ADR-857 §7 — Connected-Capability / MCP contract (the deferred served-catalog channel).