* test(#4011): TDD gate keys on TDD_MODE alone, not the MVP intersection Contract updates: no shipped line may conjoin MVP_MODE with TDD_MODE as a gate condition, the end-of-phase escalation must not require MVP, the executor agent's gate section triggers on TDD_MODE alone, and the gate semantics reference loads without MVP_MODE. * fix(#4011): key the TDD runtime gate on TDD_MODE alone The RED-commit gate shipped as #76's MVP slice kept the paired invocation's conjunct, so workflow.tdd_mode=true was silently inert on every non-MVP phase, contradicting references/tdd.md's own contract. Drops the MVP conjunct from the per-task gate and the end-of-phase review escalation; rescopes execute-mvp-tdd.md's load condition, gsd-executor's gate section, and mvp-concepts' intersection claim. MVP remains free to imply TDD; the file is not renamed (stated assumption in the PR body). * test(#4011): scope no-conjunct detector to shell conditions; clean stale MVP+TDD phrasing Review follow-ups: the detector now only inspects if/[ condition lines so explanatory prose mentioning both flags cannot trip it; remaining 'under/outside MVP+TDD' phrases in execute-phase.md, the gate reference, and docs/INVENTORY.md now describe TDD-mode semantics. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: execute-phase.md — TDD-gate decoupling comment + escalation rescoping (#4011) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-executor.md — gate section trigger rescoped to TDD_MODE alone (#4011) * chore(#4011): backfill changeset pr number --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Changeset Fragments
This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.
Why
Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.
See #2975 for the full rationale.
Adding a fragment
node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
--type Fixed \
--pr 1234 \
--body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"
This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.
Format
---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.
Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.
Opting out
PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.
At release time
Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:
node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty
This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.
Archived fragments
.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.