Files
msd-core/docs
Michel Moreira af822a8024 fix(#4776): resolve the artifact-exists prompt under --auto (#4832)
* fix(#4776): resolve the artifact-exists prompt under --auto

/gsd-ui-phase <phase> --auto stopped at 'UI-SPEC.md already exists for
Phase {N}. What would you like to do?' whenever the file was on disk —
which is most often after an earlier run wrote the contract as a draft
and ended before its checker ran, exactly the state a re-run exists to
verify. Step 4 had no --auto arm; step 9.5 in the same file has had one
since it was added, which is how the drift went unnoticed.

Step 4 now auto-selects Skip: the existing UI-SPEC is left untouched and
the run proceeds to the checker. Skip is the only non-destructive choice
— Update re-runs the researcher, which rewrites the whole contract and
drops answers a person already recorded in it, and View exits without
verifying anything.

spec-phase.md's artifact-exists arm auto-selected 'Update it', which is
the same defect with the opposite sign: an unattended run regenerating a
spec nobody is watching. Per the decision recorded on #4776 — an
unattended run reuses an existing artifact rather than regenerating it —
it now auto-selects Skip and leaves the spec unchanged.

The max-revision-iterations escalation (Force approve / Edit manually /
Abandon) is deliberately untouched and pinned by a test: accepting
blocking findings is a decision a person makes.

Closes #4776

* chore(#4776): add changeset fragment

Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: ui-phase.md — --auto arm added to the existing-UI-SPEC branch (#4776)
Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: spec-phase.md — --auto arm reworded to reuse the existing SPEC (#4776)

* fix(#4776): extend the reuse-as-is --auto fix to the 3 sibling files

The PR's original scope claim -- that ai-integration-phase.md,
eval-review.md and ui-review.md were "scoped by triage to their own
issues" -- was false; no such issues existed, and it contradicted #4776's
own most recent (2026-09-16) triage comment, which explicitly widened the
fix to require all 5 files under one recommended fix.

Applies the same reuse-as-is pattern: ai-integration-phase.md mirrors
ui-phase.md's 3-way Update/View/Skip shape (auto-selects Skip);
eval-review.md and ui-review.md have only Re-audit/View (auto-selects
View, the only non-regenerating choice). None of the three had any prior
--auto handling at all -- each has exactly one AskUserQuestion call site
total, and it is the one this fix resolves, so an --auto run through any
of them no longer stalls anywhere.

Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: ai-integration-phase.md — the --auto arm reusing an existing AI-SPEC is the deliverable (#4776)
Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: eval-review.md — the --auto arm reusing an existing EVAL-REVIEW is the deliverable (#4776)
Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: ui-review.md — the --auto arm reusing an existing UI-REVIEW is the deliverable (#4776)

---------

Co-authored-by: Tom Boucher <trekkie@nomorestars.com>
2026-09-23 11:13:34 -04:00
..

GSD Core documentation

Documentation is organised into four quadrants: tutorials help you learn by doing, how-to guides solve specific tasks, reference states authoritative facts, and explanation explores concepts and design decisions.

Language versions: English · Português (pt-BR) · 日本語 · 简体中文


Tutorials


How-to guides


Reference

  • Commands — every command with flags and examples
  • Configuration — full config schema, model profiles, git branching strategies
  • CLI tools — gsd-tools.cjs programmatic API for workflows and agents
  • JSON error mode — gsd-tools failure channels: faults (stderr, exit 1) vs degraded results (stdout, exit 0), and the reason-code taxonomy
  • Features — complete feature index
  • Inventory — installed skills and surface map
  • STATE.md schema — field-by-field reference for .planning/STATE.md
  • CONTEXT.md schema — field-by-field reference for .planning/phases/<N>/CONTEXT.md
  • PLAN.md schema — field-by-field reference for .planning/phases/<N>/PLAN.md
  • Planning artifacts — all .planning/ files and their roles
  • Review and verification capabilities — code review, security, and Nyquist capability ownership and hook contracts
  • Gate predicates — canonical specification of the phase-gate predicate vocabulary
  • Capability matrix — generated catalogue of every capability's role, tier, extension points, hook kinds, and engines.gsd
  • Exit code reference — generated catalogue of every registered process exit code, its name, meaning, and owning module, plus the reserved bands and the v1/v2 exit contract
  • Capability manifest — the full capability.json schema and validation rules
  • gsd capability command — install / update / remove / list reference for third-party capabilities
  • Workflow fragments — in-file <!-- gsd:section --> marker grammar for fragmentizing workflow markdown at emission time
  • Partition rules for compact-content splits — the protected-content list, sentinel syntax, and the five CI checks a workflow.compact_content spine/detail split must obey
  • Reviewer Lane Registry — generated catalogue of third-party reviewer lanes, with their flags, transport, and install commands

Explanation