* fix(#3132): realign spec/plan/ui-phase workflow prose from retired covered/backstop-as-status to resolved+verification
The edge-probe resolution model splits status (resolved|dismissed|unresolved)
from verification (explicit|backstop). The workflow prose in three files still
used the pre-re-cut covered/backstop-as-status vocabulary that validateResolution
rejects.
Swept all three prose surfaces:
- spec-phase.md: Step 5.5 resolution options, --auto mode + log line, comment, Step 6 row list
- plan-phase.md: lift rule (L778/L780), comments (L564/L706), quality gate (L826-827)
- ui-phase.md: resolution loop (L391), --auto mode (L405-409), write-back format (L415)
Added regression test in edge-probe-spec-phase-contract.test.cjs asserting the
retired vocab is absent and resolved+verification is used instead.
* chore(#3132): add changeset + emitted-drift ack for workflow vocab realignment
* fix(#3132): update planner contract tests for resolved+verification vocabulary
RR-02 and RR-03 tests asserted the old covered/backstop-as-status vocab.
Updated to match the realigned prose (resolved edge → must_haves).
* fix(#3132): fix specless-probe-fallback test assertion + merge duplicate ack
Test assertion was too strict (expected auto-resolved + verification:explicit
on same line). Split into two independent assertions.
Merged plan-phase.md ack into existing #2658 fragment to resolve duplicate-path
rule violation.
* fix(#3132): use bare filenames in ack keys (size map keys are bare, not full paths)
* fix(#3132): amend existing acks instead of duplicating — remove plan-phase from #2658, spec-phase from #3132, append #3132 reason to #0000 and #2650
* chore(#3132): backfill changeset PR number 3138
---------
Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>