* fix(#2615): document the effortSurface axis in the host-integration matrix #2481 added `effortSurface` as the ninth negotiated `hostIntegration` axis and wrote documentation-sourced values into 18 descriptors, but never touched `docs/reference/host-integration-capability-matrix.md`. The matrix that ADR-1239 designates the cited source of truth had zero occurrences of the axis: no entry in the axes legend, and no row in any of the per-runtime tables. `src/host-integration.cts` states "every value is documented or explicitly 'undocumented'" — for this axis that was false for every runtime. Adds the legend entry (the `argv` / `none` / `undocumented` vocabulary, plus why there is deliberately no config-file member) and an `effortSurface` row to all 19 per-runtime tables. Every citation is carried over from #2481's own commit message, where the values were sourced: - claude argv -- `claude --help` documents `--effort <level>` - opencode argv -- `opencode run --help` documents `--variant` - codex argv -- `model_reasoning_effort` is a config.toml key, not a dedicated flag, so the generic `-c key=value` override is the only argv route (still argv) - 15 hosts undocumented -- their docs state no reasoning setting kimi-code is the nineteenth section (added by #2603 after #2481) and is the one runtime with no declared value. Its row and a Documentation-gaps entry record why rather than inventing one: Kimi Code documents `/effort` (alias `/thinking`), but only as an INTERACTIVE slash command — `-m, --model` is the only model-adjacent argv. Neither vocabulary member is accurate (`none` would deny a mechanism the host has, `argv` would claim one it does not expose), so closing that gap needs a vocabulary decision, which is a negotiation change and not a documentation one. The absent value already degrades closed exactly as the sentinel does. The regression test derives its runtime list from the registry rather than hardcoding it, so a runtime added later fails until its matrix row exists — the ratchet whose absence let #2481 add an axis with nothing catching the missing docs. Closes #2615 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QT3ibz5qJuDuGqpTGRYVGf * docs(#2615): honest citations for the undocumented rows; fix the four stale 8-axis lists Two findings from the orthogonal review of the first commit. 1. The 15 `undocumented` rows shared byte-identical text — "searched the runtime's official docs (see Sources consulted above)" — which is weaker than this file's own convention ("no authoritative doc — searched: <url>") and, worse, implies a per-host targeted search that did not happen: each section's Sources-consulted list was gathered for OTHER axes and contains no CLI-reference or reasoning-effort source. The rows now say plainly what the finding is — an ABSENCE established by #2481's cross-host survey — and cite that survey rather than implying a URL was checked per host. 2. Four normative docs still described "the eight negotiated axes" and omitted effortSurface entirely. The worst of them is docs/how-to/add-or-update-a-host-integration.md — the maintainer's own guide for onboarding a host, whose Step 2 axis table would have a maintainer reproduce exactly the gap #2615 exists to close. Also fixed: docs/reference/host-integration-interface.md (which calls itself the normative reference and had no effortSurface row at all), docs/how-to/author-a-host-plugin.md, docs/registries/README.md ("**exactly** the eight … axes keys"), and CONTEXT.md's matching EoS-registry sentence. Deliberately NOT changed, because they are historical records rather than current contract: docs/whats-new-1.7.0.md and docs/FEATURES.md's 1.7.0 entry (effortSurface shipped in 1.8.0 via #2481 — rewriting them would falsify the release history), ADR-1239's pre-amendment body (already superseded by its own "Amendment (2026-07-21): effortSurface axis (#2481)"), and ADR-1016's "original eight axes", which refers to a different axis set entirely. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QT3ibz5qJuDuGqpTGRYVGf * chore(#2615): backfill changeset PR number (#2698) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
GSD Registries: Community Capability Registry & EoS Registry
Specification, entry schema, and submission process for GSD's two third-party discoverability catalogs — the GSD Community Capability Registry and the GSD EoS Registry.
Non-endorsement stance
Inclusion in this registry means only that a maintainer merged a PR that linked to the author's repository. It is not an endorsement. GSD has not reviewed, tested, audited, or verified the correctness, quality, safety, or security of any listed solution, nor its claimed GSD interactions. Use at your own risk; evaluate the linked source yourself. Entries are removed only for illegal content, malware, spam, or a link that is dead/completely non-functional — never curated for quality.
This stance applies identically to every entry in both registries. It is reproduced verbatim at the top of each generated catalog (capability-registry.md, eos-registry.md).
Narrow removal policy
A merged entry is removed only for one of these reasons:
- The linked content is illegal.
- The linked repository distributes malware.
- The entry is spam (not a genuine, working solution).
- The linked repository or its default branch is dead or completely non-functional (404, archived-and-empty, permanently inaccessible).
A registry entry is never removed for quality, staleness of a working project, disagreement with its design, or because a maintainer would have built it differently. The registry is a directory, not a curated marketplace — see Non-endorsement stance above.
What gets listed
Two independent catalogs, sharing one schema shape, one non-endorsement stance, and one submission process:
- Community Capability Registry (
docs/registries/capability-registry.md, generated fromdocs/registries/capabilities.json) — third-party Feature Capabilities: plug-ins that attach at GSD's Loop Extension Points (ADR-857, ADR-894, ADR-1244) and are installed withgsd capability install <spec>. - EoS Registry (
docs/registries/eos-registry.md, generated fromdocs/registries/eos.json) — third-party Embeddable Orchestration System (EoS) host integrations: projects that embed GSD as an orchestration engine inside a host through the ADR-1239 Host-Integration Interface.
Both registries are non-endorsing discoverability catalogs (issue #2182). Neither is the runtime Capability Registry (the generated manifest consumed at load time, ADR-894 §5) or the Capability Registry Overlay (the runtime loader that merges an installed third-party manifest into that generated registry, ADR-1244 D2) — see CONTEXT.md → "Community Capability Registry" and "EoS Registry" for the full disambiguation.
Entry schema
Every entry is one JSON object in docs/registries/capabilities.json or docs/registries/eos.json, validated by scripts/registry-schema.cjs. Field names below are exact and case-sensitive; unknown top-level keys are rejected.
Capability entries (capabilities.json, type: "capability")
| Field | Required | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
id |
yes | Unique slug across the registry (^[a-z0-9]+(-[a-z0-9]+)*$). |
name |
yes | Human-readable name. |
type |
yes | Must equal "capability". |
repo |
yes | owner/repo on github.com — the author's own repository. |
description |
yes | One-paragraph plain-language description of the solution and the problem it solves. |
author |
yes | Author name (and, optionally, contact). |
license |
yes | SPDX identifier (or UNLICENSED / Proprietary). |
enginesGsd |
yes | Declared engines.gsd semver range (ADR-1244 D1), e.g. >=1.6.0. |
install |
yes | Exact, copy-pasteable install command — the ADR-1244 URL-import flow, e.g. gsd capability install https://github.com/OWNER/REPO.git#v1.0.0. |
uninstall |
yes | Exact, copy-pasteable removal command, e.g. gsd capability remove <id>. |
interactions |
yes | Object — see below. |
discussion |
yes | URL of this entry's GitHub Discussion (https://github.com/<owner>/<repo>/discussions/<n>). |
interactions (Capability):
| Field | Required | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
loopExtensionPoints |
yes, non-empty | Subset of the 12 Loop Extension Points the capability registers on: discuss:pre, discuss:post, plan:pre, plan:post, execute:pre, execute:wave:pre, execute:wave:post, execute:post, verify:pre, verify:post, ship:pre, ship:post. |
hookKinds |
yes | Subset of step, contribution, gate — the hook kind registered at each point above. |
configKeys |
yes | Array of federated config keys the capability owns (may be empty). |
requires |
yes | Array of other Capability ids this capability depends on (may be empty). |
runtimeCompat |
yes | Array of compatible runtimes; ["all"] is allowed. |
produces |
yes | Array describing artifacts/data the capability produces (may be empty). |
consumes |
yes | Array describing artifacts/data the capability consumes (may be empty). |
Example:
{
"id": "linear-issue-sync",
"name": "Linear Issue Sync",
"type": "capability",
"repo": "some-org/gsd-cap-linear-sync",
"description": "Mirrors ROADMAP.md items to Linear issues as a ship:post contribution.",
"author": "Some Org <hello@some-org.example>",
"license": "MIT",
"enginesGsd": ">=1.6.0",
"install": "gsd capability install https://github.com/some-org/gsd-cap-linear-sync.git#v1.0.0",
"uninstall": "gsd capability remove linear-issue-sync",
"interactions": {
"loopExtensionPoints": ["ship:post"],
"hookKinds": ["contribution"],
"configKeys": ["linear-issue-sync.enabled"],
"requires": [],
"runtimeCompat": ["all"],
"produces": ["linear-issue-links"],
"consumes": ["ROADMAP.md"]
},
"discussion": "https://github.com/open-gsd/gsd-core/discussions/1234"
}
EoS entries (eos.json, type: "eos")
| Field | Required | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
id |
yes | Unique slug across the registry. |
name |
yes | Human-readable name. |
type |
yes | Must equal "eos". |
repo |
yes | owner/repo on github.com — the author's own repository. |
description |
yes | One-paragraph plain-language description of the host integration. |
author |
yes | Author name (and, optionally, contact). |
license |
yes | SPDX identifier (or UNLICENSED / Proprietary). |
enginesGsd |
yes | Declared engines.gsd semver range this integration targets. |
protocolVersion |
yes | Integer ≥ 1 — the ADR-1239 PROTOCOL_VERSION this integration implements. |
install |
yes | The host-plugin's own install steps (free string). |
uninstall |
yes | The host-plugin's own teardown steps (free string). |
interactions |
yes | Object — see below. |
discussion |
yes | URL of this entry's GitHub Discussion. |
interactions (EoS):
| Field | Required | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
interfacePoints |
yes, non-empty | Subset of the six ADR-1239 interface points it binds: command, dispatch, model, hooks, state, artifact. |
profile |
yes | One of the three host-capability profiles: programmatic-cli, declarative-cli, ide. |
axes |
yes | Object with exactly the nine ADR-1239 negotiated axes keys: embeddingMode, commandSurface, dispatch, modelMode, hookBus, stateIO, transport, runtime, effortSurface. |
axes value vocabulary:
| Axis | Allowed values |
|---|---|
embeddingMode |
imperative, declarative |
commandSurface |
slash-file, slash-programmatic, slash-toml, palette, prose-only |
dispatch |
Free descriptive string (ADR-1239 dispatch is a structured object; the registry accepts a human summary). |
modelMode |
active, passive |
hookBus |
host, engine, none |
stateIO |
filesystem, sandboxed-storage, session-log-append |
transport |
mcp, native-extension |
runtime |
node, bun, sandboxed-web, python, go, rust, electron, other |
Example:
{
"id": "acme-editor-embed",
"name": "Acme Editor GSD Embed",
"type": "eos",
"repo": "some-org/acme-gsd-embed",
"description": "Embeds GSD as an orchestration engine inside the Acme editor's command palette.",
"author": "Some Org <hello@some-org.example>",
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"enginesGsd": ">=1.6.0",
"protocolVersion": 1,
"install": "Install the Acme GSD Embed extension from the Acme marketplace — see https://github.com/some-org/acme-gsd-embed#install",
"uninstall": "Remove the extension from Acme's extension manager.",
"interactions": {
"interfacePoints": ["command", "dispatch", "model", "hooks", "state", "artifact"],
"profile": "ide",
"axes": {
"embeddingMode": "declarative",
"commandSurface": "palette",
"dispatch": "Routes palette invocations through Acme's own task-runner to gsd_run",
"modelMode": "active",
"hookBus": "host",
"stateIO": "filesystem",
"transport": "native-extension",
"runtime": "electron"
}
},
"discussion": "https://github.com/open-gsd/gsd-core/discussions/1235"
}
Submission process
Registration is a documentation PR, per CONTRIBUTING.md → Documentation Updates:
- Fork the repository.
- Edit
docs/registries/capabilities.json(Capability Registry) ordocs/registries/eos.json(EoS Registry) and append exactly one entry matching the schema above. - Run
npm run gen:registryto regenerate the correspondingdocs/registries/capability-registry.mdordocs/registries/eos-registry.md. Commit both the JSON source and the regenerated markdown. - Open a PR from a
docs/<issue#>-<slug>branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md branch-naming conventions) using the registry-entry PR template. - A maintainer reviews and merges. The only gate is whether the entry is a real, linkable solution with all required fields present — not a quality judgment (see Non-endorsement stance).
One entry = one PR. Do not bundle multiple registry additions, updates, or removals into a single PR.
The generated .md files are GENERATED — never hand-edit them. docs/registries/capability-registry.md and docs/registries/eos-registry.md are produced by scripts/gen-registry.cjs from capabilities.json / eos.json. A PR that edits the generated markdown without a matching JSON source change will fail the gen:registry --check drift gate. Always edit the JSON and regenerate.
Latest-release tracking
Each entry embeds a live shields.io badge and a permalink to the linked repository's latest GitHub Release:

https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/releases/latest
There is no re-registration on new releases: register once, and your GitHub Releases are the update channel forever. The badge and permalink are rendered live by GitHub's markdown viewer directly from the linked repository — the registry itself never needs a follow-up PR when you cut a new version.
Ranking + comments
Ranking and community feedback live in GitHub Discussions, not in the registry markdown. Each merged entry — from either registry — gets exactly one Discussion in the dedicated EoS Registry Discussions category:
- Upvotes on the Discussion post and on individual comments, with GitHub's built-in Top sort surfacing the most-upvoted community feedback first.
- Threaded comments for experience reports, questions, and follow-up from other users.
Operational setup (one-time, per repo): a repo admin creates the EoS Registry category under this repository's Discussions settings, using the open-ended discussion format. From then on, every merged entry gets its own Discussion thread created in that category, and the thread's URL is recorded in the entry's discussion field (see Entry schema above) so the generated catalog links directly to it. Despite its name, the category carries threads for both registries — discussion is required on Capability entries exactly as it is on EoS entries.
The open-ended format is required, and the choice is not cosmetic. Because discussion is a required field, the thread must exist before the entry's PR is opened — and the person opening it is the entry's author, an outside contributor holding neither maintain nor admin permission on this repository. GitHub's Announcement format restricts starting new discussions to those two permission levels, so choosing it blocks every external submission at the first step, while still looking correctly configured to the admin who set it up. Question/Answer adds answer-marking, which pins one reply above the rest of a thread — a directory entry has no answer, and the pinning cuts across the upvote Top ordering described above. Open-ended is the format this process requires.