Files
msd-core/docs/how-to/design-a-ui-phase.md
Tom Boucher 3bb2f8f1c5 docs: rebrand to GSD Core and restructure docs with Diataxis (#605)
* chore: wire docs/agents config into AGENTS.md Agent skills section

Add the `## Agent skills` discovery block pointing the engineering
skills at the existing docs/agents/{issue-tracker,triage-labels,domain}.md
files (issue tracker, triage label mapping, single-context domain docs).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: rebrand to GSD Core and restructure docs with Diataxis

Reorganise the root README and docs/ around the Diataxis framework
(tutorials, how-to guides, reference, explanation), add new how-to
guides and schema references (STATE.md / CONTEXT.md / PLAN.md /
planning artifacts), and cross-link the whole set. Update the lone
legacy gsd-build reference to open-gsd; keep internal get-shit-done/
filesystem paths unchanged (directory rename tracked separately in
open-gsd/gsd-core#604). Regenerate the ja-JP, ko-KR, pt-BR and zh-CN
localised trees to mirror the new structure.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: backfill changeset PR number (#605)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-02 08:13:09 -04:00

6.6 KiB
Raw Blame History

How to design a UI phase

Goal: Produce a locked UI design contract (UI-SPEC.md) that fixes spacing, colour, typography, and copywriting decisions before the planner writes tasks, preventing visual inconsistency caused by ad-hoc styling choices during execution.

Prerequisites: .planning/ROADMAP.md exists. The phase must have frontend or UI work. Running /gsd-discuss-phase N first is strongly recommended — the UI researcher reads CONTEXT.md to avoid re-asking decisions you have already made.


Decide whether this phase needs a UI contract

Not all phases need /gsd-ui-phase. Use it when:

  • The phase introduces new UI surfaces (pages, flows, layouts)
  • Multiple components will be built and visual consistency matters
  • You are starting a new project's frontend and need a design system baseline
  • You are adding significant UI work to an existing project and want to lock tokens, spacing, and colour before execution

Skip it when:

  • The phase is purely backend, infrastructure, or data work with no user-facing output
  • A UI-SPEC.md already exists for an earlier phase and this phase builds on identical visual patterns without introducing new surfaces

If you are unsure, the safety gate will prompt you: when workflow.ui_safety_gate is enabled (default), /gsd-plan-phase warns when it detects frontend work but no UI-SPEC.md and asks whether to run /gsd-ui-phase first.


Run the UI design contract

/gsd-ui-phase 2

If no phase number is given, GSD Core targets the current phase.

The command runs in two stages:

  1. gsd-ui-researcher — reads CONTEXT.md, RESEARCH.md, and REQUIREMENTS.md for existing decisions, detects the design system state (shadcn components.json, Tailwind config, existing tokens), and asks only the unanswered design questions across five areas: spacing, colour, typography, copywriting, and registry safety.
  2. gsd-ui-checker — validates the resulting UI-SPEC.md across six dimensions. If issues are found, a revision loop reruns the researcher (up to two iterations) targeting only the flagged items.

Output: {padded_phase}-UI-SPEC.md in .planning/phases/{phase-dir}/.


What the UI-SPEC covers

The researcher locks decisions across five areas:

Area Examples
Spacing Base scale (4px or 8px), grid alignment, component padding
Colour Primary, accent, neutral palette; 60/30/10 rule; dark-mode considerations
Typography Font families, size/weight scale constraints, heading hierarchy
Copywriting CTA labels, empty state messages, error state copy, loading indicators
Registry safety shadcn component inspection protocol (see below)

The checker validates the spec against six pillars, scored 1–4 each: Copywriting, Visuals, Colour, Typography, Spacing, and Experience Design (loading / error / empty state coverage).


shadcn initialisation

For React, Next.js, and Vite projects, the researcher offers to initialise shadcn if no components.json is found. The flow:

  1. Visit ui.shadcn.com/create and configure your preset (colours, border radius, fonts)
  2. Copy the preset string
  3. Run:
npx shadcn init --preset <paste>

The preset string becomes a first-class GSD Core planning artefact that is reproducible across phases and milestones.


Registry safety gate

Third-party shadcn registries can inject arbitrary code. When workflow.ui_safety_gate is enabled (default), the spec requires these steps before installing any non-official component:

npx shadcn view <component>   # inspect source before installing
npx shadcn diff <component>   # compare against the official registry

The checker will flag the spec as BLOCKED if registry safety is not addressed. Disable the gate via /gsd-settings if your project does not use shadcn or you have an alternative vetting process.


Use sketch findings as a head start

If you have already run /gsd-sketch --wrap-up, the UI researcher loads .claude/skills/sketch-findings-[project]/ automatically. Pre-validated decisions (layout, palette, typography, spacing) are treated as locked — the researcher does not re-ask them. You see a note at the start of the run:

⚡ Sketch findings detected: .claude/skills/sketch-findings-[project]/SKILL.md
   Pre-validated decisions (layout, palette, typography, spacing) should be treated
   as locked — not re-asked.

This is the main reason to run /gsd-sketch --wrap-up before /gsd-ui-phase: it turns the conversational design exploration into binding contract input.


Retroactive visual audit with /gsd-ui-review

/gsd-ui-review runs after execution, not before. Use it to audit the implemented frontend against the UI-SPEC (or against abstract 6-pillar standards when no spec exists).

/gsd-ui-review        # audit the current phase
/gsd-ui-review 3      # audit phase 3 specifically

It works on any project with frontend code — GSD project initialisation is not required.

What it checks (6 pillars, scored 1–4 each):

  1. Copywriting — CTA labels, empty states, error states
  2. Visuals — focal points, visual hierarchy, icon accessibility
  3. Colour — accent usage discipline, 60/30/10 compliance
  4. Typography — font size and weight constraint adherence
  5. Spacing — grid alignment, token consistency
  6. Experience Design — loading, error, and empty state coverage

Output: {padded_phase}-UI-REVIEW.md with scores and top three priority fixes. When a browser MCP server such as gsd-browser is configured, the audit also captures screenshots with visual evidence.

Screenshot storage: Screenshots are saved to .planning/ui-reviews/. A .gitignore is created automatically to prevent binary files from reaching git. Screenshots are cleaned up during /gsd-complete-milestone.


/gsd-discuss-phase N      ← lock implementation preferences
/gsd-ui-phase N           ← lock design contract (frontend phases)
/gsd-plan-phase N         ← research + plan (reads UI-SPEC.md as context)
/gsd-execute-phase N      ← parallel execution
/gsd-verify-work N        ← manual UAT
/gsd-ui-review N          ← retroactive visual audit (optional but recommended)

/gsd-ui-phase sits between discuss and plan because the planner reads UI-SPEC.md as design context — tasks in PLAN.md reference spacing tokens, colour variables, and copywriting decisions that the spec locked.