Mechanical rename produced by scripts/msd-rename.cjs: gsd/Gsd/GSD -> msd/Msd/MSD across contents and paths, upstream package/repo coordinates -> @golem15/msd-core and golem15com/msd-core. Deep links into upstream history, sibling upstream packages, the GSD-2 import feature, CHANGELOG.md and .changeset/ are kept as-is. Hand edits on top: MSD block-letter banner and logos, LICENSE copyright line, package/plugin identity, regenerated lockfile, install-tree fixtures, derived registries and benchmark baseline; migration checksum baseline re-locked (MSD keeps its own install state, so no install had applied the old sums); sort-order and regex-escaped expectations in tests adjusted.
121 lines
5.5 KiB
JavaScript
121 lines
5.5 KiB
JavaScript
// allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product
|
|
// Workflow .md / agent .md / command .md / reference .md files — their text
|
|
// IS what the runtime loads. Testing text content tests the deployed contract.
|
|
// Per CONTRIBUTING.md exception matrix.
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* MSD Tools Tests - autonomous --interactive flag
|
|
*
|
|
* Validates that the autonomous workflow and command definition
|
|
* correctly document and support the --interactive flag.
|
|
*
|
|
* Closes: #1413
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const { test, describe } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
|
|
describe('autonomous --interactive flag (#1413)', () => {
|
|
const workflowPath = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'msd-core', 'workflows', 'autonomous.md');
|
|
const commandPath = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'commands', 'msd', 'autonomous.md');
|
|
|
|
test('command definition includes --interactive in argument-hint', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(commandPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('--interactive'), 'command should document --interactive flag');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('argument-hint:') && content.includes('--interactive'),
|
|
'argument-hint should include --interactive');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('command definition describes interactive mode behavior', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(commandPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('discuss') && content.includes('inline'),
|
|
'command should describe discuss running inline');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('background'),
|
|
'command should mention background agents for plan+execute');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow parses --interactive flag', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes("--interactive") && content.includes('INTERACTIVE'),
|
|
'workflow should parse --interactive into INTERACTIVE variable');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow uses discuss-phase skill in interactive mode', () => {
|
|
// Per #2697 the user-facing form is the hyphen invariant msd-discuss-phase;
|
|
// the colon form was retired and is enforced absent by bug-2543 tests.
|
|
//
|
|
// Don't `.includes()` against the full file — both tokens could appear in
|
|
// unrelated sections (e.g. INTERACTIVE="" initialization + a stray
|
|
// msd-discuss-phase mention in prose) and falsely pass. Instead, isolate
|
|
// the structural region that gates on INTERACTIVE and assert the Skill
|
|
// invocation lives inside it.
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
const interactiveMarker = '**If `INTERACTIVE` is set:**';
|
|
const branchStart = content.indexOf(interactiveMarker);
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(
|
|
branchStart, -1,
|
|
`workflow must define an explicit '${interactiveMarker}' branch`,
|
|
);
|
|
// Bound the branch by the next "**If `..." prose marker (the non-interactive
|
|
// sibling) or, failing that, the next `<step ...>`/`</step>` boundary.
|
|
const afterStart = branchStart + interactiveMarker.length;
|
|
const candidates = [
|
|
content.indexOf('**If `INTERACTIVE` is NOT set', afterStart),
|
|
content.indexOf('**If `', afterStart),
|
|
content.indexOf('</step>', afterStart),
|
|
content.indexOf('<step ', afterStart),
|
|
].filter((i) => i !== -1);
|
|
assert.ok(candidates.length > 0, 'INTERACTIVE branch must have a closing boundary');
|
|
const branchEnd = Math.min(...candidates);
|
|
const branch = content.slice(branchStart, branchEnd);
|
|
|
|
// The branch must invoke the hyphen-form Skill. Tolerate whitespace
|
|
// around `(`, `skill`, and `=` so harmless reformatting doesn't break this.
|
|
const skillCall = /Skill\(\s*skill\s*=\s*['"]msd-discuss-phase['"]/.test(branch);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
skillCall,
|
|
`INTERACTIVE branch must invoke Skill(skill="msd-discuss-phase"). Got branch:\n${branch}`,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow dispatches plan as background agent in interactive mode', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
// Should have Agent() with run_in_background for plan
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('run_in_background') && content.includes('plan-phase'),
|
|
'workflow should dispatch plan-phase as background agent in interactive mode'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow dispatches execute as background agent in interactive mode', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('run_in_background') && content.includes('execute-phase'),
|
|
'workflow should dispatch execute-phase as background agent in interactive mode'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow describes pipeline parallelism in interactive mode', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('pipeline parallelism') || content.includes('Phase N+1'),
|
|
'workflow should describe overlapping discuss/execute between phases'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('success criteria include --interactive requirements', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
// eslint-disable-next-line local/no-unbounded-quantifier -- parses this repo's own workflow .md content, fixed-size author-controlled content
|
|
const criteriaMatch = content.match(/<success_criteria>([\s\S]*?)<\/success_criteria>/);
|
|
const criteria = criteriaMatch ? criteriaMatch[1] : '';
|
|
assert.ok(criteria.includes('--interactive'),
|
|
'success criteria should include --interactive requirements');
|
|
assert.ok(criteria.includes('discuss inline'),
|
|
'success criteria should mention discuss inline');
|
|
assert.ok(criteria.includes('background agents'),
|
|
'success criteria should mention background agents');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|