Files
msd-core/docs/zh-CN
Tom Boucher 1adf6d2245 fix(#3620): point the docs at files that actually exist (#3658)
* fix(3620): point the docs at files that actually exist

docproof found 34 stale references; the reporter hand-read all 34 and reported the 8 that
are real, explaining why the other 26 are deliberate (files the documents themselves label
legacy or "superseded by", and one pre-Diataxis link label whose target still resolves).
Those 26 are left alone — re-touching them would contradict the issue's own analysis.

Every claim was re-verified against git ls-files at HEAD before editing.

docs/INVENTORY.md said its roster is anchored by six drift-control tests. Five are gone
(commands-doc-parity, agents-doc-parity, cli-modules-doc-parity, hooks-doc-parity in
5d8a8c4d; command-count-sync in fbf30792), so the sentence now names the one that exists.
Whether one test is sufficient coverage is a maintainer question the issue explicitly
declined to answer, so no new drift tests are proposed here.

The four translations were a revision further behind, each naming a seventh test deleted in
ae8bb707 that the English file had already dropped. All four now match.

Renamed targets corrected in CONTEXT.md, VERSIONING.md, docs/CONFIGURATION.md and the
update workflow. The new test names carry no issue-NNN- prefix, which is what
lint-regression-test-names requires, so they are the correct targets.

docs/TESTING-SUITES.md is the one that could cost somebody time: it INSTRUCTED contributors
to add an acknowledgment to the legacy drift-ack file, which CONTRIBUTING.md says to never
use. Rewritten from the real workflow — per-PR fragments under the drift-acks directory,
and a spent base-side ack is re-armed by rewording that fragment's reason in place, never
by adding a duplicate, since two sources naming one path is a hard error.

docs/skills/discovery-contract.md's heading named a query module deleted in 11918dcc. The
section was REMOVED rather than retargeted: its documented behavior (skip the deprecated
root) is not what the surviving code does — skill-manifest includes that root marked
deprecated:true — so retargeting would have documented something false.

Found and fixed inline, same class: VERSIONING.md described an SDK bundling step the
release workflow does not have (zero such mentions in that file); CONFIGURATION.md and four
translations named a dead model-catalog triple collapsed by ADR-457.

Dead config removed: the changeset lint's user-facing prefix list still carried two retired
sdk entries. git ls-files -- 'sdk/*' returns nothing. No test pins that array.

Left deliberately: the comment explaining the retired catalog path, the install regression
test that reconstructs the old broken layout to prove it fails, and the generated
test-timings cache. Each is a legitimate mention of a dead path, not drift.

Note lint-removed-but-needed cannot catch this class: it diffs baseRef...HEAD, so it only
sees files deleted in the change under review. These were orphaned by PRs that predate the
lint. A repo-wide existence audit would need a suppression mechanism for the 26 deliberate
mentions above; that is a feature, not part of this fix.

Fixes #3620

* chore(3620): backfill changeset PR number (#3658)

---------

Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
2026-08-19 01:54:01 -04:00
..

GSD Core 文档

文档按四个象限组织:教程通过实践帮助你学习,操作指南解决具体任务,参考文档提供权威信息,概念说明探讨设计理念与决策。

语言版本:English · Português (pt-BR) · 日本語 · 简体中文


Tutorials


How-to guides


Reference

  • 命令 — 每个命令的标志和示例
  • 配置 — 完整配置模式、模型配置文件、Git 分支策略
  • CLI 工具 — gsd-tools.cjs 用于工作流和代理的编程式 API
  • 功能特性 — 完整功能索引
  • 清单 — 已安装的技能与界面映射
  • STATE.md 模式 — .planning/STATE.md 的逐字段参考
  • CONTEXT.md 模式 — .planning/phases/<N>/CONTEXT.md 的逐字段参考
  • PLAN.md 模式 — .planning/phases/<N>/PLAN.md 的逐字段参考
  • 规划产物 — 所有 .planning/ 文件及其作用

Explanation

  • 上下文工程 — 上下文腐化如何形成,以及 GSD Core 如何防止它
  • 阶段循环 — 讨论 → 规划 → 执行 → 验证 → 交付循环的设计原理
  • 多代理编排 — 子代理的生成、范围界定和协调方式
  • 安全模型 — 信任边界、权限和安全自动化
  • 架构 — 系统架构、代理模型和数据流
  • 讨论模式 — /gsd-discuss-phase 的假设模式与访谈模式
  • 上下文监控 — 上下文窗口监控钩子架构
  • Issue 驱动编排 — 使用现有原语从追踪器 issue 驱动 GSD 的方案