* refactor(#1771): ADR-1769 Phase 1 — STATE.md Transition Module substrate + beginPhase Lands the Phase 1 substrate per ADR-1769: - src/state-transition.cts (new Module): - Field-classification table (FieldClass enum + FIELD_CLASSIFICATION rows) - STATE_MD_SECTIONS constants block - Pure transitionCore(content, intent, deps) dispatch - beginPhase intent implementation (first-time + #3127 resume paths) - src/state.cts:cmdStateBeginPhase — collapses ~190 lines to a thin dispatch onto transitionCore via readModifyWriteStateMd. The lock, no-op write guard, and #1230 post-sync delta heuristic stay in the RMW seam; the body-mutation policy moves to transitionCore. - tests/state-transition.test.cjs (24 tests): - Substrate invariants (table enum, section constants) - Characterization: 6 first-time body field updates - Characterization: 5 #3127 idempotency-guard resume behaviors - Characterization: 3 Current Position section mutations - Characterization: Current focus body text line (#1104) - Property (RULESET.TESTS.property-based-testing): beginPhase status propagation + FIELD_CLASSIFICATION own-property contract - Resume Current Position mutation (preserves Plan/Phase/Status) No external behavior change. Full state.test.cjs regression (177 tests) plus bug-3127/#3242/#905/#948 pass. Property tests surfaced two pre-existing quirks (state-document.cjs greedy \s* on whitespace-only field values; Object.prototype method leakage on FIELD_CLASSIFICATION lookups for strings like 'toString') — documented in test comments; fix-out-of-scope for Phase 1. Closes #1771 * refactor(#1771): ADR-1769 Phase 1 codex review corrections Addresses 3 blocking findings from codex gpt-5.5/high review: 1. FIELD_CLASSIFICATION shape (state-transition.cts): - Was flat FieldClass enum (collapsed source + preservation) - Now two-column {source, preservation} rows per ADR-1769 §4 - Added missing fields verified via Memtrace against buildStateFrontmatter (state.cts:1633-1653): gsd_state_version, last_updated, last_activity_desc, progress.{total_phases, completed_phases, total_plans, completed_plans, percent} - Field 2-7 preservation dispatch can now consult the table 2. Prototype-pollution hardening (state-transition.cts): - Table is now Object.freeze(Object.assign(Object.create(null), {...})) - getFieldClassification() helper uses Object.hasOwn; returns null for inherited prototype methods (toString/valueOf/__proto__) - Old code: FIELD_CLASSIFICATION['toString'] returned the function 3. STATE_MD_SECTIONS aligned to canonical template: - Verified against gsd-core/templates/state.md via Memtrace - Was: 8 entries including non-template sections (## Session, ## Decisions, ## Operator Next Steps, ## Session Log, ## Roadmap Evolution) - Now: 6 canonical top-level sections (## Project Reference, ## Current Position, ## Performance Metrics, ## Accumulated Context, ## Deferred Items, ## Session Continuity) Also: beginPhase now consults getFieldClassification() per touched field (codex finding: 'table not consulted by transitionCore'). Unknown fields raise immediately — adding a field without a table row is caught at runtime. Repo-hygiene catches from gsd-test (not node --test, which missed these): - gsd-core/bin/lib/state-transition.cjs added to eslint.config.mjs ignore list (ADR-457 tsc-generated) - docs/INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json regenerated via node scripts/gen-inventory-manifest.cjs --write Property test for Object.prototype leakage tightened to verify getFieldClassification() returns null for toString/valueOf/__proto__. Ref #1771 * fix(#1771): cast Object.create(null) to satisfy @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-assignment ESLint CI failed on src/state-transition.cts:72:14 — Object.create(null) returns `any`, which leaked through Object.assign to the typed `FIELD_CLASSIFICATION` declaration. Adding an explicit cast to `Record<string, FieldClassification>` eliminates the unsafe-assignment while preserving the null-prototype protection codex review recommended. gsd-test: 21888/21888 PASS. * fix(#1771): add 'see #1771' to allow-test-rule exemption per ADR-456 CI lint-allow-test-rule-refs failed: 'New allow-test-rule exemption without an issue ref — add `see #NNN` per ADR-456'. Updated comment on tests/state-transition.test.cjs to reference the Phase 1 issue. * fix(#1771): remove unnecessary allow-test-rule exemption The exemption was added speculatively. The test file does not use readFileSync + .includes()/.match()/.startsWith() on source content — it calls transitionCore() with string literals and verifies results via stateExtractField() and array .includes() on the updated[] array. No exemption needed.
GSD Core documentation
Documentation is organised into four quadrants: tutorials help you learn by doing, how-to guides solve specific tasks, reference states authoritative facts, and explanation explores concepts and design decisions.
Language versions: English · Português (pt-BR) · 日本語 · 简体中文
Tutorials
- Your first project — install to first shipped phase, one guaranteed path
- Onboarding an existing codebase — bring GSD Core to a brownfield repo
- Build your first capability — author a tiny declarative capability and watch it act in the loop
- Install your first capability — install a third-party capability end-to-end: consent, verify, check for updates, remove
How-to guides
- Install on your runtime — runtime-specific install steps for all 16 supported runtimes
- Install a minimal GSD and add skills later — install only the core skills, then grow the surface with profiles and
/gsd:surface - Attach a plugin-provided skill to a GSD agent — use the
global:plugin:skillentry form to load Claude Code plugin skills into agent prompts - Discuss a phase — capture implementation decisions before planning begins
- Resolve edge-coverage findings — turn the spec phase's surfaced domain-boundary edges into covered, dismissed, or backstopped spec decisions
- Resolve prohibition findings — turn the spec phase's surfaced must-NOT constraints into resolved, dismissed, or deferred spec decisions
- Plan a phase — run research, decompose work, and verify plan quality
- Execute a phase — run plans in parallel waves with fresh-context subagents
- Verify and ship — walk through completed work, diagnose failures, and create the PR
- Run phases autonomously — use autonomous mode for unattended phase execution
- Handle quick and fast tasks — use
/gsd-quickand/gsd-fastfor ad-hoc work outside the phase loop - Configure model profiles — switch between quality, balanced, and budget model tiers
- Set up cross-AI review — configure a second AI to review code produced by the primary agent
- Work in parallel with workstreams — run independent lines of work simultaneously using workstreams
- Isolate work with workspaces — use workspaces to sandbox experimental or risky changes
- Debug a failed execution — diagnose and recover from broken or incomplete phase execution
- Spike and sketch — use
/gsd-spikeand/gsd-sketchfor exploratory work before committing to a plan - Design a UI phase — use the UI phase loop for frontend and visual work
- Develop a Capability for GSD 1.5+ — add feature Capabilities, hook fragments, and registry entries
- Add or update a host's integration — set a host's documentation-sourced
runtime.hostIntegrationaxes (ADR-1239 Phase A), with theundocumentedsentinel rule - Turn a capability off (and keep it off) — disable a capability via the surface, or gate individual hooks off without removing the capability
- Drive GSD from a tracker issue — start a phase from a GitHub, Linear, or Jira issue
- Migrate from GSD 2 — upgrade an existing GSD 2 project to GSD Core
- Update GSD — re-run the installer to pick up the latest release
- Clean up get-shit-done-cc — remove leftover old-package artifacts that cause a spurious
⬆ /gsd:updateindicator after migrating to@opengsd/gsd-core - Fix the worktree base-mismatch (exit 42) error — resolve the branch-divergence condition that halts parallel phase execution
- Recover and troubleshoot — fix common problems, rebuild context, and uninstall
Reference
- Commands — every command with flags and examples
- Configuration — full config schema, model profiles, git branching strategies
- CLI tools —
gsd-tools.cjsprogrammatic API for workflows and agents - Features — complete feature index
- Inventory — installed skills and surface map
- STATE.md schema — field-by-field reference for
.planning/STATE.md - CONTEXT.md schema — field-by-field reference for
.planning/phases/<N>/CONTEXT.md - PLAN.md schema — field-by-field reference for
.planning/phases/<N>/PLAN.md - Planning artifacts — all
.planning/files and their roles - Review and verification capabilities — code review, security, and Nyquist capability ownership and hook contracts
- Capability matrix — generated catalogue of every capability's role, tier, extension points, hook kinds, and
engines.gsd - Capability manifest — the full
capability.jsonschema and validation rules gsd capabilitycommand — install / update / remove / list reference for third-party capabilities
Explanation
- Context engineering — how context rot forms and how GSD Core prevents it
- The phase loop — design rationale for the Discuss → Plan → Execute → Verify → Ship cycle
- Multi-agent orchestration — how subagents are spawned, scoped, and coordinated
- Security model — trust boundaries, permissions, and safe automation
- The capability trust model — why third-party capabilities are gated by consent + integrity + reversibility, not a sandbox
- How overlay capabilities compose — why first-party always wins and how the loader resolves precedence, conflicts, and fail-closed gates
- Architecture — system architecture, agent model, and data flow
- Discuss modes — assumptions mode vs interview mode for
/gsd-discuss-phase - Context monitoring — context window monitoring hook architecture
- Issue-driven orchestration — recipe for driving GSD from a tracker issue using existing primitives
Related
- Root README — landing page, quickstart, and documentation overview
- Changelog — release history