Files
msd-core/tests/compact-content-variant-guard.test.cjs
Jakub Zych a9a7a328e6 refactor: hard-fork GSD -> MSD (Make Software Done)
Mechanical rename produced by scripts/msd-rename.cjs: gsd/Gsd/GSD -> msd/Msd/MSD
across contents and paths, upstream package/repo coordinates -> @golem15/msd-core
and golem15com/msd-core. Deep links into upstream history, sibling upstream
packages, the GSD-2 import feature, CHANGELOG.md and .changeset/ are kept as-is.

Hand edits on top: MSD block-letter banner and logos, LICENSE copyright line,
package/plugin identity, regenerated lockfile, install-tree fixtures, derived
registries and benchmark baseline; migration checksum baseline re-locked
(MSD keeps its own install state, so no install had applied the old sums);
sort-order and regex-escaped expectations in tests adjusted.
2026-10-06 01:47:40 +02:00

294 lines
14 KiB
JavaScript

'use strict';
/**
* tests/compact-content-variant-guard.test.cjs — ADR-4139, epic #4139, Phase 6 (#4406).
*
* Implements the four mechanical checks `.msd/phase/enhance-4406-lazy-remainder/40-design.md`
* describes for the variant-swap shape (two independent, complete files; the gate picks which
* one gets `Read`) covering `msd-core/workflows/<name>/{modes,steps,templates}/*.compact.md`
* and `msd-core/templates/**\/*.compact.md`. This is a DIFFERENT shape from
* `tests/compact-content-partition-guard.test.cjs` (stream 1's spine+detail partition) — see
* `tests/helpers/compact-content-variant.cjs` for why disjointness/completeness do not apply
* here. Template consumer parity (the fifth check) lives in its own file,
* `tests/compact-content-template-variant-parity.test.cjs`, because it needs a real
* artifact-generation + real-parser round trip per template rather than a generic file-shape
* check.
*
* Each check gets a RED (deliberately broken) and GREEN (fixed) fixture pair, built against
* synthetic temp files — never against this repo's own real variants — per this repo's rule
* that a guard nobody has seen go red is not yet a guard.
*/
const { describe, test } = require('node:test');
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
const fs = require('node:fs');
const os = require('node:os');
const path = require('node:path');
const { cleanup } = require('./helpers.cjs');
const {
discoverRegisteredVariants,
checkRegistration,
checkReachability,
checkProtectedContentPreserved,
checkSizeSmaller,
} = require('./helpers/compact-content-variant.cjs');
describe('compact-content variant guard — real repo state (ADR-4139, Phase 6 #4406)', () => {
test('check 1 (registration): every .compact.md file has a canonical sibling', () => {
const pairs = discoverRegisteredVariants();
const violations = checkRegistration(pairs);
assert.deepStrictEqual(violations, [], `registration violations: ${JSON.stringify(violations, null, 2)}`);
});
test('check 2 (reachability): every registered compact variant is named by at least one spine', () => {
const pairs = discoverRegisteredVariants();
const violations = checkReachability(pairs);
assert.deepStrictEqual(violations, [], `reachability violations: ${JSON.stringify(violations, null, 2)}`);
});
test('check 3 (protected content preserved): every protected block in a canonical file survives in its compact sibling', () => {
const pairs = discoverRegisteredVariants();
const violations = checkProtectedContentPreserved(pairs);
assert.deepStrictEqual(violations, [], `protected-content violations: ${JSON.stringify(violations, null, 2)}`);
});
test('check 4 (size smaller): every compact file is strictly smaller than its canonical sibling', () => {
const pairs = discoverRegisteredVariants();
const violations = checkSizeSmaller(pairs);
assert.deepStrictEqual(violations, [], `size violations: ${JSON.stringify(violations, null, 2)}`);
});
test('non-vacuity: this repo actually has registered variant pairs to check', () => {
const pairs = discoverRegisteredVariants();
assert.ok(pairs.length > 0, 'expected at least one registered .compact.md pair — an empty result proves nothing');
});
});
describe('failing-first fixture: check 1 (registration)', () => {
test('RED — a .compact.md file exists with no canonical sibling (orphan)', () => {
const tmpRoot = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'msd-variant-orphan-'));
try {
const workflowsDir = path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows', 'foo', 'steps');
fs.mkdirSync(workflowsDir, { recursive: true });
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(workflowsDir, 'bar.compact.md'), 'Compact content with no canonical pair.\n');
const pairs = discoverRegisteredVariants([path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows')]);
const violations = checkRegistration(pairs);
assert.ok(violations.length > 0, 'expected at least one registration violation');
assert.ok(
violations.some((v) => v.kind === 'orphan_compact_file' && v.compactPath.endsWith('bar.compact.md')),
`expected the orphan file to be named: ${JSON.stringify(violations)}`,
);
} finally {
cleanup(tmpRoot);
}
});
test('GREEN — the canonical sibling is added', () => {
const tmpRoot = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'msd-variant-orphan-ok-'));
try {
const workflowsDir = path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows', 'foo', 'steps');
fs.mkdirSync(workflowsDir, { recursive: true });
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(workflowsDir, 'bar.compact.md'), 'Terser.\n');
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(workflowsDir, 'bar.md'), 'Canonical, longer content.\n');
const pairs = discoverRegisteredVariants([path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows')]);
const violations = checkRegistration(pairs);
assert.deepStrictEqual(violations, []);
} finally {
cleanup(tmpRoot);
}
});
});
describe('failing-first fixture: check 2 (reachability)', () => {
test('RED — a registered pair whose compact path is never named by any spine', () => {
const tmpRoot = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'msd-variant-unreached-'));
try {
const workflowsRoot = path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows');
const stepsDir = path.join(workflowsRoot, 'foo', 'steps');
fs.mkdirSync(stepsDir, { recursive: true });
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(stepsDir, 'bar.md'), 'Canonical, longer content.\n');
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(stepsDir, 'bar.compact.md'), 'Terser.\n');
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(workflowsRoot, 'foo.md'), 'Spine with entirely unrelated content and no path reference of any kind.\n');
const pairs = discoverRegisteredVariants([workflowsRoot]);
const violations = checkReachability(pairs, [workflowsRoot]);
assert.ok(violations.length > 0, 'expected at least one reachability violation');
assert.ok(
violations.some((v) => v.kind === 'unreachable_compact_file' && v.compactPath.endsWith('bar.compact.md')),
`expected the unreached file to be named: ${JSON.stringify(violations)}`,
);
} finally {
cleanup(tmpRoot);
}
});
test('GREEN — the spine names the compact path via the variant-resolution rule', () => {
const tmpRoot = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'msd-variant-unreached-ok-'));
try {
const workflowsRoot = path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows');
const stepsDir = path.join(workflowsRoot, 'foo', 'steps');
fs.mkdirSync(stepsDir, { recursive: true });
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(stepsDir, 'bar.md'), 'Canonical, longer content.\n');
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(stepsDir, 'bar.compact.md'), 'Terser.\n');
fs.writeFileSync(
path.join(workflowsRoot, 'foo.md'),
'Read and execute `msd-core/workflows/foo/steps/bar.md` (or its `msd-core/workflows/foo/steps/bar.compact.md` variant per the shared gate).\n',
);
const pairs = discoverRegisteredVariants([workflowsRoot]);
const violations = checkReachability(pairs, [workflowsRoot]);
assert.deepStrictEqual(violations, []);
} finally {
cleanup(tmpRoot);
}
});
test('a vendored path ending in the same filename does not grant false reachability', () => {
const tmpRoot = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'msd-variant-unreached-prefix-'));
try {
const workflowsRoot = path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows');
const stepsDir = path.join(workflowsRoot, 'foo', 'steps');
fs.mkdirSync(stepsDir, { recursive: true });
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(stepsDir, 'bar.md'), 'Canonical, longer content.\n');
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(stepsDir, 'bar.compact.md'), 'Terser.\n');
fs.writeFileSync(
path.join(workflowsRoot, 'foo.md'),
'This mentions vendor/foo/steps/bar.compact.md, a different tree entirely.\n',
);
const pairs = discoverRegisteredVariants([workflowsRoot]);
const violations = checkReachability(pairs, [workflowsRoot]);
assert.ok(
violations.some((v) => v.kind === 'unreachable_compact_file'),
'a prefixed match must not count as reachability',
);
} finally {
cleanup(tmpRoot);
}
});
});
describe('failing-first fixture: check 3 (protected content preserved)', () => {
test('RED — a protected block in the canonical file is absent from the compact sibling', () => {
const tmpRoot = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'msd-variant-protected-'));
try {
const workflowsRoot = path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows', 'foo', 'steps');
fs.mkdirSync(workflowsRoot, { recursive: true });
fs.writeFileSync(
path.join(workflowsRoot, 'bar.md'),
'Intro.\n\n<!-- msd:protected -->\nNever weaken this exact guardrail sentence.\n\nMore filler text that is safe to shorten elsewhere in this file to pad it out longer than the compact sibling.\n',
);
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(workflowsRoot, 'bar.compact.md'), 'Terser intro with the guardrail dropped.\n');
const pairs = discoverRegisteredVariants([path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows')]);
const violations = checkProtectedContentPreserved(pairs);
assert.ok(violations.length > 0, 'expected at least one protected-content violation');
assert.ok(
violations.some((v) => v.missing.includes('Never weaken this exact guardrail sentence.')),
`expected the dropped sentence to be named: ${JSON.stringify(violations)}`,
);
} finally {
cleanup(tmpRoot);
}
});
test('GREEN — the guardrail sentence is preserved verbatim in the compact sibling', () => {
const tmpRoot = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'msd-variant-protected-ok-'));
try {
const workflowsRoot = path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows', 'foo', 'steps');
fs.mkdirSync(workflowsRoot, { recursive: true });
fs.writeFileSync(
path.join(workflowsRoot, 'bar.md'),
'Intro.\n\n<!-- msd:protected -->\nNever weaken this exact guardrail sentence.\n\nMore filler text that is safe to shorten elsewhere in this file to pad it out longer than the compact sibling.\n',
);
fs.writeFileSync(
path.join(workflowsRoot, 'bar.compact.md'),
'Terser intro.\n\nNever weaken this exact guardrail sentence.\n',
);
const pairs = discoverRegisteredVariants([path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows')]);
const violations = checkProtectedContentPreserved(pairs);
assert.deepStrictEqual(violations, []);
} finally {
cleanup(tmpRoot);
}
});
test('a canonical file with no protected blocks is a correct no-op (nothing to preserve)', () => {
const tmpRoot = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'msd-variant-protected-none-'));
try {
const workflowsRoot = path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows', 'foo', 'steps');
fs.mkdirSync(workflowsRoot, { recursive: true });
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(workflowsRoot, 'bar.md'), 'Plain canonical content with no protected sentinel at all.\n');
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(workflowsRoot, 'bar.compact.md'), 'Terser.\n');
const pairs = discoverRegisteredVariants([path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows')]);
const violations = checkProtectedContentPreserved(pairs);
assert.deepStrictEqual(
violations,
[],
'a canonical file with zero <!-- msd:protected --> blocks has nothing to check — never a violation',
);
} finally {
cleanup(tmpRoot);
}
});
});
describe('failing-first fixture: check 4 (size smaller)', () => {
test('RED — a "compact" file the same size as its canonical sibling', () => {
const tmpRoot = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'msd-variant-size-'));
try {
const workflowsRoot = path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows', 'foo', 'steps');
fs.mkdirSync(workflowsRoot, { recursive: true });
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(workflowsRoot, 'bar.md'), 'x'.repeat(100));
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(workflowsRoot, 'bar.compact.md'), 'y'.repeat(100));
const pairs = discoverRegisteredVariants([path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows')]);
const violations = checkSizeSmaller(pairs);
assert.ok(violations.length > 0, 'expected at least one size violation');
assert.ok(
violations.some((v) => v.kind === 'compact_not_smaller' && v.canonicalSize === 100 && v.compactSize === 100),
`expected the equal-size pair to be named: ${JSON.stringify(violations)}`,
);
} finally {
cleanup(tmpRoot);
}
});
test('RED — a "compact" file one byte LARGER than its canonical sibling (boundary point)', () => {
const tmpRoot = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'msd-variant-size-over-'));
try {
const workflowsRoot = path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows', 'foo', 'steps');
fs.mkdirSync(workflowsRoot, { recursive: true });
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(workflowsRoot, 'bar.md'), 'x'.repeat(100));
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(workflowsRoot, 'bar.compact.md'), 'y'.repeat(101));
const pairs = discoverRegisteredVariants([path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows')]);
const violations = checkSizeSmaller(pairs);
assert.ok(violations.length > 0, 'expected at least one size violation');
} finally {
cleanup(tmpRoot);
}
});
test('GREEN — a compact file exactly one byte smaller (boundary point)', () => {
const tmpRoot = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'msd-variant-size-ok-'));
try {
const workflowsRoot = path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows', 'foo', 'steps');
fs.mkdirSync(workflowsRoot, { recursive: true });
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(workflowsRoot, 'bar.md'), 'x'.repeat(100));
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(workflowsRoot, 'bar.compact.md'), 'y'.repeat(99));
const pairs = discoverRegisteredVariants([path.join(tmpRoot, 'msd-core', 'workflows')]);
const violations = checkSizeSmaller(pairs);
assert.deepStrictEqual(violations, []);
} finally {
cleanup(tmpRoot);
}
});
});