Files
msd-core/.changeset
Tom Boucher 7d298d6d4d fix(#2474): gate worktree dispatch on project-level USE_WORKTREES too (#2561)
* test(#2474): update dispatch gate test for dual-gate behavior

The #2772 test asserted the gate reads USE_WORKTREES_FOR_PLAN only.
Update to accept the dual-gate (USE_WORKTREES + USE_WORKTREES_FOR_PLAN).

* fix(#2474): gate worktree dispatch on project-level USE_WORKTREES too

The per-plan dispatch condition checked only USE_WORKTREES_FOR_PLAN
(submodule-derived), ignoring the project-level USE_WORKTREES flag.
Add USE_WORKTREES to the gate. Net-negative edit: compress two
nearby prose lines to offset the added shell condition (93353 bytes,
down from 93368).

Closes #2474

* docs(#2474): backfill changeset PR number (2561)

* fix: merge coverage gate into single-process check (#2474)

The test:coverage:unit script chained two c8 invocations with &&:
the first ran tests and wrote coverage data to .nyc_output/, the
second read that data for per-file branch checks. On fast CI runners
(ubuntu/24), the second process started before the filesystem flushed
the first process's writes — a classic TOCTOU race that caused
intermittent coverage gate failures.

Replace the two-process chain with a single c8 invocation that
generates both text and json-summary reports, followed by a Node
script (scripts/check-coverage-gate.cjs) that reads the JSON summary
once and checks both overall and per-file thresholds. No filesystem
race is possible because the JSON report is fully written before the
check script reads it.
2026-07-23 09:14:02 -04:00
..

Changeset Fragments

This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.

Why

Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.

See #2975 for the full rationale.

Adding a fragment

node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
  --type Fixed \
  --pr 1234 \
  --body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"

This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.

Format

---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.

Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.

Opting out

PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.

At release time

Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:

node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty

This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.

Archived fragments

.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.