Files
msd-core/commands/gsd/debug.md
TÂCHES 246d542c65 feat(gsd-tools): add compound init commands and update workflows (#468)
* feat(gsd-tools): add compound init commands for workflow setup

Adds 8 compound commands that return all context a workflow needs in
one JSON blob, replacing 5-10 atomic calls per workflow:

- init execute-phase: models, config, phase info, plan inventory
- init plan-phase: models, workflow flags, existing artifacts
- init new-project: models, brownfield detection, state checks
- init new-milestone: models, milestone info
- init quick: models, next task number, timestamps
- init resume: file existence, interrupted agent
- init verify-work: models, phase info
- init phase-op: generic phase context

Updated 8 workflows to use compound commands:
- execute-phase, plan-phase, new-project, quick
- resume-project, verify-work, discuss-phase

Token savings: ~200 lines of bash setup replaced with single init calls.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(gsd-tools): add 4 new init commands and update files to use compound commands

Add new compound init commands:
- init todos - context for todo workflows
- init milestone-op - context for milestone operations
- init map-codebase - context for codebase mapping
- init progress - context for progress workflow

Update 24 files to use compound init commands instead of atomic calls:
- 4 phase operation workflows (add-phase, insert-phase, remove-phase, verify-phase)
- 5 todo/milestone workflows (add-todo, check-todos, audit-milestone, complete-milestone, new-milestone)
- 6 misc workflows (execute-plan, map-codebase, pause-work, progress, set-profile, settings)
- 6 agent files (gsd-executor, gsd-planner, gsd-phase-researcher, gsd-plan-checker, gsd-debugger, gsd-research-synthesizer)
- 2 command files (debug, research-phase)
- 1 reference file (planning-config)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(gsd-tools): add init to help output

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(verify-phase): correct expected init fields

The workflow was referencing plans/summaries from init phase-op,
but those fields come from ls command. Updated to reference
has_plans and plan_count which are actually in phase-op output.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-07 22:09:07 -06:00

3.5 KiB

name, description, argument-hint, allowed-tools
name description argument-hint allowed-tools
gsd:debug Systematic debugging with persistent state across context resets
issue description
Read
Bash
Task
AskUserQuestion
Debug issues using scientific method with subagent isolation.

Orchestrator role: Gather symptoms, spawn gsd-debugger agent, handle checkpoints, spawn continuations.

Why subagent: Investigation burns context fast (reading files, forming hypotheses, testing). Fresh 200k context per investigation. Main context stays lean for user interaction.

User's issue: $ARGUMENTS

Check for active sessions:

ls .planning/debug/*.md 2>/dev/null | grep -v resolved | head -5

0. Initialize Context

INIT=$(node ~/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.js state load)

Extract commit_docs from init JSON. Resolve debugger model:

DEBUGGER_MODEL=$(node ~/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.js resolve-model gsd-debugger --raw)

1. Check Active Sessions

If active sessions exist AND no $ARGUMENTS:

  • List sessions with status, hypothesis, next action
  • User picks number to resume OR describes new issue

If $ARGUMENTS provided OR user describes new issue:

  • Continue to symptom gathering

2. Gather Symptoms (if new issue)

Use AskUserQuestion for each:

  1. Expected behavior - What should happen?
  2. Actual behavior - What happens instead?
  3. Error messages - Any errors? (paste or describe)
  4. Timeline - When did this start? Ever worked?
  5. Reproduction - How do you trigger it?

After all gathered, confirm ready to investigate.

3. Spawn gsd-debugger Agent

Fill prompt and spawn:

<objective>
Investigate issue: {slug}

**Summary:** {trigger}
</objective>

<symptoms>
expected: {expected}
actual: {actual}
errors: {errors}
reproduction: {reproduction}
timeline: {timeline}
</symptoms>

<mode>
symptoms_prefilled: true
goal: find_and_fix
</mode>

<debug_file>
Create: .planning/debug/{slug}.md
</debug_file>
Task(
  prompt=filled_prompt,
  subagent_type="gsd-debugger",
  model="{debugger_model}",
  description="Debug {slug}"
)

4. Handle Agent Return

If ## ROOT CAUSE FOUND:

  • Display root cause and evidence summary
  • Offer options:
    • "Fix now" - spawn fix subagent
    • "Plan fix" - suggest /gsd:plan-phase --gaps
    • "Manual fix" - done

If ## CHECKPOINT REACHED:

  • Present checkpoint details to user
  • Get user response
  • Spawn continuation agent (see step 5)

If ## INVESTIGATION INCONCLUSIVE:

  • Show what was checked and eliminated
  • Offer options:
    • "Continue investigating" - spawn new agent with additional context
    • "Manual investigation" - done
    • "Add more context" - gather more symptoms, spawn again

5. Spawn Continuation Agent (After Checkpoint)

When user responds to checkpoint, spawn fresh agent:

<objective>
Continue debugging {slug}. Evidence is in the debug file.
</objective>

<prior_state>
Debug file: @.planning/debug/{slug}.md
</prior_state>

<checkpoint_response>
**Type:** {checkpoint_type}
**Response:** {user_response}
</checkpoint_response>

<mode>
goal: find_and_fix
</mode>
Task(
  prompt=continuation_prompt,
  subagent_type="gsd-debugger",
  model="{debugger_model}",
  description="Continue debug {slug}"
)

<success_criteria>

  • Active sessions checked
  • Symptoms gathered (if new)
  • gsd-debugger spawned with context
  • Checkpoints handled correctly
  • Root cause confirmed before fixing </success_criteria>