81f9534b5a
ADR-0002: commands/gsd/*.md contract now enforced at two layers: LINT (scripts/lint-command-contract.cjs — new CI step): - name: present, starts with gsd: or gsd- - description: non-empty - allowed-tools: non-empty, all entries canonical - execution_context @-refs: resolve on disk, no trailing prose on same line - handles both @~/ and $HOME/ path prefixes TEST (tests/command-contract.test.cjs — 361 assertions): - Behavioral contract for all 65 command files - Replaces scattered coverage in enh-2790 + bug-3135 - Per-command per-rule test — one failure names the exact file + rule CI (.github/workflows/test.yml): - 'Lint — command contract (ADR-0002)' step added to lint-tests job PROSE @-REF CLEANUP (39 command files, ~900 tokens/invocation recovered): - Removed redundant @~/.claude/get-shit-done/... paths from <process> prose - execution_context block is now the single authoritative load declaration - Routing commands (sketch, spike, update, pause-work, etc.) keep routing instructions; only the inert path token is stripped WORKFLOW EXTRACTION (debug.md + thread.md, ~15,000 chars / ~3,750 tokens): - get-shit-done/workflows/debug.md: full process extracted from commands/gsd/debug.md - get-shit-done/workflows/thread.md: full process extracted from commands/gsd/thread.md - Command files reduced to frontmatter + objective + execution_context + context - debug.md: 9,603 → 1,703 chars; thread.md: 7,868 → 585 chars RENAME: - get-shit-done/workflows/extract_learnings.md → extract-learnings.md (aligns with hyphen convention of all other workflow files) DOCS: - docs/INVENTORY.md: count 85→87, new rows, rename row, fix add-todo --backlog attribution - docs/INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json: +debug.md +thread.md +extract-learnings.md -extract_learnings.md Closes ADR-0002 implementation.
2.8 KiB
2.8 KiB
name, description, argument-hint, allowed-tools
| name | description | argument-hint | allowed-tools | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gsd:execute-phase | Execute all plans in a phase with wave-based parallelization | <phase-number> [--wave N] [--gaps-only] [--interactive] [--tdd] |
|
Orchestrator stays lean: discover plans, analyze dependencies, group into waves, spawn subagents, collect results. Each subagent loads the full execute-plan context and handles its own plan.
Optional wave filter:
--wave Nexecutes only WaveNfor pacing, quota management, or staged rollout- phase verification/completion still only happens when no incomplete plans remain after the selected wave finishes
Flag handling rule:
- The optional flags documented below are available behaviors, not implied active behaviors
- A flag is active only when its literal token appears in
$ARGUMENTS - If a documented flag is absent from
$ARGUMENTS, treat it as inactive
Context budget: ~15% orchestrator, 100% fresh per subagent.
<execution_context>
@/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/execute-phase.md
@/.claude/get-shit-done/references/ui-brand.md
</execution_context>
<runtime_note>
Copilot (VS Code): Use vscode_askquestions wherever this workflow calls AskUserQuestion. They are equivalent — vscode_askquestions is the VS Code Copilot implementation of the same interactive question API.
</runtime_note>
Available optional flags (documentation only — not automatically active):
--wave N— Execute only WaveNin the phase. Use when you want to pace execution or stay inside usage limits.--gaps-only— Execute only gap closure plans (plans withgap_closure: truein frontmatter). Use after verify-work creates fix plans.--interactive— Execute plans sequentially inline (no subagents) with user checkpoints between tasks. Lower token usage, pair-programming style. Best for small phases, bug fixes, and verification gaps.
Active flags must be derived from $ARGUMENTS:
--wave Nis active only if the literal--wavetoken is present in$ARGUMENTS--gaps-onlyis active only if the literal--gaps-onlytoken is present in$ARGUMENTS--interactiveis active only if the literal--interactivetoken is present in$ARGUMENTS- If none of these tokens appear, run the standard full-phase execution flow with no flag-specific filtering
- Do not infer that a flag is active just because it is documented in this prompt
Context files are resolved inside the workflow via gsd-sdk query init.execute-phase and per-subagent <files_to_read> blocks.