19edab21da
* fix(#1006): harden render --preview against fragment parse failures `render --preview` wrote `report.preview` unconditionally. When a `.changeset` fragment fails to parse, `cmdRender` early-returns with `{exitCode:1, report: {failures}}` and NO `preview` key, so `process.stdout.write(undefined)` threw ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE and the rc release job's "Preview CHANGELOG" step died with a cryptic TypeError that masked the real cause. Guard the preview write on `typeof report.preview === 'string'` (ADR-227: shape, not just type); when absent, fall through to the existing failure reporter that names the offending fragment and exits non-zero — identical to a non-preview render. Also backfills the stray placeholder `pr: 0` -> `pr: 939` in .changeset/936-convergence-inline-plan-phase.md that triggered the live failure. Regression test (red-then-green verified) added at the render --preview seam. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#1006): validate changeset fragment content at the Changeset Required gate The `Changeset Required` gate (scripts/changeset/lint.cjs) only checked that a `.changeset/*.md` fragment EXISTS in the PR diff; it never validated the fragment's contents. So a malformed fragment (e.g. an un-backfilled `pr: 0` placeholder) silently merged to `next` and only detonated later in the rc release job. This is the upstream prevention for #1006 — the crash hardening turns the failure into a clear message, this stops the bad fragment ever reaching the release path. evaluateLint now accepts `fragmentFailures` and fails with the typed reason `fail_invalid_fragment` (naming each offending file) before the existence/ opt-out checks — a malformed fragment beats `no-changelog`, since it will break the render regardless. main() reads + parseFragment()s every changed fragment: a deleted fragment (not on disk) is skipped, a present-but-unreadable one fails closed. Tests assert on the typed LINT_REASON enum (no raw-text matching), a precedence case over the opt-out label, and an end-to-end suite that drives the real main() against a temp git repo (malformed -> fail, valid -> pass, deleted -> skipped) so the wiring is regression-proof. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(#1006): assert the typed --json report in the preview regression test Code review flagged the preview parse-failure regression test for positive raw-text matching on CLI output (`combined.includes('bad-fragment.md')` / `'invalid_pr'`), which this repo's testing standards forbid. Keep the non-json `runRenderRaw` call for the negative crash proof (the ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE crash lives only on the non-json stdout.write path), and add a `--json` invocation that asserts the offending fragment + typed `invalid_pr` reason via the structured `report.failures[]` surface instead of rendered prose. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
890 B
type, pr
| type | pr |
|---|---|
| Fixed | 939 |
plan-review-convergence now runs gsd-plan-phase inline instead of inside Agent() — both sites that previously wrapped gsd-plan-phase in Agent() (initial planning + replan loop) have been changed to bare Skill() calls at depth 0. On Claude Code, a depth-1 Agent has no Agent tool, so a wrapped plan-phase could never spawn gsd-planner or gsd-plan-checker — the replan loop silently failed to produce a revised plan whenever HIGH concerns were found. Running plan-phase inline from the depth-0 orchestrator (which retains the Agent tool) restores the full planner→checker sub-agent chain. A new structural guard test (bug-936-no-nested-spawner-wrap.test.cjs) statically scans all workflow files and fails if any workflow wraps a spawner orchestrator in Agent() without a RUNTIME != claude carve-out, preventing regression. (#936)