83a26ed1dc
* test(#2939): prove shouldFlattenDispatch ignores the depth budget Failing-first regression for #2939. shouldFlattenDispatch checks only background+backgroundDispatch, never nested/subagentToolkit/maxDepth, so a maxDepth:1 descriptor (no room for a bg orchestrator plus a leaf) is told it may background. Row 1 (codex-like, maxDepth:1) asserts true (flatten) and fails today; rows 2/3 guard the unchanged depth-sufficient cases. * fix(#2939): honor the declared depth budget in shouldFlattenDispatch shouldFlattenDispatch checked only background+backgroundDispatch, never nested/subagentToolkit/maxDepth, so a maxDepth:1 descriptor (no room for a backgrounded orchestrator plus a delegated leaf) was told it may background — producing a depth-2 tree (Codex MultiAgent V2) the declared contract cannot support. canBackground now ALSO requires nested:true + subagentToolkit:"full" + a depth budget > 1 (or unbounded -1), reusing the exact predicate shape from bin/install.js _normalizeDispatchCallSpan and matching degradationFor's treatment of maxDepth===1 as flat. Non-finite/missing maxDepth fails closed to flatten. Correct the two existing pins that asserted the buggy output (bare {bg,bgDispatch} now fail-closes on missing depth; the codex-like maxDepth:1 pin flips to flatten) and add a maxDepth:2 negative-space row. * fix(#2939): propagate depth-aware flatten to all pinned descriptors + tests The isolated adversarial review found the depth-aware predicate reclassifies codex/kimi/kimi-code (previously background-eligible under the two-field rule) to flatten — the correct behavior, since each lacks what a backgrounded nesting orchestrator needs: - codex: maxDepth:1 (no room for a depth-2 leaf) - kimi: nested:false (cannot host a nesting orchestrator) - kimi-code: subagentToolkit:'built-in-only' (cannot delegate to full subagents) Only cursor (maxDepth:2) remains background-eligible. Update the three test files that pinned the old contract (host-integration-descriptors EXPECTED_FLATTEN, kimi-upgrades UPGRADE 2, trae-imperative-reference), and align the unbounded convention to maxDepth < 0 (matching degradationFor/negotiateHostCapabilities) with an accurate docstring noting the deliberate nested-check addition over _normalizeDispatchCallSpan. * fix(#2939): update dispatch-should-flatten CLI query pins for codex The depth-aware rule (a0ad0f680) reclassifies codex (maxDepth:1) to flatten, but command-routing-hub.test.cjs exercises the contract through the CLI query route (runGsdTools query dispatch-should-flatten), not a direct shouldFlattenDispatch call — so neither the reviewer's caller-search nor a grep for the symbol found it; only the full gsd-test matrix did. Update the codex query assertions to shouldFlatten=true (maxDepth:1 insufficient), preserving cursor (maxDepth:2 → false) and the backgroundDispatch:true descriptor field. * chore(#2939): add changeset fragment pr:0 placeholder backfilled with the real PR number once the PR exists. * fix(#2939): rephrase changeset for product-name-purity + opencode flatten pin Two failures from the full gsd-test matrix on the prior sha: 1. product-name-purity: changeset fragments must not include parenthetical product descriptions (they render verbatim into CHANGELOG.md). 'Codex (and kimi/kimi-code)' tripped it — rephrase to lead with the behavior, naming runtimes inline without the parenthetical. lint:ci changeset-lint does not catch this; only the test does. 2. opencode-imperative-reference: the #2087-retraction pin flipped only the two background booleans and asserted shouldFlatten:false. Under #2939 that is no longer sufficient (opencode lacks nested + full toolkit + depth budget), so the retracted axes now correctly flatten — update the pin to true with rationale. * chore(#2939): backfill changeset PR number 3063 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Changeset Fragments
This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.
Why
Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.
See #2975 for the full rationale.
Adding a fragment
node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
--type Fixed \
--pr 1234 \
--body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"
This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.
Format
---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.
Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.
Opting out
PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.
At release time
Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:
node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty
This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.
Archived fragments
.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.