* feat(#1708): typed documentation-sourced #853 dispatch-flatten Graduate the #853 orchestrator-backgrounding decision from a scattered RUNTIME==='codex' prose check to a typed, documentation-sourced engine decision. Adds a backgroundDispatch dispatch sub-axis (sourced per host: codex+cursor documented true, 9 documented false, 5 undocumented), shouldFlattenDispatch(dispatch) (inline UNLESS background && backgroundDispatch, fail-closed), and a gsd_run query dispatch-should-flatten the plan/execute workflows call. Cursor is newly background-eligible per its docs (inline->background) — a documentation-justified behavior change. No RUNTIME-name residue for this decision. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#1708): backgroundDispatch citations in matrix + CONTEXT note Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#1708): address review findings on typed dispatch-flatten Code/adversarial review: convert the manager.md/autonomous.md Compound Action preamble from hardcoded 'On Codex' to FLATTEN-based branching (the handlers already use the query; the preamble contradicted them and was wrong for cursor); make shouldFlattenDispatch null-safe + type-honest (accepts raw 'undocumented' registry values); make backgroundDispatch a required descriptor field (matching its siblings, all 16 carry it); strengthen the config.runtime behavioral test; update the bug-853 prose-pin test + comment. Security review clean; Codex confirmed no fail-open. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(#1708): backfill backgroundDispatch in role:runtime test fixtures Making backgroundDispatch a required descriptor field broke role:runtime fixtures in capability-manifest-version/capability-registry/host-integration-descriptors tests that build a dispatch object without it (caught by full gsd-test, not scoped npm test). Backfill backgroundDispatch:false into the well-formed fixtures; the deliberately-malformed 'required-field' test fixture is left malformed by design. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(#1708): update fix-1521 dispatch-gating assertion to the FLATTEN gate fix-1521 pinned the codex-specific run_in_background prose that #1708 graduated to the typed dispatch-should-flatten/FLATTEN gate. Update its assertions to verify FLATTEN=false gating (not a runtime name) + that the old RUNTIME===codex gate is gone. Caught by full gsd-test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#1708): add changeset for typed dispatch-flatten Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#1708): remove stray temp PR-body file Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(#1708): add issue ref to bug-853 allow-test-rule annotations ADR-456 requires every allow-test-rule exemption to carry a see #NNN reference; the source-text-is-the-product annotations added when migrating the prose assertions lacked it (lint-tests CI gate). Add (see #1708). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
401 lines
16 KiB
JavaScript
401 lines
16 KiB
JavaScript
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* ADR-1239 Phase A: Descriptor tests — validate that all 16 role:runtime
|
|
* capability descriptors have correct hostIntegration axes, pass the validator,
|
|
* and negotiate correctly via the host-integration module.
|
|
*
|
|
* Expectations are derived from the generated capability registry and
|
|
* .host-cli-final.json (source of truth). Values are verbatim; 'undocumented'
|
|
* sentinels fail-closed in negotiation (safe documented default, never propagate).
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const { describe, test } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const path = require('node:path');
|
|
|
|
const {
|
|
negotiateHostCapabilities,
|
|
profileOf,
|
|
shouldFlattenDispatch,
|
|
} = require(path.join(__dirname, '../gsd-core/bin/lib/host-integration.cjs'));
|
|
|
|
const registry = require(path.join(__dirname, '../gsd-core/bin/lib/capability-registry.cjs'));
|
|
|
|
const {
|
|
validateCapability,
|
|
} = require(path.join(__dirname, '../gsd-core/bin/lib/capability-validator.cjs'));
|
|
|
|
// All 8 scalar hostIntegration axis keys
|
|
const SCALAR_AXES = ['embeddingMode', 'commandSurface', 'modelMode', 'hookBus', 'stateIO', 'transport', 'runtime'];
|
|
// All 6 dispatch sub-keys (includes backgroundDispatch added in feat/1679-dispatch-flatten)
|
|
const DISPATCH_KEYS = ['namedDispatch', 'nested', 'maxDepth', 'background', 'subagentToolkit', 'backgroundDispatch'];
|
|
|
|
// All 16 runtime IDs (ordered alphabetically)
|
|
const RUNTIME_IDS = [
|
|
'antigravity', 'augment', 'claude', 'cline', 'codebuddy',
|
|
'codex', 'copilot', 'cursor', 'gemini', 'hermes',
|
|
'kilo', 'kimi', 'opencode', 'qwen', 'trae', 'windsurf',
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
// Contract-pinned profile split (derived from .host-cli-final.json):
|
|
// programmatic-cli: claude, cline, cursor, hermes, kilo, kimi, opencode, qwen, trae (9)
|
|
// declarative-cli: antigravity, augment, codebuddy, codex, copilot, gemini, windsurf (7)
|
|
// ide: 0
|
|
const EXPECTED_PROFILES = {
|
|
claude: 'programmatic-cli',
|
|
cline: 'programmatic-cli',
|
|
cursor: 'programmatic-cli',
|
|
hermes: 'programmatic-cli',
|
|
kilo: 'programmatic-cli',
|
|
kimi: 'programmatic-cli',
|
|
opencode: 'programmatic-cli',
|
|
qwen: 'programmatic-cli',
|
|
trae: 'programmatic-cli',
|
|
antigravity: 'declarative-cli',
|
|
augment: 'declarative-cli',
|
|
codebuddy: 'declarative-cli',
|
|
codex: 'declarative-cli',
|
|
copilot: 'declarative-cli',
|
|
gemini: 'declarative-cli',
|
|
windsurf: 'declarative-cli',
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
describe('ADR-1239 Phase A: hostIntegration descriptors', () => {
|
|
// ─── Registry shape ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
test('registry.runtimes contains all 16 expected runtime ids', () => {
|
|
for (const id of RUNTIME_IDS) {
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(registry.runtimes, id),
|
|
'registry.runtimes must contain "' + id + '"',
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
Object.keys(registry.runtimes).length,
|
|
16,
|
|
'registry.runtimes must have exactly 16 entries',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Per-runtime assertions ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
for (const id of RUNTIME_IDS) {
|
|
describe('runtime: ' + id, () => {
|
|
const cap = registry.runtimes[id];
|
|
const hi = cap && cap.runtime && cap.runtime.hostIntegration;
|
|
|
|
// (i) Validator passes with zero errors
|
|
test('(i) validateCapability returns zero errors', () => {
|
|
const errors = validateCapability(cap, id);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
errors,
|
|
[],
|
|
id + ': validateCapability must return no errors, got: ' + JSON.stringify(errors),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// (ii) hostIntegration object is present with all required keys
|
|
test('(ii) cap.runtime.hostIntegration is present with all 8 axis keys and 6 dispatch sub-keys', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
hi !== undefined && hi !== null && typeof hi === 'object',
|
|
id + ': cap.runtime.hostIntegration must be a non-null object',
|
|
);
|
|
// All 8 scalar axes present
|
|
for (const axis of SCALAR_AXES) {
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(hi, axis),
|
|
id + ': hostIntegration must have axis "' + axis + '"',
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
// dispatch is an object
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
hi.dispatch !== null && typeof hi.dispatch === 'object',
|
|
id + ': hostIntegration.dispatch must be a non-null object',
|
|
);
|
|
// All 5 dispatch sub-keys present
|
|
for (const key of DISPATCH_KEYS) {
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(hi.dispatch, key),
|
|
id + ': hostIntegration.dispatch must have key "' + key + '"',
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// (iii) negotiateHostCapabilities does not throw and behaves correctly
|
|
test('(iii) negotiateHostCapabilities: documented scalars pass through; undocumented scalars degrade with warning', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(hi, id + ': hostIntegration must exist to negotiate');
|
|
let result;
|
|
assert.doesNotThrow(() => {
|
|
result = negotiateHostCapabilities(hi);
|
|
}, id + ': negotiateHostCapabilities must not throw');
|
|
|
|
const eff = result.effective;
|
|
|
|
// For each scalar axis: if declared !== 'undocumented', effective === declared
|
|
// If declared === 'undocumented', effective !== 'undocumented' (safe default) and
|
|
// warnings must mention that axis.
|
|
for (const axis of SCALAR_AXES) {
|
|
const declared = hi[axis];
|
|
if (declared !== 'undocumented') {
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
eff[axis],
|
|
declared,
|
|
id + ': effective.' + axis + ' must equal declared (' + JSON.stringify(declared) + '), got: ' + JSON.stringify(eff[axis]),
|
|
);
|
|
} else {
|
|
// fail-closed: effective must be a documented safe default, not 'undocumented'
|
|
assert.notStrictEqual(
|
|
eff[axis],
|
|
'undocumented',
|
|
id + ': effective.' + axis + ' must NOT be "undocumented" (fail-closed)',
|
|
);
|
|
// warnings must mention this axis
|
|
const mentionsAxis = result.warnings.some((w) => w.includes(axis));
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
mentionsAxis,
|
|
id + ': result.warnings must mention axis "' + axis + '" when declared is undocumented, got: ' + JSON.stringify(result.warnings),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// (iii-b) dispatch negotiation for namedDispatch
|
|
test('(iii-b) dispatch.namedDispatch negotiation', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(hi, id + ': hostIntegration must exist to negotiate');
|
|
const result = negotiateHostCapabilities(hi);
|
|
|
|
const declaredND = hi.dispatch && hi.dispatch.namedDispatch;
|
|
|
|
if (declaredND === true) {
|
|
// documented as true → effective must be true
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
result.effective.dispatch.namedDispatch,
|
|
true,
|
|
id + ': effective.dispatch.namedDispatch must be true when declared is true',
|
|
);
|
|
} else if (declaredND === 'undocumented') {
|
|
// undocumented → fail-closed: effective namedDispatch must be false
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
result.effective.dispatch.namedDispatch,
|
|
false,
|
|
id + ': effective.dispatch.namedDispatch must be false when declared is "undocumented" (fail-closed)',
|
|
);
|
|
// dispatch.effectiveLevel must be 'absent' (no named dispatch)
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
result.points.dispatch.effectiveLevel,
|
|
'absent',
|
|
id + ': points.dispatch.effectiveLevel must be "absent" when namedDispatch is undocumented',
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// (iv) profileOf returns expected profile
|
|
test('(iv) profileOf returns expected profile', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(hi, id + ': hostIntegration must exist to profile');
|
|
const profile = profileOf(hi);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
profile !== null,
|
|
id + ': profileOf must return a non-null profile',
|
|
);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
profile,
|
|
EXPECTED_PROFILES[id],
|
|
id + ': profileOf must return "' + EXPECTED_PROFILES[id] + '" (got: "' + profile + '")',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ─── Contract-pin profile split ───────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
test('contract-pin: exactly 9 programmatic-cli, 7 declarative-cli, 0 ide', () => {
|
|
const counts = { 'programmatic-cli': 0, 'declarative-cli': 0, 'ide': 0 };
|
|
for (const id of RUNTIME_IDS) {
|
|
const cap = registry.runtimes[id];
|
|
const hi = cap && cap.runtime && cap.runtime.hostIntegration;
|
|
assert.ok(hi, id + ': hostIntegration must exist for profile count');
|
|
const profile = profileOf(hi);
|
|
assert.ok(profile !== null, id + ': profileOf must be non-null');
|
|
if (counts[profile] !== undefined) {
|
|
counts[profile]++;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
assert.strictEqual(counts['programmatic-cli'], 9, 'Must have exactly 9 programmatic-cli runtimes');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(counts['declarative-cli'], 7, 'Must have exactly 7 declarative-cli runtimes');
|
|
assert.strictEqual(counts['ide'], 0, 'Must have exactly 0 ide runtimes');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── backgroundDispatch presence ─────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
test('every runtime descriptor has dispatch.backgroundDispatch (boolean or "undocumented")', () => {
|
|
for (const id of RUNTIME_IDS) {
|
|
const cap = registry.runtimes[id];
|
|
const dispatch = cap && cap.runtime && cap.runtime.hostIntegration && cap.runtime.hostIntegration.dispatch;
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
dispatch !== null && typeof dispatch === 'object',
|
|
id + ': hostIntegration.dispatch must be an object',
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(dispatch, 'backgroundDispatch'),
|
|
id + ': dispatch must have a backgroundDispatch key',
|
|
);
|
|
const v = dispatch.backgroundDispatch;
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
v === true || v === false || v === 'undocumented',
|
|
id + ': dispatch.backgroundDispatch must be true, false, or "undocumented", got: ' + JSON.stringify(v),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── shouldFlattenDispatch per-host (#853 discriminator) ─────────────────────
|
|
|
|
// Expected: false (may background) for codex and cursor ONLY; true (must inline) for the other 14.
|
|
const EXPECTED_FLATTEN = {
|
|
antigravity: true,
|
|
augment: true,
|
|
claude: true,
|
|
cline: true,
|
|
codebuddy: true,
|
|
codex: false,
|
|
copilot: true,
|
|
cursor: false,
|
|
gemini: true,
|
|
hermes: true,
|
|
kilo: true,
|
|
kimi: true,
|
|
opencode: true,
|
|
qwen: true,
|
|
trae: true,
|
|
windsurf: true,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
for (const id of RUNTIME_IDS) {
|
|
test('shouldFlattenDispatch(' + id + ') === ' + EXPECTED_FLATTEN[id], () => {
|
|
const cap = registry.runtimes[id];
|
|
const dispatch = cap && cap.runtime && cap.runtime.hostIntegration && cap.runtime.hostIntegration.dispatch;
|
|
assert.ok(dispatch, id + ': dispatch must exist');
|
|
const result = shouldFlattenDispatch(dispatch);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
result,
|
|
EXPECTED_FLATTEN[id],
|
|
id + ': shouldFlattenDispatch must return ' + EXPECTED_FLATTEN[id] + ' (got: ' + result + ')',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test('contract-pin: exactly 2 hosts are background-eligible (shouldFlattenDispatch === false): codex and cursor', () => {
|
|
const eligible = RUNTIME_IDS.filter((id) => {
|
|
const cap = registry.runtimes[id];
|
|
const dispatch = cap && cap.runtime && cap.runtime.hostIntegration && cap.runtime.hostIntegration.dispatch;
|
|
return dispatch && shouldFlattenDispatch(dispatch) === false;
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
eligible.slice().sort(),
|
|
['codex', 'cursor'],
|
|
'Exactly codex and cursor must be background-eligible, got: ' + JSON.stringify(eligible.sort()),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('contract-pin: spot-check claude→programmatic-cli, codex→declarative-cli, opencode→programmatic-cli, gemini→declarative-cli', () => {
|
|
const checks = [
|
|
['claude', 'programmatic-cli'],
|
|
['codex', 'declarative-cli'],
|
|
['opencode', 'programmatic-cli'],
|
|
['gemini', 'declarative-cli'],
|
|
];
|
|
for (const [id, expectedProfile] of checks) {
|
|
const cap = registry.runtimes[id];
|
|
const hi = cap && cap.runtime && cap.runtime.hostIntegration;
|
|
assert.ok(hi, id + ': hostIntegration must exist');
|
|
const profile = profileOf(hi);
|
|
assert.strictEqual(
|
|
profile,
|
|
expectedProfile,
|
|
id + ': profileOf must return "' + expectedProfile + '" (got: "' + profile + '")',
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── NEGATIVE cases ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('NEGATIVE: invalid hostIntegration.embeddingMode triggers validator error', () => {
|
|
test('embeddingMode "bogus" produces a validator error naming embeddingMode', () => {
|
|
const cap = {
|
|
id: 'test-neg',
|
|
role: 'runtime',
|
|
version: '1.0.0',
|
|
title: 'Test Negative',
|
|
description: 'Negative case for hostIntegration validation.',
|
|
tier: 'core',
|
|
requires: [],
|
|
runtime: {
|
|
configHome: { kind: 'dot-home', name: '.test-neg', env: [] },
|
|
configFormat: 'settings-json',
|
|
artifactLayout: { global: [], local: [] },
|
|
commandStyle: 'slash-hyphen',
|
|
hooksSurface: 'settings-json',
|
|
hookEvents: 'claude',
|
|
sandboxTier: 'none',
|
|
supportTier: 1,
|
|
installSurface: 'settings-json',
|
|
writesSharedSettings: true,
|
|
permissionWriter: null,
|
|
extendedHookEvents: [],
|
|
hostIntegration: {
|
|
embeddingMode: 'bogus',
|
|
commandSurface: 'slash-file',
|
|
dispatch: { namedDispatch: true, nested: false, maxDepth: 1, background: false, subagentToolkit: 'full', backgroundDispatch: false },
|
|
modelMode: 'passive',
|
|
hookBus: 'host',
|
|
stateIO: 'filesystem',
|
|
transport: 'mcp',
|
|
runtime: 'node',
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
const errors = validateCapability(cap, 'test-neg');
|
|
assert.ok(errors.length > 0, 'Expected validation errors for bogus embeddingMode');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
errors.some((e) => e.includes('embeddingMode')),
|
|
'At least one error must mention embeddingMode, got: ' + JSON.stringify(errors),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('NEGATIVE: missing hostIntegration produces required-object error', () => {
|
|
test('runtime body without hostIntegration produces the required-object error', () => {
|
|
const cap = {
|
|
id: 'test-missing-hi',
|
|
role: 'runtime',
|
|
version: '1.0.0',
|
|
title: 'Test Missing HI',
|
|
description: 'Negative case for missing hostIntegration.',
|
|
tier: 'core',
|
|
requires: [],
|
|
runtime: {
|
|
configHome: { kind: 'dot-home', name: '.test-missing-hi', env: [] },
|
|
configFormat: 'settings-json',
|
|
artifactLayout: { global: [], local: [] },
|
|
commandStyle: 'slash-hyphen',
|
|
hooksSurface: 'settings-json',
|
|
hookEvents: 'claude',
|
|
sandboxTier: 'none',
|
|
supportTier: 1,
|
|
installSurface: 'settings-json',
|
|
writesSharedSettings: true,
|
|
permissionWriter: null,
|
|
extendedHookEvents: [],
|
|
// hostIntegration intentionally absent
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
const errors = validateCapability(cap, 'test-missing-hi');
|
|
assert.ok(errors.length > 0, 'Expected validation errors for missing hostIntegration');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
errors.some((e) => e.includes('hostIntegration') && e.includes('required')),
|
|
'At least one error must mention hostIntegration and required, got: ' + JSON.stringify(errors),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|