* docs(#2904): how-to for listing a reviewer lane in the registry #2912 shipped the Reviewer Lane Registry, which lands in 1.9.1. Two docs consequences. New: docs/how-to/list-your-reviewer-lane.md. A Diataxis how-to for the publish task -- which of the three catalogs applies (and why a runtime carrying a reviewer body lists under its primary install shape instead), opening the required discussion thread BEFORE the PR, the three fields that reject entries most often (slug grammar differs from id, flags stay kebab when the slug is snake, install/uninstall must be copy-pasteable), regenerate-don't-hand-edit, and register-once-then-Releases. Links the registry README for the field table rather than duplicating it -- the spec is reference, this is the task flow. Corrected: ship-a-reviewer-lane.md said "Listing your lane is not wired yet" and pointed at #2904 as future work. #2906 merged at 11:25Z and #2912 at 12:11Z, so that section shipped false the moment the registry landed. Replaced with the publish pointer. Indexed the new guide and the generated catalog in docs/README.md, and added the guide to develop-a-capability.md's ecosystem list. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#2904): caveat credential-bearing configKeys in both the guide and the spec Isolated security review found the worked entry's `configKeys: ["acme.api_key"]` modelled storing a live credential with no note on where that value ends up. Verified: config values are written in plaintext to .planning/config.json (docs/CONFIGURATION.md:227 -- masking is display-only, "that file is the security boundary"), and planning.commit_docs defaults to true (:466). So a credential declared that way lands in the installing user's git repository unless they have gitignored .planning/. None of the twelve first-party lanes does this -- they own only review.models.*, host, and prompt-budget keys. The pattern originates in docs/registries/README.md:221, shipped by #2912, so the caveat goes on BOTH surfaces rather than only on the copy that inherited it -- the spec's example is what future authors will read first. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#2915): backfill changeset PR number pr: 0 -> 2917. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
13 KiB
Develop a Capability for GSD 1.5+
This guide shows you how to add or change a first-party GSD Capability after the ADR-857 cutover. In GSD terms, the extension unit is a Capability. A plugin is a packaging or host-runtime term, for example a Claude Code plugin, not the unit that owns a GSD feature.
A Capability is right when the feature can be toggled as one unit and owns its own skills, agents, hooks, config keys, or command family. Keep verifier predicate contracts, the five-step loop spine, and shared infrastructure in core unless the ADRs explicitly move that boundary.
Start from the boundary
Before writing a manifest, decide whether the work is core or a Capability.
Use a Capability when the feature:
- Can be enabled or disabled without changing the meaning of the base loop.
- Owns a stable feature name such as
research,ui,graphify,ai-integration, orpattern-mapper. - Adds a step, gate, or contribution at a Loop Extension Point.
- Owns one or more feature config keys.
- Owns a command family that can route through the capability registry.
Keep the work in core when the feature:
- Defines the reliability substrate of the loop, such as the verifier predicate contract described by ADR-550 and ADR-857.
- Is required for every installation profile.
- Mutates shared host workflow state rather than adding a declared hook contribution.
Create the folder
Create one folder per Capability:
capabilities/<id>/
capability.json
fragments/
plan-pre.md
The manifest path is capabilities/<id>/capability.json.
The <id> must match the id field in capability.json. Co-locate prompt fragments, owned skills, owned agents, and other owned artefacts under the Capability folder when the schema allows it. Shared host artefacts can be referenced by name, but ownership should remain clear in the manifest.
Write capability.json
Use the existing manifests as the source of truth while the schema is still first-party:
capabilities/research/capability.jsoncapabilities/ai-integration/capability.jsoncapabilities/pattern-mapper/capability.jsoncapabilities/ui/capability.jsoncapabilities/graphify/capability.json
At minimum, a feature Capability declares:
{
"id": "example",
"role": "feature",
"version": "0.1.0",
"title": "Example",
"description": "Adds an example planning step.",
"tier": "standard",
"requires": [],
"runtimeCompat": { "supported": ["*"], "unsupported": [] },
"skills": [],
"agents": ["gsd-example-agent"],
"hooks": [],
"config": {},
"steps": [
{
"point": "plan:pre",
"ref": { "agent": "gsd-example-agent" },
"fragment": { "path": "fragments/plan-pre.md" },
"produces": ["EXAMPLE.md"],
"consumes": ["CONTEXT.md"],
"onError": "skip"
}
],
"contributions": [],
"gates": []
}
The registry generator validates the shape, ownership, and cross-capability contracts. ref.skill must name a skill declared by the same Capability. ref.agent must name an agent declared by the same Capability.
Declare runtime compatibility
Every feature Capability must declare runtimeCompat. This is part of the GSD 1.5+ developer contract: a Capability says which runtime descriptors it can surface through, and the generator validates that declaration before the central registry is written.
Use the wildcard when the Capability is runtime-agnostic:
"runtimeCompat": {
"supported": ["*"],
"unsupported": []
}
Use explicit runtime ids when the Capability is intentionally narrower:
"runtimeCompat": {
"supported": ["claude", "codex"],
"unsupported": ["kilo"],
"notes": {
"kilo": "Requires a hook surface Kilo does not expose yet."
}
}
supported is required and must be non-empty. "*" means every descriptor-backed runtime, including future first-party runtime descriptors, is compatible unless it is listed in unsupported. Explicit runtime ids and notes keys must match runtime Capability ids such as claude, codex, opencode, or kilo; typos fail node scripts/gen-capability-registry.cjs --check.
Add hooks
Loop Extension Points are the stable sites where Capabilities attach to the host loop. Phase 6 planning-time features use plan:pre so the core planner can ask the registry for active planning hooks instead of reading feature config directly.
Choose the hook kind that matches the behaviour:
stepsadd a sequenced unit of work, such as runninggsd-phase-researcherorgsd-pattern-mapper.contributionsadd labelled context to a host prompt.gatescheck a condition and may block whenblockingis true.
Declare file artefact flow with produces and consumes. The registry uses those arrays to order hooks and to reject unsatisfied dependencies.
Use prompt fragments
Use fragment.path for prompt text longer than a short sentence:
"fragment": { "path": "fragments/plan-pre.md" }
The generator materialises that file into fragment.inline in the generated registry. Paths must be relative to the Capability folder, must not be absolute, and must not contain ...
Use fragment.inline only for short, stable text:
"fragment": { "inline": "Add the generated example context to the planner input." }
Generate and verify the registry
After editing any Capability manifest or fragment, regenerate the committed registry:
node scripts/gen-capability-registry.cjs --write
Then run the drift check:
node scripts/gen-capability-registry.cjs --check
For a planning hook, verify the rendered output:
node gsd-core/bin/gsd-tools.cjs loop render-hooks plan:pre --raw
In installed workflow prose, the same resolver surface appears as gsd-tools loop render-hooks plan:pre.
The rendered JSON should include the active hook, the declared ref, and the materialised fragment.inline.
To verify a runtime-specific surface, pass the same config directory that the runtime installation uses:
node gsd-core/bin/gsd-tools.cjs loop render-hooks plan:pre --config-dir ~/.claude --raw
node gsd-core/bin/gsd-tools.cjs capability state --config-dir ~/.claude --raw
capability state is the diagnostic view for the same state that workflow dispatch consumes. For each Capability, enabled is true only when the Capability is both installed by the active profile and surfaced by the runtime surface. A hook's configured field reflects the when config key; active is true only when the Capability is enabled and the hook is configured on.
Add or change a runtime descriptor
Runtime-specific facts belong in the runtime Capability declaration, not in a parallel allowlist or runtime-name branch. When adding a first-party runtime under capabilities/<runtime>/capability.json, declare these fields in the runtime object:
configHome: the global config root resolver, including env overrides and probes.configHome.skillsHome: optional separate base home for runtimes whose global skills root differs from the config root.artifactLayout.globalandartifactLayout.local: command, agent, skill, and Kimi-agent destinations.hooksSurface,hookEvents, andextendedHookEvents: hook registration surface and event dialect.installSurface,writesSharedSettings, andpermissionWriter: install-time config mutation behavior.
The runtime homes, artifact layout, and install-plan resolvers read those descriptor fields directly. Adding a descriptor-backed runtime should not require editing a second list in runtime-artifact-layout or a fallback branch in runtime-config-adapter-registry.
Own config in the Capability
Declare feature config keys in the Capability manifest:
"config": {
"workflow.example_enabled": {
"type": "boolean",
"default": true,
"description": "Enable the example planning step."
}
}
Do not add migrated Capability keys to gsd-core/bin/shared/config-schema.manifest.json. The central schema remains for host/core keys; Capability-owned keys validate through the generated registry and are merged into loadConfig by the federated config overlay. Existing nested .planning/config.json values such as { "workflow": { "example_enabled": false } } continue to override the Capability default.
Wire the workflow through the registry
Host workflows should ask the resolver for active hooks and then dispatch from the resolved data. Do not add new direct config-get workflow.<feature> checks to a host workflow for a migrated feature.
The Phase 6 migrations follow this pattern:
researchregisters aplan:prestep that invokesgsd-phase-researcher.ai-integrationowns the AI-SPEC planning activation and config key.pattern-mapperregisters aplan:prestep that invokesgsd-pattern-mapper.plan-phase.mdreads the resolvedPLAN_PRE_HOOKS_JSONand dispatchesref.agentorref.skillfrom that data.code-reviewregisters anexecute:poststep and review workflows dispatch from the active hook'sref.skill.securityregisters aplan:precontribution, averify:poststep, and a blockingship:pregate.nyquistregisters averify:poststep for validation coverage auditing.
This keeps "off means off" enforceable by construction: disabled Capabilities are absent from the active hook set, so the host workflow has nothing feature-specific to run.
Test the Capability
Add focused tests before changing behaviour:
- Registry tests for manifest validation, ordering, config ownership, command family dispatch, or fragment materialisation.
- Workflow text tests for host workflow cutovers when a workflow stops reading direct feature config.
- Behavioural command tests when a command family moves behind
dispatchCapabilityCommand. - Documentation tests when the feature changes developer-facing behaviour.
Run the smallest affected tests first, then the full suite before opening a ready PR:
node --test tests/capability-registry.test.cjs
node --test tests/phase6-planning-capabilities.test.cjs
node --test tests/phase6-capstone-conformance.test.cjs
npm test
Run the Phase 6 capstone test whenever a Capability adds a when key or moves activation logic in a host workflow. It checks that migrated activation keys are resolved through Capability hooks or state, and that Capability-owned config keys stay out of the central schema. If a host workflow must keep core behaviour behind a workflow.* key, document why it is core rather than Capability-owned before adding it.
Keep the docs with the slice
Every Phase 6 slice that changes capability behaviour must update the relevant docs in the same PR. Use this manual for developer-facing Capability authoring facts, use how-to guides for task flows, and use ADRs only for decisions and trade-offs.
The capability ecosystem (1.6.0)
From GSD 1.6.0, capabilities are versioned (the version field is required in capability.json) and can be installed directly from a URL, a git ref, an npm package, or a local path — without modifying the core repo.
- Tutorial — Build your first capability: scaffold and install a declarative capability end-to-end in under ten minutes.
- How-to — Publish a capability: package and distribute a capability via a URL or registry.
- How-to — Import a capability from a URL: install a third-party capability from a git URL, tarball, or npm package.
- How-to — Version and update a capability: manage
version,engines.gsd, andcompatVersions; usegsd capability update. - How-to — Remove a capability: uninstall cleanly with
gsd capability remove, including the--purge-dataoption. - How-to — Ship a reviewer lane in your capability: declare a
reviewerbody (GSD 1.9.0+) so/gsd-reviewdiscovers and invokes your external review CLI or model endpoint. - How-to — List your reviewer lane in the registry: publish a lane to the Reviewer Lane Registry (GSD 1.9.1+) so other people can find and install it.
- Reference — Capability manifest: all fields and validation rules for
capability.json. - Reference — Capability matrix: which first-party capabilities exist, their extension points, and their compatibility matrix.
- Explanation — Capability trust model: how declarative and executable capabilities are treated differently at install time.
- ADR-1244 —
docs/adr/1244-capability-ecosystem.md: the architectural decision that introduced the installable capability ecosystem.