81f9534b5a
ADR-0002: commands/gsd/*.md contract now enforced at two layers: LINT (scripts/lint-command-contract.cjs — new CI step): - name: present, starts with gsd: or gsd- - description: non-empty - allowed-tools: non-empty, all entries canonical - execution_context @-refs: resolve on disk, no trailing prose on same line - handles both @~/ and $HOME/ path prefixes TEST (tests/command-contract.test.cjs — 361 assertions): - Behavioral contract for all 65 command files - Replaces scattered coverage in enh-2790 + bug-3135 - Per-command per-rule test — one failure names the exact file + rule CI (.github/workflows/test.yml): - 'Lint — command contract (ADR-0002)' step added to lint-tests job PROSE @-REF CLEANUP (39 command files, ~900 tokens/invocation recovered): - Removed redundant @~/.claude/get-shit-done/... paths from <process> prose - execution_context block is now the single authoritative load declaration - Routing commands (sketch, spike, update, pause-work, etc.) keep routing instructions; only the inert path token is stripped WORKFLOW EXTRACTION (debug.md + thread.md, ~15,000 chars / ~3,750 tokens): - get-shit-done/workflows/debug.md: full process extracted from commands/gsd/debug.md - get-shit-done/workflows/thread.md: full process extracted from commands/gsd/thread.md - Command files reduced to frontmatter + objective + execution_context + context - debug.md: 9,603 → 1,703 chars; thread.md: 7,868 → 585 chars RENAME: - get-shit-done/workflows/extract_learnings.md → extract-learnings.md (aligns with hyphen convention of all other workflow files) DOCS: - docs/INVENTORY.md: count 85→87, new rows, rename row, fix add-todo --backlog attribution - docs/INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json: +debug.md +thread.md +extract-learnings.md -extract_learnings.md Closes ADR-0002 implementation.
2.4 KiB
name, description, argument-hint, allowed-tools
| name | description | argument-hint | allowed-tools | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gsd:spec-phase | Clarify WHAT a phase delivers with ambiguity scoring; produces a SPEC.md before discuss-phase. | <phase> [--auto] [--text] |
|
Position in workflow: spec-phase → discuss-phase → plan-phase → execute-phase → verify
How it works:
- Load phase context (PROJECT.md, REQUIREMENTS.md, ROADMAP.md, STATE.md)
- Scout the codebase — understand current state before asking questions
- Run Socratic interview loop (up to 6 rounds, rotating perspectives)
- Score ambiguity across 4 weighted dimensions after each round
- Gate: ambiguity ≤ 0.20 AND all dimensions meet minimums → write SPEC.md
- Commit SPEC.md — discuss-phase picks it up automatically on next run
Output: {phase_dir}/{padded_phase}-SPEC.md — falsifiable requirements that lock "what/why" before discuss-phase handles "how"
<execution_context>
@/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/spec-phase.md
@/.claude/get-shit-done/templates/spec.md
</execution_context>
<runtime_note>
Copilot (VS Code): Use vscode_askquestions wherever this workflow calls AskUserQuestion. They are equivalent.
</runtime_note>
Flags:
--auto— Skip interactive questions; Claude selects recommended defaults and writes SPEC.md--text— Use plain-text numbered lists instead of TUI menus (required for/rcremote sessions)
Context files are resolved in-workflow using init phase-op.
MANDATORY: Read the workflow file BEFORE taking any action. The workflow contains the complete step-by-step process including the Socratic interview loop, ambiguity scoring gate, and SPEC.md generation. Do not improvise from the objective summary above.
<success_criteria>
- Codebase scouted for current state before questioning begins
- All 4 ambiguity dimensions scored after each interview round
- Gate passed: ambiguity ≤ 0.20 AND all dimension minimums met
- SPEC.md written with falsifiable requirements, explicit boundaries, and acceptance criteria
- SPEC.md committed atomically
- User knows they can now run /gsd-discuss-phase which will load SPEC.md automatically </success_criteria>