* chore: rebuild ADR index as a generated artifact and enforce lifecycle invariants
The ADR index in docs/adr/README.md was hand-maintained with nothing checking
it, and had drifted to 40 of 65 ADRs. The absent rows included the entire
capability family (857/894/959/1016/1143/1213/1244) and ADR-1239 (EoS) itself,
so the decisions a reader most needed were the ones they could not find.
Make the index a derived artifact, matching the repo's existing generated-file
idiom (lint:generated-sync), and enforce the corpus' lifecycle invariants:
- scripts/gen-adr-index.cjs generates the index between markers and validates
the status vocabulary (Accepted/Proposed/Superseded/Legacy/Retired),
successor links, id/filename agreement, and supersession symmetry.
- Wire --check into lint:generated-sync so drift fails CI.
Correct the lifecycle metadata the gate surfaced, without flipping any status:
- ADR-1239 (EoS) declared it subsumed ADR-1016/58/3660/894; none recorded it.
Add reciprocal "Subsumed by" pointers + dated amendments. Subsumption keeps
the target Accepted -- these are live adapters, not dead decisions.
- ADR-857/894 carry dated status caveats: they read Proposed while the
capability system shipped and epic #857 is closed. Ratification is a
maintainer act and is deliberately left open.
- Link ADR-0005/0007/0012/3524 -> ADR-0174 and ADR-0010 -> ADR-0009; record
the reciprocal Supersedes on ADR-0009.
- ADR-218 declared itself "ADR-0175" -- an unfinished rename.
- The 0011 PRD moves from the non-canonical "Draft" to "Legacy".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test: capture stderr via spawnSync; record ADR-0010 draft supersession
Two fixes surfaced by the first gsd-test run and by regenerating the index:
- tests/adr-index-gate.test.cjs used execFileSync, which only surfaces stderr
through the thrown error on non-zero exit. The `--write` path exits 0 while
reporting outstanding violations on stderr, so the helper always saw ''.
spawnSync captures both streams on both outcomes.
- The hand-maintained index recorded 0010-skill-surface-budget-module.md as
"earlier draft superseded by ADR-0011" while the file itself still said
Proposed. Deriving the index from the files would have dropped that
assertion and resurrected a superseded draft as a live decision, so it is
recorded at its source, with the reciprocal Supersedes on ADR-0011.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: drop the dead sdk/ model-catalog candidate retired by ADR-0174
src/model-catalog.cts resolved model-catalog.json through three candidates, the
second being sdk/shared/model-catalog.json three levels up. That was the legacy
source-repo fallback kept by the #3288 fix ("check the co-located path FIRST,
before the legacy source-repo path").
ADR-0174 then retired the @opengsd/gsd-sdk package boundary and deleted the sdk/
tree (11918dcc3), so the candidate can no longer resolve in any layout: a source
repo has no sdk/, and an install layout points it at ~/.claude/sdk/shared/, which
the installer never writes -- the original #3288 bug. It was dead weight implying
a package boundary this repo no longer has.
No test depends on it: the #3288 regression tests in tests/install.test.cjs write
their own synthetic old-path fixture and assert it throws.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: ratify nine shipped ADRs; record why ten others stay Proposed
The corpus carried 19 Proposed ADRs, most describing architecture that had
already shipped. A Proposed label on live architecture tells contributors and
agents the decision is an unbuilt idea -- the capability system and EoS were
both being misread that way.
Audited all 19 against the shipped tree and GitHub. Each candidate flip then had
to survive two independent reviewers instructed to refute it.
Ratified Proposed -> Accepted, each with a dated Ratification section carrying
the verified evidence (file:line, symbols, tests, issue state):
857 capability system 894 declaration format 1244 capability ecosystem
1577 injection boundary 1610 size-budget ratchet 1990 existing-code onboarding
15 cross-AI convergence 22 plan-drift guard 0011 default reviewers
Held ten, each now carrying a "Why this is still Proposed" section naming the
blocker and its unblock condition, so the audit is not repeated:
2264 its own headline acceptance criterion is unmet in the tree
230 live branch protection contradicts the decided spec (1 approval, not 2)
660 the namesake release/<version> re-cut is manual, not automated
959 issue #2346 is approved and plans its graduation as its own ADR
1213 the shipped writer's return shape differs from the decided interface
443 the orchestrator override path has no live caller
1143 / 1606 each states its own bar for acceptance; neither is met
612 / 1671 legitimately open
Shipped code proved necessary but not sufficient: eight ADRs had every named
module, symbol, and test present with their epics closed, and still failed the
bar. That lesson is written into README.md's ratification procedure.
Also corrected ADR-857's "Supersedes (generalizes)" to "Subsumes": taken
literally it would have marked two live seams dead -- ADR-0011 (surface.cts:348)
and ADR-58 (runtime-artifact-install-plan.cts:82). Both keep Accepted status and
gain Subsumed-by pointers.
Index: Active 39->48, Proposed 19->10, Superseded/Legacy 7. 65 total.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: harden gen-adr-index against hostile titles and non-ADR filenames (#2356)
Three findings from the pre-PR orthogonal security review, all confirmed:
- An ADR title containing the literal ADR-INDEX:END marker was emitted verbatim
into its table cell, relocating the splice boundary so the NEXT --write
spliced against the wrong marker and truncated README.md. Titles now render
through cellText(), which escapes pipes and angle brackets -- making an HTML
comment (and any other HTML) unformable from ADR-authored text.
- A docs/adr/*.md without a numeric prefix crashed on match(...)[1] of null.
Such a file is also invisible to the index -- the very failure this gate
exists to prevent -- so it is now reported as a naming-convention violation
naming the file and the fix.
- Tests leaked their mkdtemp dirs. They now use helpers.createTempDir/cleanup
via t.after(); helpers.cleanup carries the Windows-EBUSY retry budget that a
raw fs.rmSync lacks (caught by local/no-raw-rmsync-in-tests).
Adds five regression tests: marker hijack, HTML injection, pipe cell-break,
non-conforming filename, and splice stability across repeated writes.
Refs #2356
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: close two gate false-passes; read ## Supersedes sections (#2356)
Second round of confirmed findings from the pre-PR orthogonal code review. Both
false-passes matter more than a false-fail: a gate that silently misses a
violation is worse than no gate, because it is trusted.
- A relation field mixing a link with a bare id silently dropped the bare claim:
the check tested `rel.links.length` (does this field have ANY link?) instead
of whether THAT id was linked. `Supersedes: [ADR-0001](...), ADR-0011` passed
clean -- accepting exactly the ambiguous bare reference the rule forbids. Now
each bare id is checked against the ids actually linked in the same field, so
a repeat in trailing prose stays quiet while an unlinked claim is flagged.
- The ratification guard (`statusToken !== 'Accepted'`) skipped BOTH relation
directions, which killed the IN check entirely: `supersedes.in` is only ever
populated on an ADR whose status IS `Superseded`, so a dangling `Superseded by
X` where X never claims it always passed. The guard now applies to OUT only --
a prospective claim must not obligate its target, but an ADR's statement about
ITSELF is always owed a reciprocal.
- Fixing that surfaced a parser gap: ADR-0174 declares its supersessions in a
`## Supersedes` table SECTION, not a header field, and headerBlock() stops at
the first `##`. The repo's best-documented supersession was invisible. Section
form is now parsed for both relations.
- Replaced a vacuous test: the em-dash negation case passed whether or not
NEGATED_RELATION_RE matched (a mutation to /$^/ survived). It now carries a
link that would create a failing asymmetric relation if negation did not fire.
Also removes docs/adr/9401-test-target.md -- a synthetic fixture a reviewer
created in the worktree while reproducing a finding, swept in by `git add -A`.
Adds regression tests for each: mixed link+bare, linked-and-repeated-in-prose,
dangling superseded-by from a non-Accepted ADR, and the ADR-0174 section shape.
Refs #2356
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: escape backslashes before pipes in the ADR index cell renderer (#2356)
CodeQL js/incomplete-sanitization (high) on scripts/gen-adr-index.cjs: cellText()
escaped `|` -> `\|` without first escaping the backslash. Markdown's escape
character is the backslash, so the input `\|` became `\\|`, which renders as a
literal backslash followed by an UNESCAPED pipe -- re-opening the cell break the
pipe escape exists to prevent. Order is load-bearing: escape the escape
character first, then everything that emits one.
Same class as the index-marker hijack fixed earlier: ADR-authored text breaking
out of the cell it is rendered into.
Adds a regression test asserting a `\|`-bearing title leaves exactly the row's
own 5 unescaped delimiters and cannot forge a Status cell. Uses split(/\r?\n/)
per local/no-crlf-fragile-split -- a literal "\n" split is CRLF-fragile on the
Windows CI leg.
Refs #2356
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
11 KiB
Plan-vs-codebase drift guard: defaults and symbol-resolver seam
- Status: Accepted — ratified 2026-07-17 (originally Proposed 2026-05-29); see "Ratification" below
- Date: 2026-05-29
- Issue: open-gsd/gsd-core#22
Ratification (2026-07-17): Proposed → Accepted
Ratified by explicit maintainer directive; the Status field sat at Proposed for roughly 14 months against a decision that in fact shipped and closed within a day of the ADR being written (issue closed 2026-05-30, one day after the 2026-05-29 ADR date).
Evidence the decision shipped
src/plan-drift-guard.ctsimplements the ADR's authority ladder and severity table as a pure decision module:AUTHORITY_RUNGS(grep=0…scip=4),getEffectiveAuthority()(auto-upgradesgrep→intelwhenintel.enabled), andclassifyDriftSeverity()producing the exact table (VERIFIED→none, MISSING@rung<3→needs-acknowledgement, MISSING@rung>=3→HIGH/hardBlock, AMBIGUOUS→MEDIUM, UNCHECKABLE→INFO); compiled togsd-core/bin/lib/plan-drift-guard.cjs(gitignored generated artifact,.gitignore:101).gsd-core/bin/shared/config-defaults.manifest.json:94-97setsplan_review.source_groundingdefaulttrueandplan_review.source_grounding_authoritydefault'grep'— the default-on verification pass from Part 1 point 1.capabilities/intel/capability.jsonkeepsintel.enableddefaultfalseand wires itsplan:prestep (intel api-surface) withonError: "skip"—intel.enabledstays opt-in and the injection never blocks, per Part 1 points 2-3.gsd-core/workflows/plan-review-convergence.md's "Source-grounding pass" section (~lines 184-208) implements the four-valued resolver contract (VERIFIED/MISSING/AMBIGUOUS/UNCHECKABLE), excludes plan-declared "Artifacts this phase produces," delegates severity to thedrift-guardCLI seam rather than inline reviewer reasoning, and appends a "Verification coverage" block to REVIEWS.md.gsd-core/workflows/plan-phase.md§7.9 ("Regenerate API-SURFACE.md (intel gate)") regenerates the surface only when the intel step hook is active and injects it into the planner prompt labeled "HINT ONLY... MAY BE INCOMPLETE... Never treat the surface as exhaustive" — matching Part 1 point 2 verbatim.gsd-core/workflows/settings.mdandgsd-core/workflows/new-project.mdsurfaceplan_review.source_groundingas a "Drift Guard" toggle/setup question;docs/CONFIGURATION.mddocuments both config keys, explicitly marking authority rungs 2-4 (treesitter/lsp/scip) as reserved with no effect in the current release.
Governance: owning issue open-gsd/gsd-core#22 — CLOSED, stateReason COMPLETED, closed 2026-05-30T21:08:13Z, labeled enhancement + approved-feature.
Context
The planner regularly cites symbols that do not exist in the codebase — invented decorators, wrong dataclass fields, renamed CLI flags, mismatched signatures. The phenomenon is measured, not anecdotal: the Practical Code Generation hallucination taxonomy (arXiv:2409.20550) reports Dependency Conflicts (11.26%) and API Knowledge Conflicts (20.41%), which together describe exactly this failure. Today the drift is caught only at execution time by the executor (ImportError/AttributeError), at roughly 10–15 min/fix, a dozen per multi-wave phase.
/gsd:plan-review-convergence does not catch it because planner and reviewer both read the same channel (other plan files); the drift originates in that channel. The fix must introduce an out-of-band source of truth: the project's own source code.
GSD ships intel.cjs (api-map.json et al.), but: enabling intel.enabled populates nothing (the gsd-intel-updater LLM agent is never auto-spawned; population is a manual /gsd:map-codebase --query refresh); extraction is regex, JS/CJS/ESM only; intel is stale after 24h with no auto-refresh (intelUpdate() is a stub); useful intel therefore costs recurring LLM-agent token spend.
The feature has two halves with different dependencies: a verification pass that reads live source (needs no intel, works in any language) and a surface-injection step that renders api-map.json into API-SURFACE.md for the planner (needs intel).
Decision
Part 1 — Defaults
- Ship the verification pass on by default, behind a new, additive config key
plan_review.source_grounding(boolean, defaulttrue, opt-out). Surface it as one question in/gsd:new-project(default Y) and as a toggle in/gsd:settings. It stays on permanently with an easy off switch. - The
API-SURFACE.mdinjection stays gated on the existingintel.enabled(default unchanged). It ships in this release but only activates for projects that opted into intel and populated it. Its planner instruction is a hint ("prefer symbols in API-SURFACE.md; it may be incomplete"), never a hard rule. intel.enabledstays opt-in. Flip its default totrueonly once all three hold: (a) deterministic population (tree-sitter/CJS parse, not an LLM agent); (b) auto-refresh on staleness; (c) multi-language coverage. None of these block the drift guard, because the default-on half does not depend on intel.- Only new, additive config keys are introduced. No pre-existing default is changed.
Part 2 — Symbol-resolver seam
The reviewer pass depends on a resolver seam, not a hardcoded tool:
resolve(ref) -> VERIFIED{location, exported, signature?} | MISSING | AMBIGUOUS{candidates} | UNCHECKABLE{reason}
Resolution is three-valued, not boolean. UNCHECKABLE (the adapter cannot analyze this language or symbol kind) never blocks and never falsely blesses; it is recorded as a coverage gap. Only MISSING from a capable adapter is actionable.
Adapters form an authority ladder, selected by plan_review.source_grounding_authority (enum; default grep, auto-upgrades to intel when intel.enabled), with no prompt changes when climbing:
| Rung | Backend | Asserts | This release? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | ripgrep / Read | name present in source | yes (default) |
| 1 | api-map.json (existing intel) | name in parsed export list | yes (when intel on) |
| 2 | tree-sitter | real declaration + kind | deferred (new dep) |
| 3 | LSP workspace/symbol | + resolved definition, signature | deferred (new dep) |
| 4 | SCIP / GitNexus (#3802) | + exported?, signature, references | deferred (new dep) |
Locked sub-decisions:
- Severity.
MISSINGfrom rung 0–1 ->needs-acknowledgement(the plan proceeds if the author confirms the symbol is new/dynamic, logged), not a hard block — because rung 0–1 produce false positives on dynamic dispatch, re-exports, metaprogrammed decorators, and generated code. Hard block (HIGH) is reserved for rung >=3 adapters that can prove absence.AMBIGUOUS-> MEDIUM.UNCHECKABLE-> INFO. - New vs. existing. Plans declare created symbols in an "Artifacts this phase produces" section. The resolver only checks symbols not in that list, so greenfield work is never flagged MISSING.
- Extraction contract. The reviewer enumerates a fixed set of symbol kinds (
@decorators,Class.method,module.function,--cli-flags, file paths, dataclass/struct fields) and must quote the plan line for each, so coverage is auditable. - Signature-drift can only be asserted at rung >=3; rungs 0–1 return
UNCHECKABLEfor signatures (name-drift only this release). - Cadence. Resolve once per unique symbol per convergence cycle (cache within the cycle); run the pass every cycle so cycle-N fixes are re-verified in cycle N+1.
- Coverage reporting.
REVIEWS.mdcarries a "Verification coverage" INFO block listing every UNCHECKABLE/skipped symbol and why, so "the guard ran" can never silently mean "nothing was checked."
Consequences
Positive
- Every project gets drift protection on day one, in any language, with zero setup and zero token cost (live Grep/Read against ground truth).
- The high-authority, always-fresh check is the default; the low-authority, stale-able cache (intel) stays an explicit, paid opt-in.
- One interface, many backends: raising verification authority (grep -> intel -> tree-sitter -> LSP -> SCIP) is a config change, never a workflow rewrite — the durable lever against worsening hallucination.
- Three-valued resolution refuses the RAG trap where missing context is treated as permission to invent, and cannot be poisoned by stale/partial intel.
needs-acknowledgementkeeps the default-on gate tolerable (no blocking valid plans), preserving adoption.- Honors the issue author's own sequencing ("treat the default flip as a separate proposal") and changes no established default.
Negative
- Two config surfaces (
plan_review.source_groundingandintel.enabled) instead of one. - This release's rung 0–1 catch name-drift but not signature-drift; signature coverage waits on a rung >=3 adapter.
- Requires planners to populate the "Artifacts this phase produces" section reliably; a missing list degrades precision (new symbols flagged for acknowledgement).
- The default-on pass adds reviewer tool calls per convergence cycle (bounded by the cadence rule above).
Alternatives considered
- Flip
intel.enabledto default-on and gate the whole feature on it. Rejected: enabling intel populates nothing, so default-on intel makesAPI-SURFACE.mdinject a near-empty surface; combined with a "use only these symbols" instruction it tells the planner the codebase is empty — strictly worse than no surface. Also imposes silent emptiness on non-JS projects, widens the stale-data window, and pulls solo devs toward unrequested agent-token spend. - Ship the feature opt-in (default-off). Rejected: the protection is free in the default (live-source) configuration; opt-in would leave most projects unprotected for no benefit while hallucination worsens.
- Hardcode Grep/Read in the reviewer prompt. Rejected: binds the workflow to one tool, over-claims ("found in text" = "verified"), and forces a prompt rewrite to adopt a better backend later.
- Boolean resolution (verified / not-verified). Rejected: collapses "couldn't check" into "missing," producing false positives on every unsupported language and silently blessing nothing.
- Hard-block on any MISSING (as originally proposed). Rejected for rung 0–1: false positives from dynamic/re-exported/generated symbols would block valid plans and get the default-on guard switched off. Retained only for rung >=3.
References
- Issue: open-gsd/gsd-core#22 (migrated from open-gsd/gsd-core#3813)
- Relates to #3802 (GitNexus first-class code intelligence) — rung 4 backend
- arXiv:2409.20550 — hallucination taxonomy + RAG mitigation (modest gains)
- arXiv:2502.05111 — grammar-constrained decoding (soft vs hard constraints)
- SCIP: https://github.com/sourcegraph/scip · LSP 3.17 spec · tree-sitter.github.io