342590c70e
* test(#3184): failing-first milestone-window single-owner suite Covers the 50 input classes in the phase test matrix: scope classification (genuinely-empty vs truncated vs unscoped vs unreadable), the section-end owner's level boundaries, consumer-output identity per ADR-3180 Decision 4(c), the milestone.complete refusal with negative proof that no directory moved, the version-token boundary defect, drift-guard behavior, and three fast-check properties over document-shaped generators. Committed alone so the remote runner records the failure before the fix lands. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015kfkRFNUESoBspUYcAQaT3 * refactor(#3184): milestone windowing routes through one owner Three copies of the milestone section-end walk lived in roadmap-parser.cts — two distinct computeSectionEnd function nodes plus an inline third in getMilestonePhaseFilter's versionOverride branch. computeMilestoneSectionEnd is now the sole owner and the other two are deleted, not kept in sync by comment. The whole-repo drift guard found what the epic did not: state.cts held three more re-derivations of the same vocabulary — two byte-identical milestone bounding checks carrying a defect neither reported copy has (no boundary after the version token, so v2.0 matched inside v2.0.1), and a milestone-sectioning predicate. All three route through the owner now. A composition-level duplicate appeared inside this change's own first pass: getMilestonePhaseFilter and cmdMilestoneComplete each re-assembled a window out of the owner's primitives, and had already diverged on whether to skip a closed milestone heading. sliceMilestoneWindow is the one composition. Windows now carry the ADR-3180 SCOPE discriminator, so a truncated window is distinguishable from a genuinely empty milestone — those were output-identical, which is the whole failure class. roadmap analyze emits it (#3165), and milestone complete refuses to archive on anything but COMPLETE rather than pass-all moving every phase directory on disk (#3166). The pass-all degrade is preserved where its premise holds: making the filter deny-all would trade a silent over-inclusive answer for a silent under-inclusive one on the read paths that count with it. extractCurrentMilestone keeps its signature — 200+ affected symbols across 41 files and 25 process flows — and is a one-line wrapper over the scoped owner. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015kfkRFNUESoBspUYcAQaT3 * fix(#3184): fence-aware phase detection and one heading-selection owner Review fixes from the two orthogonal passes. The blocker: hasPhaseEntries matched ATX phase headings fence-aware via tokenizeHeadings but tested the #2199 bullet form against un-stripped markdown, so a fenced EXAMPLE of the bullet syntax counted as a real phase. A genuinely empty milestone then classified TRUNCATED and milestone complete refused a legitimate archive — a false positive in the destructive direction, worse than the defect this phase set out to fix. Both that path and getMilestonePhaseFilter own pre-existing bullet scan now run on stripFencedCode, since leaving one meant the owner file gave two different answers to the same question. The selection rule — locate, prefer the non-closed heading, else the first — had been written three more times inside the file whose thesis is single ownership. selectMilestoneHeading owns it; all three sites route through it. The copies were behaviorally identical, so this is de-duplication with no observable change, verified by probing that all three paths select the same heading. roadmap analyze emitting a scope no consumer read left #3165's actual symptom alive, so Route 0 in next.md now treats a non-complete scope as scan-failed rather than as a clean empty scan, and the ADR amendment no longer overstates what shipped. Also: the scope refusal moved above the archive-directory create, so a refusal leaves nothing on disk; the versionOverride comment names all four consumers; COMMANDS.md documents the new guard beside its sibling. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015kfkRFNUESoBspUYcAQaT3 * test(#2658): exclude the changelog from the malformed-path scan The gate walks every emitted .md/.js/.cjs file in an installed tree and asserts none contains `.claude/.trae/rules` or `.trae/.trae/rules`. CHANGELOG.md ships into that tree, and its #2658 entry quotes both malformed paths while describing the fix that removed them — so the release note documenting the fix trips the fix's own regression test. Red on next before this branch. The installer is correct: a probe over a real --trae --local install found 621 emitted files, exactly one hit, and it was gsd-core/CHANGELOG.md. The scan scope was the defect, not the product. Excluded by exact relative path rather than by loosening the patterns or skipping all markdown — the emitted agent and command markdown is precisely what #2658 was about, so the gate stays strong everywhere it matters. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015kfkRFNUESoBspUYcAQaT3 * test(#3184): regenerate install-tree fixtures for the shared drift scanner scripts/lib/ ships in the npm package and installer, so extracting the shared tree-walk into scripts/lib/drift-scan.cjs adds one path to every runtime's install tree. Regenerated via npm run gen:install-tree; the delta is exactly that one path per fixture. The two drift guards themselves do not ship (scripts/lint-*.cjs is excluded), so only the extracted library moves. This matches the existing scripts/lib/allowlist-ratchet.cjs precedent, which is likewise a lint-only helper carried in the shipped tree. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015kfkRFNUESoBspUYcAQaT3 * fix(#3184): restore the #730 sub-milestone boundary and narrow the refusal The remote runner caught two regressions this branch introduced. Both were mine, and neither review pass found them — only running the existing suite did. The version-token boundary. I replaced locateMilestoneHeadings' \b with (?![\w.-]), reasoning that v2.0 matching inside v2.0.1 was the same defect #2562 fixed in isMilestoneShippedInRoadmap. It is not the same question. A milestone state of v8.0 legitimately selects the '## v8.0-B' sub-milestone section over a closed v8.0-A sibling (#730), and \b is what allows it while the stricter boundary forbids it — nine tests in roadmap-phase-fallback said so. Reverted to \b; the state.cts consolidation is now a straight merge with no behavior change, and the v2.0/v2.0.1 ambiguity is left exactly as it was. The ADR amendment and the design doc no longer claim otherwise. The refusal scope. I refused whenever the window was not COMPLETE, but #3166 is about the TRUNCATED window specifically — the heading is found and the section closes before the phase region, so pass-all archives everything. UNREADABLE and UNSCOPED are pre-existing, legitimately handled states, and refusing on them broke 'handles missing ROADMAP.md gracefully' and three archive tests. Narrowed to TRUNCATED; docs corrected to match. One of the new tests was also wrong: its fixture gave the shipped and current milestones' phases the same numeric id, and the filter matches on that id, so it could not have distinguished the two windows. Fixture corrected to exercise what it claims to. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015kfkRFNUESoBspUYcAQaT3 * fix(#3184): enumerate drift-scan.cjs for uninstall The installer copies scripts/lib/ wholesale, but uninstall removes an explicit set — deliberately, so a user's own helpers in that directory survive. The extracted drift-scan.cjs was copied in and never enumerated, so it outlived uninstall, left the directory non-empty, and the rmdir that follows failed. Added to GSD_SCRIPTS_LIB_FILES, following allowlist-ratchet.cjs, which is likewise a lint-only helper that ships there and is enumerated. Verified with a real install-then-uninstall into a temp target: scripts/lib/ held exactly the three GSD files and was gone afterwards. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015kfkRFNUESoBspUYcAQaT3 * test(#3184): assert install and uninstall agree on scripts/lib and scripts/changeset Found while shipping this phase, and fixed here rather than noted. install() copies scripts/lib/ and scripts/changeset/ into the target WHOLESALE — the comment at the copy site literally says "and any future lib helpers". uninstall() removes them by hardcoded enumeration, deliberately, so a user's own helpers in those directories survive. A wholesale writer paired with an enumerated remover cannot stay in sync by construction: any file added to either directory ships to every user and is then orphaned in their repo forever, since it survives uninstall, leaves the directory non-empty, and the rmdir that follows fails. Nothing reported this. 31,225 tests were green over it. That is the same divergence class this epic exists to delete, sitting in the installer, so it gets the same remedy CLAUDE.md prescribes for it: a parity assertion that fails the moment the two surfaces disagree. The test compares each directory's real contents against its enumeration and names the offending file plus the constant to add it to. Both enumerations are hoisted to module scope and exported, so the test asserts on the actual arrays rather than pattern-matching the installer's source — no allow-test-rule annotation needed. Proven non-vacuous both ways: empty diff on the current tree, correct report when an unenumerated file is injected. scripts/changeset/ turned out to carry the identical defect and is covered too. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015kfkRFNUESoBspUYcAQaT3 * chore(#3184): backfill changeset PR number Also narrows the wording to match the shipped behavior: the refusal fires on a truncated window specifically, not on any non-complete scope. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015kfkRFNUESoBspUYcAQaT3 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Architecture Decision Records
This directory contains Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) for GSD.
Each ADR documents one architectural decision: what was decided, why, and what consequences follow. ADRs are append-only. Amendments extend existing ADRs with a dated section rather than replacing them.
Reading this corpus
Start with the index below, and respect the status. The index is grouped so that the first table — Active decisions — is the set that governs the system as it stands. An ADR in Superseded, Retired, and Legacy is historical: it records what was once decided and names what replaced it. Do not cite it as current architecture.
Two things the index makes explicit, because getting them wrong has actually misled readers here:
- "Read first" on an active ADR points at a broader ADR that now frames it. A decision can be entirely correct and still not be the whole picture. The runtime capability descriptor (ADR-1016) is live and load-bearing, but ADR-1239 (EoS — GSD as an Embeddable Orchestration Engine) subsumes it as the declarative adapter and inverts its direction: GSD is the engine a host embeds, not an installer that projects onto a host. For how GSD meets a host, EoS is the current frame.
Proposedmeans not ratified — and it is kept honest. On 2026-07-17 the corpus was audited against the shipped tree and nine ADRs whose decisions had demonstrably shipped were ratified toAccepted, each carrying a dated Ratification section with the evidence (see ADR-857 for the fullest example). The ADRs that remainProposedareProposedfor a reason recorded in the file — an unmet acceptance criterion, an outstanding phase, or a successor ADR already planned — not through neglect. Trust the label; if you think it is wrong, prove it in a dated section and see Ratifying a staleProposed.
Naming Convention
New ADRs use issue#-prefix slug naming:
docs/adr/<issue#>-<kebab-slug>.md
Examples: 2264-golden-parity-redesign.md, 1239-gsd-embeddable-orchestration-engine.md.
Why
Two developers computing "next ADR number" locally against main will independently pick the same integer and both ship. The collision is already on disk — 0010-* exists twice and 0011-* exists three times. GitHub issue numbers are server-assigned and atomic: the moment you open an issue, that number is reserved globally. Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — two PRs that each use a distinct issue# as their ADR prefix never collide. Same shape, same solution.
Legacy naming is not Legacy status
Files 0001-* through 0012-* are preserved as immutable historical record of the old local-compute numbering. The duplicate 0010-* and the three-way 0011-* are documented residue of that convention — not patterns to imitate. Do not renumber them.
This is the single authoritative statement of the legacy range.
docs/contributor-standards.mdreferences it rather than restating it, so the two cannot drift.
Two other zero-padded files look legacy but are not: 0174-retire-gsd-sdk-package-boundary.md (issue #174) and 0656-research-module-seam.md (issue #656) are mis-padded modern ADRs — modern, issue-numbered files whose four-digit padding is a mistake. They are NOT part of the legacy sequential set above and are not "old local-compute numbering" residue.
This is a statement about filenames only. Many of those ADRs are Accepted and load-bearing today (ADR-0002, ADR-0004, ADR-0008, ADR-0009). An old filename says nothing about whether a decision still holds. The Legacy status in the table below is a separate claim — see the vocabulary.
Because 0010-* and 0011-* each resolve to more than one file, a bare cross-reference like "ADR-0011" is genuinely ambiguous. Link the file (see Lifecycle rules).
Full process
See CONTRIBUTING.md — "Proposing an ADR or PRD" for the end-to-end workflow: opening the issue, waiting for approval, naming the file, and submitting the PR.
PRDs live in docs/prd/, not here. (0011-review-default-reviewers-prd.md predates that directory and is kept in place as frozen historical record.)
Lifecycle rules
These are enforced by scripts/gen-adr-index.cjs, which runs in CI via npm run lint:generated-sync. A violation fails the build with the exact file and fix.
1. Every ADR declares one status from the canonical vocabulary
The first word of the Status field must be one of:
| Status | Means | Obligation |
|---|---|---|
Accepted |
Decided and in force. Cite it. | — |
Proposed |
Decided in principle, not ratified. Do not cite as settled. | If the work has demonstrably shipped, ratify it (below) — do not leave the label lying. |
Superseded |
A specific newer ADR replaced this decision. | Must name the successor as a file link. |
Retired |
What this ADR decided no longer exists at all, and no single ADR replaced it. | Say what was removed and when. |
Legacy |
Frozen historical record, kept for provenance; not a pattern to follow. | Say why it is frozen. |
Prose may follow the token (Superseded by [ADR-0174](0174-retire-gsd-sdk-package-boundary.md) (2026-05-23); originally Accepted (2026-05-09)). Both the bullet form (- **Status:** Accepted) and the table form (| **Status** | Accepted |) are accepted.
2. Cross-references to other ADRs are file links, never bare ids
Write [ADR-0011](0011-skill-surface-budget-module.md), not ADR-0011. Bare ids are ambiguous for 0010/0011, and unlinked references cannot be checked.
If you mean an issue, write #857 — not ADR-857. (An ADR and its owning issue often share a number; that is intentional and not a conflict.)
3. Supersession and subsumption are symmetric
These are different relations. Do not conflate them:
Supersedes/Superseded by— the target is replaced. Its status becomesSuperseded.Subsumes/Subsumed by— the target still holds, but a broader ADR now frames it. Its status is unchanged; it becomes a component of the larger decision.
If A declares either relation toward B, B must record the reciprocal. A one-way pointer is the failure this corpus actually suffered: ADR-1239 declared it subsumed four ADRs, none of which said so, and none of which pointed back — so a reader landing on any of them concluded the superseded frame was the way forward.
Only an Accepted ADR is owed the back-link. A Proposed ADR's claim is prospective: it has not taken effect, so its target is not marked. On ratification, the check begins demanding the back-links.
4. The declared id matches the filename
An H1 of # ADR-0175: … in a file named 218-*.md is a rename that never finished. The id in the title must match the filename's prefix.
Ratifying a stale Proposed
A stale Proposed is not cosmetic: it tells contributors and agents that live architecture is an unbuilt idea. Fix it — but on evidence, not vibes.
The bar. All four must hold before flipping to Accepted:
- The decided mechanism demonstrably exists in the tree — name the files, symbols, and tests.
- The owning issue is closed as completed. A closed issue is not proof:
stateReasonof not planned / duplicate means the decision was dropped (that isLegacyorRetired, notAccepted). - No material part is unshipped. If the ADR defines phases and one is outstanding, or states its own bar for acceptance and that bar is unmet, it stays
Proposed. - No later ADR supersedes it, and no approved issue already plans its graduation as separate work.
The procedure. Set the status to Accepted — ratified <date> (originally Proposed <date>), add a dated ## Ratification section holding the evidence, then run node scripts/gen-adr-index.cjs --write. If the ADR claims to supersede or subsume others, the gate will now demand their back-links — that is the point. Ratify deliberately.
Two traps worth knowing, both hit during the 2026-07-17 audit:
- Shipped code is necessary, not sufficient. Eight ADRs had every named module, symbol, and test present and their epics closed — and still failed the bar: ADR-2264's own headline acceptance criterion is unmet in the tree, ADR-230's decided branch protection does not match the live API, ADR-660's namesake mechanism is performed by hand, and ADR-959 has an approved issue planning its graduation as its own ADR. Verify the decision, not just the code.
- "Supersedes" is often "subsumes". Read what the ADR means before the gate makes you act on what it says. ADR-857 said "Supersedes (generalizes)"; taken literally, ratifying it would have stamped two live seams (ADR-0011, ADR-58) as dead. The parenthetical was the truth; the field name was wrong.
Maintaining the index
The index is generated. Do not hand-edit it. Everything between the ADR-INDEX:START / ADR-INDEX:END markers is derived from the ADR files themselves:
node scripts/gen-adr-index.cjs # print the index
node scripts/gen-adr-index.cjs --write # regenerate it into this file
node scripts/gen-adr-index.cjs --check # CI: fail if stale or invalid
After adding an ADR, or changing any ADR's status or relations, run --write and commit the result. npm run lint:generated-sync runs --check in CI, so a missing or stale row fails the build rather than rotting silently.
This replaces a hand-maintained table that had drifted to 40 of 65 ADRs — the entire capability family and EoS itself were missing from it, which is precisely why the ADRs a reader most needed were the ones they could not find.
Index
Active decisions (56)
These govern the system as it stands. Cite these.
| ADR | Title | Status | Read first |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADR-0001 | Dispatch policy module as single seam for query execution outcomes | Accepted | — |
| ADR-0002 | Command Contract Validation Module | Accepted | — |
| ADR-0003 | Model Catalog Module as single source of truth for agent profiles and runtime tier defaults | Accepted | — |
| ADR-0004 | Planning Workspace Module as single seam for worktree and workstream state | Accepted | — |
| ADR-0006 | Planning Path Projection Module for SDK query handlers | Accepted | — |
| ADR-0008 | Installer Migration Module owns install-time upgrade safety | Accepted | — |
| ADR-0009 | Shell Command Projection Module owns runtime-aware OS command rendering | Accepted | — |
| ADR-0011 | review.default_reviewers config key scopes the no-flag /gsd-review fan-out |
Accepted | — |
| ADR-0011 | Skill Surface Budget Module owns install-time profile staging and runtime surface control | Accepted | ADR-857 |
| ADR-15 | Cross-AI Plan Convergence via Existing Orchestration Commands | Accepted | — |
| ADR-22 | Plan-vs-codebase drift guard: defaults and symbol-resolver seam | Accepted | — |
| ADR-58 | Runtime Install Policy Module owns the typed install-plan projection | Accepted | ADR-1239, ADR-857 |
| ADR-0174 | Retire @opengsd/gsd-sdk package boundary — single-runtime collapse | Accepted | — |
| ADR-218 | Harden release-workflow version validation — reject leading zeros and pre-check npm | Accepted | — |
| ADR-227 | Input validation must check semantic shape, not just type | Accepted | — |
| ADR-415 | Prevent stale-base reintroduction of retired runtime tokens | Accepted | — |
| ADR-452 | Adopt standard ESLint flat-config lint harness | Accepted | — |
| ADR-456 | Test-rigor architecture — deterministic scheduling, antagonistic tier, typed-surface mandate, and delete-bad-tests policy | Accepted | — |
| ADR-457 | Generation model for bin/lib/*.cjs type safety |
Accepted | — |
| ADR-550 | spec-phase probe pattern and prohibition contract | Accepted | — |
| ADR-0656 | Research Module — L2-hybrid seam for cached, curated-first research | Accepted | — |
| ADR-766 | Claude Code Plugin Manifest Module owns the projection of gsd-core surfaces onto the Claude Code plugin contract | Accepted | — |
| ADR-857 | Capability system — five-step loop as core, features as plug-ins behind Loop Extension Points | Accepted | — |
| ADR-894 | Capability declaration format + registry generation | Accepted | ADR-1239 |
| ADR-959 | Capability Command Contribution | Accepted | — |
| ADR-1016 | Runtime Capability Descriptor | Accepted | ADR-1239 |
| ADR-1235 | Migrate agent conversion to the descriptor-driven install path | Accepted | — |
| ADR-1239 | GSD as an Embeddable Orchestration Engine | Accepted | — |
| ADR-1244 | Capability Ecosystem: third-party authoring, versioned manifests, and URL import/upgrade/remove | Accepted | — |
| ADR-1372 | Canonical markdown-structure parsing — the markdown-sectionizer seam |
Accepted | — |
| ADR-1411 | Resolution must report provenance, not fall open silently | Accepted | — |
| ADR-1508 | Runtime Artifact Conversion Module owns per-runtime content rewriting | Accepted | — |
| ADR-1517 | Reviewer instances — bounded config surface for same-adapter multi-model review | Accepted | — |
| ADR-1577 | Untrusted-input boundary + opt-in injection blocking | Accepted | — |
| ADR-1593 | Skill mapping & converter methodology across runtimes | Accepted | — |
| ADR-1610 | workflow & agent size-budget ratchet (per-file byte baseline + tier hard caps) | Accepted | — |
| ADR-1703 | Cross-platform portability enforcement as AST ESLint rules | Accepted | — |
| ADR-1769 | STATE.md Transition Module — intent-based transitions over scattered RMW callbacks | Accepted | — |
| ADR-1787 | /gsd:next smart-entry front door delegates advancement to /gsd:progress --next |
Accepted | — |
| ADR-1817 | STATE.md rebuild — derivability contract (capstone transition) | Accepted | — |
| ADR-1820 | Spec-Optional Predicate Rail — the Spec-Section Detection Module, the fallback toggle, and the SPEC↔probe precedence contract | Accepted | — |
| ADR-1866 | agent_skills dual injection — orchestrator-side + agent-side self-load | Accepted | — |
| ADR-1990 | Existing Code Onboarding Module owns deterministic repo-state detection and onboarding route selection | Accepted | — |
| ADR-2008 | Generic gate-predicate evaluator | Accepted | — |
| ADR-2121 | Phase-Identifier Parsing Consolidation | Accepted | — |
| ADR-2143 | Markdown Table Model, Bounded Mutation, and Fail-Loud Consolidation (#1372 part 2) | Accepted | — |
| ADR-2164 | Statusline draws its data boundary at local, read-only sources | Accepted | — |
| ADR-2207 | STATE.md Status lifecycle — phase-completion writes an intermediate state; milestone-close owns termination |
Accepted | — |
| ADR-2346 | Command Dispatch Completion | Accepted | — |
| ADR-2619 | Observability and shareable diagnostics — wire the dispatch seam, add the outbound trust boundary | Accepted | — |
| ADR-2629 | Phase effort is estimated against a calibrated smart-zone budget, not a static heuristic | Accepted | — |
| ADR-2719 | Emitted-artifact attribution — replace the committed parity fixtures with a computed conservation law | Accepted | — |
| ADR-2782 | Reviewer Lane — the cross-AI reviewer handoff becomes a declared capability surface | Accepted | — |
| ADR-2966 | Test the five-step loop as a continuous walk, not isolated points | Accepted | — |
| ADR-3180 | Planning Semantic Model — Single Owner per Derivation | Accepted | — |
| ADR-3660 | Runtime Artifact Layout Module owns per-runtime artifact placement | Accepted | ADR-1239 |
Proposed (9)
Decided in principle, not yet ratified. Do not cite as settled architecture.
| ADR | Title | Status | Read first |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADR-230 | Introduce next as a long-lived integration branch |
Proposed | — |
| ADR-443 | Unified cross-provider effort controls and fast-mode-aware routing | Proposed | — |
| ADR-612 | Bracket Phase-ID Convention | Proposed | — |
| ADR-660 | Release from the head of next; immutable release tags; @next dist-tag as the RC surface |
Proposed | — |
| ADR-1143 | Claude orchestration capability — Workflow tool (ultracode) as a runtime-gated loop execution backend | Proposed | — |
| ADR-1213 | Capability write side — the Capability State Writer | Proposed | — |
| ADR-1606 | prohibition-enforcement verify-time seam | Proposed | — |
| ADR-1671 | Dynamic context management platform | Proposed | — |
| ADR-3128 | Adaptive runtime evidence for GSD Debug | Proposed | — |
Superseded, Retired, and Legacy (8)
Historical record. Do not follow these — each names what replaced it, or why it was retired.
| ADR | Title | Status | Replaced by |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADR-0005 | SDK Architecture seam map for query/runtime surfaces | Superseded | ADR-0174 |
| ADR-0007 | SDK Package Seam Module owns SDK-to-get-shit-done-redux compatibility | Superseded | ADR-0174 |
| ADR-0010 | File Operation Engine Module owns safe runtime/config file mutations | Superseded | ADR-0009 |
| ADR-0010 | Skill Surface Budget Module owns install-time skill listing curation | Superseded | ADR-0011 |
| ADR-0011 | PRD — review.default_reviewers config key for /gsd-review reviewer selection |
Legacy | — |
| ADR-0012 | CommandRoutingHub as single dispatch seam for CJS command families | Superseded | ADR-0174 |
| ADR-2264 | Redesign golden-install-parity — single-source manifest builder + split invariant | Superseded | ADR-2719 |
| ADR-3524 | CJS↔SDK hard seam — one source of truth per Shared Module | Superseded | ADR-0174 |
73 ADRs. Generated by scripts/gen-adr-index.cjs — run --write after adding or restatusing an ADR.
Seam map
Orientation for the module-ownership ADRs. This section is prose and hand-maintained; the index above is the authority on status.
How GSD meets a host — start at ADR-1239 (EoS). It is the current frame and subsumes the descriptor/projection ADRs (ADR-1016, ADR-58, ADR-3660, ADR-894) as adapters beneath it.
The SDK seam map is gone. ADR-0005 was once the entry point for SDK module ownership; it is superseded by ADR-0174, which retired the @opengsd/gsd-sdk package boundary entirely. There is no sdk/ tree. Read ADR-0174 for the single-runtime collapse; the seam-Module vocabulary survives under one src/.
ADR-0006 documents how query handlers project planning paths (cwd → effectiveRoot → .planning/<project>/...). Cross-reference the Planning Workspace Module (ADR-0004) for workstream pointer policy.
ADR-0008 documents the Installer Migration Module for safe install-time moves, removals, config rewrites, and user-data preservation.
ADR-0009 documents the Shell Command Projection Module seam for runtime-aware projection of installer-owned command text and projection IR. Its Phases 3–4 absorbed the File Operation Engine Module (ADR-0010).
ADR-0011 documents the Skill Surface Budget Module for install-time skill/agent profile staging (--profile=<name>, .gsd-profile marker, requires: closure) and the Phase 2 runtime /gsd:surface command.
ADR-1411 establishes the Resolution Provenance principle: context resolution (config loading, project-root anchoring, workstream resolution) must report its provenance rather than fall open silently to defaults. It is the resolution-side analog of ADR-227 (input-validation shape).