* test: forbid stale /gsd-intel references in workflow/reference docs (#3258) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: replace retired /gsd-intel with /gsd-map-codebase --query (#3258) Fixes 5 stale references across the two primary source files called out in the issue. PR #2790 folded /gsd-intel into /gsd-map-codebase --query; these prose surfaces were not updated at that time. Fixes #3258 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: fix additional stale /gsd-intel references found in adversarial sweep (#3258) Sweep found 7 more occurrences in docs/INVENTORY.md (x2), docs/USER-GUIDE.md (x4), docs/FEATURES.md (x2), and agents/gsd-intel-updater.md (x2). All replaced with /gsd-map-codebase --query. The gsd-intel-updater agent name itself (without leading slash) is intentionally preserved. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * changeset: pr=3260 for #3258 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test: fail loudly on unreadable files in bug-3258 regression scan (CR finding) Replace silent early-return on readFileSync failure with an explicit throw so unreadable files surface as test failures rather than skipped coverage gaps. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
21 KiB
<required_reading> Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting. </required_reading>
Ensure config exists and load current state:gsd-sdk query config-ensure-section
INIT=$(gsd-sdk query state.load)
if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fi
# `state.load` returns STATE frontmatter JSON from the SDK — it does not include `config_path`. Orchestrators may set `GSD_CONFIG_PATH` from init phase-op JSON; otherwise resolve the same path gsd-tools uses for flat vs active workstream (#2282).
if [[ -z "${GSD_CONFIG_PATH:-}" ]]; then
if [[ -f .planning/active-workstream ]]; then
WS=$(tr -d '\n\r' < .planning/active-workstream)
GSD_CONFIG_PATH=".planning/workstreams/${WS}/config.json"
else
GSD_CONFIG_PATH=".planning/config.json"
fi
fi
Creates config.json (at the resolved path) with defaults if missing. INIT still holds state.load output for any step that needs STATE fields.
Store $GSD_CONFIG_PATH — all subsequent reads and writes use this path, not a hardcoded .planning/config.json, so active-workstream installs target the correct file (#2282).
Parse current values (default to true if not present):
workflow.research— spawn researcher during plan-phaseworkflow.plan_check— spawn plan checker during plan-phaseworkflow.verifier— spawn verifier during execute-phaseworkflow.nyquist_validation— validation architecture research during plan-phase (default: true if absent)workflow.pattern_mapper— run gsd-pattern-mapper between research and planning (default: true if absent)workflow.ui_phase— generate UI-SPEC.md design contracts for frontend phases (default: true if absent)workflow.ui_safety_gate— prompt to run /gsd-ui-phase before planning frontend phases (default: true if absent)workflow.ai_integration_phase— framework selection + eval strategy for AI phases (default: true if absent)workflow.tdd_mode— enforce RED/GREEN/REFACTOR gate sequence during execute-phase (default: false if absent)workflow.code_review— enable /gsd-code-review and /gsd-code-review --fix commands (default: true if absent)workflow.code_review_depth— default depth for /gsd-code-review:quick,standard, ordeep(default:"standard"if absent; only relevant whencode_reviewis on)workflow.ui_review— run visual quality audit (/gsd-ui-review) in autonomous mode (default: true if absent)commit_docs— whether.planning/files are committed to git (default: true if absent)intel.enabled— enable queryable codebase intelligence (/gsd-map-codebase --query) (default: false if absent)graphify.enabled— enable project knowledge graph (/gsd-graphify) (default: false if absent)model_profile— which model each agent uses (default:balanced)git.branching_strategy— branching approach (default:"none")workflow.use_worktrees— whether parallel executor agents run in worktree isolation (default:true)
Text mode (workflow.text_mode: true in config or --text flag): Set TEXT_MODE=true if --text is present in $ARGUMENTS OR text_mode from init JSON is true. When TEXT_MODE is active, replace every AskUserQuestion call with a plain-text numbered list and ask the user to type their choice number. This is required for non-Claude runtimes (OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, etc.) where AskUserQuestion is not available.
Non-Claude runtime note: If TEXT_MODE is active (i.e. the runtime is non-Claude), prepend the following notice before the model profile question:
Note: Quality, Balanced, Budget, and Adaptive profiles assign semantic tiers
(Opus/Sonnet/Haiku) to each agent. When `runtime` is set in .planning/config.json,
tiers resolve to runtime-native model IDs — on Codex that's gpt-5.4 / gpt-5.3-codex /
gpt-5.4-mini with appropriate reasoning effort. See "Runtime-Aware Profiles" in
docs/CONFIGURATION.md.
If `runtime` is unset on a non-Claude runtime, the profile tiers have no effect on
actual model selection — agents use the runtime's default model. Choose "Inherit" to
force session-model behavior, set `runtime` + a profile to get tiered models, or
configure `model_overrides` manually in .planning/config.json to target specific
models per agent.
Use AskUserQuestion with current values pre-selected. Questions are grouped into six visual sections; the first question in each section carries the section-denoting header field (AskUserQuestion renders abbreviated section tags for grouping, max 12 chars).
Section layout:
Planning
Research, Plan Checker, Pattern Mapper, Nyquist, UI Phase, UI Gate, AI Phase
Execution
Verifier, TDD Mode, Code Review, Code Review Depth (conditional — only when code_review=on), UI Review
Docs & Output
Commit Docs, Skip Discuss, Worktrees
Features
Intel, Graphify
Model & Pipeline
Model Profile, Auto-Advance, Branching
Misc
Context Warnings, Research Qs
Conditional visibility — code_review_depth: This question is shown only when the user's chosen code_review value (after they answer that question, or the pre-selected value if unchanged) is on. If code_review is off, omit the code_review_depth question from the AskUserQuestion block and preserve the existing workflow.code_review_depth value in config (do not overwrite). Implementation: ask the Model + Planning + Execution-up-to-Code-Review questions first; if code_review=on, include code_review_depth in the same batch; otherwise skip it. Conceptually this is a one-branch split on the code_review answer.
AskUserQuestion([
{
question: "Which model profile for agents?",
header: "Model",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Quality", description: "Opus everywhere except verification (highest cost) — Claude only" },
{ label: "Balanced (Recommended)", description: "Opus for planning, Sonnet for research/execution/verification — Claude only" },
{ label: "Budget", description: "Sonnet for writing, Haiku for research/verification (lowest cost) — Claude only" },
{ label: "Inherit", description: "Use current session model for all agents (required for non-Claude runtimes: Codex, Gemini CLI, OpenRouter, local models)" }
]
},
{
question: "Spawn Plan Researcher? (researches domain before planning)",
header: "Research",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Yes", description: "Research phase goals before planning" },
{ label: "No", description: "Skip research, plan directly" }
]
},
{
question: "Spawn Plan Checker? (verifies plans before execution)",
header: "Plan Check",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Yes", description: "Verify plans meet phase goals" },
{ label: "No", description: "Skip plan verification" }
]
},
{
question: "Spawn Execution Verifier? (verifies phase completion)",
header: "Verifier",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Yes", description: "Verify must-haves after execution" },
{ label: "No", description: "Skip post-execution verification" }
]
},
{
question: "Enable TDD Mode? (RED/GREEN/REFACTOR gates for eligible tasks)",
header: "TDD",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Execute tasks normally. Tests written alongside implementation." },
{ label: "Yes", description: "Planner applies type:tdd to business logic/APIs/validations; executor enforces gate sequence. End-of-phase review checks compliance." }
]
},
{
question: "Enable Code Review? (/gsd-code-review and /gsd-code-review --fix commands)",
header: "Code Review",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Enable /gsd-code-review commands for reviewing source files changed during a phase." },
{ label: "No", description: "Commands exit with a configuration gate message. Use when code review is handled externally." }
]
},
// Conditional: include the following code_review_depth question ONLY when the user's
// chosen code_review value is "Yes". If code_review is "No", omit this question from
// the AskUserQuestion call and do not touch the existing workflow.code_review_depth value.
{
question: "Code Review Depth? (default depth for /gsd-code-review — override per-run with --depth=)",
header: "Review Depth",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Standard (Recommended)", description: "Per-file analysis. Balanced cost and signal." },
{ label: "Quick", description: "Pattern-matching only. Fastest, lowest cost." },
{ label: "Deep", description: "Cross-file analysis with import graphs. Highest cost, highest signal." }
]
},
{
question: "Enable UI Review? (visual quality audit via /gsd-ui-review in autonomous mode)",
header: "UI Review",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Run visual quality audit after phase execution in autonomous mode." },
{ label: "No", description: "Skip the UI audit step. Good for backend-only projects." }
]
},
{
question: "Auto-advance pipeline? (discuss → plan → execute automatically)",
header: "Auto",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Manual /clear + paste between stages" },
{ label: "Yes", description: "Chain stages via Agent() subagents (same isolation)" }
]
},
{
question: "Run Pattern Mapper? (maps new files to existing codebase analogs between research and planning)",
header: "Pattern Mapper",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "gsd-pattern-mapper runs between research and plan steps. Surfaces conventions so new code follows house style." },
{ label: "No", description: "Skip pattern mapping. Faster; lose consistency hinting for new files." }
]
},
{
question: "Enable Nyquist Validation? (researches test coverage during planning)",
header: "Nyquist",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Research automated test coverage during plan-phase. Adds validation requirements to plans. Blocks approval if tasks lack automated verify." },
{ label: "No", description: "Skip validation research. Good for rapid prototyping or no-test phases." }
]
},
// Note: Nyquist validation depends on research output. If research is disabled,
// plan-phase automatically skips Nyquist steps (no RESEARCH.md to extract from).
{
question: "Enable UI Phase? (generates UI-SPEC.md design contracts for frontend phases)",
header: "UI Phase",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Generate UI design contracts before planning frontend phases. Locks spacing, typography, color, and copywriting." },
{ label: "No", description: "Skip UI-SPEC generation. Good for backend-only projects or API phases." }
]
},
{
question: "Enable UI Safety Gate? (prompts to run /gsd-ui-phase before planning frontend phases)",
header: "UI Gate",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "plan-phase asks to run /gsd-ui-phase first when frontend indicators detected." },
{ label: "No", description: "No prompt — plan-phase proceeds without UI-SPEC check." }
]
},
{
question: "Enable AI Phase? (framework selection + eval strategy for AI phases)",
header: "AI Phase",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Run /gsd-ai-integration-phase before planning AI system phases. Surfaces the right framework, researches its docs, and designs the evaluation strategy." },
{ label: "No", description: "Skip AI design contract. Good for non-AI phases or when framework is already decided." }
]
},
{
question: "Git branching strategy?",
header: "Branching",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "None (Recommended)", description: "Commit directly to current branch" },
{ label: "Per Phase", description: "Create branch for each phase (gsd/phase-{N}-{name})" },
{ label: "Per Milestone", description: "Create branch for entire milestone (gsd/{version}-{name})" }
]
},
{
question: "Enable context window warnings? (injects advisory messages when context is getting full)",
header: "Ctx Warnings",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Warn when context usage exceeds 65%. Helps avoid losing work." },
{ label: "No", description: "Disable warnings. Allows Claude to reach auto-compact naturally. Good for long unattended runs." }
]
},
{
question: "Research best practices before asking questions? (web search during new-project and discuss-phase)",
header: "Research Qs",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Ask questions directly. Faster, uses fewer tokens." },
{ label: "Yes", description: "Search web for best practices before each question group. More informed questions but uses more tokens." }
]
},
{
question: "Commit .planning/ files to git? (controls whether plans/artifacts are tracked in your repo)",
header: "Commit Docs",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Commit .planning/ to git. Plans, research, and phase artifacts travel with the repo." },
{ label: "No", description: "Do not commit .planning/. Keep planning local only. Automatic when .planning/ is in .gitignore." }
]
},
{
question: "Skip discuss-phase in autonomous mode? (use ROADMAP phase goals as spec)",
header: "Skip Discuss",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Run smart discuss before each phase — surfaces gray areas and captures decisions." },
{ label: "Yes", description: "Skip discuss in /gsd-autonomous — chain directly to plan. Best for backend/pipeline work where phase descriptions are the spec." }
]
},
{
question: "Use git worktrees for parallel agent isolation?",
header: "Worktrees",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Each parallel executor runs in its own worktree branch — no conflicts between agents." },
{ label: "No", description: "Disable worktree isolation. Agents run sequentially on the main working tree. Use if EnterWorktree creates branches from wrong base (known cross-platform issue)." }
]
},
{
question: "Enable Intel? (queryable codebase intelligence via /gsd-map-codebase --query — builds a JSON index in .planning/intel/)",
header: "Intel",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Skip intel indexing. Use when codebase is small or intel queries are not needed." },
{ label: "Yes", description: "Enable /gsd-map-codebase --query commands. Builds and queries a JSON index of the codebase." }
]
},
{
question: "Enable Graphify? (project knowledge graph via /gsd-graphify — builds a graph in .planning/graphs/)",
header: "Graphify",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Skip knowledge graph. Use when dependency graphs are not needed." },
{ label: "Yes", description: "Enable /gsd-graphify commands. Builds and queries a project knowledge graph." }
]
}
])
{
...existing_config,
"model_profile": "quality" | "balanced" | "budget" | "adaptive" | "inherit",
"commit_docs": true/false,
"workflow": {
"research": true/false,
"plan_check": true/false,
"verifier": true/false,
"auto_advance": true/false,
"nyquist_validation": true/false,
"pattern_mapper": true/false,
"ui_phase": true/false,
"ui_safety_gate": true/false,
"ai_integration_phase": true/false,
"tdd_mode": true/false,
"code_review": true/false,
"code_review_depth": "quick" | "standard" | "deep",
"ui_review": true/false,
"text_mode": true/false,
"research_before_questions": true/false,
"discuss_mode": "discuss" | "assumptions",
"skip_discuss": true/false,
"use_worktrees": true/false
},
"intel": {
"enabled": true/false
},
"graphify": {
"enabled": true/false
},
"git": {
"branching_strategy": "none" | "phase" | "milestone",
"quick_branch_template": <string|null>
},
"hooks": {
"context_warnings": true/false,
"workflow_guard": true/false
}
}
Safe merge: Apply each chosen value via gsd-sdk query config-set <key.path> <value> so unrelated keys are never clobbered. code_review_depth is written only if the code_review question was answered on; otherwise leave the existing value in place.
Write updated config to $GSD_CONFIG_PATH (the workstream-aware path resolved in ensure_and_load_config). Never hardcode .planning/config.json — workstream installs route to .planning/workstreams/<slug>/config.json.
AskUserQuestion([
{
question: "Save these as default settings for all new projects?",
header: "Defaults",
multiSelect: false,
options: [
{ label: "Yes", description: "New projects start with these settings (saved to ~/.gsd/defaults.json)" },
{ label: "No", description: "Only apply to this project" }
]
}
])
If "Yes": write the same config object (minus project-specific fields like brave_search) to ~/.gsd/defaults.json:
mkdir -p ~/.gsd
Write ~/.gsd/defaults.json with:
{
"mode": <current>,
"granularity": <current>,
"model_profile": <current>,
"commit_docs": <current>,
"parallelization": <current>,
"branching_strategy": <current>,
"quick_branch_template": <current>,
"workflow": {
"research": <current>,
"plan_check": <current>,
"verifier": <current>,
"auto_advance": <current>,
"nyquist_validation": <current>,
"pattern_mapper": <current>,
"ui_phase": <current>,
"ui_safety_gate": <current>,
"ai_integration_phase": <current>,
"tdd_mode": <current>,
"code_review": <current>,
"code_review_depth": <current>,
"ui_review": <current>,
"skip_discuss": <current>
},
"intel": {
"enabled": <current>
},
"graphify": {
"enabled": <current>
}
}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
GSD ► SETTINGS UPDATED
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
| Setting | Value |
|----------------------|-------|
| Model Profile | {quality/balanced/budget/inherit} |
| Plan Researcher | {On/Off} |
| Plan Checker | {On/Off} |
| Pattern Mapper | {On/Off} |
| Execution Verifier | {On/Off} |
| TDD Mode | {On/Off} |
| Code Review | {On/Off} |
| Code Review Depth | {quick/standard/deep} |
| UI Review | {On/Off} |
| Commit Docs | {On/Off} |
| Intel | {On/Off} |
| Graphify | {On/Off} |
| Auto-Advance | {On/Off} |
| Nyquist Validation | {On/Off} |
| UI Phase | {On/Off} |
| UI Safety Gate | {On/Off} |
| AI Integration Phase | {On/Off} |
| Git Branching | {None/Per Phase/Per Milestone} |
| Skip Discuss | {On/Off} |
| Context Warnings | {On/Off} |
| Saved as Defaults | {Yes/No} |
These settings apply to future /gsd-plan-phase and /gsd-execute-phase runs.
Quick commands:
- /gsd-config --integrations — configure API keys (Brave/Firecrawl/Exa), review.models CLI routing, and agent_skills injection
- /gsd-config --profile <profile> — switch model profile
- /gsd-plan-phase --research — force research
- /gsd-plan-phase --skip-research — skip research
- /gsd-plan-phase --skip-verify — skip plan check
- /gsd-config --advanced — power-user tuning (plan bounce, timeouts, branch templates, cross-AI, context window)
<success_criteria>
- Current config read
- User presented with 22 settings (profile + workflow toggles + features + git branching + ctx warnings), grouped into six sections: Planning, Execution, Docs & Output, Features, Model & Pipeline, Misc.
code_review_depthis conditional oncode_review=on. - Config updated with model_profile, workflow, and git sections
- User offered to save as global defaults (~/.gsd/defaults.json)
- Changes confirmed to user </success_criteria>