* test(#3797): the roadmapper must follow one write-first contract * fix(#3797): make the roadmapper's role, output, and checklist match its write-first execution flow The roadmapper contradicted itself: role blurb, output format, and completion checklist described an approve-first flow while its execution flow said "Write Files Immediately" with reactive-only revision (#3797). The approval gate belongs to the ORCHESTRATOR — both callers read the written ROADMAP.md, present it, and gate on approval (with an auto-mode bypass a subagent cannot host) — so write-first is the contract. All approve-first text now describes the write-then-return reality, the old "Draft Presentation Format" (whose ## ROADMAP DRAFT header matched no orchestrator branch) is folded into the ## ROADMAP CREATED structured return as a preview block, and the duplicate checklist lines are merged. A structural guard pins the single contract. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-roadmapper.md — #3797: +bytes — approve-first wording replaced with write-first descriptions; the DRAFT presentation template folded into the ROADMAP CREATED return as a preview block * chore(#3797): changeset fragment (pr number backfilled after PR creation) * chore(#3797): backfill changeset PR number (4008) --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
58 lines
2.9 KiB
JavaScript
58 lines
2.9 KiB
JavaScript
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
// ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
// #3797 — gsd-roadmapper must follow ONE contract: write-first.
|
|
//
|
|
// The agent's role blurb, output format, and completion checklist described
|
|
// an approve-first flow ("Return structured draft for user approval",
|
|
// "Awaiting / Approve roadmap", "Files written (after approval)") while its
|
|
// execution flow said "Write Files Immediately ... Write files first, then
|
|
// return" with reactive-only revision. The approval gate belongs to the
|
|
// ORCHESTRATOR (new-project.md reads the written ROADMAP.md, presents it,
|
|
// and gates on approval/auto-mode itself — a subagent cannot host the user
|
|
// loop). The agent's write-first execution flow is the intentional contract
|
|
// (explicit durability rationale; the #2255 write-guard arming in the same
|
|
// Step 7); the approve-first text is a leftover and must not return.
|
|
// ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
const { test } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('node:fs');
|
|
const path = require('node:path');
|
|
|
|
const ROADMAPPER = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'agents', 'gsd-roadmapper.md');
|
|
|
|
// agents/*.md is shipped agent text — the bytes ARE what the runtime loads;
|
|
// a structural scan over it tests the deployed contract.
|
|
test('#3797: the roadmapper follows one write-first contract (approval is the orchestrator\'s)', () => {
|
|
const md = fs.readFileSync(ROADMAPPER, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!/for (user )?approval/i.test(md),
|
|
'#3797: the agent cannot host a user approval loop — approve-first phrasing must not return',
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!/Awaiting \/ Approve/.test(md),
|
|
'#3797: the Awaiting/Approve output footer is the old contract; revision is the orchestrator\'s gate plus Step 9 re-runs',
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!/^## ROADMAP DRAFT/m.test(md),
|
|
'#3797: the agent returns ## ROADMAP CREATED — a DRAFT header matches no orchestrator branch (they branch on CREATED/BLOCKED only)',
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/Files written immediately/.test(md),
|
|
'the checklist must pin the write-first ordering',
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/^## Step 7: Write Files Immediately$/m.test(md),
|
|
'the write-first execution flow (durability rationale) is the intended contract and must stay',
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!/\(after approval\)/.test(md),
|
|
'#3797: the checklist must not claim files are written after an approval the agent never hosts',
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/^## Step 9: Handle Revision \(if needed\)$/m.test(md),
|
|
'reactive revision (Step 9) stays — it is the revision path under the write-first contract too',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|