* fix(#2810): accept the documented effortSurface axis on EoS registry entries The EoS registry schema required an exact eight-key `interactions.axes` object, while `docs/registries/README.md` and `CONTEXT.md` both documented nine keys including `effortSurface`. An entry that faithfully mirrored its upstream descriptor's `effortSurface` key was rejected outright. `effortSurface` reached the runtime-descriptor vocabulary through ADR-1239 amendment #2481 (`HOST_INTEGRATION_AXES`), but the registry's hand-maintained copy of that vocabulary never picked it up. The runtime-descriptor surface is guarded by tests/host-integration-validator-parity.test.cjs; the registry copy had no equivalent guard, which is what let the two drift. Accept `effortSurface` as an OPTIONAL ninth axis validated against the canonical ['argv','none'] rather than a required one: registry entries mirror their upstream registry/eos-entry.json byte-for-byte, so requiring it would retroactively invalidate every entry published before the amendment. Adds tests/registry-axes-parity.test.cjs, which asserts that every key shared between the registry vocabulary and HOST_INTEGRATION_AXES has an identical enum array, plus limit-1/limit/limit+1 boundary coverage on the axes key set. Closes #2810 * test(#2810): fail when a canonical axis is added but never mirrored The enum-equality assertion compares only keys the registry and HOST_INTEGRATION_AXES already share, so it is blind to the exact drift that produced #2810: a new canonical axis appears and the registry copy is never told. Verified by simulation — mutating an enum is caught, adding a new canonical key is not. Assert instead that every HOST_INTEGRATION_AXES key is either modeled by the registry or named in an explicit NOT_MODELLED allowlist (subagentToolkit and isolation, both dispatch sub-fields the registry collapses into its free-form dispatch summary). Adding a canonical axis now fails until someone decides which bucket it belongs in. The allowlist is itself guarded against going stale. Refs #2810 * fix(#2810): harden the axis value lookup with the CodeQL barrier pattern Both orthogonal reviews flagged the same line: `AXES[key] !== undefined` is not an own-property test, and the bracket reads are shaped like a prototype-pollution sink even though the unknown-key gate above provably makes them unreachable. Switch the presence test to `Object.hasOwn` and add the repo's inline literal guards (`capability-state.cts:146-155`, "Prototype-pollution guard (inline literal, CodeQL barrier)"), which CodeQL can follow where it cannot follow the `.includes()` filter that actually does the work. Behavior is unchanged — re-verified all five axes key-count shapes plus a genuine own `__proto__` property built through JSON.parse (the shape a third-party registry PR would submit): it is rejected as an unknown key and Object.prototype is untouched. Refs #2810 * chore(#2810): backfill changeset PR number
Changeset Fragments
This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.
Why
Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.
See #2975 for the full rationale.
Adding a fragment
node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
--type Fixed \
--pr 1234 \
--body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"
This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.
Format
---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.
Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.
Opting out
PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.
At release time
Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:
node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty
This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.
Archived fragments
.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.