Files
msd-core/gsd-core/workflows/settings.md
Behruz Nassre Esfahani f0abdb1b89 fix(#2486): do not recommend or persist Claude-only worktree isolation on non-Claude runtimes (#2531)
* fix(#2486): runtime-branch the settings worktrees question + W020 health diagnostic

On non-Claude runtimes /gsd:settings offered "Yes (Recommended)" for
worktree isolation and persisted workflow.use_worktrees: true — the exact
value the execution workflows fail closed on (#1521 guards). Branch the
question on the same stamped config-get runtime read the guards use:
Claude keeps the unchanged question; non-Claude offers only
"No (Recommended)" / "Leave unchanged", never persists true, and warns
when the config carries an inherited explicit true. /gsd:health gains
W020, surfacing such a config with the guards' own predicate before
execution-time failure. Docs state the runtime-conditional default.

Fixes #2486

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2486): add changeset for PR #2531

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2486): reassign the health worktrees check W020 -> W024 (verify.cts namespace collision)

The workflow-level check collided with the live W020 (git-worktree-list
health) emitted by cmdValidateHealth in src/verify.cts — invisible from
health.md's error_codes table, which stops at W019 and under-represents
the real namespace (W010-W017, W020-W023 all live). W024 verified free.
Adds a regression test pinning the chosen code against src/verify.cts so
a future assignment cannot silently collide, a table note naming the
namespace owner, and the changeset body reworded to house style.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2486): pre-select the recommended repair in the broken-inheritance case

Review round 2: at settings.md:142 the pre-selection rule left "Leave
unchanged" as the default when the config carried an explicit
non-false use_worktrees — the exact broken state the adjacent notice
warns about, so accepting the default kept a config that fails closed
at execution time. "Leave unchanged" is now the default only when the
key is absent (nothing to repair); explicit false AND explicit
non-false both pre-select "No (Recommended)", aligning the default,
the label, and the notice.

Pinned by two source-contract assertions in the #2486 regression
block. Goldens (settings.md hash x19) + size baseline regenerated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2486): gate the worktrees question on dispatch.isolation, not the runtime name

Review round 2: #2584 Phase 3 replaced the runtime-name test with a
declared `dispatch.isolation` capability, invalidating this PR's
premise. cursor declares harness-worktree and codex/opencode/kimi/
kimi-code declare orchestrator-worktree, so a `RUNTIME != claude` gate
blocked a supported configuration on five runtimes and false-warned in
health.

- settings.md + health.md read `query dispatch-isolation` and branch on
  `ISOLATION = none`; the runtime-name read is gone from both, and the
  capability read needs no per-runtime stamping (it fail-closes unknown/
  undocumented internally)
- all "Claude Code-only primitive" prose rewritten, including the two
  gates the shell-syntax check missed (config-key list, JSON schema
  comment)
- W024 reconciled across health.md + CONFIGURATION.md + planning-config.md
  (docs still said W020, which collides with a verify.cts code)
- health.md error-codes table fixed: the namespace note no longer sits
  between rows orphaning I001
- the asymmetry note for the two workflows #2584 has not migrated
  (quick.md, diagnose-issues.md) is enforced by a set-equality test with
  a self-check table, so it cannot go stale in either direction

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(#2486): restore the Executor isolation section clobbered by #2661

`46ba02ac` (feat(#2630), the current next tip) reverted docs/CONFIGURATION.md
to a pre-#2584 state: it restored the old "Non-Claude note" wording on the
workflow.use_worktrees row and deleted the whole "Executor isolation per
runtime" section. The change is unrelated to that PR's phase-estimation
feature and looks like a stale-copy edit.

This PR's use_worktrees row links to #executor-isolation-per-runtime, so the
deletion leaves a dangling anchor. Restored byte-for-byte from a40ee8a5 (the
text #2584 Phase 3 originally shipped). No link/anchor checker exists in
scripts/ or tests/, so CI would not have caught the dead link.

The reverted row wording is outside this PR's scope and is still wrong on
next; reported upstream as #2668.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#2486): acknowledge the emitted size growth for settings.md and health.md

The #2723 differential attribution check (epic #2719 Phase 3) landed on next
after this branch opened and gates emitted-file growth behind a committed
acknowledgment. Both grown files are attributable to source this PR changes;
the ack names them and says why, per ADR-2719 §3.

Verified load-bearing: removing tests/emitted-drift-ack.json reproduces the
same failure; restoring it passes 59/59.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2486): reword the W024 remediation so it names no bare gsd-tools call

The W024 warning told the user to run `gsd-tools query config-set`, a
command-position bare invocation that fails with "command not found" on a
shim-only install (#2751) — the diagnostic sent the user into a second,
more confusing error than the one it reported. The remediation now names
only `/gsd:settings` and the config key itself, both of which work on
every install layout, and the #2751 command-position gate goes green.

Fixes #2486

* fix(#2486): drop the Known-asymmetry note and its guard test — #2728 migrates both workflows

Review Major 2: once #2728 lands, the note describes a gap that no longer
exists and instructs maintainers not to do the thing that was just done —
with the set-equality guard test pinning the stale prose green. This PR now
depends on #2728 (declared in the PR body), so the note and its guard go.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#2486): make the #2728 merge order enforceable instead of advisory

settings.md recommends and persists `workflow.use_worktrees: true` for every
runtime whose declared dispatch.isolation is not `none` — cursor
(harness-worktree) and codex/opencode/kimi/kimi-code (orchestrator-worktree).
quick.md and diagnose-issues.md consume that value at dispatch time and, while
they still gate on the runtime NAME, FATAL for all five. Merged first, this PR
reintroduces #2486's own shape for the exact runtimes it exists to help — on
the path it now labels "Recommended".

The dependency was stated only as prose in the PR body. A merge-order note is
not a gate: an automated batch merge never reads it. This adds the check that
makes the ordering structural — red while either sibling is still name-gated,
green the moment #2728 lands.

The predicate matches a RUNTIME-vs-"claude" comparison, not the legitimate
runtime-identity read, and accepts either the inline canonical
dispatch-isolation read or a reference to dispatch-isolation-gate.md, which is
the shape #2728 gives quick.md. Verified both directions against real sources:
red against the current workflows, green against #2728's.

This also closes W024's coverage window. W024 fires only when ISOLATION is
`none`, so it is structurally blind to these five runtimes — /gsd:health would
report healthy right up until quick.md FATALs. W024 cannot see the hazard, so
the hazard is prevented by making the unsafe ordering unmergeable rather than
by warning after the fact.

Separately, the W-code namespace-collision test now declares its source read
instead of passing lint silently: verify.cts emits its codes as inline string
literals across ~25 addIssue() calls and exports no enumerable registry, so
there is nothing to require() and assert against. The gap, and what it costs,
are stated in the test.

* docs(#2486): use the hyphen command form for /gsd-health in CONFIGURATION.md

docs/ is never passed through the install-time slash-form converters, so the
colon form names a command no runtime registers. Clears the sole
lint-docs-command-form violation attributable to this PR.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2486): resolve isolation via new side-effect-free inspect-dispatch-isolation query; scope the settings change to isolation-none runtimes

Review round 4:

- B1: /gsd:health and /gsd:settings no longer call the recording
  dispatch-isolation query — on current next it persists the resolved
  decision to the executor-isolation sentinel as an unconditional #3045
  side effect, letting a read-only diagnostic hard-block executor
  dispatch for the sentinel's lifetime across sessions. Both surfaces now
  use inspect-dispatch-isolation, a new read-only verb sharing the exact
  resolution implementation (extracted resolveDispatchIsolationDecision)
  with zero writes. Behavioral tests pin: no sentinel write, per-runtime
  parity with the recording verb, recording knobs ignored, --json shape.

- B2: the #2728 merge-order interlock test is deleted — a repo test
  cannot sequence merges; it only made this PR unmergeable on its own
  schedule. The settings behavior change is scoped entirely to the
  ISOLATION=none branch, which needs nothing from #2728; the != none
  path is base behavior unchanged.

- M1: the W024-vs-verify.cts namespace test (an admitted source-grep) is
  deleted per RULESET.TESTS.delete-bad-tests, without a standing
  exemption; the namespace claim lives as guidance in health.md.

- M2: remaining allow-test-rule exemptions re-derived into documented
  categories (source-text-is-the-product, integration-test-input) with
  issue refs per ADR-456.

- Minor: settings.md's current-value read drops the stampable
  --default/fallback so key-absence stays distinguishable from an
  explicit false on non-Claude emits (the pre-selection rule depends on
  the tri-state); docs now present inspect-dispatch-isolation as the
  inspection command and name dispatch-isolation as the recording
  resolver.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2486): put the install-marker rung in the canonical runtime resolver

Round-7 review (independent cross-AI pass over the whole PR).

BLOCKER — the gate did not fire in the default case. `resolveRuntime`
stopped at GSD_RUNTIME > config.runtime > 'claude', and
`config-new-project` writes NO `runtime` key — so on a real non-Claude
install every consumer believed it was on Claude: isolation reported
`harness-worktree`, /gsd:settings still offered "Yes (Recommended)" and
W024 stayed silent. That is #2486's own symptom, surviving the fix meant
to remove it. Verified end-to-end on a real `--qwen` install with a
runtime-neutral config and GSD_RUNTIME unset: pre-fix `harness-worktree`,
fixed `none`.

The rung lives in `resolveRuntime` (src/runtime-slash.cts), the ONE
canonical resolver, not in the isolation call site. A per-consumer fix
forks precedence: `inspect-dispatch-isolation` would answer `cursor` while
`dispatch-should-flatten` and `resolve-dispatch-type` still answered
`claude` for the same install. All three now agree. `readInstallRuntimeMarker`,
its cache and its test seams MOVED from model-resolver.cts to
runtime-slash.cts, with model-resolver re-exporting the seams — one marker
read and one cache, not two that drift.

Deliberately NOT `resolveActiveRuntime`/`loadConfig`: an intermediate
revision of this fix routed through `loadConfig`, which normalizes and
rewrites legacy keys back to disk. That gave `inspect-dispatch-isolation`
— the verb whose entire purpose is being side-effect-free — a write side
effect, which is the defect the verb exists to avoid. `resolveRuntime`
reads .planning/config.json directly. Re-verified: the inspect query
against a real install creates no `.gsd/`.

Tests, both of which were too weak in the first attempt and are now
fail-first proven:
- The W024 behavioral stub returned success-with-empty-output for an absent
  key. Real `config-get` EXITS NON-ZERO, and the `|| echo "true"` fallback
  only triggers on failure — so reintroducing the fallback would have passed.
  The stub now returns 1 for the absent case.
- The marker regression asserted on the exported helper, so reverting
  gsd-tools.cjs to a marker-blind resolver still passed. It now drives a real
  `--qwen` install through the shipped `inspect-dispatch-isolation` query.
  (GSD_TEST_MODE must be cleared for that child, or install.js no-ops while
  still exiting 0 — a green test over an install that wrote nothing.)
  Spawned through `installSpawnEnv()` so ambient GSD_HOME cannot leak in.

Also: the three PR-added `try/finally` test bodies converted to `t.after()`
per CONTRIBUTING; CONTEXT.md's `worktree create` UNCONSUMED claim corrected
(Phase 3 calls it in executor-isolation-dispatch.md); docs/CONFIGURATION.md
now states the current non-Claude `use_worktrees` default rather than
describing capability-scoped stamping that lands with #2652; resolver
precedence comments updated to name the marker rung.

Refs #2486
Refs #2668

* fix(#2486): split the marker rung out; make the use_worktrees doc row order-independent

Round-8 review. trek-e's Blocker was procedural — commit 10fba7b8 moved the
per-install .gsd-runtime marker rung into the canonical resolver, a large
blast-radius change that arrived undisclosed and unreviewed. They offered
two remedies; taking the second: SPLIT IT OUT.

src/runtime-slash.cts and src/model-resolver.cts are reverted to their next
state and the marker regression test is removed. What remains is what this
PR was filed for: the settings.md / health.md / gsd-tools.cjs isolation
query, W024, and the #2668 docs restoration.

COST, stated plainly rather than buried: without that rung this PR's gate
resolves 'claude' on a non-Claude install whose project config carries no
`runtime` key — which is every config config-new-project writes. On those
installs W024 stays quiet and /gsd-settings still offers Worktrees. The gate
is correct whenever the runtime IS resolvable (GSD_RUNTIME set, or an
explicit config.runtime). That is why `Fixes #2486` is already downgraded to
`Refs` — #2486 must not close until the residual lands. A KNOWN LIMITATION
comment at the resolver call site names #2395 so this does not read as an
oversight.

The rung itself belongs to #2395, which reports this exact defect and was
closed by #2446 — a PR that touched only bin/install.js and fixtures and
never runtime-slash.cts, so it persisted the identity into
~/.gsd/defaults.json, a tier resolveRuntime does not read. Evidence and a
reopen request are posted there. That same tier is #2566's B1.

DOCS — the reviewer flagged that this row and #2728's are order-dependent:
whichever merges second falsifies the other. Removed the dependency instead
of picking an order. The "Current default … until #2652" paragraph is now a
plain troubleshooting note, true before and after #2728 lands.

CONFLICT — one hunk in CONTEXT.md: next added the #2596 scope-conformance
interface to the same Worktree-Safety paragraph where this PR corrected the
`worktree create` UNCONSUMED claim. Resolved keeping both.

Verified: lint:ci green. Full suite clean apart from the pre-existing
#1160 installed-runtime capability surface. (emitted-attribution also failed
until the fork's stale next was fast-forwarded — it defaults to origin/next,
which was 131 commits behind; 175/175 against the current base.)

Refs #2486
Refs #2668

* fix(#2486): address round-9 review — distinguish "cannot resolve" from "declares none", reject recording-only args on the read verb

Codex review of the whole PR, five findings, all verified against source first.

Major 3 (the one real defect). Both surfaces read isolation as
`ISOLATION=$(… || echo "none")`, so a resolver failure became indistinguishable
from a genuine `dispatch.isolation: none` declaration — and W024's text then
asserts the latter, telling a user their runtime declares no executor-isolation
primitive when GSD simply could not find out. health.md and settings.md now
capture the raw value and track ISOLATION_RESOLVED, the same shape
references/dispatch-isolation-gate.md already uses (#2652 review). W024 gained a
second message for the unresolved case; settings still fails closed there — it
must never persist a `true` it cannot justify — but reports what happened rather
than a verdict it never reached.

Major 4. `dispatch-isolation` applies --force-isolation AFTER the shared
resolver returns; inspection accepted the flag and silently ignored it, so the
same argv yielded 'none' from one verb and the declared capability from the
other. inspect-dispatch-isolation now rejects --force-isolation/--phase/--plan
as usage errors. Verified by mutation: disabling the guard reds exactly the
three new rejection tests.

Major 1. settings.md claimed this flow and the execution guards "always reach
the same verdict". False while quick.md still gates on the runtime name: an
orchestrator-worktree host can be offered a `true` that /gsd:quick rejects as
fatal, W024 silent because isolation is not none. Scoped the claim to the
capability gate, named #2728 as the conversion, and added the same caveat to the
CONFIGURATION.md use_worktrees row. Not a behavior change — the `!= none` branch
is untouched base behavior.

Major 2. "side-effect-free" overstated it: every gsd-tools invocation runs the
shared bootstrap, and getActiveWorkstream unlinks a stale workstream pointer.
That is pre-existing, verb-independent and cannot block a dispatch; writing the
sentinel can. Renamed the claim to "sentinel-free" everywhere and documented
precisely what is and is not asserted.

Minor 5. The JSON parity test asserted against a handwritten key list and never
invoked the recording verb, so the two could diverge and stay green. It now runs
`dispatch-isolation --json` in a separate project dir and deep-compares, with a
control asserting that verb DID write a sentinel. Added the orchestrator exec
branch (--cwd-target) the registry parity test never covered.

runtime-converters.test.cjs pinned the old `|| echo "none"` line as canonical —
that literal was the Major 3 defect. Repinned as two invariants (the raw read is
present; the collapsing fallback is absent) plus an ISOLATION_RESOLVED
requirement, so reformatting does not fail the test but a semantic regression
does.

settings.md sits at 40777 bytes against the 40960 DEFAULT hard cap. The
round-9 prose was compressed to fit rather than raising the cap.

Validated: lint:ci clean; full suite green except the two failures that
reproduce identically on pristine next @ 33fca50d (#1160 _resolveManifest, and
the #3053 quick_id tests, which compare a local-time expectation against a
TZ=UTC child and so only pass on a UTC host).

* fix(#2486): second review pass — drop a dangling reference, correct the whole unresolved branch, pin the branch behaviorally

Codex re-review of the full PR after the first round-9 pass. It confirmed Majors
1, 2 and 4 and Minor 5 fixed, and found seven more. All verified against source.

Minor 5 was mine and the worst of them: settings.md and health.md pointed at
`gsd-core/references/dispatch-isolation-gate.md`, which exists only on the #2728
branch — not in this PR and not on the merge-base. Merging this alone would have
shipped three dangling canonical-source references. Removed; the surrounding
text now stands on its own.

Major 2. The unresolved branch corrected only the two option descriptions. The
pre-selection rationale still claimed an absent key already resolves to false on
this runtime, and the explicit-true notice still stated the runtime declares no
primitive — both capability verdicts that were never reached. The substitution
rule now covers every place in that branch that asserts one.

Major 3. The repinned invariants could not catch the mutation they existed to
catch: flipping the shipped block's ISOLATION_RESOLVED=true to false left all
three green, since they only assert the raw read is present, the token appears,
and the collapsing fallback is gone. Added a behavioral test that drives the
shipped W024 block twice — resolver answering vs resolver exiting non-zero — and
asserts the two emit different text, that the unresolved branch says "could not
resolve", and that it does NOT claim the runtime has no primitive. Verified: the
true->false mutation now reds it.

Major 1. The verb fail-closes an unknown or undeclared runtime to `none` and
exits 0, so ISOLATION_RESOLVED=true means "the query answered", not "the runtime
published a declaration" — the shell cannot see an internal fallback. Exposing
provenance is an API change and out of scope here, so W024's resolved-case text
is instead written to be true of every path that reaches it ("no usable
executor-isolation primitive — declared or fail-closed from an unknown value"),
and both workflows state the limit of the signal explicitly.

Minor 4. The rejection tests regex-matched human prose, so swapping
ERROR_REASON.USAGE for UNKNOWN would have kept them green while breaking machine
consumers. They now pass --json-errors and assert reason === 'usage' on the
parsed envelope.

Minor 6. CONTEXT.md still described the verb as side-effect-free. Now
sentinel-free, consistent with the router comment and the other two surfaces.

Minor 7. 183 bytes of headroom under the 40960 hard cap was called
unacceptable, and it was — a routine 184-byte edit would have failed CI.
Compressed this PR's own settings.md prose (the #2486 block was carrying ~7.1KB
of rationale) to 40499 bytes, 458 free. Two phrases other tests pin verbatim
were restored after the first compression pass reworded them.

Validated: lint:ci clean; full suite green except the two failures that
reproduce identically on pristine next @ 33fca50d.

* fix(#2486): third review pass — placeholder table replaces the fragile substitution rule

Codex round 3 blocked the push on two Majors. Both verified and real.

Major 2 was the substantive one and my error. The round-2 fix told the model to
find and replace the string "this runtime declares no executor-isolation
primitive (dispatch.isolation: none)" — text that does not appear anywhere in
the branch. The first option description has no parenthetical, the second
asserts "absent, it already resolves to false on this runtime" (not covered at
all), and the pre-selection rationale and notice carried three more unsupported
assertions. A model following the instruction literally would have found no
match and changed nothing.

Replaced with three named placeholders — {FINDING}, {CONSEQUENCE}, {ABSENCE} —
and a two-column table giving each one's resolved and unresolved wording. Every
assertion in the branch now flows from the table, so none of them can outrun
what was actually established, and there is no string-matching to get wrong. It
is also shorter than the prose it replaced.

Major 1: the resolver catches thrown errors and returns none successfully, a
path the round-2 wording ("declared, or unknown/undeclared") did not cover.
Both surfaces now say "declared as none, or fail-closed because the capability
could not be determined", which is true of the thrown path too, and both state
that an internal resolution error is among the things the verb fail-closes.
Still not provenance — the verb cannot distinguish these for the caller — but no
longer a claim the code contradicts.

Minor 3: the behavioral test asserted only that the two branches differ and that
the resolved one omits "could not resolve", so arbitrary resolved text stayed
green. Now pins what it must positively say: the capability finding, the
fail-closed consequence, the offending key, and (both branches) the repair
command.

Minor 4: two stale artifacts the round-2 sweep missed — a test comment still
citing the #2728-only references/dispatch-isolation-gate.md, and the emitted
drift ack still describing inspection as side-effect-free. Also aligned the two
remaining router comments to sentinel-free.

settings.md 40420 bytes, 540 free under the cap.

Validated: lint:ci clean; full suite green except the two failures that
reproduce identically on pristine next @ 33fca50d.

* fix(#2486): fourth review pass — stop recommending a repair whose effect depends on the emit

Codex round 4, one Major and three Minors. The Major is a real hole and worth
the round.

W024 advised "remove the key from .planning/config.json so the runtime default
(false) applies". That default is not false everywhere: execute-phase.md:102,
quick.md:155 and diagnose-issues.md:62 all read the key as
`|| echo "true"`, and only `_stampNonClaudeRuntimeDefaults` rewrites them to
`--default false` on a non-Claude emit. So on an un-stamped emit the advised
repair leaves use_worktrees resolving to TRUE against isolation none — exactly
the state W024 exists to flag. Reachable in the round-3 gap: a caught internal
resolver error returns none with rc=0, so ISOLATION_RESOLVED is true and the
confident branch fires on a host whose emit was never stamped.

Fixed by removing the dependence rather than the symptom: both surfaces now say
to set workflow.use_worktrees false explicitly, and say why deleting the key is
not equivalent. The {ABSENCE} placeholder no longer claims absence resolves to
false unconditionally — it is scoped to an emit that stamped that default.

Minor: the notice and W024 hardcoded .planning/config.json, which is the wrong
file in an active workstream (settings itself resolves $GSD_CONFIG_PATH
correctly). Both now say "the project config", naming the workstream case.

Minor: the new repair pin required the literal /gsd:settings, a form documented
as no longer routable. Relaxed to accept the canonical slash and $-prefixed
forms so a correct rewording cannot fail the test.

Nit: two test descriptions still said side-effect-free.

Not fixed, deliberately: the verb still cannot tell a caught resolver error from
a declared none, so ISOLATION_RESOLVED remains a signal about the CALL, not the
declaration. Both workflows now state that limit outright. Exposing provenance
is a change to the query contract that belongs with the runtime-resolution work
in #2395, not here.

Validated: lint:ci clean; full suite green except the two failures that
reproduce identically on pristine next @ 33fca50d. The only change after that
suite run was removing a redundant regex escape flagged by eslint; that test was
re-run individually and eslint is clean.

* fix(#2486): fifth review pass — stop recommending "leave it absent" as the safe default

Codex round 5, one Major: the round-4 fix corrected the {ABSENCE} wording but
left the pre-selection rule built on the assumption it had just falsified. An
absent key still pre-selected "Leave unchanged" on the rationale that there was
nothing to repair. Absence resolves to false only where the emit stamped that
default; on an un-stamped emit it reads as true, so accepting the recommended
default could preserve the exact isolation-none-plus-true state this branch
exists to prevent.

The isolation-none branch now pre-selects "No (Recommended)" in every case,
including an absent key. Writing an explicit false is correct under either emit;
"Leave unchanged" stays available for the deliberate shared-config case but is
never the default. The test that pinned the old rule pinned a falsified
assumption, so it now pins the new one and asserts the old sentence is gone.

Also tightened the round-4 repair regex, which had been relaxed far enough to
accept `$gsd:settings` and `/gsd:settings-bogus`. It now matches only the
canonical `/gsd-settings`, `/gsd:settings` and `$gsd-settings` forms.

settings.md 40685 bytes, 275 free.

Validated: lint:ci clean; full suite green except the two failures that
reproduce identically on pristine next @ 33fca50d.

* fix(#2486): make the inspection exemption block-scoped, and drop the last pre-#2728 claim

Codex review of the conflict resolution: one Major, two Minors, all real.

Major. The inspection-surface exemption I added to #2728's "every dispatch-site
degrade block re-records" guard was FILE-wide. Codex probed it by adding an
unrecorded executor block to health.md: the exemption assertions still passed,
the whole file was skipped, and the offender went unreported. That is the same
hole the hand-listed revision of this guard had — a promise of "every dispatch
site" with a silent carve-out.

Now scoped per block. A block earns the exemption only by resolving through
`inspect-dispatch-isolation` AND carrying no dispatch primitive (`Agent(`,
`harnessFlag`/`HARNESS_FLAG`, `isolation="worktree"`, or the recording verb).
The file-level assertions remain as a precondition on top. Verified with Codex's
own probe: the appended dispatch block is now reported at health.md:285, while
the legitimate inspection block still passes.

Minor. settings.md still carried the caveat saying `quick.md` gates on the
runtime name and "#2728 converts that surface". #2728 has landed. Same obsolete
premise already removed from docs/CONFIGURATION.md in the merge commit; this was
the copy I missed. Removing it also returns 413 bytes, so settings.md now has
688 free under the 40960 cap rather than 275.

Minor. Four scratch-directory prefixes still read `w024` after the renumber.
Non-functional, but the whole point of the rename was that W024 now means
someone else's warning.

Validated: lint:ci clean; full suite green except the two failures that
reproduce identically on pristine next.

* fix(#2486): name the diagnostics' state INSPECTED_ISOLATION and delete the exemption

Codex probed the per-block exemption and it was still escapable: DISPATCH_PRIMITIVE
matched only `Agent(`, two harness-flag spellings, `isolation="worktree"` and the
recording verb, so `Task(`, `spawn_agent(`, a `codex exec` process dispatch, and —
unfixably by any regex — the repo's normal split shape (isolation resolved in one
bash fence, dispatch in a later one) all still qualified as exempt.

Took Codex's suggested fix, which is better than the one it replaces. The
diagnostics now name their state `INSPECTED_ISOLATION` / `INSPECTED_RESOLVED` /
`_INSPECTED_RAW` instead of reusing the dispatch-site names. #2728's guard scans
for a literal `ISOLATION=none`, so health.md and settings.md fall outside it BY
CONSTRUCTION and the exemption is deleted outright — no carve-out to escape, and
a diagnostic that ever writes a real `ISOLATION=none` is caught like any other
site. The name is also just more accurate: an inspection result is not a dispatch
decision.

Pinned so the reasoning cannot be lost: the #2486 suite now asserts neither
diagnostic assigns the bare `ISOLATION` name, with the rationale in the comment.
Verified by mutation — renaming back makes #2728's guard flag health.md:107 AND
fails the new naming pin.

Net effect on the guard's coverage is positive: before this PR it scanned two
fewer files by exemption; now it scans everything.

settings.md 40352 bytes, 608 free.

Validated: lint:ci clean; full suite green except the two failures that reproduce
identically on pristine next.

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 20:45:08 -04:00

39 KiB

Interactive configuration of GSD workflow agents (research, plan_check, verifier) and model profile selection via multi-question prompt. Updates .planning/config.json with user preferences. Optionally saves settings as global defaults (~/.gsd/defaults.json) for future projects.

<required_reading> Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting. </required_reading>

Ensure config exists and load current state:
_GSD_SHIM_NAME="gsd-tools.cjs"; _GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT="${RUNTIME_DIR:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)}"; GSD_TOOLS="${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; if [ -f "$GSD_TOOLS" ]; then gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.claude/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.claude/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.codex/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${_GSD_RUNTIME_ROOT}/.codex/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif command -v gsd-tools >/dev/null 2>&1; then GSD_TOOLS="$(command -v gsd-tools)"; gsd_run() { "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.claude}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.claude}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${HERMES_HOME:-$HOME/.hermes}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${HERMES_HOME:-$HOME/.hermes}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${CURSOR_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.cursor}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${CURSOR_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.cursor}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${GEMINI_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.gemini}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${GEMINI_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.gemini}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${COPILOT_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.copilot}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${COPILOT_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.copilot}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${WINDSURF_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.codeium/windsurf}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${WINDSURF_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.codeium/windsurf}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${AUGMENT_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.augment}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${AUGMENT_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.augment}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${TRAE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.trae}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${TRAE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.trae}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${QWEN_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.qwen}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${QWEN_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.qwen}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${CODEBUDDY_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.codebuddy}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${CODEBUDDY_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.codebuddy}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${CLINE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.cline}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${CLINE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.cline}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${GROK_AGENTS_HOME:-$HOME/.agents}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${GROK_AGENTS_HOME:-$HOME/.agents}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${ANTIGRAVITY_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.gemini/antigravity}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${ANTIGRAVITY_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.gemini/antigravity}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${OPENCODE_CONFIG_DIR:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/opencode}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${OPENCODE_CONFIG_DIR:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/opencode}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; elif [ -f "${KILO_CONFIG_DIR:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/kilo}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}" ]; then GSD_TOOLS="${KILO_CONFIG_DIR:-${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-$HOME/.config}/kilo}/gsd-core/bin/${_GSD_SHIM_NAME}"; gsd_run() { node "$GSD_TOOLS" "$@"; }; else echo "ERROR: gsd-tools.cjs not found at $GSD_TOOLS and gsd-tools is not on PATH. Run: npx -y @opengsd/gsd-core@latest --claude --local" >&2; exit 1; fi; if [ -n "${CLAUDE_ENV_FILE:-}" ] && [ -n "${GSD_TOOLS:-}" ]; then printf "export PATH='%s':\"\$PATH\"\n" "${GSD_TOOLS%/*}" >> "$CLAUDE_ENV_FILE" 2>/dev/null || true; fi
RESPONSE_LANGUAGE=$(gsd_run query config-get response_language --default "" 2>/dev/null || echo "")
gsd_run query config-ensure-section
INIT=$(gsd_run query state.load)
if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fi
# `state.load` returns STATE frontmatter JSON from the SDK — it does not include `config_path`. Orchestrators may set `GSD_CONFIG_PATH` from init phase-op JSON; otherwise resolve the same path gsd-tools uses for flat vs active workstream (#2282).
if [[ -z "${GSD_CONFIG_PATH:-}" ]]; then
  if [[ -f .planning/active-workstream ]]; then
    WS=$(tr -d '\n\r' < .planning/active-workstream)
    GSD_CONFIG_PATH=".planning/workstreams/${WS}/config.json"
  else
    GSD_CONFIG_PATH=".planning/config.json"
  fi
fi

If response_language is set: All user-facing questions, prompts, and explanations in this workflow MUST be presented in {response_language}. Technical terms, code, file paths, and subagent prompts stay in English — only user-facing output is translated.

Creates config.json (at the resolved path) with defaults if missing. INIT still holds state.load output for any step that needs STATE fields. Store $GSD_CONFIG_PATH — all subsequent reads and writes use this path, not a hardcoded .planning/config.json, so active-workstream installs target the correct file (#2282).

```bash cat "$GSD_CONFIG_PATH" ```

Parse current values (default to true if not present):

  • workflow.research — spawn researcher during plan-phase
  • workflow.plan_check — spawn plan checker during plan-phase
  • workflow.verifier — spawn verifier during execute-phase
  • plan_review.source_grounding — verify plan symbols against live source during plan review (default: true if absent; set plan_review.source_grounding_authority to select the resolver adapter: grep (default), intel, treesitter, lsp, or scip)
  • workflow.nyquist_validation — validation architecture research during plan-phase (default: true if absent)
  • workflow.pattern_mapper — run gsd-pattern-mapper between research and planning (default: true if absent)
  • workflow.ui_phase — generate UI-SPEC.md design contracts for frontend phases (default: true if absent)
  • workflow.ui_safety_gate — prompt to run /gsd:ui-phase before planning frontend phases (default: true if absent)
  • workflow.ai_integration_phase — framework selection + eval strategy for AI phases (default: true if absent)
  • workflow.tdd_mode — enforce RED/GREEN/REFACTOR gate sequence during execute-phase (default: false if absent)
  • workflow.code_review — enable /gsd:code-review and /gsd:code-review --fix commands (default: true if absent)
  • workflow.code_review_depth — default depth for /gsd:code-review: quick, standard, or deep (default: "standard" if absent; only relevant when code_review is on)
  • workflow.ui_review — run visual quality audit (/gsd:ui-review) in autonomous mode (default: true if absent)
  • commit_docs — whether .planning/ files are committed to git (default: true if absent)
  • intel.enabled — enable queryable codebase intelligence (/gsd:map-codebase --query) (default: false if absent)
  • graphify.enabled — enable project knowledge graph (/gsd:graphify) (default: false if absent)
  • graphify.auto_update — opt-in: auto-rebuild graph after main HEAD advances (#3347) (default: false)
  • model_profile — which model each agent uses (default: balanced)
  • git.branching_strategy — branching approach (default: "none")
  • workflow.use_worktrees — whether parallel executor agents run in worktree isolation (honored when the runtime declares a dispatch.isolation primitive — harness-worktree or orchestrator-worktree; runtimes declaring none default it to false and fail closed on an explicit true — #1521, #2486, #2584)
  • model_policy.provider — provider slug for model policy (default: null; known values: anthropic, openai, google, qwen; set via /gsd:config --advanced)
  • model_policy.budget — budget level for model policy (default: null; known values: high, medium, low; set via /gsd:config --advanced)
  • model_policy.high — model ID for high-cost tier (default: null; set via /gsd:config --advanced)
  • model_policy.medium — model ID for medium-cost tier (default: null; set via /gsd:config --advanced)
  • model_policy.low — model ID for low-cost tier (default: null; set via /gsd:config --advanced)

Text mode (workflow.text_mode: true in config or --text flag): Set TEXT_MODE=true if --text is present in $ARGUMENTS OR text_mode from init JSON is true. When TEXT_MODE is active, replace every AskUserQuestion call with a plain-text numbered list and ask the user to type their choice number. This is required for non-Claude runtimes (OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, etc.) where AskUserQuestion is not available.

Non-Claude runtime note: If TEXT_MODE is active (i.e. the runtime is non-Claude), prepend the following notice before the model profile question:

Note: Quality, Balanced, Budget, and Adaptive profiles assign semantic tiers
(Opus/Sonnet/Haiku) to each agent. When `runtime` is set in .planning/config.json,
tiers resolve to runtime-native model IDs — on Codex that's gpt-5.6-sol / gpt-5.6-terra /
gpt-5.6-luna with appropriate reasoning effort. See "Runtime-Aware Profiles" in
docs/CONFIGURATION.md.

If `runtime` is unset on a non-Claude runtime, the profile tiers have no effect on
actual model selection — agents use the runtime's default model. Choose "Inherit" to
force session-model behavior, set `runtime` + a profile to get tiered models, or
configure `model_overrides` manually in .planning/config.json to target specific
models per agent.

Isolation resolution for the Worktrees question (#2486): resolve the runtime's declared executor-isolation primitive and the current worktrees value before presenting the questions. Use inspect-dispatch-isolation, the sentinel-free inspection verb — never dispatch-isolation, whose #3045 contract records the resolved decision to the executor-dispatch sentinel as an unconditional side effect; a settings menu must not be able to stamp a sentinel the isolation guards then enforce against real dispatches. Sentinel-free is the exact claim: the shared CLI bootstrap still runs, but nothing it does can block a dispatch. The worktrees read deliberately carries no --default/fallback: an absent key must stay distinguishable from an explicit false (empty output = key absent), which the pre-selection rule below depends on.

A failed query is not a capability verdict, so track the two apart: settings still fails closed, but says so instead of claiming the runtime declares no primitive. The verb fail-closes an unknown runtime — or an internal resolution error — to none and exits 0, so INSPECTED_RESOLVED=false means only "the query did not answer" (#2486 review):

_INSPECTED_RAW=$(gsd_run query inspect-dispatch-isolation --raw 2>/dev/null)
_ISOLATION_RC=$?
if [ $_ISOLATION_RC -ne 0 ] || [ -z "$_INSPECTED_RAW" ]; then
  INSPECTED_ISOLATION=none
  INSPECTED_RESOLVED=false      # no verdict learned — not the same as "declares none"
else
  INSPECTED_ISOLATION="$_INSPECTED_RAW"
  INSPECTED_RESOLVED=true
fi
case "$INSPECTED_ISOLATION" in
  harness-worktree|orchestrator-worktree|none) ;;
  *) INSPECTED_ISOLATION=none; INSPECTED_RESOLVED=false ;;   # out of vocabulary is not a verdict either
esac
USE_WORKTREES_CURRENT=$(gsd_run query config-get workflow.use_worktrees --raw 2>/dev/null)

Use AskUserQuestion with current values pre-selected. Questions are grouped into six visual sections; the first question in each section carries the section-denoting header field (AskUserQuestion renders abbreviated section tags for grouping, max 12 chars).

Section layout:

Planning

Research, Plan Checker, Drift Guard, Pattern Mapper, Nyquist, UI Phase, UI Gate, AI Phase

Execution

Verifier, TDD Mode, Code Review, Code Review Depth (conditional — only when code_review=on), UI Review

Docs & Output

Commit Docs, Skip Discuss, Worktrees

Features

Intel, Graphify, Graph auto-update (conditional — only when graphify=on)

Model & Pipeline

Model Profile, Auto-Advance, Branching

Misc

Context Warnings, Research Qs

Conditional visibility — code_review_depth: This question is shown only when the user's chosen code_review value (after they answer that question, or the pre-selected value if unchanged) is on. If code_review is off, omit the code_review_depth question from the AskUserQuestion block and preserve the existing workflow.code_review_depth value in config (do not overwrite). Implementation: ask the Model + Planning + Execution-up-to-Code-Review questions first; if code_review=on, include code_review_depth in the same batch; otherwise skip it. Conceptually this is a one-branch split on the code_review answer.

Conditional visibility — graphify.auto_update: This question is shown only when the user's chosen graphify.enabled value is on. If graphify.enabled is off, omit the graphify.auto_update question and preserve the existing graphify.auto_update value in config (do not overwrite). Implementation: ask Graphify first; only ask Graph auto-update when Graphify is enabled.

Conditional options — Worktrees (#2486): whether a runtime can honor workflow.use_worktrees: true depends on its declared dispatch.isolation capability, not its name (#2584): harness-worktree (the host isolates each executor) and orchestrator-worktree (GSD drives the worktrees) both run parallel; none fails closed on an explicit true. Branch on the same negotiation the execution gate resolves, via the sentinel-free inspect-dispatch-isolation verb, which fail-closes unknown/undeclared/undocumented to none. The rule is one-directional: never persist a value the isolation gate would fail closed on. Do not add a runtime-name test here. Branch on $INSPECTED_ISOLATION:

  • If INSPECTED_ISOLATION ≠ none (harness-worktree or orchestrator-worktree): present the Worktrees question exactly as written below — unchanged behavior. The none branch is the entirety of the #2486 change.
  • If INSPECTED_ISOLATION = none: replace the question's options with the two below — do NOT offer an enabling option, and NEVER write workflow.use_worktrees: true from this workflow when the runtime declares no isolation primitive, regardless of the user's answer:
{
  question: "Use git worktrees for parallel agent isolation?",
  header: "Worktrees",
  multiSelect: false,
  options: [
    { label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Write use_worktrees: false. {FINDING}, so parallel plans run sequentially and {CONSEQUENCE}." },
    { label: "Leave unchanged", description: "Do not write the key. {ABSENCE}; an existing explicit value is kept intact (e.g. for a worktree-capable install sharing this config)." }
  ]
}

The three placeholders carry the only difference between a capability GSD resolved and one it could not, so no text in this branch ever asserts a verdict that was not reached. Substitute them everywhere they appear — the two descriptions above, the pre-selection rationale, and the notice — from whichever column applies:

INSPECTED_RESOLVED=true INSPECTED_RESOLVED=false
{FINDING} this runtime has no usable executor-isolation primitive GSD could not resolve this runtime's executor-isolation capability
{CONSEQUENCE} execution fails closed on an explicit true GSD cannot tell whether execution will accept an explicit true
{ABSENCE} absent, it resolves to false wherever this emit stamped that default absent, it is the safe state until the capability resolves

Failing closed is right in both columns — never write workflow.use_worktrees: true from this branch either way. Only the explanation changes.

Persistence: "No (Recommended)" → write workflow.use_worktrees: false; "Leave unchanged" → do not write workflow.use_worktrees at all (preserve the existing value or absence).

Pre-selection: the generic "current values pre-selected" rule does not apply when INSPECTED_ISOLATION is none — an explicit true has no matching option by design. Pre-select "No (Recommended)" in every case, including an absent key ($USE_WORKTREES_CURRENT empty, the no---default read's absent signal): absence resolves to false only where this emit stamped that default and to true otherwise, so leaving it absent can preserve the very state this branch prevents, while an explicit false is correct under either emit (#2486 review). The same applies when it is an explicit non-false value — the broken-inheritance case the notice below covers. "Leave unchanged" remains available for the deliberate shared-config case, but is never the default here. The default must be the repair the "(Recommended)" label points to, so accepting it never keeps a value this branch could not justify. In TEXT_MODE, mark that option as the default in the numbered list.

Additionally, if $USE_WORKTREES_CURRENT is non-empty and not false (the config carries an explicit true — e.g. inherited from a worktree-capable install sharing the repo; empty means the key is absent, which needs no notice), prepend this notice before the question:

Note: the project config currently sets workflow.use_worktrees: true.
{FINDING}, so {CONSEQUENCE}. Choose "No" to repair it for this runtime, or
"Leave unchanged" to keep it for a worktree-capable install that shares this
config.
// Model profile is selected via a two-question split because AskUserQuestion enforces a
// hard 4-option cap and there are 5 valid profiles (quality, balanced, budget, adaptive,
// inherit). Q1 routes between adaptive/standard-tier/inherit; Q2 (shown only when the
// user chose "Standard tier" in Q1) picks among the three standard profiles. (#3784)
AskUserQuestion([
  {
    question: "Which model profile for agents?",
    header: "Model",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Adaptive (Recommended)", description: "Role-based cost optimization: heavy roles use the highest-tier model available on the active runtime, light roles use the cheapest. Best balance of quality and cost across all supported runtimes (Claude, Codex, Gemini, OpenRouter, local)." },
      { label: "Standard tier…", description: "Choose Quality, Balanced, or Budget — flat tier applied to all agents" },
      { label: "Inherit", description: "Use current session model for all agents (required for non-Claude runtimes: Codex, Gemini CLI, OpenRouter, local models)" }
    ]
  }
])

**Conditional visibility — model_profile (Q2):**
  Only ask this question when Q1's answer is "Standard tier…".
  If Q1 = "Adaptive (Recommended)" → write model_profile=adaptive and SKIP Q2.
  If Q1 = "Inherit"                → write model_profile=inherit and SKIP Q2.
  If user cancels Q2 after picking "Standard tier…" → leave existing model_profile value unchanged (mirror code_review_depth's cancellation rule).

AskUserQuestion([
  {
    question: "Which standard profile? (Quality / Balanced / Budget)",
    header: "Model Tier",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Quality", description: "Opus everywhere except verification (highest cost) — Claude only" },
      { label: "Balanced", description: "Opus for planning, Sonnet for research/execution/verification — Claude only" },
      { label: "Budget", description: "Sonnet for writing, Haiku for research/verification (lowest cost) — Claude only" }
    ]
  }
])

// Map UI choices → config values:
//   Q1 "Adaptive (Recommended)" → model_profile = "adaptive"
//   Q1 "Inherit"                → model_profile = "inherit"
//   Q1 "Standard tier…" + Q2 "Quality"   → model_profile = "quality"
//   Q1 "Standard tier…" + Q2 "Balanced"  → model_profile = "balanced"
//   Q1 "Standard tier…" + Q2 "Budget"    → model_profile = "budget"

AskUserQuestion([
  {
    question: "Spawn Plan Researcher? (researches domain before planning)",
    header: "Research",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes", description: "Research phase goals before planning" },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip research, plan directly" }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Spawn Plan Checker? (verifies plans before execution)",
    header: "Plan Check",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes", description: "Verify plans meet phase goals" },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip plan verification" }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Spawn Execution Verifier? (verifies phase completion)",
    header: "Verifier",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes", description: "Verify must-haves after execution" },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip post-execution verification" }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable Plan Drift Guard? (verifies that symbols cited in plans exist in source at review time)",
    header: "Drift Guard",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Resolve symbol references (decorators, classes, functions, CLI flags) against live source — catches hallucinated names before execution. Authority controlled by plan_review.source_grounding_authority (default: grep)." },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip symbol grounding. Plan review proceeds without source verification." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable TDD Mode? (RED/GREEN/REFACTOR gates for eligible tasks)",
    header: "TDD",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Execute tasks normally. Tests written alongside implementation." },
      { label: "Yes", description: "Planner applies type:tdd to business logic/APIs/validations; executor enforces gate sequence. End-of-phase review checks compliance." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable Code Review? (/gsd:code-review and /gsd:code-review --fix commands)",
    header: "Code Review",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Enable /gsd:code-review commands for reviewing source files changed during a phase." },
      { label: "No", description: "Commands exit with a configuration gate message. Use when code review is handled externally." }
    ]
  },
  // Conditional: include the following code_review_depth question ONLY when the user's
  // chosen code_review value is "Yes". If code_review is "No", omit this question from
  // the AskUserQuestion call and do not touch the existing workflow.code_review_depth value.
  {
    question: "Code Review Depth? (default depth for /gsd:code-review — override per-run with --depth=)",
    header: "Review Depth",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Standard (Recommended)", description: "Per-file analysis. Balanced cost and signal." },
      { label: "Quick", description: "Pattern-matching only. Fastest, lowest cost." },
      { label: "Deep", description: "Cross-file analysis with import graphs. Highest cost, highest signal." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable UI Review? (visual quality audit via /gsd:ui-review in autonomous mode)",
    header: "UI Review",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Run visual quality audit after phase execution in autonomous mode." },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip the UI audit step. Good for backend-only projects." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Auto-advance pipeline? (discuss → plan → execute automatically)",
    header: "Auto",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Manual /clear + paste between stages" },
      { label: "Yes", description: "Chain stages via Agent() subagents (same isolation)" }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Run Pattern Mapper? (maps new files to existing codebase analogs between research and planning)",
    header: "Pattern Mapper",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "gsd-pattern-mapper runs between research and plan steps. Surfaces conventions so new code follows house style." },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip pattern mapping. Faster; lose consistency hinting for new files." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable Nyquist Validation? (researches test coverage during planning)",
    header: "Nyquist",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Research automated test coverage during plan-phase. Adds validation requirements to plans. Blocks approval if tasks lack automated verify." },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip validation research. Good for rapid prototyping or no-test phases." }
    ]
  },
  // Note: Nyquist validation depends on research output. If research is disabled,
  // plan-phase automatically skips Nyquist steps (no RESEARCH.md to extract from).
  {
    question: "Enable UI Phase? (generates UI-SPEC.md design contracts for frontend phases)",
    header: "UI Phase",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Generate UI design contracts before planning frontend phases. Locks spacing, typography, color, and copywriting." },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip UI-SPEC generation. Good for backend-only projects or API phases." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable UI Safety Gate? (prompts to run /gsd:ui-phase before planning frontend phases)",
    header: "UI Gate",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "plan-phase asks to run /gsd:ui-phase first when frontend indicators detected." },
      { label: "No", description: "No prompt — plan-phase proceeds without UI-SPEC check." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable AI Phase? (framework selection + eval strategy for AI phases)",
    header: "AI Phase",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Run /gsd:ai-integration-phase before planning AI system phases. Surfaces the right framework, researches its docs, and designs the evaluation strategy." },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip AI design contract. Good for non-AI phases or when framework is already decided." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Git branching strategy?",
    header: "Branching",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "None (Recommended)", description: "Commit directly to current branch" },
      { label: "Per Phase", description: "Create branch for each phase (gsd/phase-{N}-{name})" },
      { label: "Per Milestone", description: "Create branch for entire milestone (gsd/{version}-{name})" }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Create git tags on milestone completion?",
    header: "Git Tagging",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Tag releases with version (e.g., v1.0) on milestone completion" },
      { label: "No", description: "Skip git tagging — use if your project doesn't use tags or uses a different release convention" }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable context window warnings? (injects advisory messages when context is getting full)",
    header: "Ctx Warnings",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Warn when context usage exceeds 65%. Helps avoid losing work." },
      { label: "No", description: "Disable warnings. Allows Claude to reach auto-compact naturally. Good for long unattended runs." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Research best practices before asking questions? (web search during new-project and discuss-phase)",
    header: "Research Qs",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Ask questions directly. Faster, uses fewer tokens." },
      { label: "Yes", description: "Search web for best practices before each question group. More informed questions but uses more tokens." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Commit .planning/ files to git? (controls whether plans/artifacts are tracked in your repo)",
    header: "Commit Docs",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Commit .planning/ to git. Plans, research, and phase artifacts travel with the repo." },
      { label: "No", description: "Do not commit .planning/. Keep planning local only. Automatic when .planning/ is in .gitignore." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Skip discuss-phase in autonomous mode? (use ROADMAP phase goals as spec)",
    header: "Skip Discuss",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Run smart discuss before each phase — surfaces gray areas and captures decisions." },
      { label: "Yes", description: "Skip discuss in /gsd:autonomous — chain directly to plan. Best for backend/pipeline work where phase descriptions are the spec." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Use git worktrees for parallel agent isolation?",
    header: "Worktrees",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes (Recommended)", description: "Each parallel executor runs in its own worktree branch — no conflicts between agents." },
      { label: "No", description: "Disable worktree isolation. Agents run sequentially on the main working tree. Use if EnterWorktree creates branches from wrong base (known cross-platform issue)." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable Intel? (queryable codebase intelligence via /gsd:map-codebase --query — builds a JSON index in .planning/intel/)",
    header: "Intel",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Skip intel indexing. Use when codebase is small or intel queries are not needed." },
      { label: "Yes", description: "Enable /gsd:map-codebase --query commands. Builds and queries a JSON index of the codebase." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Enable Graphify? (project knowledge graph via /gsd:graphify — builds a graph in .planning/graphs/)",
    header: "Graphify",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Skip knowledge graph. Use when dependency graphs are not needed." },
      { label: "Yes", description: "Enable /gsd:graphify commands. Builds and queries a project knowledge graph." }
    ]
  },
  {
    question: "Auto-rebuild graph after main HEAD advances? (only effective if Graphify is enabled — #3347)",
    header: "Graph auto-update",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "No (Recommended)", description: "Manual /gsd:graphify build only. Conservative default — opt in if you want fresh context on every /gsd:quick or /gsd:plan-phase." },
      { label: "Yes", description: "Auto-rebuild the graph in a detached background process after git commit/merge/pull/rebase --continue/cherry-pick on the default branch. Hook returns instantly; rebuild runs out-of-band. No-op if Graphify is disabled." }
    ]
  }
])
Merge new settings into existing config.json:
{
  ...existing_config,
  "model_profile": "quality" | "balanced" | "budget" | "adaptive" | "inherit",
  "commit_docs": true/false,
  "workflow": {
    "research": true/false,
    "plan_check": true/false,
    "verifier": true/false,
    "auto_advance": true/false,
    "nyquist_validation": true/false,
    "pattern_mapper": true/false,
    "ui_phase": true/false,
    "ui_safety_gate": true/false,
    "ai_integration_phase": true/false,
    "tdd_mode": true/false,
    "code_review": true/false,
    "code_review_depth": "quick" | "standard" | "deep",
    "ui_review": true/false,
    "text_mode": true/false,
    "research_before_questions": true/false,
    "discuss_mode": "discuss" | "assumptions",
    "skip_discuss": true/false,
    "use_worktrees": true/false   // never written as true when the runtime's dispatch.isolation is none; omitted entirely when the user chose "Leave unchanged" (#2486)
  },
  "plan_review": {
    "source_grounding": true/false
  },
  "intel": {
    "enabled": true/false
  },
  "graphify": {
    "enabled": true/false,
    "auto_update": true/false
  },
  "git": {
    "branching_strategy": "none" | "phase" | "milestone",
    "quick_branch_template": <string|null>,
    "create_tag": true/false
  },
  "hooks": {
    "context_warnings": true/false,
    "workflow_guard": true/false
  },
  "model_policy": {
    // Read-only in this flow — written only by /gsd:config --advanced (Section 8).
    // Listed here so safe-merge never clobbers an existing model_policy object.
    "provider": <existing|null>,
    "budget": <existing|null>,
    "high": <existing|null>,
    "medium": <existing|null>,
    "low": <existing|null>
  }
}

Safe merge: Apply each chosen value so unrelated keys are never clobbered. Use the appropriate write path per key:

  • Capability hook-gate keys (owned by a capability in the registry — see registry.configSchema): write via the capability writer:

    gsd_run capability set <owner> --gate <key>=<value> [--config-dir "$RUNTIME_CONFIG_DIR"]
    

    The capability-owned keys written by this workflow and their owners are:

    Key Owner capability
    workflow.research research
    workflow.nyquist_validation nyquist
    workflow.pattern_mapper pattern-mapper
    workflow.ui_phase ui
    workflow.ui_safety_gate ui
    workflow.ai_integration_phase ai-integration
    workflow.tdd_mode tdd
    workflow.code_review code-review
    workflow.code_review_depth code-review
    workflow.ui_review ui
    intel.enabled intel
    graphify.enabled graphify

    code_review_depth is written only if the code_review question was answered on; otherwise leave the existing value in place.

  • Non-capability keys (model_profile, commit_docs, workflow.plan_check, workflow.verifier, workflow.auto_advance, workflow.text_mode, workflow.research_before_questions, workflow.discuss_mode, workflow.skip_discuss, workflow.use_worktrees, plan_review.source_grounding, graphify.auto_update, git.*, hooks.*, model_policy.*): write via gsd_run query config-set <key.path> <value> as before.

model_profile is written on Q1 "Adaptive (Recommended)" (→ adaptive) or Q1 "Inherit" (→ inherit) immediately; for Q1 "Standard tier…", model_profile is written from Q2's answer. If Q1 = "Standard tier…" but Q2 is cancelled, leave the existing model_profile value unchanged — do not write any new value.

Write updated config to $GSD_CONFIG_PATH (the workstream-aware path resolved in ensure_and_load_config). Never hardcode .planning/config.json — workstream installs route to .planning/workstreams/<slug>/config.json.

Ask whether to save these settings as global defaults for future projects:
AskUserQuestion([
  {
    question: "Save these as default settings for all new projects?",
    header: "Defaults",
    multiSelect: false,
    options: [
      { label: "Yes", description: "New projects start with these settings (saved to ~/.gsd/defaults.json)" },
      { label: "No", description: "Only apply to this project" }
    ]
  }
])

If "Yes": write the same config object (minus project-specific fields like brave_search) to ~/.gsd/defaults.json:

mkdir -p ~/.gsd

Write ~/.gsd/defaults.json with:

{
  "mode": <current>,
  "granularity": <current>,
  "model_profile": <current>,
  "commit_docs": <current>,
  "parallelization": <current>,
  "branching_strategy": <current>,
  "quick_branch_template": <current>,
  "workflow": {
    "research": <current>,
    "plan_check": <current>,
    "verifier": <current>,
    "auto_advance": <current>,
    "nyquist_validation": <current>,
    "pattern_mapper": <current>,
    "ui_phase": <current>,
    "ui_safety_gate": <current>,
    "ai_integration_phase": <current>,
    "tdd_mode": <current>,
    "code_review": <current>,
    "code_review_depth": <current>,
    "ui_review": <current>,
    "skip_discuss": <current>
  },
  "plan_review": {
    "source_grounding": <current>
  },
  "intel": {
    "enabled": <current>
  },
  "graphify": {
    "enabled": <current>,
    "auto_update": <current>
  }
}
Display:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
 GSD ► SETTINGS UPDATED
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

| Setting              | Value |
|----------------------|-------|
| Model Profile        | {quality/balanced/budget/adaptive/inherit} |
| Plan Researcher      | {On/Off} |
| Plan Checker         | {On/Off} |
| Pattern Mapper       | {On/Off} |
| Execution Verifier   | {On/Off} |
| TDD Mode             | {On/Off} |
| Code Review          | {On/Off} |
| Plan Drift Guard     | {On/Off} |
| Code Review Depth    | {quick/standard/deep} |
| UI Review            | {On/Off} |
| Commit Docs          | {On/Off} |
| Intel                | {On/Off} |
| Graphify             | {On/Off} |
| Auto-Advance         | {On/Off} |
| Nyquist Validation   | {On/Off} |
| UI Phase             | {On/Off} |
| UI Safety Gate       | {On/Off} |
| AI Integration Phase | {On/Off} |
| Git Branching        | {None/Per Phase/Per Milestone} |
| Git Tagging          | {On/Off} |
| Skip Discuss         | {On/Off} |
| Context Warnings     | {On/Off} |
| Saved as Defaults    | {Yes/No} |

These settings apply to future /gsd:plan-phase and /gsd:execute-phase runs.

Quick commands:
- /gsd:config --integrations — configure API keys (Brave/Firecrawl/Exa), review.models CLI routing, and agent_skills injection
- /gsd:config --profile <profile> — switch model profile
- /gsd:plan-phase --research — force research
- /gsd:plan-phase --skip-research — skip research
- /gsd:plan-phase --skip-verify — skip plan check
- /gsd:config --advanced — power-user tuning (plan bounce, timeouts, branch templates, cross-AI, context window, model policy)

<success_criteria>

  • Current config read
  • User presented with 24 settings (profile + workflow toggles + features + git branching + git tagging + ctx warnings), grouped into six sections: Planning, Execution, Docs & Output, Features, Model & Pipeline, Misc. code_review_depth is conditional on code_review=on. Model profile uses a two-question split (Q1: Adaptive / Standard tier / Inherit; Q2: Quality / Balanced / Budget — only when Standard tier chosen) to stay within the 4-option AskUserQuestion cap while exposing all 5 valid profiles (#3784). Drift Guard (plan_review.source_grounding) is in the Planning section.
  • Config updated with model_profile, workflow, and git sections
  • User offered to save as global defaults (~/.gsd/defaults.json)
  • Changes confirmed to user </success_criteria>