97e9fd50bd
* test(#2752): path is authoritative over model-controlled file_path in phase-boundary hook Rewrite the #2304 precedence test (which pinned the buggy file_path-wins behavior with an impossible no-tool_name {file_path,path} payload) to assert the correct precedence with realistic Kimi-shaped payloads: a real .planning/ write with a decoy file_path must still fire the reminder (suppression repro), and a write elsewhere with a decoy .planning/ file_path must NOT fabricate one (fabrication repro). Update the parity vocabulary alarm to the new expression. * fix(#2752): make tool_input.path authoritative over model-controlled file_path in gsd-phase-boundary.sh The hook consulted file_path first, path second. kimi-cli executes on path and sends path only; file_path on a Kimi payload is always model-supplied. So a model-supplied decoy file_path could suppress the reminder for a real .planning/ write or fabricate one for a file never touched. Flip the precedence so path is authoritative and file_path is the fallback (Claude Code emits file_path and no path, so the fallback must remain). Mirrors the #2595 JS-guard fix. * chore(#2752): changeset fragment * chore(#2752): clarify comment/changeset — JS guards use upstream normalization, shell hook applies precedence directly (review minor 1) * chore(#2752): backfill changeset PR number (2860) --------- Co-authored-by: Test <test@example.com>
Changeset Fragments
This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.
Why
Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.
See #2975 for the full rationale.
Adding a fragment
node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
--type Fixed \
--pr 1234 \
--body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"
This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.
Format
---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.
Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.
Opting out
PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.
At release time
Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:
node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty
This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.
Archived fragments
.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.