The windows-test-parity ratchet greps test source for fs.rmSync-without-
maxRetries (and six other Windows-portability anti-patterns), failing when an
integer offender COUNT exceeds a frozen baseline (rmSync: 95). A count ratchet
is a Goodhart metric: fixing one offender and adding another keeps the count
constant, so a new defect slips through green. Replace it — and every other
count ratchet in the repo — with a layered, masking-proof design.
Behavioral seam test
- tests/helpers-cleanup.test.cjs proves helpers.cleanup() carries the Windows
EBUSY retry budget. cleanup() delegates retries to Node's fs.rmSync via
maxRetries (it owns no loop), so the test asserts the option contract
(recursive/force/maxRetries>0/retryDelay>0) + real-FS removal + the cwd-guard,
rather than a loop that does not exist. The EBUSY risk is now tested ONCE at
the helper, not approximated textually at every call site.
Write-time ESLint rule (AST-accurate, replaces the grep)
- eslint-rules/no-raw-rmsync-in-tests.cjs (error in tests/**/*.test.cjs) bans
raw fs.rmSync, steering to cleanup(). Catches member, computed (fs['rmSync']),
destructured and aliased forms; escape hatch is inline
`// eslint-disable-next-line local/no-raw-rmsync-in-tests -- <reason>` only.
- Migrated 336 raw fs.rmSync teardown calls across ~116 test files to cleanup().
~18 genuinely load-bearing sites (mid-test SUT/fault-injection removals,
error-swallowing or name-colliding local teardown helpers) keep the raw call
with an inline eslint-disable + reason.
Shared anti-ratchet primitive
- scripts/lib/allowlist-ratchet.cjs:
- assertWithinAllowlist: fails on NOVEL ids (new offender introduced) AND on
STALE ids (a known offender was fixed but not pruned) — identity, not count,
and a ratchet DOWN toward zero.
- assertTightCeiling: a size/length budget whose ceiling must stay within a
grace band of the high-water mark, so budgets may only tighten, never creep.
Ratchets converted onto the primitive
- windows-test-parity-guard.test.cjs: rmSync rule deleted (now ESLint-enforced);
the remaining six patterns moved from integer baselines to named-set
allowlists with ratchet-down.
- scripts/lint-test-file-count.{cjs,allowlist.json}: per-module integer counts →
named filename sets (closes the swap-a-file-keep-the-count blind spot); a
module dropping under cap now FAILS to force pruning its allowlist entry.
- enh-2790 skill-count `<= 63` → named skill allowlist (ratchets toward ~58).
Size budgets hardened (tighten-only)
- agent-size / workflow-size / feat-3039 help-tiered: ceilings lowered to the
current high-water mark and an assertTightCeiling anti-creep check added per
tier. Fixed external-contract limits (description ≤100 chars, agent ≤100 KB)
are intentionally left as-is — they are not grandfathered creeping budgets.
No user-facing behavior change (tests + tooling only); no USER_FACING_PREFIXES
touched, so no changeset fragment is required.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
272 lines
9.4 KiB
JavaScript
272 lines
9.4 KiB
JavaScript
// allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product
|
|
// Workflow .md / agent .md / command .md / reference .md files — their text
|
|
// IS what the runtime loads. Testing text content tests the deployed contract.
|
|
// Per CONTRIBUTING.md exception matrix.
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* GSD Forensics Tests
|
|
*
|
|
* Validates the forensics command and workflow files exist,
|
|
* follow expected patterns, and cover all anomaly detection types.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const { test, describe, beforeEach, afterEach } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
const os = require('os');
|
|
const { cleanup } = require('./helpers.cjs');
|
|
|
|
const repoRoot = path.resolve(__dirname, '..');
|
|
const commandPath = path.join(repoRoot, 'commands', 'gsd', 'forensics.md');
|
|
const workflowPath = path.join(repoRoot, 'get-shit-done', 'workflows', 'forensics.md');
|
|
|
|
describe('forensics command', () => {
|
|
test('command file exists', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(commandPath), 'commands/gsd/forensics.md should exist');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('command has correct frontmatter', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(commandPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('name: gsd:forensics'), 'should have correct command name');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('type: prompt'), 'should have type: prompt');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('argument-hint'), 'should have argument-hint');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('command references workflow in execution_context', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(commandPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('workflows/forensics.md'),
|
|
'should reference the forensics workflow'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('command has success_criteria section', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(commandPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('<success_criteria>'), 'should have success_criteria');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('command has critical_rules section', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(commandPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('<critical_rules>'), 'should have critical_rules');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('command enforces read-only investigation', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(commandPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.toLowerCase().includes('read-only') || content.toLowerCase().includes('do not modify'),
|
|
'should enforce read-only investigation'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('command requires evidence-grounded findings', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(commandPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Ground findings') || content.includes('cite specific'),
|
|
'should require evidence-grounded analysis'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('forensics workflow', () => {
|
|
test('workflow file exists', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(workflowPath), 'workflows/forensics.md should exist');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow gathers evidence from all data sources', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
const sources = [
|
|
'git log',
|
|
'git status',
|
|
'STATE.md',
|
|
'ROADMAP.md',
|
|
'PLAN.md',
|
|
'SUMMARY.md',
|
|
'VERIFICATION.md',
|
|
'SESSION_REPORT',
|
|
'worktree',
|
|
];
|
|
for (const source of sources) {
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes(source),
|
|
`workflow should reference data source: ${source}`
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow detects all 6 anomaly types', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
const anomalies = [
|
|
'Stuck Loop',
|
|
'Missing Artifact',
|
|
'Abandoned Work',
|
|
'Crash',
|
|
'Scope Drift',
|
|
'Test Regression',
|
|
];
|
|
for (const anomaly of anomalies) {
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes(anomaly),
|
|
`workflow should detect anomaly: ${anomaly}`
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow writes report to forensics directory', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('.planning/forensics/report-'),
|
|
'should write to .planning/forensics/'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow includes redaction rules', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Redaction') || content.includes('redact'),
|
|
'should include data redaction rules'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow offers interactive investigation', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('dig deeper') || content.includes('Interactive'),
|
|
'should offer interactive follow-up'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow offers GitHub issue creation', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('gh issue create'),
|
|
'should offer to create GitHub issue from findings'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow submits issues to open-gsd/gsd-core, not the current repo', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
// Scope check to the gh issue create invocation — a whole-file search would
|
|
// pass even if gh issue create lacked --repo, because gh label list also
|
|
// contains the repo string.
|
|
assert.match(
|
|
content,
|
|
/gh issue create[\s\S]{0,250}--repo\s+open-gsd\/gsd-core/,
|
|
'gh issue create must use --repo open-gsd/gsd-core to avoid submitting to the user\'s current project repo'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow checks bug label in open-gsd/gsd-core, not the current repo', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
// Regex is more robust than a fixed-length slice to formatting changes
|
|
assert.match(
|
|
content,
|
|
/gh label list[\s\S]{0,250}--repo\s+open-gsd\/gsd-core/,
|
|
'gh label list must target open-gsd/gsd-core'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow updates STATE.md', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('state record-session') || content.includes('state.record-session'),
|
|
'should update STATE.md via state record-session (CJS or gsd-sdk query)'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow has confidence levels for anomalies', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('HIGH') && content.includes('MEDIUM') && content.includes('LOW'),
|
|
'anomalies should have confidence levels'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('forensics report structure', () => {
|
|
test('report template has all required sections', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
const sections = [
|
|
'Evidence Summary',
|
|
'Git Activity',
|
|
'Planning State',
|
|
'Artifact Completeness',
|
|
'Anomalies Detected',
|
|
'Root Cause Hypothesis',
|
|
'Recommended Actions',
|
|
];
|
|
for (const section of sections) {
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes(section),
|
|
`report should include section: "${section}"`
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('report includes artifact completeness table', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('PLAN') && content.includes('CONTEXT') && content.includes('RESEARCH') &&
|
|
content.includes('SUMMARY') && content.includes('VERIFICATION'),
|
|
'artifact table should check all 5 artifact types'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('forensics fixture-based tests', () => {
|
|
let tmpDir;
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
tmpDir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'gsd-forensics-test-'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
afterEach(() => {
|
|
cleanup(tmpDir);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('detects missing artifacts in phase structure', () => {
|
|
// Phase 1: complete
|
|
const phase1 = path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'phases', '01-setup');
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(phase1, { recursive: true });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(phase1, '01-PLAN-A.md'), 'plan');
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(phase1, '01-SUMMARY.md'), 'summary');
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(phase1, '01-VERIFICATION.md'), 'verification');
|
|
|
|
// Phase 2: missing SUMMARY and VERIFICATION (anomaly)
|
|
const phase2 = path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'phases', '02-core');
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(phase2, { recursive: true });
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(phase2, '02-PLAN-A.md'), 'plan');
|
|
|
|
// Verify detection
|
|
const p1Files = fs.readdirSync(phase1);
|
|
const p2Files = fs.readdirSync(phase2);
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(p1Files.some(f => f.includes('SUMMARY')), 'phase 1 has SUMMARY');
|
|
assert.ok(p1Files.some(f => f.includes('VERIFICATION')), 'phase 1 has VERIFICATION');
|
|
assert.ok(!p2Files.some(f => f.includes('SUMMARY')), 'phase 2 missing SUMMARY (anomaly)');
|
|
assert.ok(!p2Files.some(f => f.includes('VERIFICATION')), 'phase 2 missing VERIFICATION (anomaly)');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('forensics report directory can be created', () => {
|
|
const forensicsDir = path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'forensics');
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(forensicsDir, { recursive: true });
|
|
const reportPath = path.join(forensicsDir, 'report-20260321-150000.md');
|
|
fs.writeFileSync(reportPath, '# Forensic Report\n');
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(reportPath), 'report file should be created');
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(reportPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('Forensic Report'), 'report should have header');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('handles project with no .planning directory', () => {
|
|
// No .planning/ at all
|
|
const planningExists = fs.existsSync(path.join(tmpDir, '.planning'));
|
|
assert.strictEqual(planningExists, false, 'no .planning/ should exist');
|
|
|
|
// Forensics should still work with git data
|
|
const forensicsDir = path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'forensics');
|
|
fs.mkdirSync(forensicsDir, { recursive: true });
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(forensicsDir), 'forensics dir created on demand');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|