The autonomous workflow previously had two extremes: full auto-answer mode (--auto discuss, lean context but no user input) or manager mode (interactive but bloated context from accumulating everything inline). The --interactive flag bridges this gap: - Discuss runs inline via gsd:discuss-phase (asks questions, waits for user answers — preserving all design decisions) - Plan and execute dispatch as background agents (fresh context per phase — no accumulation in the main session) - Pipeline parallelism: discuss Phase N+1 while Phase N builds in the background This keeps the main context lean (only discuss conversations accumulate) while preserving user input on all decisions. Particularly helpful for users hitting context limits with /gsd:manager on multi-phase milestones. Usage: /gsd:autonomous --interactive /gsd:autonomous --interactive --from 3 /gsd:autonomous --interactive --only 5 Also adds --only N flag parsing to the upstream workflow (previously only in PR #1444's branch). Closes #1413 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
85 lines
3.5 KiB
JavaScript
85 lines
3.5 KiB
JavaScript
/**
|
|
* GSD Tools Tests - autonomous --interactive flag
|
|
*
|
|
* Validates that the autonomous workflow and command definition
|
|
* correctly document and support the --interactive flag.
|
|
*
|
|
* Closes: #1413
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const { test, describe } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
|
|
describe('autonomous --interactive flag (#1413)', () => {
|
|
const workflowPath = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'get-shit-done', 'workflows', 'autonomous.md');
|
|
const commandPath = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'commands', 'gsd', 'autonomous.md');
|
|
|
|
test('command definition includes --interactive in argument-hint', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(commandPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('--interactive'), 'command should document --interactive flag');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('argument-hint:') && content.includes('--interactive'),
|
|
'argument-hint should include --interactive');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('command definition describes interactive mode behavior', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(commandPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('discuss') && content.includes('inline'),
|
|
'command should describe discuss running inline');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('background'),
|
|
'command should mention background agents for plan+execute');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow parses --interactive flag', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes("--interactive") && content.includes('INTERACTIVE'),
|
|
'workflow should parse --interactive into INTERACTIVE variable');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow uses discuss-phase skill in interactive mode', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('gsd:discuss-phase') && content.includes('INTERACTIVE'),
|
|
'workflow should invoke gsd:discuss-phase when INTERACTIVE is set'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow dispatches plan as background agent in interactive mode', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
// Should have Agent() with run_in_background for plan
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('run_in_background') && content.includes('plan-phase'),
|
|
'workflow should dispatch plan-phase as background agent in interactive mode'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow dispatches execute as background agent in interactive mode', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('run_in_background') && content.includes('execute-phase'),
|
|
'workflow should dispatch execute-phase as background agent in interactive mode'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow describes pipeline parallelism in interactive mode', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('pipeline parallelism') || content.includes('Phase N+1'),
|
|
'workflow should describe overlapping discuss/execute between phases'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('success criteria include --interactive requirements', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
const criteriaMatch = content.match(/<success_criteria>([\s\S]*?)<\/success_criteria>/);
|
|
const criteria = criteriaMatch ? criteriaMatch[1] : '';
|
|
assert.ok(criteria.includes('--interactive'),
|
|
'success criteria should include --interactive requirements');
|
|
assert.ok(criteria.includes('discuss inline'),
|
|
'success criteria should mention discuss inline');
|
|
assert.ok(criteria.includes('background agents'),
|
|
'success criteria should mention background agents');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|