Files
msd-core/tests/ci-full-lane-sharding.test.cjs
Jakub Zych a9a7a328e6 refactor: hard-fork GSD -> MSD (Make Software Done)
Mechanical rename produced by scripts/msd-rename.cjs: gsd/Gsd/GSD -> msd/Msd/MSD
across contents and paths, upstream package/repo coordinates -> @golem15/msd-core
and golem15com/msd-core. Deep links into upstream history, sibling upstream
packages, the GSD-2 import feature, CHANGELOG.md and .changeset/ are kept as-is.

Hand edits on top: MSD block-letter banner and logos, LICENSE copyright line,
package/plugin identity, regenerated lockfile, install-tree fixtures, derived
registries and benchmark baseline; migration checksum baseline re-locked
(MSD keeps its own install state, so no install had applied the old sums);
sort-order and regex-escaped expectations in tests adjusted.
2026-10-06 01:47:40 +02:00

427 lines
20 KiB
JavaScript

'use strict';
/**
* The full test lane and the scoped Windows lane are both sharded, and the
* coverage gate that sharding displaced is still wired in —
* .github/workflows/test.yml (#2952, #3057).
*
* The `scope: full` lane was the only unsharded lane in this file. It ran the
* entire unit suite under c8 on a single runner, grew past a 15-minute cap, and
* reddened `next` (#2952). Raising the cap treated the symptom; sharding is the
* shape fix, and it is the same answer #1212 reached for the Windows lane at
* the time.
*
* The `scope: windows` lane then hit the identical cliff itself: it reached
* exactly 15m05s and was CANCELLED on PR #3094, four shas in a row. Per #869's
* stated durable follow-up, it is now sharded three ways too (#3057), leaving
* `scope: targeted` as the only lane in this job with no shard.
*
* Sharding introduces two failure modes that stay GREEN while being wrong, so
* both are pinned here:
*
* 1. An incomplete shard set. If the matrix declares shards 1/3 and 2/3 but
* never 3/3, a third of the unit suite simply stops running and every check
* still passes. The partition MATH is already covered — completeness,
* disjointness, balance and determinism are asserted against selectShard in
* run-tests-harness.test.cjs (#1212), including a fast-check property. What
* is NOT covered there, and is asserted here, is that the WORKFLOW asks for
* a complete set: same denominator everywhere, numerators exactly 1..N.
*
* 2. A dropped coverage gate. A sharded run leaves each runner with a partial
* picture — shard 2 never executes shard 1's files, so those read 0%. The
* ≥70% gate therefore cannot live on the shards; it moved to `coverage-gate`,
* which merges every shard's raw V8 dumps. If that job silently stopped
* being required, coverage enforcement would vanish without any red check.
*/
const test = require('node:test');
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
const fs = require('node:fs');
const path = require('node:path');
const yaml = require('js-yaml');
const { escapeRegex } = require('../msd-core/bin/lib/pattern.cjs');
const WORKFLOWS_DIR = path.join(__dirname, '..', '.github', 'workflows');
function loadWorkflow(name) {
return yaml.load(fs.readFileSync(path.join(WORKFLOWS_DIR, name), 'utf8'));
}
/**
* Parse an `i/n` shard spec into { index, total }, or null if malformed.
* Mirrors the grammar scripts/run-tests.cjs accepts for --shard.
*/
function parseShardSpec(spec) {
const m = /^(\d+)\/(\d+)$/.exec(String(spec));
if (!m) return null;
const index = Number(m[1]);
const total = Number(m[2]);
if (!Number.isInteger(index) || !Number.isInteger(total)) return null;
if (total < 1 || index < 1 || index > total) return null;
return { index, total };
}
/** True iff `specs` is exactly one complete shard set: same N, numerators 1..N. */
function isCompleteShardSet(specs) {
if (specs.length === 0) return false;
const parsed = specs.map(parseShardSpec);
if (parsed.some((p) => p === null)) return false;
const total = parsed[0].total;
if (parsed.some((p) => p.total !== total)) return false;
if (parsed.length !== total) return false;
const seen = new Set(parsed.map((p) => p.index));
return seen.size === total && [...seen].every((i) => i >= 1 && i <= total);
}
test('the test job has no windows lane; test-conformance is the sole Windows selector (#4641)', () => {
const workflow = loadWorkflow('test.yml');
const testInclude = workflow.jobs.test.strategy.matrix.include;
const testWindowsEntries = testInclude.filter((e) => e.os === 'windows-latest');
assert.equal(
testWindowsEntries.length, 0,
`the \`test\` job's matrix.include still has ${testWindowsEntries.length} windows-latest `
+ `entr${testWindowsEntries.length === 1 ? 'y' : 'ies'} (${JSON.stringify(testWindowsEntries)}). `
+ '#4641 deletes the `test` job\'s windows lane; test-conformance is the sole Windows selector.',
);
const conformanceInclude = workflow.jobs['test-conformance'].strategy.matrix.include;
const conformanceWindowsEntries = conformanceInclude.filter((e) => e.os === 'windows-latest');
const conformanceMacosEntries = conformanceInclude.filter((e) => e.os === 'macos-latest');
// Derived, not pinned: windows-latest must be a non-empty, COMPLETE shard
// set (same denominator, numerators 1..N — see isCompleteShardSet above),
// whatever N the workflow currently declares. A bare `.length === 3` here
// would break the moment the workflow is rebalanced to a different shard
// count without a wiring regression, exactly the shape of bug this sweep
// exists to remove (the sibling macOS-tier-count magic number already did
// this once).
assert.ok(
conformanceWindowsEntries.length > 0,
`test-conformance declares no windows-latest entries: ${JSON.stringify(conformanceInclude)}`,
);
assert.ok(
isCompleteShardSet(conformanceWindowsEntries.map((e) => e.shard)),
'the windows-latest entries in test-conformance are not a complete shard set: '
+ JSON.stringify(conformanceWindowsEntries),
);
// macos-latest is, by design, a single UNSHARDED entry (see the workflow's
// "macos-latest stays unsharded; it has real headroom" comment above the
// `test-conformance` job) — unlike the windows/full shard counts, this "1"
// is not a fact about the live tree that grows with the suite, it is the
// structural claim the test exists to pin: more than one entry here would
// silently duplicate full macOS runs, and a `shard` key would mean the
// workflow started partitioning a lane the run-tests.cjs invocation below
// does not expect to be partitioned.
assert.equal(
conformanceMacosEntries.length, 1,
`expected a single unsharded macos-latest entry in test-conformance, got ${conformanceMacosEntries.length}: `
+ JSON.stringify(conformanceMacosEntries),
);
assert.equal(
conformanceMacosEntries[0] && conformanceMacosEntries[0].shard, undefined,
'the macos-latest entry in test-conformance declares a shard, contradicting the '
+ `workflow's "macos-latest stays unsharded" design: ${JSON.stringify(conformanceMacosEntries)}`,
);
});
test('the full test lane is sharded and complete (#2952)', async (t) => {
const workflow = loadWorkflow('test.yml');
const include = workflow.jobs.test.strategy.matrix.include;
const fullLanes = include.filter((e) => e.scope === 'full');
// #4641: the `test` job's `scope: windows` lane is deleted — there is no
// longer a second sharded scope in this job to pin alongside `full`.
const shardedScopes = { full: fullLanes };
for (const [scope, lanes] of Object.entries(shardedScopes)) {
await t.test(`the \`scope: ${scope}\` lane is actually sharded, not a single runner`, () => {
assert.ok(lanes.length > 0, `expected at least one \`scope: ${scope}\` matrix entry`);
assert.ok(
lanes.length > 1,
`the \`scope: ${scope}\` lane is back to a single unsharded entry. That is `
+ 'the #2952/#3057 regression: the whole suite on one runner grows past '
+ 'its cap and reddens `next`.',
);
for (const lane of lanes) {
assert.ok(
lane.shard !== undefined,
`a \`scope: ${scope}\` matrix entry declares no shard: ${JSON.stringify(lane)}`,
);
}
});
await t.test(`the \`scope: ${scope}\` lane's declared shards form one complete set`, () => {
const specs = lanes.map((e) => e.shard);
assert.ok(
isCompleteShardSet(specs),
`the \`scope: ${scope}\` lane's shards ${JSON.stringify(specs)} are not a `
+ 'complete set. Every entry must share one denominator N and the '
+ 'numerators must be exactly 1..N — a missing numerator silently stops '
+ 'running that slice of the suite while every check stays green.',
);
});
}
await t.test('no other lane is sharded', () => {
// #4641: the `test` job's `scope: windows` lane is deleted, so `full` is
// the only sharded scope left in this job's matrix.
for (const lane of include.filter((e) => e.scope !== 'full')) {
assert.equal(
lane.shard, undefined,
`lane ${JSON.stringify(lane)} declares a shard but is not \`scope: full\` — `
+ 'the targeted lane runs a selected file list, not a partition.',
);
}
});
await t.test('the scoped Windows shards are passed through to run-tests.cjs', () => {
const scopedStep = workflow.jobs.test.steps.find(
(s) => s.name === 'Run scoped tests',
);
assert.ok(scopedStep, 'no "Run scoped tests" step in the test job');
assert.match(
scopedStep.run, /matrix\.shard/,
'the "Run scoped tests" step does not reference matrix.shard, so the '
+ 'windows lane\'s three shards would each run the entire selected file '
+ 'list — N times the cost, no speedup.',
);
});
await t.test('each shard runs its own slice, not the whole suite', () => {
const unitStep = workflow.jobs.test.steps.find(
(s) => typeof s.run === 'string' && s.run.includes('test:coverage:unit:raw'),
);
assert.ok(unitStep, 'no step in the test job runs the raw unit coverage script');
assert.match(
unitStep.run, /--shard \$\{\{ matrix\.shard \}\}/,
'the unit step does not pass matrix.shard through to run-tests.cjs, so '
+ 'every shard would run the ENTIRE suite — N times the cost, no speedup.',
);
});
await t.test('the aux suites are pinned to one shard that actually exists', () => {
// Pinning to a LIVE shard is the whole assertion. A pin to a shard the
// matrix no longer declares — say the count moves to 4 and these `if:`
// conditions keep naming 1/3 — means the aux suites stop running entirely
// while every check stays green. Checking only that some shard literal is
// present would not catch that, so the literal is resolved against the
// shards the matrix actually declares.
const declared = fullLanes.map((e) => String(e.shard));
const auxScripts = ['test:integration', 'test:security', 'test:install', 'test:slow'];
const pins = new Set();
for (const script of auxScripts) {
const step = workflow.jobs.test.steps.find(
(s) => typeof s.run === 'string' && s.run.includes(script),
);
assert.ok(step, `no step runs \`npm run ${script}\``);
const pin = /matrix\.shard == '([^']+)'/.exec(String(step.if));
assert.ok(
pin,
`the \`${script}\` step is not pinned to a single shard; it would run `
+ 'once per shard and multiply its cost for no extra signal.',
);
assert.ok(
declared.includes(pin[1]),
`the \`${script}\` step is pinned to shard '${pin[1]}', which the matrix `
+ `does not declare (${JSON.stringify(declared)}). That condition can `
+ 'never be true, so this suite would silently never run.',
);
pins.add(pin[1]);
}
assert.equal(
pins.size, 1,
`the aux suites are split across shards ${JSON.stringify([...pins])}; they `
+ 'are meant to run together on exactly one.',
);
});
});
// #4070: the aux suites (integration/security/install/slow) are pinned to
// shard 1 only, but the LPT unit-test packer that balances shards 1/2/3 had
// no visibility into that fixed cost — it balanced the unit-test slice as if
// all three shards carried equal fixed cost, structurally overloading shard
// 1. RUN_TESTS_SHARD_RESERVE tells scripts/run-tests.cjs's selectShard to
// give shard 1 a virtual head start in weight equal to the aux suites'
// measured cost, so the packer routes fewer unit-test files to it. See
// tests/run-tests-harness.test.cjs's "selectShard reserved-weight partition
// (#4070)" describe block for the packer-side math; this file only pins the
// WORKFLOW wiring — that the reserve literal actually reaches the full-scope
// shards and does NOT leak onto the unrelated windows lane.
test('shard 1\'s aux-suite cost is reserved out of the unit-test packer (#4070)', async (t) => {
const workflow = loadWorkflow('test.yml');
// Reserve value derivation (see .msd/bug/fix-4070-shard1-aux-suite-budget/
// 10-diagnosis.md "Rejected fixes" for the full computation): aux-suite
// fixed cost measured at ~216-224s combined across two real runs (issue
// #4070's cited evidence, runs 33278340189 and 33285384930); shard 1's
// current unit-only real cost (~584-615s, same issue) divided by its
// current unit-only LPT weight (209.46, computed locally against
// tests/test-timings.json) gives an empirical ~2.86s-per-weight-unit
// conversion; 220s / 2.86 ≈ 77 weight units — roughly 77 average-cost test
// files' worth of virtual head start.
const EXPECTED_RESERVE = '1:77';
await t.test('the unit-test step reserves shard 1\'s aux-suite cost for the full-scope lane', () => {
const unitStep = workflow.jobs.test.steps.find(
(s) => typeof s.run === 'string' && s.run.includes('test:coverage:unit:raw'),
);
assert.ok(unitStep, 'no step in the test job runs the raw unit coverage script');
const reserveEnv = unitStep.env && unitStep.env.RUN_TESTS_SHARD_RESERVE;
assert.ok(
reserveEnv,
'the unit-test step declares no RUN_TESTS_SHARD_RESERVE env var — shard 1 would carry '
+ 'the aux-suite cost with no offsetting reduction in its unit-test share (#4070)',
);
assert.match(
String(reserveEnv), /matrix\.scope == 'full'/,
'RUN_TESTS_SHARD_RESERVE must be conditioned on `scope == \'full\'` — the windows lane '
+ 'runs no aux suites on its own shard 1 and must not be penalized for a cost it never pays',
);
assert.match(
String(reserveEnv), new RegExp(escapeRegex(EXPECTED_RESERVE)),
`RUN_TESTS_SHARD_RESERVE does not carry the documented reserve literal ${EXPECTED_RESERVE} — `
+ 'if the aux-suite cost was re-measured, update BOTH this literal and the derivation '
+ 'comment above (and the diagnosis doc) together, the same discipline LANE_COSTS uses',
);
});
await t.test('the windows lane is not given a reserve it does not need', () => {
// The reserve env is a single ternary string shared by every scope, so
// this is really the same assertion as above stated the other way: for
// any matrix entry that is NOT scope:full, the expression must resolve
// falsy. Evaluated structurally (parsing the ternary) rather than by
// simulating GitHub's expression engine.
const unitStep = workflow.jobs.test.steps.find(
(s) => typeof s.run === 'string' && s.run.includes('test:coverage:unit:raw'),
);
const reserveEnv = String((unitStep.env && unitStep.env.RUN_TESTS_SHARD_RESERVE) || '');
const ternary = /\$\{\{\s*matrix\.scope == 'full'\s*&&\s*'[^']*'\s*\|\|\s*'([^']*)'\s*\}\}/.exec(reserveEnv);
assert.ok(ternary, `RUN_TESTS_SHARD_RESERVE is not a scope-gated ternary: ${reserveEnv}`);
assert.equal(
ternary[1], '',
'the non-full-scope branch of the reserve ternary must resolve to an empty string, so '
+ 'the windows and targeted lanes see no reserve at all',
);
});
});
test('the merged coverage gate survives sharding (#2952)', async (t) => {
const workflow = loadWorkflow('test.yml');
await t.test('a dedicated coverage-gate job exists and consumes the shards', () => {
const gate = workflow.jobs['coverage-gate'];
assert.ok(gate, '.github/workflows/test.yml declares no `coverage-gate` job');
assert.ok(
(gate.needs || []).includes('test'),
'coverage-gate must depend on `test` — it merges that job\'s shard artifacts',
);
const merges = gate.steps.some(
(s) => String(s.uses || '').includes('download-artifact')
&& s.with && s.with['merge-multiple'] === true,
);
assert.ok(
merges,
'coverage-gate does not download the shard artifacts with merge-multiple. '
+ 'Without every shard merged into one coverage/tmp, the gate scores a '
+ 'partial run: files no shard in hand executed read 0%.',
);
});
await t.test('both coverage thresholds are still enforced', () => {
const runs = workflow.jobs['coverage-gate'].steps
.map((s) => s.run).filter((r) => typeof r === 'string').join('\n');
const pkg = JSON.parse(
fs.readFileSync(path.join(__dirname, '..', 'package.json'), 'utf8'),
);
assert.match(
runs, /test:coverage:report/,
'coverage-gate never runs the coverage report+gate script — the >=70% '
+ 'lines / >=60% branches gate on msd-core/bin/lib would be gone',
);
assert.match(
runs, /test:coverage:scripts-floor/,
'coverage-gate never enforces the >=55% scripts/ floor',
);
// The workflow calls npm scripts precisely so the thresholds are defined
// once. If a future edit inlines c8 into the YAML, the two surfaces can
// drift silently — the gate would still be green while measuring something
// other than what package.json says.
assert.match(
pkg.scripts['test:coverage:report'], /check-coverage-gate\.cjs/,
'test:coverage:report no longer runs check-coverage-gate.cjs',
);
assert.match(
pkg.scripts['test:coverage:scripts-floor'], /--lines 55/,
'test:coverage:scripts-floor no longer enforces 55%',
);
assert.match(
pkg.scripts['test:coverage:unit:raw'], /--suite unit/,
'test:coverage:unit:raw no longer runs the unit suite',
);
assert.doesNotMatch(
pkg.scripts['test:coverage:unit:raw'], /--shard/,
'the shard must come from the workflow matrix, not be baked into the script',
);
});
await t.test('required-tests fails when the coverage gate fails', () => {
const required = workflow.jobs['required-tests'];
assert.ok(
(required.needs || []).includes('coverage-gate'),
'required-tests does not depend on coverage-gate, so a red gate could not '
+ 'block a merge',
);
const summarize = required.steps[0];
assert.ok(
'COVERAGE_GATE_RESULT' in (summarize.env || {}),
'required-tests does not read needs.coverage-gate.result',
);
assert.match(
summarize.run, /coverage-gate did not pass/,
'required-tests never fails on a red coverage-gate — depending on a job '
+ 'without checking its result makes the dependency decorative',
);
});
await t.test('a skipped coverage gate is not treated as a failure', () => {
// coverage-gate is conditioned on product_changed, exactly like the test
// lane. A docs-only PR skips both; treating `skipped` as red would block
// every one of them.
assert.match(
workflow.jobs['required-tests'].steps[0].run,
/COVERAGE_GATE_RESULT" != "skipped"/,
'required-tests treats a skipped coverage-gate as a failure',
);
});
});
test('shard-spec parsing is exact at its boundaries (#2952)', () => {
assert.deepEqual(parseShardSpec('1/3'), { index: 1, total: 3 });
assert.deepEqual(parseShardSpec('3/3'), { index: 3, total: 3 });
assert.deepEqual(parseShardSpec('1/1'), { index: 1, total: 1 });
// index 0 is below the range, index total+1 above it.
assert.equal(parseShardSpec('0/3'), null);
assert.equal(parseShardSpec('4/3'), null);
assert.equal(parseShardSpec('1/0'), null);
assert.equal(parseShardSpec('1'), null);
assert.equal(parseShardSpec('a/3'), null);
assert.equal(parseShardSpec(''), null);
assert.equal(parseShardSpec(undefined), null);
// A complete set, and the three ways one stops being complete.
assert.equal(isCompleteShardSet(['1/3', '2/3', '3/3']), true);
assert.equal(isCompleteShardSet(['1/3', '2/3']), false, 'missing numerator');
assert.equal(isCompleteShardSet(['1/3', '2/3', '2/3']), false, 'duplicate numerator');
assert.equal(isCompleteShardSet(['1/3', '2/3', '3/4']), false, 'mixed denominator');
assert.equal(isCompleteShardSet([]), false, 'empty set');
});