* feat(#3840): generate docs/FEATURES.md from per-feature fragments docs/FEATURES.md was hand-maintained, and every feature PR wrote into two shared mutable cells: the '### N.' heading whose integer was hand-allocated at authoring time, and the hand-maintained table of contents. Concurrent PRs all picked the same next integer, and two PRs adding differently numbered features still collided on the TOC. #3831 was renumbered 165 -> 166 -> 167 -> 168 across successive rebases, each collision also costing a full matrix verification run because the sha-keyed pass marker dies with the rebase. Mechanism: one fragment per feature at docs/features/<slug>.md carrying id/title/group (and an optional order) in frontmatter, consolidated by scripts/gen-features.cjs --write|--check into a marker-delimited region of docs/FEATURES.md that holds BOTH the TOC and every section body. Group headings and their order are derived too - a group sorts by its lowest-ordered member - so there is no shared registry to edit either; optional per-group prose lives in docs/features/_groups/<slug>.md. A contributor adds exactly one new file. Wired into regen:derived and lint:generated-sync alongside the eight existing generators, matching gen-adr-index.cjs's CLI shape and typed-REASON reporting. Migration froze all 168 existing numbers verbatim: identical section set, identical order, identical bodies. Two defects found in the tree are fixed inline rather than carried forward - the '## Related' block had been spliced into the middle of the document, orphaning §142's Reference line, and four inbound anchors were already broken on next (FEATURES.md#runtime-identity in two files, and #143-spec-phase-edge-completeness-probe off by one). Since the repo has no link checker, --check now validates every inbound FEATURES.md#anchor by resolved target, so that class cannot ship silently again; locale FEATURES.md files resolve elsewhere and stay out of scope. Refs #3840 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#3840): carry upstream §69 delta into its fragment and harden the generator Review found section 69 missing '[--strict]' and REQ-STATE-05/06 versus origin/next. Root cause was a stale base, not extraction loss: those lines landed in394bf384b(#3844) AFTER this branch forked at63abcface, and 'git diff63abcfaceorigin/next -- docs/FEATURES.md' is exactly that hunk. Merging origin/next auto-applied the hunk into the GENERATED region, which --check immediately reported as stale; the delta is now carried in docs/features/statemd-consistency-gates.md and regenerated from there. --write is now fail-closed. It previously rendered the region even with violations outstanding, warning only on stderr and exiting 0, so a '--write && git commit' chain could commit a FEATURES.md carrying two colliding sections. It now refuses and exits 1; --force is the explicit override and says so in the report. The test that pinned the old behavior now pins the refusal, plus the --force override and its scoping. Marker forgery is rejected at two layers. A fragment body containing '<!-- FEATURES:START' or '<!-- FEATURES:END' is a typed body_forges_region_marker violation (fragments and group notes alike), and spliceIntoFeatures anchors the end boundary with lastIndexOf instead of indexOf, so a marker that reaches the document by any other route can only make the generated region grow, never shrink. Matching is on marker PREFIXES, so a decorated variant comment cannot slip past. Symlinked corpus entries are refused with a typed dirent_not_regular_file rather than read. A fork PR could otherwise commit docs/features/evil.md as a symlink to any readable path and have the generator inline those bytes into the committed docs/FEATURES.md on the next regen. Equivalence re-verified with a method that cannot cancel out. The first check extracted both operands with the same body-normalising helper, so anything that helper dropped was dropped on both sides. The replacement runs two independent passes: a global content-line multiset diff with no per-section logic at all (0 gained, 19 lost, all 19 the stale hand-written mini-TOC links this change deliberately deletes), and a per-section byte-exact body diff carrying a coverage assertion that fails loudly per file when the extractor accounts for fewer lines than the file contains. That assertion caught two blind spots in the checker itself. 168/168 sections present, order identical, one intended body difference (§142 regains the Reference line orphaned by the misplaced '## Related' block). Refs #3840 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#3840): backfill changeset PR number Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
4.3 KiB
id, title, group
| id | title | group |
|---|---|---|
| 166 | Machine-Readable State Contract (`.planning/state.json`) | v1.7.0 Features |
Purpose: External tools that display GSD project state — a workbench, a dashboard, an editor extension — had to parse STATE.md and ROADMAP.md heuristically. Those are human surfaces: their shape drifts as the templates evolve, and every consumer ends up carrying a brittle second parser that silently reports wrong numbers after an upgrade. GSD now publishes a small, versioned JSON snapshot instead, so the reader binds to a contract rather than to markdown (#3227).
Behavior: At every step boundary, GSD writes .planning/state.json — contract, flavor, milestone, phases[], next, updated_at. The boundaries are state begin-phase / planned-phase / advance-plan / complete-phase / milestone-switch, phase add / add-batch / insert / remove / complete, and milestone complete. The write is best-effort and completely invisible to the command that triggered it: it cannot change an exit code, cannot change stdout, and cannot fail a workflow. Readers prefer the file when it is present and fall back to markdown when it is not.
Requirements:
- REQ-SC-01:
contractis semver,1.0.0at introduction. Consumers gate on the MAJOR version;1.xchanges are additive only. Every key is ALWAYS present — an unknown value isnull, never an omitted key, because an omitted key is itself an observable a consumer would bind to. - REQ-SC-02:
phases[]carries{number, name, status}per phase,statusdrawn from exactlycomplete | in_progress | pending.numberis a string ("01"and"2.1"are both real ids and neither survives a number cast);nameisnullwhen the roadmap gives a phase no name, never a fabricated placeholder. - REQ-SC-03:
nextis the same recommended action the/gsdfront door routes, derived from the smart-entry classifier itself rather than from a second copy of its routing table. - REQ-SC-04: A missing
ROADMAP.md, a missing or unreadable.planning/, an unwritable target, or any other failure NEVER errors the parent command. A directory that is not a GSD project stays untouched — the publisher will not create.planning/in order to publish into it. - REQ-SC-05: The skills own the file; readers never write it. It is a derived cache — safe to delete, regenerated at the next boundary.
Composed, never re-derived. Milestone identity comes from getMilestoneInfo; phase rows from locateProgressTable, the same ## Progress locator the progress counters use, so state.json can never disagree with the rest of GSD about which phases are complete; the recommended action from classifyProject. This module introduces no second answer to any question GSD already answers.
Why it does not reuse planning inspect's schema. The two surfaces answer different questions and have opposite shapes. planning inspect is a rich, diagnostic-carrying pull query a consumer runs; this is a small push artifact a consumer watches. Publishing planning inspect's payload at every phase add would mean opening every plan, summary and requirements document on a hot path, and freezing a much larger surface as a contract.
It costs up to three bounded git calls per boundary. Deriving next from the smart-entry classifier means inheriting its git signals — git status --porcelain, and git log @{u}..HEAD. Each is timeout-bounded and swallows every error, so nothing can hang or fail because of it, but a command like phase add did not previously touch git at all. "Invisible to the parent command" is exact about exit code and output; it is not a claim about latency.
Known limits: an empty phases: [] cannot be told apart from "no ROADMAP.md" or "roadmap unreadable" — the 1.0 schema carries no diagnostic channel, and planning inspect is the surface that does. A roadmap phase marked Deferred is reported as pending, because the roadmap vocabulary has four values and this contract has three; inventing a fourth wire value would break every existing reader. phases[] is not milestone-scoped, so a long-running project lists every phase it has ever had.
Reference: Consume the state contract · Consume the planning snapshot